UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.            )

 

Filed by the Registrant 🗹     Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ] 
Check the appropriate box:
[   ]Preliminary Proxy Statement

[   ]Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[X]🗹Definitive Proxy Statement

[   ]Definitive Additional Materials

[   ]Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12Under Rule 14a-12

THE KROGER CO.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

THE KROGER CO.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]🗹No fee required.

[   ]Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)(4) and 0-11.

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

One of the things I love about food retail is that customers are always evolving. As tastes and needs continually shift, accommodating those shifts with agility earn us the privilege of continuing to serve our customers. This is what makes our industry so exciting.

The ways customers shop for food is ever evolving and always changing. Customers used to shop once a week, checking off items from handwritten lists. Today, our customers manage their groceries with a mix of in-person and online shopping, rely on digital technologies to make lists and track spending, and shop for more ready-made meal solutions. Outside our stores, we know customers spend approximately half of their food budgets at restaurants.

What hasn’t changed is our passion to deliver fresh, affordable food to the communities we serve and inspire our customers to discover their love for food. Our business model is built around offering fresh products at competitive prices with no compromise on quality, selection, and convenience. This is a time-tested approach in any operating environment, and we remain committed to it into the future. Every day, we provide our customers with lower prices on the foods they love and more choices to meet their needs and wants.

Our passion for our customers, associates and communities is also on display in our willingness to take on difficult challenges and see them through. We see it in the way our store and supply chain teams respond to natural disasters, always the first to help our communities. We see it in the way our associates worked with the White House, governors, and mayors to ensure America had access to fresh, affordable food during the pandemic. And we see it in our willingness to address one of our food systems most intractable challenges – that more than 40% of the food produced goes to waste each year while one in eight Americans struggle with hunger – through our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste impact plan.

Kroger has the fortitude to take on these challenges because we know that when we take care of our customers, associates and communities, our shareholders will benefit.

We continue delivering value for our shareholders. On a three-year basis, Kroger’s adjusted net earnings per diluted share has grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 24.5% which has helped support a total shareholder return of 78.2% over the same period.

This incredible outcome is the result of our dedicated and thriving associates delivering a full, fresh and friendly experience for more than 11 million customers every day. It’s no wonder Kroger was recently included in a list of America’s Most Trustworthy Companies. From our manufacturing facilities and fulfillment centers to our store and office teams, we appreciate everything our associates do to embody Our Purpose: To Feed the Human Spirit.

Our associates are driving consistent execution of our go-to-market strategy in every interaction, everyday positioning the company for sustainable, long-term growth.

Kroger is building momentum and has the people, the plan, and the operational discipline to win today and in the future.

*              *              *

Update on proposed merger with Albertsons Co.

In October 2022, we announced our definitive merger agreement with Albertsons Companies, Inc. We are incredibly impressed with the Albertsons team and their commitment to their associates, culture, customers, and communities.

Lower prices. More Choices.

We believe bringing our highly complementary organizations together will provide customers with lower prices and more choices. Our proposed merger will mean more value for our customers, with lower prices and more food choices to discover. And we will begin on day one post-close, with $500 million already committed to bringing down prices.

Empower our associates’ success

Our associates are responsible for our success, and we are committed to investing in theirs. The proposed combination will secure the long-term future of union jobs while creating a more competitive alternative to larger, non-union retailers. We have already committed $1 billion to continue raising associate wages and comprehensive, industry-leading benefits.

It is vital that we support our associates as they explore what their individual career paths will be. So many of our associates come to Kroger to experience their first job. In 2022, approximately 20% of our new hires were 18 years old or younger. It is amazing that Kroger introduces so many young people to a fulfilling career in the grocery industry. We demonstrate how our associates can choose from many different paths and how a foundation in amazing customer service supports associates’ long-term goals, no matter where associates choose to build their careers.

At Kroger, associates get to help families discover healthier answers to the question, “what’s for dinner tonight;” create technology that makes customers’ shopping trips simpler; make healthcare more accessible for their neighbors – and even dream up a job that has yet to be created. The career opportunities are truly endless.

Build healthier communities free of hunger

The proposed merger will also allow our organization to invest in our communities in ways we simply cannot do on our own. I am so proud of what we have accomplished in our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste work and am impressed by the Albertsons team’s commitment to supporting their communities as outlined in their Recipe for Change plan. We know that when families eat together, it supports their children’s success across all aspects of their lives. I cannot wait to see how our combined efforts will connect people with the meals they need to thrive.

We look forward to continue working cooperatively with regulators and remain on track for a projected closure of the merger in early 2024.

2022 in Review

As the pandemic continued to fade and inflation caused ongoing economic uncertainty, our associates showed up for our customers. Last year, Kroger associates did everything we could to minimize the impact of inflation and help stretch tight food budgets so families could access fresh, affordable food, with zero compromise on convenience or selection. Our Leading with Fresh and Accelerating with Digital strategy and key focus areas of Fresh, Our Brands, seamless and personalization give us the flexibility to navigate a changing operating environment – all while providing value to our customers and our associates. We will continue to consider a five- to ten-year time horizon as we make key decisions.

During the year, we:

Achieved positive identical sales without fuel of 5.6%
Increased associate wages, resulting in an average hourly wage of $18 and rate of more than $23 with comprehensive benefits
Exceeded $1 billion in cost savings for the fifth consecutive year
Announced 14 additional Kroger Delivery locations across the U.S.

The subsequent sections will highlight progress we made across our business in 2022 and ways we intend to continue building on our momentum moving forward.

Leading with Fresh

For us, Fresh for EveryoneTM is more than a brand promise. It’s a commitment to bringing fresh, affordable foods to more people in more neighborhoods. Fresh foods are central to families living healthy, thriving lives. And our customers prioritize fresh when they shop with Kroger – with more than more than 90% of customers purchasing fresh foods. Many companies claim they are focused on fresh – we have demonstrated success in creating fresher shopping experiences, and our customers are rewarding us for it.

In the last year, we continued to put our focus on fresh, both with our in-store and e-commerce experiences. The End-to-End Fresh initiative is at the center of how we are changing the way we bring fresh to life in our stores. Today, we have more than 1,400 stores implementing this initiative in their produce departments, driving higher produce and overall store sales. We look forward to exploring how we can expand this work in other fresh departments in 2023 and beyond.

We are also working closely with our technology and supply chain teams to understand ways we can add days of freshness to our products. From optimizing delivery routes to simplifying associate tasks, we want to ensure our customers can buy food at its peak of freshness and trust those items will remain fresh in their homes.

Freshness is also important when we think about innovation in Our Brands. In 2022, we launched a simplified opening-price-point brand known as Smart Way™. This new concept is easily identifiable for customers who want to stretch their budgets. It joins Kroger’s carefully curated, extensive Our Brands portfolio, which includes the company’s namesake Kroger brand, Simple Truth®, Private Selection®, Home Chef® and Heritage Farm®, among others.

In addition to the Smart Way brand introduction, we launched more than 680 new, unique Our Brands products last year. We engage with food trends throughout the year to understand what our customers are craving and ensure we have those items on our shelves. We aim to bring every customer the high-quality, affordable products they love – from pantry staples and fresh foods to ready-to-heat, restaurant-quality meals.

Accelerating with Digital

We continue to invest in our seamless ecosystem – bringing our customers the products they love when and where they want them. We see customers shift the ways they interact with us based on their individual needs, which aligns with our vision of a truly seamless shopping experience.

Our goal remains to be there for our customers – however they need us in a particular moment.

When it fits their day’s plans, customers may choose to shop in our stores. Sometimes, they find a Kroger Delivery order easier during a busy weekend. Or when nothing looks good in the refrigerator or the last paper towel comes off the roll, we’re here with Kroger Delivery Now, delivering in as little as 30 minutes. We remain well-positioned to achieve double-digit digital growth in the next three years.

Our brick-and-mortar stores and automated fulfillment centers work together to ensure our customers have access to the fresh foods and pantry staples they want when they need them most.

Our efforts to bring a truly personalized shopping experience to life are creating value for our customers. We serve the right promotions at the right time, directly to the customers who would be most interested in the offer. From providing suggestions to start a basket to offering a new item, we are providing customers real value. In 2022 alone, customers saved $1.4 billion through a combination of paper and digital coupons.

Last year, we also launched Boost by Kroger, the retail industry’s most-affordable membership program. We are already exceeding internal expectations in both incremental engagement and household spend. We look forward to evolving our membership program to appeal to more customers and create additional value.

The Accelerating with Digital piece of our strategy continues to drive our profit flywheel. We are improving margins by reducing digital cost-to-serve, all while growing our alternative profit streams.

Investing in Our Associates

Our associates are at the heart of everything we do. I am always impressed at the ways they create memorable food moments for our customers every day. I regularly think back to my time working in a Kroger store when I began my career more than 40 years ago. I learned how to run a successful store, how to create real community with my customers and coworkers, and how important our stores are to the neighborhoods they serve.

Kroger provides opportunities for people seeking their first job, a new beginning, or a new challenge to discover a fulfilling career path. And we continue to invest in our associates. Earlier this year we committed nearly $800 million to raise wages and benefits, create new training opportunities, and improve healthcare options in 2023.

This investment builds on our $1.9 billion in incremental investments in wages and comprehensive benefits Kroger has made since 2018. As a result, we raised our average hourly rate to $18, or $23.50 an hour with comprehensive benefits.

We understand we must support our associates’ holistic well-being. To accomplish this goal, Kroger creates programs that power our associates’ growth, including a world-class educational benefit program offering associates up to $21,000 toward continuing education opportunities – whatever that may mean to our associates. In 2022 alone, more than 5,000 people engaged with this program. We provide affordable, accessible healthcare options, which includes free counseling. Also in 2022, we introduced a first-of-its-kind free financial coaching services to all our hourly associates. We remain committed to helping our associates thrive in their careers and at home, ensuring Kroger remains an employer of choice.

Environmental Sustainability and Social Impact

Kroger is committed to responsible sourcing practices, respecting human rights, and advancing animal welfare. Our comprehensive programs hold our suppliers accountable to meet our high standards and support our continual improvement. We rely on deep knowledge from our category sourcing leaders, data insights and input from our investors, industry groups, NGOs, and subject-matter experts.

In 2022, we published our greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goal roadmap. We are diligently working to reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from our operations by 30% by 2030 against a 2018 baseline. This goal was developed using climate science, supporting a well-below 2ºC climate scenario according to the absolute contraction method.

Kroger made considerable progress against our Framework for Action: Diversity, Equity & Inclusion plan. Launched in 2020, this action plan is accelerating change across the entire company. Since its introduction, we successfully provided unconscious bias training to all leaders and nearly half a million associates. We are working with 53 Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and institutions serving Hispanic, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and Native American students. And we are taking strong steps to achieve our goal of increasing our spend with diverse suppliers to $10 billion annually by 2030.

We are growing the many ways we participate in our communities – both big and small. In 2022, we celebrated the fifth anniversary of our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste impact plan. Since its inception, we directed more than $1.65 billion in food and funds to help end hunger, which includes more than 2.3 billion meals. We remain on track to donate 3 billion meals to our neighbors by 2025.

One accomplishment I am so proud of is our stores’ work to achieve 100% execution of our food rescue program in participating Kroger stores. Flawless execution is an ideal for which we always strive. It is inspirational to see the way our store teams embrace our mission of providing healthy food to their communities.

Looking to the Future

I am optimistic for what 2023 and beyond will mean for Kroger, our customers, our associates, and our communities. We are committed to providing the freshest food to our customers, with zero compromise on value, convenience, or selection. We are investing in the business to continuously optimize our approach to freshness – and our customers are taking notice. Our teams are always looking for new opportunities to bring fresh Our Brands items to our customers, both capitalizing on food trends and creating experiences that can only come from Kroger.

Customers continue to expect the convenience our digital experience offers. We are working toward innovative ways to ensure grocery shopping fits easily into our customers’ days – whether they are looking for a need-it-now item, a weekly stock-up shop, or the perfect ingredient to make a special meal more memorable. And we do more than make it convenient – we make the shopping experience personal. We know our customers, and we earn their trust daily by providing engaging offers on the foods they love.

And our amazing associates bring it all to life. In addition to creating a full, fresh, and friendly shopping experience for every customer, every time, our associates are committed to making their communities a better place to live. This year, we are recognizing 50 outstanding associates who raised significant funds for our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation. These dollars support our nonprofit partners across America who are working to create communities free from hunger and waste. Congratulations to each of these “Zero Heroes” for making measurable change for your neighbors.

I would like to thank our customers, associates, and shareholders for your ongoing support for Kroger. I look forward to everything we will do together in the year ahead.

With gratitude,

Rodney McMullen

Chairman and CEO, The Kroger Co.

Safe Harbor Statement

This letter contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 about future performance of Kroger, including with respect to Kroger’s ability to achieve sustainable net earnings growth, strategic capital deployment, strong and attractive total shareholder return, strong free cash flow and ability to increase the dividend, ability to achieve certain operational goals, as well as ESG targets, goals, and commitments outlined in this proxy statement, or elsewhere among other statements. These statements are based on management’s assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to it. These statements are indicated by words such as “will,” “aim,” “model,” “driving,” “goal,” “plan,” “continue,” “on track,” “committed” and “believe,” as well as similar words or phrases. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, including the specific risk factors identified in “Risk Factors” in Kroger’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Kroger assumes no obligation to update the information contained herein, unless required to do so by applicable law.

Zero Hunger | Zero Waste: Associate Fundraising Heroes

The Kroger Co. Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation is a nonprofit public charity designed to help align philanthropy with the company’s Zero Hunger | Zero Waste social and environmental impact plan. We invite customers of the Kroger Family of Companies to join our journey by rounding up their purchase to the nearest dollar at checkout to benefit the Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation.

Cashiers across the country are leading the way in activating donations through Round Up. Dollars raised are directed to nonprofit partners that help end hunger and waste in our communities. These are our 2022 Zero Heroes:

Atlanta Division
Jessica Wellborn

Dianne Perkins

Rachel Dickens

Betalhem Tolla

 1)Fred Meyer Division
Pat Sears
 Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:Mid-Atlantic Division
Dee Dee Hamby
     
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[   ]

Central Division
Carol Dietz

Jess Warburton

Rebekah Lehman

Sheri Fornter

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[   ]

Fry’s Division
Jayne Cota

Melissa Horowitz

Barbara Stockton

 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.Nashville Division
Linda Whitfield

Cincinnati-Dayton Division
Jen Tudor
 1)

Houston Division
Debra Van Matre

Mashuny Squierdo

 Amount Previously Paid:

Ralphs Division
John Dailey

Marquett Valencia

Debra Sutton

Pedro Daniel

Columbus Division
Colleen Burrows

King Soopers Division
Chris Vellos

Dan Cahill

Roundy’s Division
Nancy Johnson
     

Dallas Division
Jon Mullin

Julie Olinick

Tonja Buckley

 2)

Louisville Division
Stacey Harrison

Laury Shulhafer

Robin Adams

 Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

QFC Division
Kurt Mincin

Amber Brask

     

Delta Division
Sherbert Ware

Laura Sparks

Mae Watson

 3)

Mariano’s Division
Loran Henderson

Vikki Hornbaker

 Filing Party:

Smith’s Division
Tonya Tall

     

Dillons Division
Trista Soendker

Pam Meyer

Joan Rogers

 4)

Michigan Division
Tammy Depuy

Tracey Regits

 Date Filed:

Food 4 Less

Jimmy Hu

Maricruz Chico

Mayra Sanguino

Rufina Kniefel

Food 4 Less - MW

Tamara Primm

Rohel Terrazas

 



Proxy Summary

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Overview of Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

ProposalsBoard Recommendation
No. 1 – Election of Directors

FOR

Each Director Nominee

recommended by
your Board

No. 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive CompensationFOR
No. 3 Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive CompensationONE YEAR
No. 4 Ratification of Independent AuditorsFOR
Nos. 5 – 9 Shareholder ProposalsAGAINST
Each Proposal

Corporate Governance Highlights

Kroger is committed to strong corporate governance. We believe that strong governance builds trust and promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders. Highlights of our corporate governance practices include the following:

Board Governance Practices

Strong Board oversight of enterprise risk.

Strong experienced independent Lead Director with clearly defined role and responsibilities.

Commitment to Board refreshment and diversity.

5 of 11 director nominees are women.

The chairs of the Audit, Finance, and Public Responsibilities Committees are women.

Annual evaluation of the Chairman and CEO by the independent directors, led by the independent Lead Director.

All director nominees are independent, except for the CEO.

All five Board Committees are fully independent.

Annual Board and Committee self-assessments conducted by independent Lead Director or an independent third party.

Regular executive sessions of the independent directors, at the Board and Committee level.

High degree of Board interaction with management to ensure successful oversight and succession planning.

Balanced tenure.

Robust shareholder engagement program.

Robust code of ethics.


Environmental, Social, & Governance (ESG) Practices

Long-standing Board Committee dedicated to ESG oversight — Public Responsibilities Committee — formed in 1977.

oAmended the Committee Charter in 2021 to more specifically reflect the Committee’s focused and prioritized approach to material ESG topics related to environmental issues, sustainability, and social impact

Annual ESG report, sharing progress on our goals for Zero Hunger | Zero Waste, Just & Inclusive Economy, Food Waste, Operational Waste, Water, Packaging, Climate Impact, and Responsible Sourcing.

oThe 2022 ESG report represented the 16th year of describing our progress and initiatives regarding sustainability and other ESG matters

Committed to transparency in our disclosure, informed by frameworks consistent with shareholder expectations:

oSASB’s Food Retailers and Distributors Standard
oGRI Global Sustainability Reporting Standards
oTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework

Established formal Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I) Framework for Action to:

oCreate a more inclusive culture
oDevelop diverse talent
oAdvance diverse partnerships
oAdvance equitable communities
oListen deeply and report progress

Specifically include diverse candidates in every external executive officer and Board director search.

Disclose EEO-1 data annually.

Shareholder Rights

Annual director election.

Simple majority standard for uncontested director elections and plurality in contested elections.

No poison pill.

Shareholders have the right to call a special meeting.

Robust, long-standing shareholder engagement program with regular engagements, including with independent directors, to better understand shareholders’ perspectives and concerns on a broad array of topics, such as corporate governance and ESG matters.

Adopted proxy access for director nominees, enabling a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, holding 3% of the Company’s common shares for at least three years to nominate candidates for the greater of two seats or 20% of Board nominees.

Compensation Governance

Robust clawback and recoupment policy.

Pay program tied to performance and business strategy.

Majority of pay is long-term and at-risk with no guaranteed bonuses or salary increases.

Stock ownership guidelines align executive and director interests with those of shareholders.

Prohibition on all hedging, pledging, and short sales of Kroger securities by directors and executive officers.

No tax gross-up payments to executives.


Environmental, Social, & Governance Strategy

Kroger’s Environmental, Social & Governance Strategy is called Thriving Together. This strategy reflects the evolution of the Company’s long history of operating responsibly, advancing economic opportunity and sustainability in our own operations and supply chain, and giving back meaningfully to our communities.

Our ESG objective is to achieve positive and lasting change through a shared-value framework that benefits people and our planet and creates more resilient systems for the future. The centerpiece of Kroger’s ESG strategy is our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste social and environmental impact plan. Introduced five years ago, Zero Hunger | Zero Waste is an industry-leading platform for collective action and systems change at global, national, and local levels.

Our ESG strategy aims to address material topics of importance to our business and key stakeholders, including our associates, customers, shareholders, and others. Key ESG topics — informed by a structured materiality assessment and engagement with our shareholders and other stakeholders — align to three strategic pillars: People, Planet and Systems. Please see more details here in Kroger’s annual ESG Report: https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Kroger-Co-2022-ESG-Report.pdf. The information on, or accessible through, this website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.


Director Nominee Highlights

 


2023 Director Nominee Snapshot

Diversity and Tenure

Skills and Experience

Key Attributes and Skills of All Kroger Director Nominees

Intellectual and analytical skillsBusiness and professional achievements
High integrity and business ethicsAbility to represent the interests of all shareholders
Strength of character and judgementKnowledge of corporate governance matters
Ability to devote significant time to Board dutiesUnderstanding of the advisory and proactive oversight responsibility of our Board
Desire and ability to continually build expertise in emerging areas of strategic focus for our CompanyComprehension of their his or her as a public company director and the fiduciary duties owed to shareholders
Demonstrated focus on promoting equalityAbility to work cooperatively with other members of the board


Nora
Aufreiter
Kevin
Brown
Elaine
Chao
Anne
Gates
Karen
Hoguet
Rodney
McMullen
Clyde
Moore
Ronald
Sargent
Amanda
Sourry
Mark
Sutton
Ashok
Vemuri
Total
(of 11)
Business Management11
Retail6
Consumer8
Financial Expertise11
Risk Management10
Operations & Technology10
ESG11
Manufacturing4

2022 Compensation Highlights

Executive Compensation Philosophy

Executive Summary

We delivered exceptional performance in 2022. Kroger achieved exceptional results in 2022 as we executed on our Leading with Fresh and Accelerating with Digital strategy, building on record years in 2020 and 2021. We are delivering a fresh, affordable, and seamless shopping experience for our customers, with zero compromise on quality, selection, or convenience. We are delivering on our financial commitments through our strong, resilient Value Creation Model. In 2022, we achieved financial performance results of ID sales, without fuel, of 5.6%, and adjusted FIFO operating profit, including fuel, of $5.1 billion1.
Our executive compensation program aligns with long-term shareholder value creation. 91% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and, on average, 84% of the other NEOs’ compensation is at risk and performance-based, tied to achievement of performance targets that are important to our shareholders or our long-term share price performance.
The annual performance incentive was earned above target reflecting our 2022 performance. The annual incentive program, based on a grid of identical sales, excluding fuel, and adjusted FIFO operating profit, including fuel, paid out at 192.40% of target. In light of macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, as well as the Compensation Committee’s desire to create ongoing alignment with shareholders and reward sustained performance beyond 2022, the Compensation Committee determined to structure the payout to the NEOs as follows: 150% in cash and the remaining 42.4% in restricted stock vesting in one year.  
The long-term performance incentive payout reflects alignment with performance over fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022. Long-term performance unit equity awards granted in 2020 and tied to commitments made to our investors and other stakeholders regarding long-term sales growth, adjusted FIFO operating profit growth, free cash flow generation, our commitment to Fresh, and Relative Total Shareholder Return were earned at 93.75% of target.

1 See pages 27 – 33 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2023, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2023, for a reconciliation of GAAP operating profit to adjusted FIFO operating profit.


We prioritized investment in our people. We strive to create a culture of opportunity for nearly 430,000 associates and take seriously our role as a leading employer in the United States. In 2022, we invested more than ever in our associates by continuing to raise our average hourly wage to $18, or over $23, including industry-leading benefits.
In response to our shareholder feedback, we incorporated an ESG metric focused on diversity and inclusion into our 2022 individual performance management program. Our core values of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion are incorporated into compensation decisions made for our associates who supervise a team of others, which range from store department leaders through our NEOs. These performance goals are factored into compensation decisions for these leaders, including salary increases and the amount of the annual grant of equity awards.

Summary of Key Compensation Practices

To achieve our objectives, the Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that compensation is competitive and that there is a direct link between pay and performance. To do so, it is guided by the following principles:

Compensation must be designed to attract and retain those individuals who are best suited to be an NEO at Kroger.

A significant portion of pay should be performance-based, with the percentage of total pay tied to performance increasing proportionally with an NEO’s level of responsibility.

Compensation should include incentive-based pay to drive performance, providing superior pay for superior performance, including both a short- and long-term focus.

Compensation policies should include an opportunity for, and a requirement of, significant equity ownership to align the interests of NEOs and shareholders.

Components of compensation should be tied to an evaluation of business and individual performance measured against metrics that directly drive our business strategy and progress toward our corporate ESG priorities.

Compensation plans should provide a direct line of sight to company performance.

Compensation programs should be aligned with market practices.

Compensation programs should serve to both motivate and retain talent.

Names Executive Officers (NEOs) for 2022

For the 2022 fiscal year ended January 28, 2023, the NEOs were

NameTitle
W. Rodney McMullenChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Gary MillerchipSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Stuart W. AitkenSenior Vice President and Chief Merchandising & Marketing Officer
Yael CossetSenior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Timothy A. MassaSenior Vice President and Chief People Officer


Notice of 20162023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Fellow Kroger Shareholders:

It is our pleasure

We are pleased to invite you to join our Board of Directors, senior leadership, and other Kroger associates at The Kroger Co.us for Kroger’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Shareholders on June 22, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. eastern time. The 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will once again be a completely virtual meeting conducted via webcast. We believe this is the most effective approach for enabling the highest possible attendance.

You will be able to participate in the virtual meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023.

When:Thursday, June 23, 2016,22, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. eastern time.
 
Where:School for Creative and Performing ArtsWebcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023
Corbett Theater
108 W. Central Parkway
Cincinnati, OH 45202
 
Items of Business:1.1.    To elect eleven11 director nominees.nominees
2.
2.To approve our executive compensation, on an advisory basis.
3.To select the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, on an advisory basis.
4.3.To ratify the selection of our independent auditor for fiscal year 2016.2023.
5.
4.To vote on fourfive shareholder proposals, if properly presented at the meeting.
6.
5.To transact other business as may properly come before the meeting.
 
Who can Vote:Holders of Kroger common shares at the close of business on the record date April 27, 201624, 2023 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

How to Vote:Your vote is important!YOUR VOTE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN! Please vote your proxy in one of the following ways:
1.Via the internet, by visiting www.proxyvote.com.
 
 2.1.By the internet, you can vote by the Internet by visiting www.proxyvote.com.
2.By telephone,, you can vote by callingtelephone by following the numberinstructions on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or notice.
 3.By mail,, you can vote by marking,mail by signing dating and mailingdating your proxy card if you requested printed materials, or your voting instruction form. No postage is required if mailedform, and returning it in the United States.postage-paid envelope provided with this proxy statement.
4.By mobile device, by scanning the QR code on your proxy card, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or voting instruction form.  
4.5.In person, byBy attending and voting electronically during the meeting in Cincinnati.virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023.

Attending the Meeting:Shareholders holding shares at the close of business on the record date or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the virtual meeting. If you planYou will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote and submit your questions in advance of and real-time during the meeting via a live audio webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023. To participate in the meeting, you must bring either: (1) the noticehave your sixteen-digit control number that is shown on your Notice of meeting that was separately mailed to youInternet Availability of Proxy Materials or (2) the top portion ofon your proxy card either of which will be your admission ticket.
Webcast ofif you receive the Meeting:If you are unable toproxy materials by mail. There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting. You may only attend the meeting, you may listen to a live webcast of the meeting by visiting ir.kroger.com at 11:00 a.m. eastern time on June 23, 2016.Annual Meeting virtually.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR ALL” of Kroger’s director nominees on the proxy card, “FOR” the management proposals 2 and 4, “FOR” one year for management proposal 3, and “AGAINST” the shareholder proposals 5 through 9.

We appreciate your continued confidence in Kroger, and we look forward to seeing you at theyour participation in our virtual meeting.

May 12, 2023
Cincinnati, Ohio
By Order of the Board of Directors,

Christine S. Wheatley, Secretary
May 12, 2016
Cincinnati, Ohio



Proxy Statement

May 12, 20162023

We are providing this notice, proxy statement, and annual report to the shareholders of The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”, “we”, “us”, “our”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Kroger (the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 23, 2016,22, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. eastern time, at the School for Creative and Performing Arts, Corbett Theater, 108 W. Central Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and at any adjournments thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually and can be accessed online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023. There is no physical location for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Our principal executive offices are located at 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1100. Our telephone number is 513-762-4000. This notice, proxy statement, and annual report, and the accompanying proxy card wereare first furnishedbeing sent or given to shareholders on or about May 12, 2016.2023.

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting

Why are you holding a virtual meeting?

We believe a virtual meeting is the most effective approach for enabling the highest possible attendance. Based on our experience with virtual meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe this facilitates shareholder attendance and participation, and has allowed a greater number of questions from a broader group of shareholders to be asked and answered at the Meeting than in an in-person format. It also reduces our costs and in a small way the carbon footprint of our activities. Therefore, our 2023 Annual Meeting is being held on a virtual-only basis with no physical location. Our goal for the Annual Meeting is to enable the broadest number of shareholders to participate in the meeting, while providing substantially the same access and exchange with Management and the Board as an in-person meeting. We believe that we are observing best practices for virtual shareholder meetings, including by providing a support line for technical assistance and addressing as many shareholder questions as time allows.

Who can vote?

You can vote if, as of the close of business on April 27, 2016,24, 2023, the record date, you were a shareholder of record of Kroger common shares.

Who is asking for my vote, and who pays for this proxy solicitation?

Your proxy is being solicited by Kroger’s Board of Directors. Kroger is paying the cost of solicitation. We have hired D.F. King & Co., Inc., 48 Wall Street, New York, New York, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist us in soliciting proxies and we will pay them a fee estimated not to exceed $15,000.$17,500, plus reasonable expenses for the solicitation.

We also will reimburse banks, brokers, nominees, and other fiduciaries for postage and reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding the proxy material to beneficial owners of our common shares.

Proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone, electronically via the Internet, or by mail.

Who are the members of the Proxy Committee?

Robert D. Beyer,

Anne Gates, W. Rodney McMullen, and Ronald L. Sargent, all Kroger Directors, are the members of the Proxy Committee for our 20162023 Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “beneficial shareholder” of shares held in street name?

You are the “shareholder of record” for any Kroger common shares that you own directly in your name in an account with Kroger’s stock transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services.

You are a “beneficial shareholder” of shares held in street name if your Kroger common shares are held in an account with a broker, bank, or other nominee as custodian on your behalf. The broker, bank, or other nominee is considered the shareholder of record of these shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct the broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote your Kroger common shares.


How do I vote my shares held in street name?

If your shares are held by a bank, broker, or other holder of record, you will receive voting instructions from the holder of record. Your broker is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. In most cases, you may vote by telephone or over the internet as instructed.

How do I vote my proxy?

You can vote your proxy in one of the following ways:

1.1.    ViaBy the internet, you can vote by the Internet by visiting www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.
2.
2.By telephone, you can vote by callingtelephone by following the numberinstructions on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or notice.
3.
3.By mail, you can vote by marking,mail by signing dating and mailingdating your proxy card if you requested printed materials, or your voting instruction form. No postage is required if mailedform, and returning it in the United States.postage-paid envelope provided with this proxy statement.
4.By mobile device, by scanning the QR code on your proxy card, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or voting instruction form.  
5.4.In person,byBy attending and voting electronically during the meeting in Cincinnati.virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023

How can I participate and ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

We are committed to ensuring that our shareholders have substantially the same opportunities to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting as they would at an in-person meeting. In order to submit a question at the Annual Meeting, you will need your 16-digit control number that is printed on the Notice or proxy card that you received in the mail, or via email if you have elected to receive material electronically. You may log in 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting and submit questions online. You will be able to submit questions during the Annual Meeting as well. We encourage you to submit any question that is relevant to the business of the meeting. Questions asked during the Annual Meeting will be read and addressed during the meeting. Shareholders are encouraged to log into the webcast at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the meeting to test their Internet connectivity. You may also submit questions in advance of the meeting via the internet at www.proxyvote.com when you vote your shares.

What documentation must I provide to be admitted to the virtual Annual Meeting and how do I attend?

If your shares are registered in your name, you will need to attendprovide your sixteen-digit control number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you receive a printed copy of the proxy materials) in order to be able to participate in the meeting. If your shares are not registered in your name (if, for instance, your shares are held in “street name” for you by your broker, bank or other institution), you must follow the instructions printed on your Voting Instruction Form. In order to participate in the Annual Meeting, please log on to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023 at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to provide time to register and download the required software, if needed. The webcast replay will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023 until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you access the meeting but do not enter your control number, you will be able to listen to the proceedings, but you will not be able to vote or otherwise participate.

What if I have technical or other “IT” problems logging into or participating in personthe Annual Meeting webcast?

We have provided a toll-free technical support “help line” that can be accessed by any shareholder who is having challenges logging into or participating in Cincinnati?the virtual Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support line number that will be posted on the virtual Annual Meeting login page.

What documentation must I provide to vote online at the Annual Meeting?

If you plan to attendare a shareholder of record and provide your sixteen-digit control number when you access the meeting, you must bring either: (1)may vote all shares registered in your name during the noticeAnnual Meeting webcast. If you are not a shareholder of meeting that was separately mailedrecord as to youany of your shares (i.e., instead of being registered in your name, all or (2) the topa portion of your proxy card, eithershares are registered in “street name” and held by your broker, bank or other institution for your benefit), you must follow the instructions printed on your Voting Instruction Form.


How do I submit a question at the Annual Meeting?

If you would like to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, once you have logged into the webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023, simply type your question in the “ask a question” box and click “submit”. You may also submit questions in advance of the meeting via the internet at www.proxyvote.com when you vote your shares.

When should I submit my question at the Annual Meeting?

Each year at the Annual Meeting, we hold a question-and-answer session following the formal business portion of the meeting during which will beshareholders may submit questions to us. We anticipate having such a question-and-answer session at the 2023 Annual Meeting. You can submit a question up to 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting and up until the time we indicate that the question-and-answer session is concluded. However, we encourage you to submit your admission ticket.

questions before or during the formal business portion of the meeting and our prepared statements, in advance of the question-and-answer session, in order to ensure that there is adequate time to address questions in an orderly manner. You mustmay also bring valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport.submit questions in advance of the meeting via the internet at www.proxyvote.com when you vote your shares.

Can I change or revoke my proxy?

The common shares represented by each proxy will be voted in the manner you specified unless your proxy is revoked before it is exercised. You may change or revoke your proxy by providing written notice to Kroger’s Secretary at 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1100, in person at the meeting or45202, by executing and sending us a subsequent proxy.proxy, or by voting your shares while logged in and participating in the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

How many shares are outstanding?

As of the close of business on April 27, 2016,24, 2023, the record date, our outstanding voting securities consisted of 953,786,557717,648,391 common shares.

1



How many votes per share?

Each common share outstanding on the record date will be entitled to one vote on each of the 11 director nominees and one vote on each other proposal. Shareholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors.

What voting instructions can I provide?

You may instruct the proxies to vote “For” or “Against” each proposal. Orproposal (except for Proposal 3), or you may instruct the proxies to “Abstain” from voting. For Proposal 3, you may instruct the proxies to vote for “One,” “Two,” or “Three” years.

What happens if proxy cards or voting instruction forms are returned without instructions?

If you are a registered shareholder and you return your proxy card without instructions, the Proxy Committee will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.Board.

If you hold shares in street name and do not provide your broker with specific voting instructions on proposals 1, 2, 4,3, and 5 6 or 7,– 9, which are considered non-routine matters, your broker does not have the authority to vote on those proposals. This is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Proposal 3,4, ratification of auditors, is usually considered a routine matter and, therefore, your broker may vote your shares according to your broker’s discretion.

The vote required, including the effect of broker non-votes and abstentions for each of the matters presented for shareholder vote, is set forth below.


What are the voting requirements and voting recommendation for each of the proposals?

Proposal No. 1, Election of Directors – An affirmative vote of the majority of the total number of votes cast “For” or “Against” a director nominee is required for the election of a director in an uncontested election. A majority of votes cast means that the number of shares voted “For” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes “Against” such director. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal No. 2, Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation – Advisory approval by shareholders of executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares participating in the voting. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal No. 3, Ratification of Independent Auditors – Ratification by shareholders of the selection of independent public accountants requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares participating in the voting. Abstentions will have no effect on this proposal.

Proposal Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7, Shareholder Proposals– The affirmative vote of the majority of shares participating in the voting on a shareholder proposal is required for such proposal to pass. Accordingly, broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on these proposals. Proxies will be voted against these proposals unless the Proxy Committee is otherwise instructed on a proxy properly executed and returned.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

ProposalProposalsBoard
Recommendation
Board RecommendationVoting Approval
Standard
Effect of
Abstention
Effect of
broker
non-vote
Item No. 1 Election of DirectorsFOR
Each Director
Nominee
recommended by
your Board
More votes “FOR” than “AGAINST” since it is an uncontested election  No EffectNo Effect
See pages 4-7
Item No. 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive CompensationFORFORAffirmative vote of the majority of shares participating in the voting(1) No EffectNo Effect
See page 49No. 3 Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive CompensationONE YEARThe option that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders(1) No EffectNo Effect
Item No. 3, 4 Ratification of Independent AuditorsFORFORAffirmative vote of the majority of shares participating in the votingNo EffectNo Effect
See pages 54-55Nos. 5 – 9 Shareholder ProposalsAGAINST
Each Proposal
Affirmative vote of the majority of shares participating in the votingNo EffectNo Effect

(1)Although this is an advisory vote, the Board will take into consideration the outcome of the vote based on this standard.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder
Meeting to be Held on June 22, 2023
Item Nos. 4, 5, 6The Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and 7, Shareholder ProposalsAGAINST
See pages 57-632022 Annual Report and the means to vote by internet are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder
Meeting to be Held on June 23, 2016

The Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and 2015 Annual Report and the means to vote by internet are available at www.proxyvote.com.

2



Kroger’s Corporate Governance Practices

Kroger is committed to strong corporate governance. We believe that strong governance builds trust and promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders. Highlights of our corporate governance practices include the following:

Board Governance Practices

All director nominees are independent, except for the CEO.
All fiveStrong Board Committees are fully independent.
oversight of enterprise risk.

Annual election of all directors.
Strong experienced independent Lead Director with clearly defined role and responsibilities.

All directors are elected with a simple majority standard for all uncontested director elections, with cumulative voting available in contested director elections.
Commitment to Board refreshment and diversity.

Regular engagement with shareholders to understand their perspectives and concerns.
5 of 11 director nominees are women.

Regular executive sessionsThe chairs of the independent directors, at boardAudit, Finance, and committee level.
Public Responsibilities Committees are women.

Strong independent lead director with clearly defined roles and responsibilities.
Annual Board and Committee self-assessments.
Annual evaluation of the Chairman and CEO by the independent directors.
directors, led by the independent Lead Director.

All director nominees are independent, except for the CEO.

All five Board Committees are fully independent.

Annual Board and Committee self-assessments conducted by independent Lead Director or an independent third party.

Regular executive sessions of the independent directors, at the Board and Committee level.

High degree of Board interaction with management to ensure successful oversight and succession planning.

Balanced tenure.

Robust shareholder engagement program.

Robust code of ethics.

Environmental, Social, & Governance (ESG) Practices

Long-standing Board Committee dedicated to ESG oversight — Public Responsibilities Committee — formed in 1977.

oAmended the Committee Charter in 2021 to more specifically reflect the Committee’s focused and prioritized approach to material ESG topics related to environmental issues, sustainability, and social impact

Annual ESG report, sharing progress on our goals for Zero Hunger | Zero Waste, Just & Inclusive Economy, Food Waste, Operational Waste, Water, Packaging, Climate Impact, and Responsible Sourcing.

oThe 2022 ESG report represented the 16th year of describing our progress and initiatives regarding sustainability and other ESG matters

Committed to transparency in our disclosure, informed by frameworks consistent with shareholder expectations:

oSASB’s Food Retailers and Distributors Standard

oGRI Global Sustainability Reporting Standards

oTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework

Established formal Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I) Framework for Action to:

oCreate a more inclusive culture

oDevelop diverse talent

oAdvance diverse partnerships

oAdvance equitable communities

oListen deeply and report progress

Specifically include diverse candidates in every external executive officer and Board director search.

Disclose EEO-1 data annually.


Shareholder Rights

Annual director election.

Simple majority standard for uncontested director elections and plurality in contested elections.

No poison pill.

Shareholders have the right to call a special meeting.

Robust, long-standing shareholder engagement program with regular engagements, including with independent directors, to better understand shareholders’ perspectives and concerns on a broad array of topics, such as corporate governance and ESG matters.

Adopted proxy access for director nominees, enabling a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, holding 3% of the Company’s common shares for at least three years to nominate candidates for the greater of two seats or 20% of Board nominees.

Compensation Governance

Robust clawback and recoupment policy.

Pay program tied to performance and business strategy.

Majority of pay is long-term and at-risk with no guaranteed bonuses or salary increases.

Stock ownership guidelines align executive and director interests with those of shareholders.

Prohibition on all hedging, pledging, and short sales of Kroger securities by directors and pledging.
executive officers.

No poison pill (shareholder rights plan).
tax gross-up payments to executives.

Environmental, Social, & Governance Strategy

Kroger’s Environmental, Social & Governance Strategy is called Thriving Together. This strategy reflects the evolution of the Company’s long history of operating responsibly, advancing economic opportunity and sustainability in our own operations and supply chain, and giving back meaningfully to our communities. 

Our ESG objective is to achieve positive and lasting change through a shared-value framework that benefits people and our planet and creates more resilient systems for the future. The centerpiece of Kroger’s ESG strategy is our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste social and environmental impact plan. Introduced five years ago, Zero Hunger | Zero Waste is an industry-leading platform for collective action and systems change at global, national, and local levels.

Our ESG strategy aims to address material topics of importance to our business and key stakeholders, including our associates, customers, shareholders, and others. Key ESG topics — informed by a structured materiality assessment and engagement with our shareholders and other stakeholders — align to three strategic pillars: People, Planet and Systems. Please see more details here in Kroger’s annual ESG Report: https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Kroger-Co-2022-ESG-Report.pdf. The information on, or accessible through, this website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.


People — Our Aspiration: Help billions live healthier, more sustainable lifestyles

Food Access, Health, & Nutrition

Kroger’s brand promise, Fresh for Everyone, reflects our belief that everyone should have access to affordable, fresh food. We are committed to food and product safety and to improving food access, food security, and health and nutrition for all. Protecting our associates’ and customers’ health and safety and enhancing our shopping experience are also key focus areas.

ShareholdersKroger associates have the rightrescued more than 575 million pounds of wholesome surplus food to call a special meeting.
help end hunger since introducing Zero Hunger | Zero Waste.

Robust codeIn the same period, Kroger directed a total of ethics.
$1.2 billion in charitable giving for hunger relief in our communities.

With food and funds combined, Kroger directed 2.8 billion meals to our communities since 2017, well ahead of our goal of 3 billion meals by 2025.

Just & Inclusive Economy

We offer access to employment, benefits, and more, providing good jobs for individuals ages 15 to 95 with a wide range of experience, skills, and career aspirations. In 2020, Kroger introduced our Framework for Action: Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion, a 10-point plan with short- and long-term steps to accelerate and promote greater change in the workplace and communities we serve.

StrongSince 2020, Kroger has trained 661,000 leaders and associates in diversity, equity, & inclusion, including Unconscious Bias training.

We achieved nearly $4 billion in diverse supplier spend annually, on track to our goal of $10 billion annually by 2030.

Kroger achieved a perfect score of 100 on the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index for the fourth consecutive year and was listed among the Best Places to Work for Disability Inclusion by the Disability Equality Index.

The Kroger Co. Foundation established a $5 million Racial Equity Fund and subsequently increased funding to $10M to support organizations driving change at national and local levels. To date, the fund has directed a total of $5.7 million in grants to nonprofit organizations advancing meaningful change in our communities.

Planet — Our Aspiration: Protect and restore natural resources for a brighter future

Climate Impact

Kroger is committed to reducing the impact of our business on the climate and assessing the potential future risk of a changing climate to our business operations. We support the transition to a lower-carbon economy by investing in energy efficiency and renewable energy and by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and food waste.

Kroger’s current commitment is to reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 30% by 2030 using a 2018 baseline. Reflecting updated guidance from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), Kroger is in the process of resetting this target to be more ambitious and align to a 1.5⁰C scenario.

In addition, Kroger is conducting analysis to inform a new Scope 3 target to reduce GHG emissions in our value chain. We expect to complete the goal-setting process in early 2024. To align with SBTi guidance, Kroger is also setting a new Forest, Land, and Agriculture (FLAG) target to further reduce emissions in land-intensive sectors like food and agricultural production.

Reducing food waste is another way Kroger is helping reduce climate impacts. In 2021, we reduced retail food waste generated and improved retail food waste diversion from landfill to 48.8% through our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste plan, on the path to achieving 95%+ diversion by 2025.


Resource Conservation

As a responsible business, we conserve natural resources to help safeguard people and our planet. Our current goal is to divert 90% or more of waste from landfills company-wide by 2025 and to identify alternative methods of waste management.

We have a comprehensive set of sustainable packaging goals that include seeking to achieve 100% recyclable, reusable, or compostable packaging for Our Brands products by 2030. In 2022, we completed an Our Brands packaging footprint and baseline to inform our roadmap to 2030.

Kroger partnered with TerraCycle to launch a first-of-its-kind recycling program for flexible plastic packaging across the Our Brands portfolio. Now, Kroger customers can collect flexible snack and chip bags, pouches, pet food packaging, and more — items typically not eligible for curbside recycling — for easy and free mail-in recycling.

In 2022, Kroger also conducted a six-month pilot with the innovative Loop reusable consumer product packaging platform at 25 Fred Meyer stores in the Portland, Oregon, area. We plan to publish a report outlining what may be needed to achieve commercial scale with reusable packaging in the future.

To support more sustainable agriculture, Kroger offers an expanding selection of natural, organic, free-from, and plant-based products, including our popular Simple Truth® product line. The company also is in the process of developing a sustainable agriculture commitment for its fresh produce supply chain.

Systems — Our Aspiration: Build more responsible and inclusive global systems

Business Integration

Kroger is committed to strong corporate and ESG governance. Business and functional leaders are engaged in our ESG strategy and accountable for results. Operationalizing ESG is a journey; however, we believe our centralized structure, vertical integration and commitment to responsible sourcing enables our progress.

We are committed to Board oversightrefreshment and diversity, with five of enterprise risk.11 directors being women, including the chairs of the Audit, Finance, and Public Responsibilities Committees.

3


The Public Responsibilities Committee meets three times a year to discuss progress related to the company’s ESG strategy and key topics. In 2022, areas of focused engagement included Kroger’s GHG emissions reduction roadmap and approach to responsible sourcing.

A core ESG team leads internal cross-functional working groups focused on policy, issues management and strategy implementation for key ESG topics, including food and product access and affordability, climate impacts, sustainable packaging, and supply chain accountability.

Responsible & Resilient Systems

Kroger is part of – and dependent on – an interconnected global food system and consumer goods supply chain. A renewed focus on these natural systems and the policies and practices governing them will help protect our planet and workers whose livelihoods depend on a resilient and responsible supply chain.

Kroger continues to advance its commitment to align our human rights practice with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and develop a comprehensive human rights due diligence framework. In the past year, Kroger conducted two human rights impact assessments in different sectors of our global supply chain.

We continue to offer a wide assortment of Fair Trade Certified products in the Our Brands assortment to support communities around the world.

Kroger continues to transition the foundation of our animal welfare policy to the Five Domains of Animal Welfare, an internationally respected approach that emphasizes current animal science and outcome-based standards. We are working with our suppliers to measure and report progress toward our goals.

Our long-standing commitment to seafood sustainability includes partnerships and programs aimed at improving marine ecosystems through conservation and fishery improvement practices.

Kroger’s No-Deforestation Commitment for Our Brands aims to address deforestation impacts in higher-risk supply chains, such as palm oil, pulp and paper, soy, and beef.


Proposals to Shareholders

Item No. 1. Election of Directors

You are being asked to elect 11 director nominees for a one-year term. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of all director nominees.

FORThe Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR ALL” of Kroger’s director nominees.


As of the date of this proxy statement, the KrogerKroger’s Board of Directors consists of twelve11 members. David B. Lewis will be retiring from the Board of Directors immediately prior to the 2016 annual meeting, in accordance with Kroger’s director retirement policy, and will not be standing for re-election. The number of directors will be reduced to eleven by the Board. All nominees, if elected at the 2016 annual meeting,2023 Annual Meeting, will serve until the annual meeting in 2017,2024 or until theirhis or her successors have been elected by the shareholders or by the Board pursuant to Kroger’s Regulations, and qualified. Each of our director nominees identified in this proxy statement has consented to being named as a nominee in our proxy materials and has accepted the nomination and agreed to serve as a director if elected by Kroger’s shareholders.

Kroger’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the vote required for election of a director nominee by the shareholders, except in a contested election or when cumulative voting is in effect, is the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against the election of a nominee.

The Committee memberships stated below are those in effect as of the date of this proxy statement. The experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to conclude that the following individuals should serve as directors are set forth opposite each individual’s name. The committee memberships stated below are those in effect asIn addition, all of our Director Nominees demonstrate the datefollowing qualities:

Key Attributes and Skills of this proxy statement. Except as noted, each nominee has been employed by his or her present employer (or a subsidiary thereof) in an executive capacity for at least five years.All Kroger Director Nominees

Intellectual and analytical skillsBusiness and professional achievements
High integrity and business ethicsAbility to represent the interests of all shareholders
Strength of character and judgementKnowledge of corporate governance matters
Ability to devote significant time to Board dutiesUnderstanding of the advisory and proactive oversight responsibility of our Board
Desire and ability to continually build expertise in emerging areas of strategic focus for our CompanyComprehension of their his or her as a public company director and the fiduciary duties owed to shareholders
Demonstrated focus on promoting equalityAbility to work cooperatively with other members of the board


Board Nominees for Directors for Terms of Office Continuing until 20172024

Nora A. Aufreiter

Age 56

Director Since 2014

Committees:
Financial Policy
Public
Responsibilities

Ms. Aufreiter is a Director Emeritus of McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm. She retired in June 2014 after more than 27 years with McKinsey, most recently as a director and senior partner. During that time, she worked extensively in the U.S., Canada, and internationally with major retailers, financial institutions, and other consumer-facing companies. Before joining McKinsey, Ms. Aufreiter spent three years in financial services working in corporate finance and investment banking. She is a member of the Board of Directors of The Bank of Nova Scotia The Neiman Marcus Group, and is chair of the Board of Directors of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V., the parent company of MyTheresa.com, an e-commerce retailer. She is also on the board of a privately held company, Cadillac Fairview, a subsidiary of Ontario Teachers Pension Plan, which is one of North America’s largest owners, operators, and developers of commercial real estate. Ms. Aufreiter also serves on the boards of St. Michael’s Hospital and the Canadian Opera Company, and is a member of the Dean’s Advisory Board for the Ivey Business School in Ontario, Canada.

Ms. Aufreiter has over 30 years of broad business experience in a variety of retail sectors. Her vast experience in leading McKinsey’s North American Retail Practice, North American Branding service line and the Consumer Digital and Omnichannel service line is of particular value to the Board. In addition, during her tenure with McKinsey, the firm advised consulting clients on a variety of matters, including ESG topics and setting and achieving sustainability goals which is of value to the Board and the Public Responsibilities Committee. Ms. Aufreiter has served on our Public Responsibilities Committee for eight years, the last three as chair. In 2021, she led the Board’s review of ESG accountability to clarify committee oversight of ESG topics and led the revision of the Committee’s charter to reflect the Committee’s increasing focus on material environmental sustainability and social impact topics. She also brings to the Board valuable insight on commercial real estate. In her current role as Chair of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee for the Bank of Nova Scotia, Ms. Aufreiter has responsibility for overseeing senior management succession and CEO evaluation and incentive compensation. In her previous role as Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee of The Bank of Nova Scotia, Ms. Aufreiter had responsibility for overseeing shareholder engagement, the composition of its Board of Directors, including diversity, the effectiveness of the diversity policy of its Board of Directors, ESG strategy and priorities, and the Bank’s statement on human rights. This experience is of particular value to the Board and to her role as the Chair of the Public Responsibilities Committee.


4



Robert D. Beyer,
Lead Director

Age 56

Director Since 1999

Committees:
Corporate Governance
Financial Policy


63
 Director Since
2014

Committees:
Finance
Public Responsibilities
1

Qualifications:
Business Management
Retail
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Operations & Technology
ESG

1 Denotes Chair of Committee


Kevin M. Brown

Mr. BeyerBrown is Chairman of Chaparal Investments LLC, a private investment firm and holding company that he founded in 2009. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Beyer served as Chiefthe Executive Officer of The TCW Group, Inc., a global investment management firm. From 2000 to 2005, he served asVice President and Chief InvestmentSupply Chain Officer at Dell Technologies, a leading global technology company. His previous roles at Dell include senior leadership roles in procurement, product quality, and manufacturing. Mr. Brown joined Dell in 1998 and has held roles of Trust Companyincreasing responsibility throughout his career, including Chief Procurement Officer and Vice President, ODM Fulfillment & Supply Chain Strategy before being named Chief Supply Chain Officer in 2013. Before Dell, he spent 10 years in the shipbuilding industry, directing U.S. Department of Defense projects. Mr. Brown currently serves on the National Committee of the West,Council on Foreign Relations and on the principal operating subsidiaryBoards of TCW. the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation and the Howard University Center for Supply Chain Excellence. He is also a member of the Executive Leadership Council.

Mr. BeyerBrown is a global leader with over twenty years of leadership experience and supply chain innovation experience. His efforts led Dell to be recognized as having one of the most efficient, sustainable, and innovative supply chains. Mr. Brown has established himself as an authority on sustainable business practices. His combined deep global supply chain and procurement expertise and track record of sustainability and resilience leadership, as well as his experience in circular economic business practices, are of value to the Board in his role as director and member of the Public Responsibilities Committee. His deep expertise in all matters related to supply chain, supply chain resilience, and risk and crisis management are of particular value to the Board.

Age
60
Director Since
2021

Committees:
Audit
Public Responsibilities

Qualifications:
Business Management
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG
Manufacturing


Elaine L. Chao

Ms. Chao served as the 18th U.S. Secretary of Transportation from January 2017 until January 2021. Prior thereto, she served as the 24th U.S. Secretary of Labor from January 2001 until January 2009, and was the first woman of Asian American & Pacific Islander heritage to serve in a President’s cabinet in history. Previously, Ms. Chao was President and CEO of United Way of America, Director of the Peace Corps and a banker with Citicorp and BankAmerica Capital Markets Group. She earned her M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and has served on a number of Fortune 500 and nonprofit boards. She currently serves on the Board of Directors of The Allstate CorporationChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and Leucadia National Corporation. Mr. BeyerEmbark Technology, Inc., both of which are new economy technology companies in the mobile sector focusing on sustainable and environmentally friendly transportation. In the past five years, she also served as a director of and Hyliion Holdings Corp. Recognized for her extensive record of accomplishments and public service, she is also the recipient of 38 honorary doctorate degrees. In her capacity as a director on numerous public boards while out of government, she has decided not to seek re-election to Allstate’s boardadvocated for innovation and business transformations. She has also been a director on many private and nonprofit boards, including Harvard Business School Board of directors at its annual meeting in May 2016, after ten yearsDean’s Advisors and Global Advisory Board, Los Angeles Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paraolympic Games 2028, and a trustee of service on its board.the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

Mr. Beyer

Ms. Chao brings to Kroger histhe Board extensive experience as CEOin the public, private and non-profit sectors. In her two cabinet positions, she led high-profile organizations, navigating complex regulatory and public policy environments, and she provides the Board with valuable insight on strategy, logistics, transportation, and workforce issues. Under her leadership, the Department of TCW,Labor set up a global investment management firm serving manyrecord number of health and safety partnerships with labor unions. While she was Director of the largest institutional investorsPeace Corps, she launched the first Peace Corps programs in the U.S. He has exceptional insight into Kroger’s financial strategy,newly independent Baltic states and histhe former republics of the former Soviet Union, including Ukraine. This experience qualifies himleading social impact at scale is of value to servethe Board in her role as aan independent director and member of the Board. While at TCW, he also conceivedPublic Responsibilities Committee. Ms. Chao’s leadership and developedgovernance expertise gained from her government service, nonprofits, and public company boards is of value to the firm’s risk management infrastructure, an experience that is useful to Kroger’s Board in performing its risk management oversight functions. His abilities and service as a director were recognized by his peers, who selected Mr. Beyer as an Outstanding Director in 2008 as part of the Outstanding Directors Program of the Financial Times. His strong insights into corporate governance form the foundation of his leadership role as Lead Director on the Board.

Age
70
Director Since
2021

Committees:
Corporate Governance
Public Responsibilities

Qualifications:
Business Management
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG


Anne Gates

Age 56

Director Since 2015

Committees:
Audit
Public Responsibilities

Ms. Gates iswas President of MGA Entertainment, Inc., a privately-held developer, manufacturer, and marketer of toy and entertainment products for children, a position she has held since 2014.from 2014 until her retirement in 2017. Ms. Gates held roles of increasing responsibility with The Walt Disney Company from 1992-2012. Her roles included executive vice president, managing director and chief financial officerChief Financial Officer for Disney Consumer Products (DCP) and senior vice presidentManaging Director, DCP, Europe and emerging markets. She is currently a director of operations, planningTapestry, Inc., where she serves as Chair of the Board, Chair of the Governance Committee, and analysis. Prior to joining Disney, Ms. Gates worked for PepsiCois on the Tapestry Foundation Board. She is also a director of Raymond James Financial, Inc., where she is the Chair of the Corporate Governance ESG Committee. She is also a member of the Boards of the Salzburg Global Seminar, PBS SoCal, Save the Children, and Bear Stearns.the Packard Foundation, one of the largest global foundations focused on environmental and other key ESG issues.

Ms. Gates has over 1525 years of experience in the retail and consumer products industry. She brings to Kroger financial expertise gained while serving as President of MGA and CFO of a division of theThe Walt Disney Company. Ms. Gates has a broad business background in finance, marketing, strategy and business development, including international business. As the chair of the Corporate Governance and ESG Committee at Raymond James Financial, Inc., she oversees their code of ethics, Board composition, including diversity, environmental policies and programs, sustainability targets and ESG reporting which are aligned with SASB, shareholder proposals, and shareholder engagements efforts, including social justice, community relations and charitable giving. Ms. Gates is also Chair of the Tapestry Governance Committee, which also includes oversight of ESG responsibilities. These experiences are of particular value to the Board in her role as an independent director and member of the Corporate Governance Committee. Her expertise in toyfinancial leadership and entertainmentconsumer products expertise is of particular value to the Board. Ms. Gates has been designated an Audit Committee financial expert.expert and serves as Chair of the Audit Committee.

Susan J. Kropf

Age 67


63

Director Since 2007
2015

Committees:

Audit
1
Corporate Governance

Qualifications:
Business Management
Retail
Consumer
Financial Policy
Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG
Manufacturing

1 Denotes Chair of Committee


Karen M. Hoguet

Ms. Kropf was President andHoguet served as the Chief OperatingFinancial Officer of Avon ProductsMacy’s, Inc., from October 1997 until July of 2018 when she became a manufacturer and marketer of beauty care products, from 2001strategic advisor to the Chief Executive Officer until her retirement in January 2007. She joined Avon in 1970 and, during her tenure at Avon, Ms. Kropf also2019. Previously, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Avon North America and Global Business Operations from 1998 to 2000 and President, Avon U.S. from 1997 to 1998. Ms. Kropf was a member of Avon’s Board of Directors from 1998 to 2006. She currently is a director of Avon Products Inc., Coach, Inc., and Sherwin Williams Company. In the past five years she also served as a director of MeadWestvaco Corporation.

Ms. Kropf has unique and valuable consumer insight, having led a major, publicly-traded retailer of beauty and related consumer products. She has extensive experience in manufacturing, marketing, supply chain operations, customer service, and product development, all of which assist her in her role as a member of Kroger’s Board. Ms. Kropf has a strong financial background, and has significant boardroom experience through her service on the boards of variousNielsen Holdings plc, The Chubb Corporation and Cincinnati Bell as the chairman of the audit committee and a member of the finance committee, member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Audit Committee, respectively. She also serves on the board of UCHealth.

Ms. Hoguet has over 35 years of broad financial and operational leadership experience within the omnichannel retail sector. She has a proven track record of success in driving transformations, delivering strong financial performance, and forming strong relationships with investors and industry analysts. She has extensive knowledge across all areas of finance, including financial planning, investor relations, M&A, accounting, treasury and tax, as well as strategic planning, credit card services and real estate. Ms. Hoguet played a critical role in the successful turnaround of Federated Department Stores, from bankruptcy to an industry leading omnichannel retailer, which was accomplished through acquisitions, divestiture and other strategic changes including building an omnichannel model and developing a new strategic approach to real estate. Her long tenure as a senior executive of a publicly traded company with financial, audit, strategy, and risk oversight experience is of value to the Board as is her public companies, includingcompany experience, both as a long serving on compensation, audit,executive, and corporate governance committees. She was inducted intoas a board member. In addition, her strong business acumen, understanding of diverse cross-functional issues, and ability to identify potential risks and opportunities are also of value to the YWCA AcademyBoard. Ms. Hoguet has been designated an Audit Committee financial expert and serves as Chair of Women Achievers.the Finance Committee.

Age
66
Director Since
2019

Committees:
Audit
Finance
1

Qualifications:
Business Management
Retail
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
ESG


5



W. Rodney McMullen
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer

Age 55

Director Since 2003

Mr. McMullen was elected Chairman of the Board in January 2015 and Chief Executive Officer of Kroger in January 2014. Mr. McMullenHe served as Kroger’s President and Chief Operating Officer from August 2009 to December 2013. Prior to that, role, Mr. McMullen was elected to various roles at Kroger including Vice Chairman in 2003, Executive Vice President, Strategy, Planning, and Finance in 1999, and Senior Vice President in 1997. Mr. McMullen1997, Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 1995, and Vice President, Planning and Capital Management in 1989. He is a director of VF Corporation. In the past five years, he also served as a director of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and VF Corporation.

Mr. McMullen has broad experience in the supermarket business, having spent his career spanning over 3740 years with Kroger. He has a strong financial background in finance, operations, and strategic partnerships, having served in a variety of roles with Kroger, including as our CFO, COO, and played a major roleVice Chairman. His previous service as architectchair of Kroger’s strategic plan. HisCincinnati Financial Corporation’s Compensation Committee and on its Executive and Investment Committees, as well as his service on the compensation, executive,Audit and investment committees of Cincinnati Financial CorporationGovernance and the audit and nominating and governance committeesCorporate Responsibilities Committees of VF Corporation, addadds depth to his extensive retail experience.

Jorge P. Montoya

Age 69


62

Director Since 2007

Committees:
Compensation
Public Responsibilities

Mr. Montoya was President of The Procter & Gamble Company’s Global Snacks & Beverage division, and President of Procter & Gamble Latin America, from 1999 until his retirement in 2004. Prior to that, he was an Executive Vice President of Procter & Gamble, a provider of branded consumer packaged goods, from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Montoya is a director of The Gap, Inc.

Mr. Montoya brings to Kroger’s Board over 30 years of leadership experience at a premier consumer products company. He has a deep knowledge of the Hispanic market, as well as consumer products and retail operations. Mr. Montoya has vast experience in marketing and general management, including international business. He was named among the 50 most important Hispanics in Business & Technology, inHispanic Engineer & Information Technology Magazine.


2003

Qualifications:
Business Management
Retail
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG

1 Denotes Chair of Committee


Clyde R. Moore

Age 62

Director Since 1997

Committees:
Compensation
Corporate Governance

Mr. Moore was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of First Service Networks, a national provider of facility and maintenance repair services, from 2000 to 2014, and Chairman until his retirement in 2015. PriorPreviously, Mr. Moore was President and CEO of Thomas & Betts, a global manufacturer of electric connectors and components, and President and COO of FL Industries, Inc., an electrical component manufacturing company. Mr. Moore is currently President and CEO of Gliocas LLC, a management consulting firm serving small businesses and non-profits. Mr. Moore was a leader in the founding of the Industry Data Exchange Association (IDEA), which standardized product identification data for the electrical industry, allowing the industry to that hemake the successful transition to digital commerce. Mr. Moore was Chairman of the National Electric Manufacturers Association and Chiefserved on the Executive OfficerCommittee of First Service Networks from 2000 to 2014.the Board of Governors. He served on the advisory board of Mayer Electrical Supply for over 20 years, including time as lead director, until the sale of the company in late-2021.

Mr. Moore has over 30 years of general management experience in public and private companies. He has soundextensive experience as a corporate leader overseeing all aspects of a facilities management firm and numerous manufacturing companies. Mr. Moore’s expertise broadens the scope of the Board’s experience to provide oversight to Kroger’s facilities, digital, and manufacturing businesses.businesses, and he has a wealth of Fortune 500 experience in implementing technology transformations. Additionally, his expertise and leadership as Chair of the Compensation Committee is of particular value to the Board. Mr. Moore presided over the Compensation Committee during the company’s introduction of its Framework for Action: Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion plan. Additionally, he was Chair of the Compensation Committee and led the inclusion of talent development into the Committee’s name and charter.

Susan M. Phillips

Age 71

Director Since 2003

Committees:
Audit
Compensation

Dr. Phillips is Professor Emeritus of Finance at The George Washington University School of Business. She joined The George Washington University School of Business as a Professor and Dean in 1998. Dr. Phillips retired from her position as Dean in 2010, and retired from her position as Professor the following year. She was a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from December 1991 through June 1998. Before her Federal Reserve appointment, Dr. Phillips served as Vice President for Finance and University Services and Professor of Finance in The College of Business Administration at the University of Iowa from 1987 through 1991. She is a director of CBOE Holdings, Inc., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Companies Foundation, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and Agnes Scott College. Dr. Phillips also was a director of the National Futures Association and State Farm Life Insurance Company until early 2016.

Dr. Phillips brings to the Board strong financial acumen, along with a deep understanding of, and involvement with, the relationship between corporations and the government. Her experience in academia brings a unique and diverse viewpoint to the Board’s deliberations. Dr. Phillips has been designated an Audit Committee financial expert.


6



James A. Runde

Age
69

Director Since 2006

Committees:
Compensation
Financial Policy

 

Mr. Runde is a special advisor and a former Vice Chairman of Morgan Stanley, a financial services provider, where he was employed from 1974 until his retirement in 2015. He was a member of the Board of Directors of Burlington Resources Inc. prior to its acquisition by ConocoPhillips in 2006. Mr. Runde serves as a Trustee Emeritus of Marquette University and the Pierpont Morgan Library.

Mr. Runde brings to Kroger’s Board a strong financial background, having led a major financial services provider. He has served on the compensation committee of a major corporation.

Director Since
1997

Committees:
Compensation & Talent Development1
Corporate Governance

Qualifications:
Business Management
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG
Manufacturing

Ronald L. Sargent

Age 60

Director Since 2006

Committees:
Audit
Public Responsibilities

Mr. Sargent iswas Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Staples, Inc., a business products retailer, where he has beenwas employed since 1989.from 1989 until his retirement in 2017. Prior to joining Staples, Mr. Sargent spent 10 years with Kroger in various positions. In addition to serving as a director of Staples, Mr. SargentHe is a director of Five Below, Inc. During the past five years,and Wells Fargo & Company. Previously, he wasserved as a director of Mattel, Inc. and The Home Depot, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. Currently, Mr. Sargent is a member of the board of governors of the Boys & Girls Clubs of America, the board of directors of City of Hope, and the board of trustees of Northeastern University. He is also chairman of the board of directors of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation.

Mr. Sargent has over 35 years of retail experience, first with Kroger and then with increasing levels of responsibility and leadership at Staples, Inc. His efforts helped carve out a new market niche for the international retailer thatretailer. In his role as Chair of the Wells Fargo Human Resources Committee, he leads.oversees human capital management, including diversity, equity, and inclusion, human capital risk, and culture and ethics. In his role as a member of the Five Below Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, he oversees social and environmental governance, including corporate citizenship. These committee experiences are of value to the Board in his role as a member of the Public Responsibilities Committee and Lead Director of the Board. His understanding of retail operations, and consumer insights, and e-commerce are also of particular value to the Board. Mr. Sargent has been designated an Audit Committee financial expert.expert and serves as Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and Lead Director of the Board. Mr. Sargent’s strong insights into corporate governance and his executive leadership experience serve as the basis for his leadership role as Lead Director.

Bobby S. Shackouls

Age 65


67

Director Since 1999
2006

Committees:

Audit

Corporate Governance
1
Public Responsibilities

Qualifications:
Business Management
Retail
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG

1 Denotes Chair of Committee


Mr. ShackoulsJ. Amanda Sourry Knox (Amanda Sourry)

Ms. Sourry was ChairmanPresident of North America for Unilever, a personal care, foods, refreshment, and home care consumer products company, from 2018 until her retirement in December 2019. She held leadership roles of increasing responsibility during her more than 30 years at Unilever, both in the U.S. and Europe, including president of global foods, executive vice president of global hair care, and executive vice president of the Boardfirm’s UK and Ireland business. From 2015 to 2017, she served as President of Burlington Resources Inc.their Global Foods Category. Ms. Sourry currently serves on the board for PVH Corp., where she chairs the Compensation Committee and serves on the Nominating, Governance & Management Development Committee. She is also a non-executive director of OFI, a provider of on-trend, natural and plant-based products, focused on delivering sustainable and innovative solutions to consumers across the world, and a member of their Remuneration and Talent Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee. She is also a supervisory director of Trivium Packaging B.V., a natural resourcessustainable packaging company, and a director of Beautycounter LLC.

Ms. Sourry has over thirty years of experience in the CPG and retail industry. As a member of PVH Corp.’s Nominating, Governance, & Management Development Committee, her experience with monitoring issues of corporate conduct and culture, and providing oversight of diversity, equity and inclusion policies and programs as it relates to management development, talent assessment and succession planning programs and processes is of particular value to her role as a member of the Compensation & Talent Development Committee and the Board. She brings to the Board her extensive global marketing and business from July 1997 until its merger with ConocoPhillipsexperience in 2006consumer-packaged goods as well as customer development, including overseeing Unilever’s digital efforts. Ms. Sourry was actively involved in Unilever’s global diversity, gender balance, and its Presidentsustainable living initiatives which is of value to the Board and Chief Executive Officer from December 1995 until 2006. to the Compensation & Talent Development Committee. She also has a track record of driving sustainable, profitable growth across scale operating companies and global categories across both developed and emerging markets. Ms. Sourry’s history in profit and loss responsibility and oversight, people and ESG leadership and capabilities development is of value to the Board.

Age
59
Director Since
2021

Committees:
Compensation & Talent
Development

Finance

Qualifications:
Business Management
Retail
Consumer
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG


Mark S. Sutton

Mr. Shackouls was also the PresidentSutton is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Burlington Resources OilInternational Paper, a leading global producer of renewable fiber-based packaging, pulp, and Gas Company (formerly knownpaper products. Prior to becoming CEO in 2014, he served as Meridian Oil Inc.), a wholly-owned subsidiaryPresident and Chief Operating Officer with responsibility for running International Paper’s global business. Mr. Sutton joined International Paper in 1984 as an Electrical Engineer. He held roles of Burlington Resources, from 1994 to 1995.increasing responsibility throughout his career, including Mill Manager, Vice President of Corrugated Packaging Operations across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Vice President of Corporate Strategic Planning, and Senior Vice President of several business units, including global supply chain. Mr. ShackoulsSutton is a directormember of Plains GP Holdings, L.P.The Business Council, serves on the American Forest & Paper Association board of directors, and Oasis Petroleum Inc. Duringon the past fiveBusiness Roundtable. He also serves on the board of directors of Memphis Tomorrow.

Mr. Sutton has over 30 years Mr. Shackouls was a director of ConocoPhillipsleadership experience with increasing levels of responsibility and PNGS GP LLC, the general partner of PAA Natural Gas Storage, L.P. Mr. Shackouls previously served as Kroger’s Lead Director.

Mr. Shackoulsleadership at International Paper. At International Paper, he oversees their robust ESG disclosures which are aligned with GRI, and their Vision 2030, which sets forth ambitious forest stewardship targets and plans to transition to renewable solutions and sustainable operations. He also oversees International Paper’s Vision 2030 goals pertaining to diversity and inclusion. He brings to the Board the critical thinking that comes with a chemicalan electrical engineering background as well as his experience leading a major natural resourcesglobal company coupled with labor unions. His strong strategic planning background, manufacturing and supply chain and experience, and his corporate governance expertise.ESG leadership are of value to the Board.

Age
61
Director Since
2017

Committees:
Compensation & Talent Development
Finance

Qualifications:
Business Management
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG
Manufacturing

Ashok Vemuri

Mr. Vemuri was Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Conduent Incorporated, a global digital interactions company, from its inception as a result of the spin-off from Xerox Corporation in January 2017 to 2019. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Xerox Business Services, LLC and as an Executive Vice President of Xerox Corporation from July 2017 to December 2017. Prior to that, he was President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the Board of Directors of IGATE Corporation, a New Jersey-based global technology and services company now part of Capgemini, from 2013 to 2015. Before joining IGATE, Mr. Vemuri spent 14 years at Infosys Limited, a multinational consulting and technology services company, in a variety of leadership and business development roles and served on the board of Infosys from 2011 to 2013. Prior to joining Infosys in 1999, Mr. Vemuri worked in the investment banking industry at Deutsche Bank and Bank of America. In the past five years, he served as a director of Conduent Incorporated. Mr. Vermuri is a member of the Board of Directors of Opal Fuels and is chair of the Audit Committee.

Mr. Vemuri brings to the Board a proven track record of leading technology services companies through growth and corporate transformations. His experience as CEO of global technology companies as well as his experience with cyber security and risk oversight are of value to the Board as he brings a unique operational, financial, and client experience perspective. Additionally, Mr. Vemuri served on our Public Responsibilities Committee which gives him additional perspectives on risk oversight that he brings to the Audit Committee. Mr. Vemuri has been designated an Audit Committee financial expert.

Age
55
Director Since
2019

Committees:
Audit
Finance

Qualifications:
Business Management
Financial Expertise
Risk Management
Operations & Technology
ESG


YOUR VOTE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. The Board of Directors Recommendsunanimously recommends a VoteForvote “FOR ALL” of Kroger’s director nominees.

Board Succession Planning and Refreshment Mechanisms

Board succession planning is an ongoing, year-round process. The Corporate Governance Committee recognizes the importance of thoughtful Board refreshment and engages in a continuing process of identifying attributes sought for future Board members. The Corporate Governance Committee takes into account the Board and Committee evaluations regarding the specific qualities, skills, and experiences that would contribute to overall Board and Committee effectiveness, as well as the future needs of the Board and its Committees in light of Kroger’s current and long-term business strategies, and the skills and qualifications of directors who are expected to retire in the future including as a result of our Board retirement policy, which requires directors to retire at the annual meeting following their 72nd birthday.

Outside Board Service

No director who is an officer of the Company may serve as a director of another company without the approval of the Corporate Governance Committee. Directors who are not officers of the Company may not serve as a director of another company if in so doing such service would interfere with the director’s ability to properly perform his or her responsibilities on behalf of the Company and its shareholders, as determined by the Corporate Governance Committee. None of our current directors serve on more than three public company Boards, including Kroger’s Board.

Board Diversity

Our director nominees reflect a wide array of experience, skills, and backgrounds. Each Director Nominee.director is individually qualified to make unique and substantial contributions to Kroger. Collectively, our directors’ diverse viewpoints and independent-mindedness enhance the quality and effectiveness of Board deliberations and decision-making. Our Board is a dynamic group of new and experienced members, which reflects an appropriate balance of institutional knowledge and fresh perspectives about Kroger due to the varied length of tenure on the Board. We believe this blend of qualifications, attributes, and tenure enables highly effective Board leadership.

7


The Corporate Governance Committee considers racial, ethnic, and gender diversity to be important elements in promoting full, open, and balanced deliberations of issues presented to the Board. When evaluating potential nominees to our Board, the Corporate Governance Committee considers director candidates who would help the Board reflect the diversity of our shareholders, associates, customers, and the communities in which we operate, including by considering their geographic locations to align directors’ physical locations with Kroger’s operating areas where possible. In connection with the use of a third-party search firm to identify candidates for Board positions, the Corporate Governance Committee instructs the third-party search firm to include in its initial list qualified female and racially/ethnically diverse candidates. Four of our 11 director nominees self-identify as racially/ethnically diverse: Mr. Brown and Ms. Gates self-identify as Black/African American and Ms. Chao and Mr. Vemuri self-identify as Asian. Five of our 11 directors are women.

The Corporate Governance Committee believes that it has been successful in its efforts to promote gender and ethnic diversity on our Board. Further, the Board aims to foster a diverse and inclusive culture throughout the Company and believes that the Board nominees are well suited to do so. The Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that our director nominees for election at our 2023 Annual Meeting bring to our Board a variety of different experiences, skills, and qualifications that contribute to a well-functioning diverse Board that effectively oversees the Company’s strategy and management. The charts below show the diversity of our director nominees and the skills and experience that we consider important for our directors in light of our current business, strategy, and structure:


Nora
Aufreiter
Kevin
Brown
Elaine
Chao
Anne
Gates
Karen
Hoguet
Rodney
McMullen
Clyde
Moore
Ronald
Sargent
Amanda
Sourry
Mark
Sutton
Ashok
Vemuri
Total
(of 11)
Business Management11
Retail6
Consumer8
Financial Expertise11
Risk Management10
Operations & Technology10
ESG11
Manufacturing4


Information Concerning the Board of Directors

Board Leadership Structure and Independent Lead Independent Director

The Board is currently composed of eleven independent non-employee directors and one management director, Mr. McMullen, the Chairman and CEO.

Kroger has a balanced governance structure in which independent directors exercise meaningful and vigorousrigorous oversight.

In addition, as provided The Board’s leadership structure, in particular, is designed with those principles in mind and to allow the Board to evaluate its needs and determine, from time to time, who should lead the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) provide the flexibility for the Board to modify our leadership structure in theGuidelines on Issues of Corporate Governance( future as appropriate. We believe that Kroger is well-served by this flexible leadership structure.

In order to promote thoughtful oversight, independence, and overall effectiveness, the Guidelines”),Board’s leadership includes Mr. McMullen, our Chairman and CEO, and an independent Lead Director designated by the Board has designated one ofamong the independent directors as Lead Director.directors. The Lead Director works with the Chairman to share governance responsibilities, facilitate the development of Kroger’s strategy, and grow shareholder value. The Lead Director serves a variety of roles, consistent with current best practices, including:

reviewing and approving Board meeting agendas, materials, and schedules to confirm that theappropriate topics are reviewed, with sufficient information provided to directors on each topic and sufficientappropriate time is allocated to each;
serving as the principal liaison between the Chairman, management, and the non-managementindependent directors;
presiding at the executive sessions of independent directors and at all other meetings of the Boardat which the Chairman is not present;
calling meetings of independent directors at any time; and

serving as the Board’s representative for any consultation and direct communication, following arequest, with major shareholders.

The Lead Director carries out these responsibilities in numerous ways, including:

The independent Lead Director carries out these responsibilities in numerous ways, including by:

facilitating communication and collegiality among the Board;
Board members;
soliciting direct feedback from non-executiveindependent directors;
overseeing the succession planning process, including site visits and meeting with a wide range of associates including corporateand division management associates;
meeting with the CEO frequently to discuss strategy;
serving as a sounding boardBoard and advisor to the CEO;
leading annual CEO evaluation process; and
discussing Company matters with other directors between meetings.

Unless otherwise determined by the independent members of the Board, the chairChair of the Corporate Governance Committee is designated as the Lead Director. Robert Beyer,Ronald L. Sargent, an independent director and the chairChair of the Corporate Governance Committee, is currently thewas appointed as our Board’s independent Lead Director.Director in June 2018. Mr. BeyerSargent is an effective Lead Director for Kroger due to, among other things, his independence, his deep strategic and operational understanding of Kroger obtained while serving as a Kroger director, his insight into corporate governance, his experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies, and his commitment and engagement to carrying out the roles and responsibilities of the Lead Director.his:

independence;
deep strategic and operational understanding of Kroger obtained while serving as a Kroger director;
insight into corporate governance;
experience as the CEO of an international ecommerce and brick and mortar retailer;
experience on the Boards of other large publicly traded companies; and
engagement and commitment to carrying out the role and responsibilities of the Lead Director.

With respect to the roles of Chairman and CEO, theGuidelines provide that the Board will determine whenwhether it is in the best interests of Kroger and ourits shareholders for the roles to be separated or combined, and thecombined. The Board exercises its discretionthis judgment as it deems appropriate in light of prevailing circumstances. Upon retirement of our former Chairman, David B. Dillon, on December 31, 2014, the Board determined that it is in the best interests of Kroger and our shareholders for one person to serve as the Chairman and CEO, as was the case from 2004 through 2013. The Board believes that this leadership structure improves the Board’s ability to focus on key policy and operational issues and helps the Company operate in the long-term interestsinterest of shareholders. Additionally, this structure provides an effective balance between strong Company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors. Our CEO’s strong background in finance, operations, and strategic partnerships is particularly important to the Board given Kroger’s current growth strategy. Our CEO’s consistent leadership, deep industry expertise, and extensive knowledge of the Company are also especially critical in the midst of the rapidly evolving retail and digital landscape. The Board believes that the combination or separationstructure of these positionsthe Chairman and independent Lead Director position should continue to be considered as part of the succession planning process, as was the case in 2003 and 2014 when the roles were separated.process.

8



Annual Board Evaluation Process

The Board and each of its committeesCommittees conduct an annual self-evaluationevaluation to determine whether the Board is functioning effectively both at each level.the Board and at the Committee levels. As part of this annual self-evaluation,evaluation, the Board assesses whether the current leadership structure and function continues to be appropriate for Kroger and its shareholders. TheGuidelines provideshareholders, including in consideration of director succession planning.

Every year, the flexibility forBoard’s goal is to increase the effectiveness of the Board and the results of these evaluations are used for this purpose. The Board recognizes that a robust evaluation process is an essential component of strong corporate governance practices and ensuring Board effectiveness. The Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluation process led by either the Lead Independent Director or an independent third party.

Each director completes a detailed annual evaluation of the Board and the Committees on which he or she serves and the Lead Director or an independent third-party conducts interviews with each of the directors. This year, the annual evaluation was conducted by the Lead Director.

Topics covered include, among others:

The effectiveness of the Board and Board Committees and the active participation of all directors

The Board and Committees’ skills and experience and whether additional skills or experience are needed

The effectiveness of Board and Committee meetings, including the frequency of the meetings

Board interaction with management, including the level of access to management, and the responsiveness of management

The effectiveness of the Board’s evaluation of management performance

Additional subject matters the Board would like to see presented at their meetings or Committee meetings

Board’s governance procedures

The culture of the Board to promote participation in a meaningful and constructive way

The results of this Board evaluation are discussed by the full Board and each Committee, as applicable, and changes to modify our leadership structurethe Board’s and its Committees’ practices are implemented as appropriate.

Over the past several years, this evaluation process has contributed to various enhancements in the futureway the Board and the Committees operate, including increased focus on continuous Board refreshment and diversity of its members as appropriate.well as ensuring that Board and Committee agendas are appropriately focused on strategic priorities and provide adequate time for director discussion and input.


Director Onboarding and Engagement

All directors are expected to invest the time and energy required to gain an in-depth understanding of our business and operations in order to enhance their strategic value to our Board. We believe that Kroger, like many U.S. companies, has been well-serveddevelop tailored onboarding plans for each new director. We arrange meetings for each new director with appropriate officers and associates in order to familiarize him or her with the Company’s strategic plans, financial statements, and key policies and practices. We also provide training on fiduciary obligations of board members and corporate governance topics, as well as committee-specific onboarding. From time to time, the Company will provide Board members with presentations from experts within and outside of the Company on topics relevant to the Board’s responsibilities. Any member of the Board may attend accredited third-party training and the expenses will be paid by this flexible leadership structure.the Company. Board meetings are periodically held at a location away from our home office in a geography in which we operate. In connection with these Board meetings, our directors learn more about the local business environment through meetings with our regional business leaders and visits to our stores, competitors’ stores, manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, and/or customer fulfillment centers.

Committees of the Board of Directors

To assist the Board in undertaking its responsibilities, and to allow deeper engagement in certain areas of company oversight, the Board has established five standing committees:Committees: Audit, Compensation and Talent Development (“Compensation”), Corporate Governance, Financial PolicyFinance, and Public Responsibilities. All committeesCommittees are composed exclusively of independent directors, as determined under the NYSE listing standards. Each Committee has the responsibilities set forth in its respective charter, each of which has been approved by the Board. The current charter of each Board committeeCommittee is available on our website at ir.kroger.com under Investors — Governance — Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The current membership, 2022 meetings, and responsibilities of each Committee Composition.are summarized below.

Name of Committee, Number of

Meetings, and Current Members
Primary Committee FunctionsResponsibilities

Audit Committee

Meetings in 2015:2022: 5

Members:

Anne Gates, Chair
Kevin M. Brown
Karen M. Hoguet
Ronald L. Sargent
Chair
Anne Gates
Susan J. Kropf
Susan M. Phillips
Bobby S. Shackouls

Ashok Vemuri

Oversees the Company’s financial reporting and accounting matters, including review of the Company’s financial statements and the audit thereof, the Company’s financial reporting and accounting process, and the Company’s systems of internal control over financial reporting

Selects, evaluates, and oversees the compensation and work of the independent registered public accounting firm and reviews its performance, qualifications, and independence

Oversees and evaluates the Company’s internal audit function, including review of its audit plan, policies and procedures, and significant findings

Oversees enterprise risk assessment and risk management, including review of cybersecurity risks and regular reports received from management and independent third parties

Reviews significant legal orand regulatory matters that could have a significant effect on the Company

Reviews and monitors the Company’s operational and third-party compliance programs includingand updates thereto

Reviews Ethics Hotline reports and discusses material matters

●  Reviews and approves related party transactions

●  Conducts executive sessions with independent registered public accounting firm and Vice President, Internal Audit at each meeting

Conducts executive sessions with the whistleblower program Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Vice President and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer individually at least once per year


Name of Committee, Number of
Meetings, and Current Members
Primary Committee Responsibilities

Compensation Committee

Meetings in 2015:2022: 5

Members:

Clyde R. Moore,Chair
Jorge P. Montoya
Susan M. Phillips
     James A. Runde

Amanda Sourry
Mark S. Sutton

Recommends for approval by the independent directors the compensation of the CEO and determinesapproves the compensation of other senior management and directors

officers

Administers the Company’s executive compensation policies and programs, including determining grants of equity awards under the plans

  Reviews annual incentive plans and long-term incentive plan metrics and plan design

●  Reviews emerging legislation and governance issues and retail compensation trends

●  Reviews the Company’s executive compensation peer group

●  Reviews CEO pay analysis

●  Reviews Human Capital Management, including Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion

●  Has sole authority to retain and direct the committee’sCommittee’s compensation consultant

Assists the full Board with senior management succession planning


9



Name of Committee, Number of
Meetings,

●  Conducts executive sessions with Senior Vice President and Current Members

Committee FunctionsChief People Officer and independent compensation consultant

Corporate Governance Committee

Meetings in 2015:2

2022: 3

Members:
     Robert D. Beyer,

Ronald L. Sargent, Chair
David B. Lewis

Elaine L. Chao
Anne Gates
Clyde R. Moore
     Bobby S. Shackouls

Oversees the Company’s corporate governance policies and procedures

Develops criteria for selecting and retaining directors, including identifying and identifies and recommendsrecommending qualified candidates to be director nominees

Designates membership and chairsChairs of Board committees

Committees

  Oversees and administers Board evaluation process

●  Reviews the Board’s performance

●  Establishes and reviews the practices and procedures by which the Board performs its functions

●  Reviews director independence,

financial literacy, and designation of financial expertise

  Administers director nomination process

●  Interviews and nominates candidates for director election

●  Reviews alongcompliance with share ownership guidelines

●  Reviews and participates in shareholder engagement

●  Reviews and establishes independent director compensation

●  Oversees the other independent directors,annual CEO evaluation process conducted by the performancefull Board


Name of the CEOCommittee, Number of
Meetings, and Current Members
Primary Committee Responsibilities

Financial PolicyFinance Committee

Meetings in 2015:2

2022: 6

Members:
James A. Runde,

Karen M. Hoguet, Chair

Nora A. Aufreiter
     Robert D. Beyer
     Susan J. Kropf

Amanda Sourry
Mark Sutton
Ashok Vemuri

Reviews and recommends  Oversees the Company’s financial policiesaffairs and practices

Oversees management of the Company’s financial resources

Reviews the Company’s annual and long-term financial plan, significantplans, capital investments,spending plans, capital allocation strategy, and use of cash

●  Approves and recommends for major acquisitions or sales,approval to the Board certain capital expenditures

●  Reviews the Company’s dividend policy and share buybacks

●  Reviews strategic transactions, capital structure, including potential issuance of new commondebt or preferred stock, dividend policy, creation of additional debtequity securities, credit agreements, and other capital structure considerations including additional leverage or dilution in ownership

financing transactions

Monitors the investment management of assets held in pension and profit sharingprofit-sharing plans administered by the Company

Public Responsibilities Committee

Meetings in 2015:2

Members:
Jorge P. Montoya,Chair
Nora A. Aufreiter
     Anne Gates
     Ronald L. Sargent

Reviews  Oversees the Company’s policies and procedures on hedging, swaps, risk management, and other derivative transactions

●  Oversees the Company’s engagement and relationships with, and standing in, the financial community

Public Responsibilities Committee

Meetings in 2022: 3

Members:

Nora A. Aufreiter, Chair
Kevin M. Brown
Elaine L. Chao
Ronald L. Sargent

●  Reviews the practices of the Company affecting its social and public responsibility as a corporate citizen including: community relations, charitable giving, supplier diversity,

●  Examines and reviews the Company’s practices related to environmental sustainability, government relations, political action, consumer and media relations,social impact, including but not limited to

     climate impacts

     packaging

     food and pharmacyoperational waste

     food access

     responsible sourcing

     supplier diversity

     people safety, food safety, and thepharmacy safety of customers

●  Examines and employees

Reviews and examinesreviews the Company’s evaluation ofESG strategy

●  Reviews the Company’s community engagement and responsephilanthropy

●  Reviews the Company’s advocacy and public policy

●  Reviews the Company’s communications and Corporate Brand stewardship

●  Assesses the Company’s effort in evaluating and responding to changing public expectations and public issues affectingthat affect the business


Shareholder Engagement

Maintaining ongoing relationships with our shareholders, and understanding our shareholders’ views, is a priority for both our Board and management team. We have a longstanding history of engaging with our shareholders and through our investor relations program and our year-round governance outreach program, including participation for our independent directors. In 2022, under the direction of the Board, we requested engagement meetings with 34 shareholders representing 48% of our outstanding shares and subsequently met with 18 shareholders representing 41% of our outstanding shares (many of those shareholders we met with more than once). Some investors we contacted either did not respond or confirmed that a discussion was not needed at that time.

We conduct shareholder outreach throughout the year to engage with shareholders on issues that are important to them and us. During these engagements we discussed and solicited feedback on a range of topics, which informed Board discussions and decisions, including but not limited to:

Business Strategy

Kroger’s growth strategy, priorities, and value drivers

Our strong value creation model and recent performance

ESG Practices & Disclosures

Discussions with socially conscious investors and NGOs helped inform our new ESG strategy and long-term commitments

Thriving Together, Kroger’s ESG strategy, including long-term environmental sustainability, social impact, and responsible sourcing commitments, progress updates, and steps being taken to achieve our ambitious goals

Board oversight of ESG strategy and updated Committee responsibilities

Kroger’s ESG reporting and disclosures, including our alignment with the TCFD, SASB, and GRI reporting frameworks

The centerpiece of our ESG strategy is Zero Hunger | Zero Waste, an industry-leading platform for collective action and systems change to end hunger in our communities and eliminate waste across our company

Human Capital Management

Our DE&I Framework for Action and steps we are taking to ensure our workforce reflects the communities we serve

Our focus on our associates’ well-being, including increasing our average hourly associate wage, comprehensive benefits, and opportunities for internal progression and leadership development training

Workforce diversity reporting, including EEO-1 demographic disclosure

Robust Board oversight of human rights in our supply chain


Compensation Structure

Overview of compensation program design and alignment of pay and performance

Consideration of short- and long-term metrics, including financial and non-financial metrics, such as ESG metrics

The balance of equity and cash compensation, as well as fixed versus at risk compensation

Board and Board Oversight

Our Board’s approach to board refreshment considering diversity, balance of tenure, and alignment of board skills and experience with Kroger’s current and long-term business strategies

Board and Committee responsibilities for oversight of ESG priorities, and approach to risk management

Discussions with socially conscious investors and NGOs helped inform our ESG strategy and long-term commitments. Overall shareholders expressed appreciation for the opportunity to have an ongoing discussion and were complementary of Kroger’s ESG practices. Specifically, shareholders recognized the actions we took to formalize our ESG strategy, Thriving Together, and how our Board oversees this strategy, including our ESG targets and initiatives. These conversations provided valuable insights into our shareholders’ evolving perspectives, which were shared with our full Board.

Board’s Response to Shareholder Proposals

Accountability to our shareholders continues to be an important component of our success. We actively engage with our shareholder proponents. Every year, following our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, our Corporate Governance Committee considers the voting outcomes for shareholder proposals. In addition, our Corporate Governance Committee and other Committees, as appropriate, consider proposed courses of action in light of the voting outcomes for shareholder proposals under their oversight, as well as feedback provided directly from our shareholders.

Director Nominee Selection Process

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board a slate of nominees for election at each annual meeting of shareholders. The Corporate Governance Committee recruits candidates for Board membership through its own efforts and through recommendations from other directors and shareholders. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee has retainedretains an independent, third-party search firm to assist in identifying and recruiting director candidates who meet the criteria established by the Corporate Governance Committee.

These criteria are:

Demonstrateddemonstrated ability in fields considered to be of value in the deliberation and long-term planningofto the Board, including business management, retail, consumer, operations, technology, financial, sustainability, manufacturing, public service, education, technology,science, law, andgovernment;
and government;

Highestexperience in high growth companies and nominees whose business experience can help the Company innovate and derive new value from existing assets;

highest standards of personal character and conduct;

Willingnesswillingness to fulfillfulfil the obligations of directors and to make the contribution of which he or she iscapable, including regular attendance and participation at Board and committeeCommittee meetings, andpreparationand preparation for all meetings, including review of all meeting materials provided in advance of the meeting;and

Abilityability to understand the perspectives of Kroger’s customers, taking into consideration the diversityof our customers, including regional and geographic differences.

10



Additionally, in connection with the use of an independent, third-party search firm to identify director candidates, the Corporate Governance Committee will instruct the firm to include in its initial list qualified female and racially/ethnically diverse candidates.

The Corporate Governance Committee also considers racial, ethnic and gender diversity, to be important elementsas discussed in promoting full, open and balanced deliberations of issues presented to the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee considers director candidates that help the Board reflect the diversity of our shareholders, associates, customersdetail under “Board Diversity” above, and the communities in which we operate. Some consideration also is given to the geographic locationspecific experience and abilities of director candidates in order to provide a reasonable distributionlight of members from Kroger’s operating areas.our current business, strategy, and structure, and the current or expected needs of the Board in its identification and recruitment of director candidates.

At least annually,

The criteria for Board membership applied by the Corporate Governance Committee actively engages in its evaluation of potential Board succession planning. The Corporate Governance Committee takes into account the Board and committee evaluations regarding the specific backgrounds, skills, and experiences that would contribute to overall Board and committee effectiveness as well as the future needs of the Board and its committees in light of Kroger’s current and future business strategies and the skills and qualifications ofmembers does not vary based on whether a candidate is recommended by our directors, who are expected to retire in the future.a third-party search firm, or shareholders.

Candidates Nominated by Shareholders

The Corporate Governance Committee will consider shareholder recommendations for director nominees for membership onelection to the Board of Directors.Board. If shareholders wish to nominate a person or persons for election to the Board at our 20172024 annual meeting, written notice must be submitted to Kroger’s Secretary, and received at our executive offices, in accordance with Kroger’s Regulations, not later than March 28, 2017.2024. Such notice should include the name, age, business address, and residence address of such person, the principal occupation or employment of such person, the number of Kroger common shares owned of record or beneficially by such person and any other information relating to the person that would be required to be included in a proxy statement relating to the election of directors. The Secretary will forward the information to the Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. The Corporate Governance Committee will use the same criteria in evaluating candidates submitted by shareholders as it uses in evaluating candidates identified by the Corporate Governance Committee, as described above. See “Director Nominee Selection Process.”

Additionally, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must provide notice to Kroger’s Secretary that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act no later than April 23, 2024, and must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b).

Eligible shareholders have the ability to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders. To be eligible, shareholders must have owned at least 3% of our common shares for at least three years. Up to 20 shareholders are able to aggregate for this purpose. Nominations must be submitted to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than December 14, 2023 and no later than January 13, 2024.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted theGuidelines,. TheGuidelines, which include copiesprovide a framework for the Board’s governance and oversight of the current charters for each of the five standing committees of the Board,Company. The Guidelines are available on our website at ir.kroger.com under CorporateInvestors — Governance – Highlights.—Corporate Governance Guidelines. Shareholders may also obtain a copy of theGuidelines, at no cost, by making a written request to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices. Certain key principles addressed in the Guidelines are summarized below.


Independence

The Board has determined that all of the non-employeecurrent independent directors and nominees have no material relationships with Kroger and therefore,satisfy the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Therefore, all independent directors and nominees are independent for purposes of the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listing standards. The Board made its determination based on information furnished to the Company by all memberseach of the directors regarding their relationships with Kroger and its management, and other relevant information. After reviewing the information, theThe Board determinedconsidered, among other things, that all of the non-employee directors were independent because:

they all satisfied the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 303A.02 of the NYSE ListedCompany Manual,
the value of any business transactions between Kroger and entities with which the directors areaffiliated falls below the thresholds identified by the NYSE listing standards, and
noneno directors had any material relationships with Kroger except for those arising directly from theirperformance of services as a director for Kroger.other than serving on our Board.

In determining that Mr. Sargent is independent, the Board considered transactions during fiscal 2015 between Kroger and Staples, Inc. (where Mr. Sargent is Chairman and CEO) and determined that the amount of business fell below the thresholds set by the NYSE listing standards. The transactions involved the purchase of goods by Kroger in the ordinary course of business totaling approximately $12 million and represented less than 0.06% of Staples’ annual consolidated gross revenue. Kroger periodically employs a bidding process or negotiations following a benchmarking of costs of products from various vendors for the items purchased from Staples and awards the business based on the results of that process.

11



Audit Committee Independence and Expertise

The Board has determined that Anne Gates, SusanKaren M. Phillips andHoguet, Ronald L. Sargent, and Ashok Vemuri, independent directors, who are memberseach of whom is a member of the Audit Committee, are “audit committee“Audit Committee financial experts” as defined by applicable SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations and that all members of the Audit Committee are “financially literate” as that term is used in the NYSE listing standards and are independent in accordance with Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Code of Ethics

The Board has adoptedThe Kroger Co. Policy on Business Ethics, applicable to all officers, employeesassociates, and directors, including Kroger’s principal executive, financial, and accounting officers. ThePolicy on Business Ethics is available on our website at ir.kroger.com under CorporateInvestors — Governance – Highlights.— Policy on Business Ethics. Shareholders may also obtain a copy of thePolicy on Business Ethics by making a written request to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices.

Communications with the Board

The Board has established two separate mechanisms for shareholders and interested parties to communicate with the Board. Any shareholder or interested party who has concerns regarding accounting, improper use of Kroger assets, or ethical improprieties may report these concerns via the toll-free hotline (800-689-4609) or email address (helpline@kroger.com)website (ethicspoint.com) established by the Board’s Audit Committee. The concerns are investigated by Kroger’s Vice President, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, and the Vice President of AuditingInternal Audit and reported to the Audit Committee as deemed appropriate by the Vice President of Auditing.appropriate.

Shareholders or interested parties also may communicate with the Board in writing directed to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices. Communications relating to personnel issues, or our ordinary business operations, or companies seeking to do business with us, will be forwarded to the business unit of Kroger that the Secretary deems appropriate. All otherOther communications will be forwarded to the chairChair of the Corporate Governance Committee for further consideration. The chairChair of the Corporate Governance Committee will take such action as he or she deems appropriate, which may include referral to the full Corporate Governance Committee or the entire Board.

Executive Officer Succession Planning

The Guidelines provide that the Compensation Committee will review Company policies and programs for talent development and evaluation of executive officers, and will review management succession planning. In connection with the use of a third-party search firm to identify external candidates for executive officer positions, including the chief executive officer, the Board and/or the Company, as the case may be, will instruct the third-party search firm to include in its initial list qualified female and racially/ethnically diverse candidates.

Attendance

The Board held five14 meetings in fiscal year 2015.2022. During fiscal year 2015,2022, all incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and committeesCommittees on which that director served. Members of the Board are expected to use their best efforts to attend all annual meetings of shareholders. All elevenBoard members then serving on the Board attended last year’s virtual annual meeting.


Independent Compensation Consultants

The Compensation Committee directly engages a compensation consultant from Mercer Human Resource Consulting to advise the Compensation Committee in the design of Kroger’s executive compensation. The Committee retained Korn Ferry Hay (US) (“Korn Ferry”) beginning in December 2017. Retained by – and reporting directly to – the Compensation Committee, Korn Ferry provided the Committee with assistance in evaluating Kroger’s executive compensation programs and policies.

In 2015,fiscal 2022, Kroger paid that consultant $390,767Korn Ferry $402,007 for work performed for the Compensation Committee. Kroger, on management’s recommendation, retained the parent and affiliated companies of Mercer Human Resource ConsultingKorn Ferry to provide other services for Kroger in 2015,fiscal 2022 for which Kroger paid $2,339,577.$69,500. These other services primarily related to insurance claims (for which Kroger was reimbursed by insurance carriers as claims were adjusted), insurance brokeragesalary surveys, benchmarking, integrated reporting, and bonding commissions provided by Marsh USA Inc., and pension plan compliance and actuary services provided by Mercer Inc. Kroger also made payments to affiliated companies for insurance premiums that were collected by the affiliated companies on behalf of insurance carriers, but these amounts are not included in the totals referenced above, as the amounts were paid over to insurance carriers for services provided by those carriers.

12



Although neither theoperational finance review. The Compensation Committee nor the Board expressly approved the other services, afterKorn Ferry performing these additional services. After taking into consideration the NYSE’s independence standards and the SEC rules, the Compensation Committee determined that the consultant isKorn Ferry was independent, and histheir work has not raised any conflict of interest because:interest.

the consultant was first engaged by the Compensation Committee before he became associatedwith Mercer;
the consultant works exclusively for the Compensation Committee and not for our management;
the consultant does not benefit from the other work that Mercer’s parent and affiliated companiesperform for Kroger; and
neither the consultant nor the consultant’s team perform any other services for Kroger.

The Compensation Committee may engage an additional compensation consultant from time to time as it deems advisable.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employeeassociate of Kroger during fiscal 2015,2022, and no member of the Compensation Committee is a former officer of Kroger or was a party to any disclosable related person transaction involving Kroger.Kroger required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During fiscal 2015,2022, none of our executive officers served on the boardBoard of directors or on the compensation committeeCommittee of any other entity that has or had executive officers serving as a member of Kroger’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the Board.

Board

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight of Enterprise Risk

While risk management is primarily the responsibility of Kroger’s management team, the Board is responsible for strategic planning and overall supervision of our risk management activities. The Board’s oversight of the material risks faced by Kroger occurs at both the full Board level and at the committee level.Committee level, each of which may engage advisors and experts from time to time to provide advice and counsel on risk-related matters.

We believe that our approach to risk oversight optimizes our ability to assess inter-relationships among the various risks, make informed cost-benefit decisions, and approach emerging risks in a proactive manner for Kroger. We also believe that our risk oversight structure complements our current Board leadership structure, as it allows our independent directors, through the five fully independent Board Committees, and in executive sessions of independent directors led by the Lead Director, to exercise effective oversight of the actions of management’s identification of risk and implementation of effective risk management policies and controls.

The Board receives presentations throughout the year from various department and business unit leaders that include discussion of significant risks, including newly identified and evolving high priority risks. When new risks are identified, management conducts, and either the full Board or the appropriate Board committee reviews and discusses, an enterprise risk assessment related to such new risks which may include human capital, supply chain, associate and customer health and safety, legal, regulatory, and other risks. Management and the Board then discuss the relative severity of each category of risk as necessary. well as mitigating actions and considerations relating to disclosures of material risks.

At each Board meeting, the Chairman and CEO addresses matters of particular importance or concern, including any significant areas of risk, such as newly identified risks, that require Board attention. Additionally, through dedicated sessions focusing entirely on corporate strategy, the full Board reviews in detail Kroger’s short- and long-term strategies, including consideration of significant risks facing Kroger – either immediately or longer term – and their potential impact. The independent directors, in executive sessions led by the Lead Director, address matters of particular concern, including significant areas of risk, that warrant further discussion or consideration outside the presence of Kroger employees. At the committee level, reports are given by management subject matter experts to each committeeCommittee on risks within the scope of their charters. Each Committee reports to the full Board at each meeting, including any areas of risk discussed by the Committee.

The Audit Committee has oversight responsibility not only for financial reporting of Kroger’s major financial exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures, but also for the effectiveness of management’s processes that monitor and manage key business risks facing Kroger, as well as the major areas of risk exposure, and management’s efforts to monitor and control thatthe major areas of risk exposure. The Audit Committee incorporates its risk oversight function into its regular reports to the Board and also discusses with management its policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

Management, including our


Our Vice President, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer provides regular updates throughout the year to the respectiveAudit Committee on our compliance risks and actions taken to mitigate that risk. In addition, the Audit Committee is charged with oversight of data privacy and cybersecurity risks. Protection of our customers’ data is a fundamental priority for our Board committees regardingand management ofteam. Our Chief Information Officer and our Chief Information Security Officer provide updates at each quarterly Committee meeting on our cybersecurity risks and actions taken to mitigate that risk to the risks they oversee,Audit Committee and each of these committees reports on risk tomeet with the full Board at each regular meetingleast annually. The Chief Information Security Officer reports on compliance and regulatory issues, continuously evolving threats and mitigating actions, and presents a NIST Cybersecurity Framework Scorecard to the Audit Committee. In overseeing cybersecurity risks, the Audit Committee focuses on thematic issues within an aggregated strategic lens and uses a risk-based approach. Oversight of cybersecurity risk incorporates strategy metrics, third party assessments, and internal audit and controls. Finally, an independent third party also regularly reports to the Audit Committee/Board on cybersecurity and outside counsel advises the Board about best practices for cybersecurity oversight by the Board, and the evolution of that oversight over time. Management also reports on strategic key risk indicators, ongoing initiatives, and significant incidents and their impact.

Board Oversight of Environmental, Sustainability, and Governance

We are aligned with the desire of our customers, associates, and shareholders to engage in our communities and reduce our impacts on the environment while continuing to create positive economic value over the long-term. Given the breadth of topics and their importance to us, all of our Board Committees have direct oversight of environmental, social, and governance topics. ESG topics our Board Committees oversee are as follows:

Audit

●    Legal & Regulatory

●    Ethics

●    Operational and Third-Party Compliance

●    Data Privacy & Cyber Security

●    Financial Integrity

Compensation & Talent Development

●    Human Capital Management

●    Talent Development

●    Executive Compensation

●    Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Corporate Governance

●    Board recruitment/diversity

●    Board succession

●    Shareholder engagement program

●    Shareholder advisory votes & shareholder proposals

●    Independent director compensation

Finance●    Capital spending to ensure consistency with ESG strategy and goals
Public Responsibilities

●    Environmental Sustainability

✓     Climate Impacts

✓     Packaging

✓     Food Waste (Zero Waste)

●    Social Impact

✓     Food Access and Affordability (Zero Hunger)

✓     Local Communities

✓     Philanthropy

✓     Responsible Sourcing

   Human Rights

   Animal Welfare

●    Safety

✓     Food

✓     People

✓     Pharmacy

●    Advocacy & Public Policy

✓     Government Relations

✓     Political action (KroPAC)

●    Communications & Brand Stewardship

✓     Associate & External Communications

●    Stakeholder Relations


Our commitment to ESG matters is not new. Our Public Responsibilities Committee was established in 1977. For the past 16 years, our Company has prepared and produced an annual report describing our progress and initiatives regarding sustainability and other ESG matters. For the most recent information regarding our ESG initiatives and related matters, please visit https://www.thekrogerco.com/esgreport/. The information on, or accessible through, this website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.

In addition, our full Board oversees issues related to diversity and inclusion within the Kroger workplace. Diversity and inclusion have been deeply rooted in Kroger’s values for decades. We are committed to fostering an environment of inclusion in the workplace, marketplace, and workforce where the diversity of cultures, backgrounds, experiences, perspectives, and ideas are valued and appreciated. Kroger’s corporate team and retail divisions have strategic collaborations with universities, educational institutions, and community organizations to improve how we attract candidates from all backgrounds and ethnicities for jobs at all levels. Diversity and inclusion will continue to be a key ingredient in feeding Kroger’s innovation, long-term sustainability, and the human spirit.

The Kroger family of companies provides inclusion training to all management and all hourly associates. Most work locations (stores, plants, distribution centers, and offices) have an inclusion-focused team, called Our Promise team. The teams work on projects that reflect Kroger’s values, offer leaders valuable feedback and suggestions on improving diversity and inclusion, and facilitate communication to champion business priorities.

Our Commitment to Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion

Kroger’s Chief People Officer leads Human Resources & Labor Relations, which includes our Diversity, Equity & Inclusion team. This function — with human resources professionals in place across our lines of business and retail divisions — advocates for and fosters an associate experience that reflects our Values. It also monitors and measures progress toward goals and identifies potential opportunities for improvement.

Kroger publicly affirmed our commitment with our Framework for Action: Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion, a 10-point plan outlining short- and longer-term steps developed with associates and leaders to promote greater change in the workplace and the communities we serve. This framework outlines five focus areas: Create More Inclusive Culture, Develop Diverse Talent, Advance Diverse Partnerships, Advance Equitable Communities, and Deeply Listen and Report Progress. More details about the plan are available here: https://www.thekrogerco.com/community/standing-together/. The information on, or accessible through, this website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.

Enabling Connections

As part of the Board.

We believe thatframework, we committed to provide inclusion training for our approachassociates. More than 661,000 leaders and associates have completed diversity and inclusion training since 2020. In 2020, Kroger formed an internal Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Advisory Council comprised of leaders from across the organization. The Council works closely with our executive leadership team and other business leaders to risk oversight, as described above, optimizes our ability to assess inter-relationships among the various risks, make informed cost-benefit decisions,identify opportunities and approach emerging risks in a proactive manneraction steps for Kroger.improvement. We also believecreated an Associate Influencer Group to facilitate representation and input from all levels of the company.

Kroger also operates 15 internal Associate Resource Groups (ARGs), or affinity groups, some of which also have local chapters. These groups enable stronger connections across our family of companies, lift up shared experiences, promote personal and professional growth, and influence business decisions. Kroger leaders sponsor and personally engage with the ARGs.

Workplace Equity

Kroger strives to attract, retain, and develop diverse leaders and associates who reflect the communities we serve. We offer accessible employment for a wide range of people across the country. Because of our unique business model, we help unlock economic opportunity for more than 430,000 people of all ages and aspirations, from those wanting an entry-level part-time job to graduate-degree specialists across corporate functions.

Kroger strategically invests in our associates’ growth and movement across levels, lines of business, and geographies. Our goal is to shift the demographic representation of women and people of color at company-wide and local levels to reflect our changing country, communities, and neighborhoods. The Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Advisory Council helps define aspirations for our workforce of the future.


Community Engagement

As part of our Framework for Action, the Company also pledged to invest in advancing equitable communities. Kroger directed a total of $10 million to establish and advance The Kroger Co. Foundation’s Racial Equity Fund in 2020. To date, the Foundation has directed $5.7 million in grants to organizations driving positive change at national and local levels.

In 2022, the Foundation directed $1 million to The Asian American Foundation to support the Asian-American community. As part of its continuing relationship with the Thurgood Marshall College Fund, the Foundation also hosted its second annual Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Innovation Challenge. During the three-day business pitch competition with 36 students from Historically Black Colleges and Universities across the U.S., the Foundation awarded a total of $75,000 in scholarships. In collaboration with Proctor & Gamble, the Foundation also introduced the Game Changers Scholarship program and awarded $25,000 in scholarships to five diverse female students in the Greater Cincinnati area.


Director Compensation

2022 Director Compensation

The following table describes the fiscal year 2022 compensation for independent directors. Mr. McMullen does not receive compensation for his Board service.

Name Fees Earned or Paid in
Cash
  Stock Awards(1)  Change in Pension
Value and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation(2)
  Total 
Nora A. Aufreiter $114,691  $186,382  $0  $301,073 
Kevin M. Brown $109,704  $186,382  $0  $296,086 
Elaine L. Chao $99,731  $186,382  $0  $286,113 
Anne Gates $134,637  $186,382  $0  $321,019 
Karen M. Hoguet $124,664  $186,382  $0  $311,046 
Clyde R. Moore $119,677  $186,382     $306,059 
Ronald L. Sargent $162,063  $186,382  $5,282  $353,727 
Amanda Sourry $99,731  $186,382  $0  $286,113 
Mark S. Sutton $99,731  $186,382  $0  $286,113 
Ashok Vemuri $109,704  $186,382  $0  $296,086 

(1)Amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the annual incentive share award, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. On July 13, 2022, each independent director then serving received 3,887 incentive shares with a grant date fair value of $186,382.

(2)The amount reported for Mr. Sargent represents preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. For a complete explanation of preferential earnings, please refer to footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Moore’s pension value decreased by $210,996 which represents the change in actuarial present value of his accumulated benefit under the pension plan for independent directors. This change in value of accumulated pension benefits is not included in the Director Compensation Table because the value decreased. Pension values may fluctuate significantly from year to year depending on a number of factors, including age, average annual earnings, and the assumptions used to determine the present value, such as the discount rate. The decrease in the actuarial present value of his accumulated pension benefit for 2022 is primarily due to the increase in the discount rate as well as the change in value due to aging.

Annual Compensation

Each independent director receives an annual cash retainer of $100,000. The Lead Director receives an additional annual retainer of $37,500 per year; the members of the Audit Committee each receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000; the Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $25,000; the Chair of the Compensation Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000; and the Chair of each of the other Committees receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000. Each independent director also receives an annual grant of incentive shares (Kroger common shares) with a value of approximately $185,000.


The Board has determined that our risk structure complements our current Board leadership structure, as it allows our independent directors, through the five fully independent Board committees, and in executive sessionscompensation of independent directors ledmust be competitive on an ongoing basis to attract and retain directors who meet the qualifications for service on the Board. Independent director compensation was adjusted in 2021 and will be reviewed from time to time as the Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate.

Pension Plan

Independent directors first elected prior to July 17, 1997 receive an unfunded retirement benefit equal to the average cash compensation for the five calendar years preceding retirement. Only Mr. Moore is eligible for this benefit. Benefits begin at the later of actual retirement or age 65.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We also maintain a deferred compensation plan for independent directors. Participants may defer up to 100% of their cash compensation and/or the receipt of all (and not less than all) of the annual award of incentive shares.

Cash Deferrals

Cash deferrals are credited to a participant’s deferred compensation account. Participants may elect from either or both of the following two alternative methods of determining benefits:

interest accrues until paid out at the rate of interest determined prior to the beginning of the deferral year to represent Kroger’s cost of ten-year debt; and/or

amounts are credited in “phantom” stock accounts and the amounts in those accounts fluctuate with the price of Kroger common shares.

In both cases, deferred amounts are paid out only in cash, based on deferral options selected by the Lead Director,participant at the time the deferral elections are made. Participants can elect to exercise effective oversighthave distributions made in a lump sum or in quarterly installments, and may make comparable elections for designated beneficiaries who receive benefits in the event that deferred compensation is not completely paid out upon the death of the actionsparticipant.

Incentive Share Deferrals

Participants may also defer the receipt of management, led by Mr. McMullen as Chairmanall (and not less than all) of the annual award of incentive shares. Distributions will be made by delivery of Kroger common shares within 30 days after the date which is six months after the participant’s separation of service.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Independent directors are required to own shares equivalent to five times their annual base cash retainer. For more details on the Stock Ownership Guidelines, see page 60.


Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

The following table sets forth the common shares beneficially owned as of April 24, 2023 by Kroger’s directors, the NEOs, and the directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership is based on 723,532,073 of Kroger common shares outstanding on April 24, 2023. Shares reported as beneficially owned include shares held indirectly through Kroger’s defined contribution plans and other shares held indirectly, as well as shares subject to stock options exercisable on or before June 23, 2023. Except as otherwise noted, each beneficial owner listed in the table has sole voting and investment power with regard to the common shares beneficially owned by such owner. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the beneficial owners listed below is c/o The Kroger Co., Corporate Secretary, 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

Name Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
  Options Exercisable on or
before June 23, 2023 –
included in column (a)
 
Stuart W. Aitken(2)   441,766   260,420 
Nora A. Aufreiter(3)   48,543    
Kevin M. Brown  11,004    
Elaine L. Chao(3)   8,036     
Yael Cosset  399,835   248,377 
Anne Gates(3)   43,125    
Karen M. Hoguet(4)   19,552    
Timothy A. Massa  506,660   311,704 
W. Rodney McMullen  6,353,306   2,772,130 
Gary Millerchip  540,043   354,620 
Clyde R. Moore  121,423    
Ronald L. Sargent(3)   180,871    
Amanda Sourry  11,004    
Mark S. Sutton(3)   38,452    
Ashok Vemuri  24,900    
Directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons, including those named above)  9,988,204   4,579,577 

(1)No director or officer owned as much as 1% of Kroger common shares. The directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned 1.4% of Kroger common shares.

(2)This amount includes 3,018 shares held by Mr. Aitken’s spouse. He disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

(3)This amount includes incentive share awards that were deferred under the deferred compensation plan for independent directors in the following amounts: Ms. Aufreiter, 10,037; Ms. Chao, 3,952; Ms. Gates, 12,100; Mr. Sargent, 55,960; Mr. Sutton, 6,909.

(4)This amount includes 2,075 shares held by Ms. Hoguet’s spouse. She disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.


The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial owners of more than five percent of Kroger common shares as of April 24, 2023 based on reports on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC.

Name Address Amount and Nature of
Ownership
   Percentage of Class 
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 3555 Farnam Street
Omaha, NE 68131
  50,000,000(1)   7.0%
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
  65,963,885(2)   9.2%
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
  82,426,702(3)   11.51%

(1)Reflects beneficial ownership by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as of December 31, 2022, as reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023, reporting shared voting power with respect to 50,000,000 common shares, and shared dispositive power with regard to 50,000,000 common shares.

(2)Reflects beneficial ownership by BlackRock Inc., as of December 31, 2022, as reported on Amendment No. 15 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 24, 2023, reporting sole voting power with respect to 59,579,943 common shares, and sole dispositive power with regard to 65,963,885 common shares.

(3)Reflects beneficial ownership by The Vanguard Group as of December 30, 2022, as reported on Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, reporting shared voting power with respect to 931,562 common shares, sole dispositive power of 79,719,502 common shares, and shared dispositive power of 2,707,200 common shares.

Related Person Transactions

The Board has adopted a written policy requiring that any Related Person Transaction may be consummated or continue only if the Audit Committee approves or ratifies the transaction in accordance with the policy. A “Related Person Transaction” is one (a) involving Kroger, (b) in which one of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers, or greater than five percent shareholders, or their immediate family members, have a direct or indirect material interest; and CEO,(c) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in identifying risksa fiscal year.

The Audit Committee will approve only those Related Person Transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of Kroger and implementing effective riskits shareholders, as determined by the Audit Committee in good faith in accordance with its business judgment. No director may participate in any review, approval, or ratification of any transaction if he or she, or an immediate family member, has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction.

Where a Related Person Transaction will be ongoing, the Audit Committee may establish guidelines for management policiesto follow in its ongoing dealings with the related person and controls.the Audit Committee will review and assess the relationship on an annual basis to ensure it complies with such guidelines and that the Related Person Transaction remains appropriate.

13



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides a discussionan overview of the elements and analysisphilosophy of our executive compensation program foras well as how and why the Compensation Committee and our named executive officersBoard of Directors make specific compensation decisions and policies with respect to our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”). For

Executive Summary

We delivered exceptional performance in 2022. Kroger achieved exceptional results in 2022 as we executed on our Leading with Fresh and Accelerating with Digital strategy, building on record years in 2020 and 2021. We are delivering a fresh, affordable, and seamless shopping experience for our customers, with zero compromise on quality, selection, or convenience. We are delivering on our financial commitments through our strong, resilient Value Creation Model. In 2022, we achieved financial performance results of ID sales, without fuel, of 5.6%, and adjusted FIFO operating profit, including fuel, of $5.1 billion1.
Our executive compensation program aligns with long-term shareholder value creation. 91% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and, on average, 84% of the other NEOs’ compensation is at risk and performance-based, tied to achievement of performance targets that are important to our shareholders or our long-term share price performance.
The annual performance incentive was earned above target reflecting our 2022 performance. The annual incentive program, based on a grid of identical sales, excluding fuel, and adjusted FIFO operating profit, including fuel, paid out at 192.40% of target. In light of macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, as well as the Compensation Committee’s desire to create ongoing alignment with shareholders and reward sustained performance beyond 2022, the Compensation Committee determined to structure the payout to the NEOs as follows: 150% in cash and the remaining 42.4% in restricted stock vesting in one year.  
The long-term performance incentive payout reflects alignment with performance over fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022. Long-term performance unit equity awards granted in 2020 and tied to commitments made to our investors and other stakeholders regarding long-term sales growth, adjusted FIFO operating profit growth, free cash flow generation, our commitment to Fresh, and Relative Total Shareholder Return were earned at 93.75% of target.
We prioritized investment in our people. We strive to create a culture of opportunity for nearly 430,000 associates and take seriously our role as a leading employer in the United States. In 2022, we invested more than ever in our associates by continuing to raise our average hourly wage to $18, or over $23, including industry-leading benefits.
In response to our shareholder feedback, we incorporated an ESG metric focused on diversity and inclusion into our 2022 individual performance management program. Our core values of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion are incorporated into compensation decisions made for our associates who supervise a team of others, which range from store department leaders through our NEOs. These performance goals are factored into compensation decisions for these leaders, including salary increases and the amount of the annual grant of equity awards.

1 See pages 27 – 33 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2015 fiscal year ended January 30, 2016,28, 2023, filed with the NEOs were:SEC on March 28, 2023, for a reconciliation of GAAP operating profit to adjusted FIFO operating profit.


Our Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2022

Name Title
W. Rodney McMullenChairman and Chief Executive Officer
J. Michael SchlotmanGary Millerchip ExecutiveSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Michael J. DonnellyStuart W. AitkenExecutiveSenior Vice President ofand Chief Merchandising & Marketing Officer
Christopher T. HjelmYael CossetExecutiveSenior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Frederick J. Morganthall IITimothy A. MassaExecutiveSenior Vice President of Retail Operationsand Chief People Officer

Messrs. Schlotman, Donnelly, Hjelm

Fiscal 2022 Financial and Morganthall were each promotedStrategic Performance Highlights

Driven by our unwavering purpose to Feed the positionHuman Spirit, Kroger achieved exceptional results in 2022 as we executed on our Leading with Fresh and Accelerating with Digital strategy, building on record years in 2020 and 2021. Our associates are customer-focused, delivering the products customers want, when and how they want them, with zero compromise on quality, convenience, and selection.

In 2022, we achieved financial performance results of Executive Vice President effective September 1, 2015.

Executive Compensation in Context: Our Growth Plan, Financial Strategy and Fiscal Year 2015 Results

Kroger’s growth plan includes four key performance indicators: positive identical supermarketID sales, without fuel, (“ID Sales”) growth, slightly expanding non-fuel first in, first out (“FIFO”) operating margin, growing return on invested capital (“ROIC”)of 5.6%, and annual market share growth.adjusted FIFO operating profit of $5.1 billion. We have built a digital platform that offers a seamless shopping experience, allowing customers to shift effortlessly between store, pickup and delivery solutions. In 2015,2022, we met or exceededincreased delivery sales, opened new customer fulfilment centers, increased digitally engaged households, and grew loyalty as our goalscustomers more deeply engaged with personalized coupons and fuel rewards.

Our associates enable our success, and we are committed to investing in theirs by continuing to improve wages, comprehensive benefits, and career development opportunities. We invested approximately $600 million in incremental wages in 2022, for eacha total of $1.9 billion in incremental investments since 2018.

Continued strategic efforts to streamline our operations allowed us to achieve cost savings greater than $1 billion for the fifth consecutive year to balance these performance indicators:investments without compromising food affordability for our customers across our communities.

ID Sales.ID Sales increased 5.0% from 2014. Through 2015, we have achieved 49 consecutivequarters of positive ID Sales growth.
ROIC.Our ROIC for 2015 was 13.93%, compared to 13.76% for 2014, excluding Roundy’s (acquiredin December 2015).
Non-Fuel FIFO Operating Margin.We exceeded our commitment to slightly expand FIFO operatingmargin, excluding fuel and Roundy’s on a rolling four quarters basis.
Market Share.Our market share grew for an eleventh consecutive year.
Other highlights of the year include:
Net earnings per diluted share were $2.06.
We exceeded our long-term, net earnings per diluted share growth rate of 8-11% in 2015.
We reduced operating costs excluding fuel as a percentage of sales for the eleventh consecutive year.
Also during 2015, we met all of our objectives with regard to our financial strategy:
Maintain our current investment grade debt rating.Our net total debt to adjusted EBITDA ratiodecreased, even while investing approximately $870 million in our merger with Roundy’s late inthe year.
Repurchase shares. In 2015, we repurchased $703 million in Kroger common shares.
Fund the dividend. We returned $385 million to shareholders through our dividend in 2015, and weincreased our dividend for the ninth consecutive year since we reinstated our dividend in 2006.
Increase capital investments. Our 2015 cash flow generation was strong, allowing us to make$3.3 billion in capital investments during the year, excluding mergers, acquisitions and purchases ofleased facilities.

The compensation

As part of our NEOsZero Hunger | Zero Waste social and environmental impact plan, in 2015 reflects Kroger’s short-term2022, we donated nearly 600 million meals to feed families across America.

Our proven go-to-market strategy enables us to successfully navigate many operating environments. We believe that by delivering value for our customers, investing in our associates and long-term goalsserving our communities, we will continue to achieve attractive and outcomes. Totalsustainable total returns for our shareholders.

2022 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation and Shareholder Engagement

At the 2022 annual meeting, we held our annual advisory vote on executive compensation. Approximately 92% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory vote. As part of our ongoing dialogue with our shareholders regarding governance matters, in 2022, we requested meetings with 32 shareholders representing 49% of our outstanding shares during proxy season and off-season engagement and 7 shareholders representing 24% of our outstanding shares accepted our invitation to share feedback. Some investors we contacted either did not respond or confirmed that a discussion was not needed at that time.

Conversations in these meetings included discussions about our NEO’s compensation forprogram, with our shareholders providing feedback that they appreciated the year is an indicatorpay-for-performance structure of our executive pay program. The Compensation Committee considers both the general and specific feedback received from shareholders, and with the guidance of our independent compensation consultant, incorporates that input into pay design.

During shareholder engagement, we specifically discuss our shareholders’ perspectives on ESG metrics in executive compensation programs. Our investors are all supportive of companies’ decisions to incorporate ESG metrics, but none are prescriptive about how well Kroger performed comparedto do so. Our investors share our view that a range of ESG matters are essential to our business plan, reflecting howcurrent and future success, and acknowledge that ESG priorities are embedded into our compensation program respondsstrategic and operational priorities. Management collects and reports the feedback to business challengesthe Compensation Committee, and the marketplace.Committee decided, beginning in 2022, to integrate our core values of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion into compensation decisions made for our associates who supervise a team of others, which range from store department leaders through our NEOs. Specifically, one of several performance goals established for these associates and senior officers relate to improvement in the Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion category score as measured by our annual Associate Insights Survey and active mentorship and development of at least one other associate with a different background. These performance goals are factored into compensation decisions for these associates and senior officers, including salary increases and the amount of the annual grant of equity awards, consistent with our program design as described herein.

14



Summary of Key

2022 Compensation PracticesProgram Overview

What we do:What we do not do:

Align pay and performance
Significant share ownership guidelines of 5x salary for our CEO
Multiple performance metrics under our short- and long-term performance-based plans discourage excessive risk taking
Balance between short-term and long-term compensation discourages short-term risk taking at the expense of long-term results
Engagement of an independent compensation consultant
Robust clawback policy
Ban on hedging and pledging of Kroger securities
Limited perquisites
×No employment contracts with executives
×No special severance or change of control programs applicable only to executive officers
×No gross-up payments were made to executives under Kroger plans
×No re-pricing or backdating of options
×No guaranteed salary increases or bonuses
×No payment of dividends or dividend equivalents until performance units are earned
×No single-trigger cash severance benefits upon a change in control

Summary of Fixed and At-Risk Pay Elements

The fixed and at-risk pay elements of the NEO compensation program are reflected in the following table and charts.

Fiscal Year 2022 CEO Compensation

The Compensation Committee establishes Mr. McMullen’s target direct compensation such that only 9% of his compensation is fixed. The remaining 91% of target compensation is at-risk, meaning that the actual compensation Mr. McMullen receives will depend on the extent to which the Company achieves the performance metrics set by the Compensation Committee, and with respect to all of the equity vehicles, the future value of Kroger common shares.

The table below compares fiscal 2022 to 2021 target direct compensation. Target total direct compensation is a more accurate reflection of how the Compensation Committee benchmarks and establishes CEO compensation than the disclosure provided in the Summary Compensation Table, which includes a combination of actual base salaries and annual incentive compensation earned in the fiscal year, the grant date fair market value of at-risk equity compensation to be earned in future fiscal years, and the actuarial value of future pension benefits.

Increases to Mr. McMullen’s pay elements shown below were based on our independent compensation consultant’s examination of pay levels and the Committee’s intention to achieve median pay levels among our peer group. Target total compensation, which is the sum of target annual compensation and target long term compensation is positioned around market median.


($000s)

   Annual  Long-Term      
Year  Salary  Target
Annual
Incentive
  Total
Annual
  Performance
Units
  Restricted
Stock
  Stock
Options
  Total
LTI
  Target
TDC
  Increase
2022   1,400   2,800   4,200   5,750   3,450   2,300   11,500   15,700  +5.6%
2021   1,355   2,500   3,855   5,500   3,300   2,200   11,000   14,855   

CEO and Named Executive Officer Target Pay Mix

The amounts used in the charts below are based on the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2015, excluding the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column.

FixedAt-Risk
‹—————————— Annual ————————————›‹—————— Long-Term ——————›
PayBase SalaryAll OtherAnnual CashLong-TermRestricted Stock
ElementCompensationBonusCash Bonus andand Stock Options
Performance Units(time-based
(the “Long-Termequity awards)
Incentive Plan”)

Description

Fixed cash compensation
Reviewed annually
No automatic or guaranteed increases
Insurance premiums paid by the Company
Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock
Matching and automatic contributions to defined contribution benefit plans
Variable cash compensation
Payout depends on actual performance against annually established goals
Variable compensation payable as long-term cash bonus and performance units
3-year performance period
Payout depends on actual performance against established goals
Stock options vest over 5 years
Exercise price of stock options is closing price on day of grant
Restricted stock vests over 3 or 5 years

15



FixedAt-Risk
‹———————————— Annual ———————————›‹—————— Long-Term ——————›

Purpose

Provide a base level of cash compensation
Recognize individual performance, scope of responsibility and experience
Provide benefits competitive with peers
Metrics and targets align with annual business goals
Rewards and incentivizes approximately 13,000 Kroger employees, including NEOs, for annual performance on key financial and operational measures
Metrics and targets align with long-term business strategy
Rewards and incentivizes approximately 160 key employees, including the NEOs, for long-term performance on key financial and operational measures
Drives sustainable performance that ties to long-term value creation for shareholders
Retain executive talent
Align the interests of executives with long-term shareholder value
Provide2022 target total direct alignment to stock price appreciation

CEO

87% of CEO pay is At Risk

Average of Other NEOs


82% of Other NEO pay is At Risk

CEO

68% of CEO pay is Long-Term

Average of Other NEOs


68% of Other NEO pay is Long-Term

16



CEO

60% of CEO pay is Equity

Average of Other NEOs

55% of Other NEO pay is Equity

The following discussion and analysis addresses the compensation of the NEOs and the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in setting compensation for the NEOsCEO and in the caseaverage of other NEOs. As illustrated below, 91% of the CEO’s target total direct compensation making recommendationsis at-risk. On average, 84% of the other NEOs’ compensation is at risk.

  

*Total exceeds 100% due to the independent directors. Additional detail is provided in the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosures that follow this discussion and analysis.rounding.

Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

As one of the largest retailers in the world, our

Our executive compensation philosophy is to attract and retain the best management talent and toas well as motivate these employeesassociates to achieve our business and financial goals. Kroger’s incentive plans are designed to reward the actions that lead to long-term value creation. We believe our strategy creates value for shareholders in a manner consistent with Kroger’s purpose: To Feed the Human Spirit. The Compensation Committee believes that there is a strong link between our business strategy, the performance metrics in our short-term and long-term incentive programs, and the business results that drive shareholder value.

We believe our strategy creates value for shareholders in a manner consistent with our focus on our core values: honesty, integrity, respect, inclusion, diversity and safety.

To achieve our objectives, the Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that compensation is competitive and that there is a direct link between pay and performance. To do so, it is guided by the following principles:

Compensation must be designed to attract and retain those individuals who are best suited to be an NEO at Kroger.

A significant portion of pay should be performance-based, with the percentage of total pay tied to performance increasing proportionally with an executive’sNEO’s level of responsibility.

Compensation should include incentive-based pay to drive performance, providing superior pay for superior performance, including both a short- and long-term focus.

Compensation policies should include an opportunity for, and a requirement of, significant equity ownership to align the interests of executivesNEOs and shareholders.

Components of compensation should be tied to an evaluation of business and individual performance measured against metrics that directly drive our business strategy.

The strategy and progress toward our corporate ESG priorities.

Compensation Committee has three related objectives regarding compensation:
plans should provide a direct line of sight to company performance.

 

Compensation programs should be aligned with market practices.

Compensation programs should serve to both motivate and retain talent.


Summary of Key Compensation Practices

What we do:What we do not do:

      Alignment of pay and performance 

      Stock ownership guidelines for executives

     Multiple performance metrics under our short- and long-term performance-based plans discourage excessive risk taking and align with our long-term value creation strategy

      Double-trigger change in control provisions in all equity awards

      Double-trigger change in control provisions in cash severance benefits

      All long-term compensation is equity-based

      Engagement of an independent compensation consultant

      Robust clawback policy

      Ban on hedging, pledging, and short sales of Kroger securities

      Minimal perquisites

First, the Compensation Committee believes that compensation must×      No employment contracts with executive officers

×      No special severance or change in control programs applicable only to executive officers

×      No cash component in long-term incentive plans

×      No tax gross-up payments for executives

×      No special executive life insurance benefit

×      No re-pricing or backdating of stock options without shareholder approval

×      No guaranteed salary increases or bonuses

×      No payment of dividends or dividend equivalents until performance units are earned

×      No evergreen or reload feature; no shares can be designedadded to attract and retain those best suited to fulfill the challenging roles that officers play at Kroger.

Second, a majority of compensation should help align the interests of our officers with the interests of our shareholders.

Third, compensation should create strong incentives for the officers to achieve the annual businessstock plan targets established by the Board, and to achieve Kroger’s long-term strategic objectives.without shareholder approval

17



Components

Establishing Each Component of Executive Compensation at Kroger

The Compensation for our NEOs is comprisedCommittee recommends, and the independent members of the following:Board determine, each component of the CEO’s compensation. The CEO recommends, and the Compensation Committee determines, each component of the other NEOs’ compensation. The Compensation Committee and the Board made changes to compensation in March of 2022. Equity awards were granted in March and salary and annual incentive plan increases were effective April 1, 2022.

Annual Compensation:
Salary
Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus
Long-Term Compensation:
Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan (consisting of a long-term cash bonus andperformance units)
Non-qualified stock options
Restricted stock

Retirement and other benefits

●    Limited perquisites

The Compensation Committee determines the amount of each NEO’s salary, annual cash incentive plan target, and long-term performance-basedequity compensation awards described herein were made pursuant to our 2011 Long-Term Incentiveby taking into consideration numerous factors including:

An assessment of individual contribution and performance;
Benchmarking with comparable positions at peer group companies;
Level in organization and tenure in role; and
Internal equity among executives.

The assessment of individual contribution and Cash Bonus Planperformance is a qualitative determination, based on the following factors:

Leadership;
Contribution to the executive officer group;
Achievement of established performance objectives;
Decision-making abilities;
Performance of the areas or groups directly reporting to the NEO;
Support of company culture;
Strategic thinking; and
Demonstrated commitment to Kroger’s Values: Safety, Honesty, Integrity, Respect, Diversity, and Inclusion, including improvement in the DE&I category score as measured by our annual Associate Insights Survey and active mentorship and development of at least one other associate with a different background.

At the end of each year, individual performance is evaluated based on the NEO’s performance objectives listed above, and our 2014 Long-Term Incentivethe results of that evaluation are used in the determination of salary increases and Cash Bonus Plan, eachthe grant amount of all annual equity awards: restricted stock and stock options, which was approved by our shareholders in 2011are time-based, and 2014, respectively.performance units granted under the long-term incentive plan, which are performance- based.

Annual


Elements of Compensation

Salary

Our philosophy with respect to salary is to provide a sufficient and stable source of fixed cash compensation. All of our compensation cannot be at-risk or long-term. Itthat is important to provide a meaningful annual salarycompetitive with the market to attract and retain a high caliber leadership team,team. NEO salaries, effective April 1, 2021 and to have an appropriate level of cash compensation that is not variable.April 1, 2022 were as follows:

Salaries for the NEOs (with the exception of the CEO) are established each year by the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the CEO. The CEO’s salary is established by the independent directors. Salaries for the NEOs are reviewed annually in June.

The amount of each NEO’s salary is influenced by numerous factors including:

An assessment of individual contribution in the judgment of the CEO and the CompensationCommittee (or, in the case of the CEO, of the Compensation Committee and the rest of theindependent directors);
Benchmarking with comparable positions at peer group companies;
Tenure in role; and
Relationship to other Kroger executives’ salaries.

The assessment of individual contribution is a qualitative determination, based on the following factors:

Leadership;
Contribution to the officer group;
Achievement of established objectives, to the extent applicable;
Decision-making abilities;
Performance of the areas or groups directly reporting to the officer;
Increased responsibilities;
Strategic thinking; and
Furtherance of Kroger’s core values.

18



The amounts shown below reflect the salaries of the NEOs effective at the end of each fiscal year.

Salary
2013     2014     2015
W. Rodney McMullen(1)$1,100,000$1,200,000$1,240,000
J. Michael Schlotman(2)$735,000$760,000$840,000
Michael J. Donnelly(2)$643,560$662,900$750,000
Christopher T. Hjelm(2)(3)$700,000
Frederick J. Morganthall II(2)(3)$670,000
____________________

(1)Mr. McMullen was named CEO of Kroger as of January 1, 2014 and Chairman of the Board as of January 1, 2015.
(2)Messrs. Schlotman, Donnelly, Hjelm and Morganthall were each promoted to the position of Executive Vice President effective September 1, 2015.
(3)Messrs. Hjelm and Morganthall became NEOs in 2015.
Name 2021 Base Salary  2022 Base Salary 
W. Rodney McMullen $1,355,000  $1,400,000 
Gary Millerchip $750,000  $825,000 
Stuart W. Aitken $885,000  $925,000 
Yael Cosset $750,000  $825,000 
Timothy A. Massa $800,000  $850,000 

2022 Annual Compensation – Performance-Based Annual Cash BonusIncentive Plan

The NEOs along with approximately 13,000 of their fellow Kroger associates, participate in a corporate performance-based annual cash bonusincentive plan. Approximately 7,000 of those associates are eligible for the same plan as the NEOs. The remaining associates are eligible for an annual cash bonus plan of which 40% is based on the Kroger corporate plan and 60% is based on the metrics and targets for their respective supermarket division or operating unit of the Company.

Over time, the Compensation Committee and our independent directors have placed an increased emphasis on our strategic plan by making the targets more difficult to achieve. The annual cash bonus plan is structured to encourage high levels of performance. A threshold level of performance must be achieved before any payouts are earned, while a payout of up to 200% of target can be achieved for superior performance.

The amountvalue of annual cash bonusincentive awards that the NEOs earn each year is based upon Kroger’s overall company performance compared to targetsgoals established by the Compensation Committee and the independent directors based on the business plan adopted by the Board of Directors.

A minimum level of performance must be achieved before any payout is earned, while a payout of up to 210% of target incentive potential can be achieved for superior performance on the corporate plan metrics. There are no guaranteed or minimum payouts; if none of the performance goals are achieved, then none of the incentive amount is earned, and no payout is made.

The annual cash bonusincentive plan is designed to encourage decisions and behavior that drive the annual operating results and the long-term success of the Company. Kroger’s success is based on a combination of factors, and accordingly the Compensation Committee believes that it is important to encourage behavior that supports multiple elements of our business strategy.

Establishing Annual Cash Bonus Potentials

The Compensation Committee establishescorporate annual cash bonusincentive plan is a broad-based plan used across the Kroger enterprise. Approximately 53,000 associates are eligible to receive incentive payouts based all or in part on the incentive plan described below.

NEO target incentive potentials for each NEO, other than the CEO, whose annual cash bonus potential is established by the independent directors. Actual payouts, which can exceed 100% of the potential amounts but may not exceed 200% of the potential amounts, represent the extent to which performance meets or exceeds the goals established by the Compensation Committee. Actual payouts may befiscal years 2021 and 2022, were as low as zero if performance does not meet the goals established by the Compensation Committee.follows:

The Compensation Committee considers multiple factors in making its determination or recommendation as to annual cash bonus potentials:

Name 2021 Target Annual Incentive  2022 Target Annual Incentive 
W. Rodney McMullen $2,500,000  $2,800,000 
Gary Millerchip $825,000  $850,000 
Stuart W. Aitken $825,000  $850,000 
Yael Cosset $825,000  $850,000 
Timothy A. Massa $650,000  $775,000 


2022 Annual Incentive Plan Metrics

MetricThe individual’s level within the organization, as the Compensation Committee believes that moresenior executives should have a more substantial part of their compensation dependent uponKroger’s performance;
The individual’s salary, as the Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of aNEO’s total cash compensation should be dependent upon Kroger’s performance;

19



The officer’s level in the organization and the internal relationship of annual cash bonus potentialswithin Kroger;
Individual performance;
The recommendation of the CEO for all NEOs other than the CEO; and
The compensation consultant’s benchmarking report regarding annual cash bonus potential andtotal compensation awarded by our peer group.

The annual cash bonus potential in effect at the end of the fiscal year for each NEO is shown below. Actual annual cash bonus payouts are prorated to reflect changes, if any, to bonus potentials during the year.

Annual Cash Bonus Potential
2013     2014     2015
W. Rodney McMullen(1)$1,500,000$1,600,000$1,650,000
J. Michael Schlotman(2)$550,000 $550,000 $600,000
Michael J. Donnelly(2)$425,000$550,000$600,000
Christopher T. Hjelm(2)(3)$600,000
Frederick J. Morganthall II(2)(3)$600,000
____________________

(1)Mr. McMullen was named CEO of Kroger as of January 1, 2014 and Chairman of the Board as of January 1, 2015.
(2)Messrs. Schlotman, Donnelly, Hjelm and Morganthall were each promoted to the position of Executive Vice President effective September 1, 2015.
(3)Messrs. Hjelm and Morganthall became NEOs in 2015.

Annual Cash Bonus Plan Metrics and Connection to our Business Plan

The annual cash bonus plan has the following measurable performance metrics, all of which are interconnected, and individually necessary to sustain our business model and achieve our growth strategy:

MetricWeightRationale for Use

ID Sales

and Profit Grid, maximum payout of 200%

30%

ID Sales, excluding Fuel

●  Identical Sales (“ID Sales”) represent sales, withoutexcluding fuel, at our supermarketsthat have been open without expansion or relocation for fivefull quarters.

five full quarters, excluding supermarket fuel sales, plus sales growth at all other customer-facing non-supermarket businesses.

We believe this isthat ID Sales are the best measure of the real growth ofourof our sales across the enterprise. A key driver of our model isstrongis ID Sales; it is the engine that fuels ourSales growth.

EBITDA withoutAdjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including Fuel(1)

30%●  This financial metric equals gross profit, excluding the LIFO charge, minus OG&A, minus rent, and minus depreciation and amortization.

EBITDA  Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including fuel, is an important way for us to evaluatea key measure of company success as it tracks our earningsfrom operatingoperations, and it measures our day-to-day operational effectiveness. It is a useful measure to investors because it reflects the business; we cannot achieve solidEBITDA withoutrevenue and expense that a strong operating model. This is one of theclosest measures we have for how much cash our businessgenerates after operating expenses.

Unlike earnings per share, whichcompany can be affected bymanagement decisions on share buybacks, this measureof earnings is relevant for allcontrol.

Kicker, worth an additional 10%
E-commerce Kicker

●  E-commerce sales are key drivers of our approximately 13,000associates who are eligible for the annual cash bonus plan.


20



MetricWeightRationale for Use

Customer 1st Strategy

30%

Kroger’s Customer 1stStrategyoverall digital strategy – meeting customers where and how they choose to shop. E-commerce is the focus, in alla key component of Kroger’sdecision-making, on the customer. The “Four Keys”our strategic pillar ofKroger’s Customer 1stStrategy are People, Products,Shopping Experience and Price.
Seamless.

This proprietary metric measures the improvement in howKroger is perceived by customers in each of the Four Keys.

Annual cash bonus payout is based on certain elements ofthe Customer 1stPlan,  Up to highlight annual objectives that areintended to receive the most focused attention in that year.

Total Operating Costs as a Percentage of Sales, without Fuel(2)

10%

An essential part of Kroger’s model is to increaseproductivity and efficiency, and to take costs out of thebusiness in a sustainable way.
We strive to be disciplined, so that as the Company grows,expenses are properly managed.

Total of 4 Metrics

100%

Fuel Bonus

5% “Kicker”

Anan additional 5%10% is earned if Kroger achieves threecertain pre-determined goalswith respect to its supermarket fuel operations: targeted fuelEBITDA, an increase in total gallons sold, and additionalfuel centers placed in service.
The fuel bonus was added to the annual cash bonus planas an incentive to encourage the addition of fuel centersat a faster rate, while maintaining fuel EBITDA and fuelgallon growth.
The fuel bonus of 5% is only available if all three measuresare met. If any of the three fuel goals are not met, no portionof the fuel bonus is earned.
e-commerce sales.


(1)EBITDA is calculated as operating profit plus depreciation and amortization, excluding fuel and consolidated variable interest entities.
(2)Total Operating Costs is calculated as the sum of (i) operating, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, and rent expense, without fuel, and (ii) warehouse and transportation costs, shrink, and advertising expenses, for our supermarket operations, without fuel.

The use of these four

Potential payouts under the plan are based on Company performance on two primary metrics, creates checks and balances on the various behaviors and decisions that impact the long-term success of the Company. The ID Sales, EBITDA without fuelexcluding Fuel, and Customer 1st Strategy metricsAdjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including Fuel. The performance objectives are weighted equally to highlight the need to simultaneously achieve all three metrics in order to maintain our growth.

We aligned the weighting of ID Sales and EBITDA without fuel metrics to emphasize sales growth balanced with the focus on profit. Kroger’s business is not sustainable if we merely increase our ID Sales, but do not have a corresponding increase in earnings. Furthermore, payoutsshown in the ID Sales and EBITDA without fuel segments are interrelated. Achieving the goalgrids below, with payouts interpolated for both the ID Sales and EBITDA without fuel results in a higher percentage payout on both elements. Achieving the target on one, but not the other will limit the payout percentage on both.actual performance between levels.

By supporting the Customer 1st Strategy and the Four Keys, we will better connect with our customers. Our unique competitive advantage is our ability to deliver on the Four Keys, which are the items that matter most to our customers, and it is that multi-faceted achievement that we believe drives our ID Sales growth.

As we strive to achieve our aggressive growth targets, we also continuously aim to reduce our operating costs as a percentage of sales, without fuel. Productivity improvements and other reductions in operating costs allow us to reduce costs in areas that do not matter to our customers so that we can

21



invest money in the areas that matter the most to our customers, like the Four Keys. We carefully manage operating cost reductions to ensure a consistent delivery of the customer experience. This again shows the need to have multiple metrics, to create checks and balances on the various behavior and decisions that are influenced by the design of the bonus plan.

Results of 2015 Annual Cash Bonus Plan

The 2015 goals established by the Compensation Committee the actual 2015 results and the bonus percentage earned for each of the performance metrics of the annual cash bonus plan were as follows:

Actual
Performance
GoalsCompared toAmount
        TargetActualTargetWeightEarned
Performance MetricsMinimum(100%)    Performance(1)    (A)    (B)    (A) x (B)
ID Sales2.1%4.1%5.0%134.3%30%40.3%
EBITDA without Fuel$4.4384$5.2217$5.2351
 BillionBillionBillion126.3%(2)30%37.9%
Customer 1stStrategy(3)****30%39.0%
OverOverOver45.0%10%4.5%
Total Operating Costs asbudget bybudget bybudget by
      Percentage of Sales,25 basis5 basis16 basis
      without Fuel(4)pointspointspoints
0%5.0%
Fuel Bonus(5)[As described in the footnote below]  or 5%
Total Earned126.7%
____________________

ID Sales, excluding Fuel and Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including Fuel

    ID Sales, excluding Fuel 
    0%  1.5%  3.0%  4.5%  6.0% 
  ≥3,934  0   14   20   29   40 
Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, ≥4,134  20   65   80   95   115 
including Fuel ($ in millions) ≥4,334  40   85   100   115   160 
  ≥4,534  70   105   120   135   180 
  ≥4,734  110   125   140   170   200 


2022 Annual Incentive Plan – Actual Results and Payout Percentage

(1)Corporate Plan Metric Actual performance results exclude Roundy’s because the merger occurred after the performance goals were established.2022 Performance(1)
Payout 
(2)Identical Sales, excluding fuelUnder the terms of the plan, if ID Sales results exceed the target and EBITDA results exceed the target, then the payout percentage for reaching the EBITDA target is 125% rather than 100%.
5.62% 
(3)Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including fuel$5.08B192.40%
Ecommerce Total Sales Kicker(2)0%
Total Payout192.40%

The Customer 1stStrategy component also(1)See grid above.

(2)Up to an additional 10% would have been earned if Kroger had achieved a certain goal with respect to e-commerce. That challenging goal was established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the year, but was not achieved. The goal is not disclosed asbecause it is competitively sensitive.
(4)Total Operating Costs without fuel were budgeted at 26.07% as a percentage of sales for fiscal year 2015.
(5)An additional 5% is earned if Kroger achieves three goals with respect to its supermarket fuel operations: achievement of the targeted fuel EBITDA of $242 million, an increase in total gallons sold of 3%,and achievement of 50 additional fuel centers placed in service. Actual results were: fuel EBITDA of $450 million; an increase in total gallons sold of 8.53%; and 57 additional fuel centers placed in service.

Following the close of the 2022 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviewed Kroger’s performance against each of the metrics outlined above and determined the extent to which Kroger achieved those objectives. The Compensation Committee believes our management produced outstanding results in 2015, measured against increasingly aggressive business plan objectives. Due to ourOur performance when compared to the goals established by the Compensation Committee and based onresulted in a payout of 192.40% of the businessparticipant’s incentive plan adopted by the Board,target for the NEOs, and all other participants inwith the exception of Mr. Aitken.

Mr. Aitken’s annual bonus payout equaled 190.98% of his bonus potential because it included the corporate annual cash bonus plan earned 126.7% of their bonus potentials.

In 2015,described above and a team metric as infollows. The merchandising team metric measured supermarket ID sales excluding pharmacy and fuel, and supermarket selling gross dollars less shrink dollars for all years, thedepartments excluding pharmacy and fuel.

  Payout Percentage  Weight 
Corporate Annual Bonus Plan  192.40%  60%
Merchandising Team Metric  188.86%  40%
Total Earned  (192.40% x 0.6) + (188.86% x 0.4%) = 190.98% 

The Compensation Committee retained discretionmaintains the ability to reduce the annual cash bonusincentive payout for all executive officers, including the NEOs, and the independent directors retain that discretion for the CEO’s incentive payout if the Compensation Committee determinedthey determine for any reason that the bonusincentive payouts were not appropriate given their assessment of Company or individual performance. The independent directors retained that discretion for the CEO’s bonus. The Compensation Committee and the independent directors also retained discretion to adjust the goals for each metric

22



under the plan should unanticipated developments arise during the year. No adjustments were made to the goalsincentive payout amount in 2015.2022. The annual incentive plan is typically an all-cash plan. While performance was achieved at 192.40%, in light of macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, as well as the Compensation Committee’s desire to create ongoing alignment with shareholders and reward sustained performance beyond 2022, the Compensation Committee determined to structure the payout to the NEOs as follows: 150% in cash and the independent directorsremaining 42.4% (41.0% for Mr. Aitken) in the case of the CEO, determined that the annual cash bonus payouts earned appropriately reflected the Company’s strong performancerestricted stock vesting in 2015 and therefore should not be adjusted.

The actual annual cash bonus percentage payout for 2015 represented excellent performance that exceeded our business plan objectives, with the exception of operating costs as a percentage of sales, without fuel. The strong link between pay and performance is illustrated by a comparison of earned amounts under our annual cash bonus plan in previous years, such as 2009, 2010 and 2012, when payouts were less than 100%. In those years, we did not achieve all of our business plan objectives.A comparison of actual annual cash bonus percentage payouts in prior years demonstrates the variability of annual cash bonus incentive compensation and its strong link to our performance:one year.

Annual Cash Bonus
Fiscal Year     Payout Percentage
2015126.7%
2014121.5%
2013104.9%
201285.9%
2011138.7%
2010 53.9%
200938.5%
2008104.9%
2007128.1%
2006141.1%

As described above, the corporate annual cash bonusincentive payout percentage is applied to each NEO’s bonus potential,incentive plan target which is determined by the Compensation Committee, and the independent directors in the case of the CEO. The actual amounts of performance-based annual cash bonusesincentive paid to the NEOs for 20152022 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column and footnote 4 to that table.the “Stock Awards” column.

Long-Term Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee believes in the importance of providing an incentive to the NEOs to achieve the long-term goals established by the Board. As such, a majority of NEO compensation is conditioneddependent on the achievement of the Company’s long-term goals and is delivered via four long-term compensation vehicles: long-term cash bonus, performance units, stock options and restricted stock.those goals. Long-term compensation promotes long-term value creation and discourages the over-emphasis of attaining short-term goals at the expense of long-term growth.

The Compensation Committee considers several factors in determining the target value of long-term compensation awarded to the NEOs or, in the case of the CEO, recommending to the independent directors the amount awarded. These factors include:

The compensation consultant’s benchmarking report regarding long-term compensation awarded by our peer group;

The officer’s level in the organization and the internal relationship of long-term compensation awards within Kroger;

Individual performance; and
The recommendation of the CEO, for all NEOs other than the CEO.

23



Long-term incentives areincentive program is structured to be a combination of performance- and time-based compensation that reflects elements of financial and stockcommon share performance to provide both retention value and alignment with company performance. Long-term cash bonusThe Compensation Committee determined that all long-term compensation would be equity-based as follows: 50% of equity granted under the program would be performance-based and performance unit payouts are contingent on the achievementremaining 50% of certain strategic performance and financial measures and incentivize recipients to promote long-term value creation and enhance shareholder wealth by supporting the Company’s long-term strategic goals. Stock options andequity would be time-based, consisting of 30% in restricted stock are linked toand 20% in stock performance creating alignment between executives and company shareholders. Options have no initial value and recipients only realize benefits ifoptions.


Each year, NEOs receive grants under the value of our stock increases following the date of grant.

A majority of long-term compensation program, which is equity-based (performance units, stock options, and restricted stock) and is tied to the future value of our common shares, further aligning the interests of our NEOs with our shareholders. All four components of long-term compensation are intended to focus executive behaviors on our long-term strategy. Each component is described in more detail below.structured as follows:

Amounts of long-term compensation awards issued and outstanding for the NEOs are set forth in the tables that follow this discussion and analysis.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Design

In contrast to the performance-based annual cash bonus plan, described above, which has approximately 13,000 participants, our performance-based Long-Term Incentive Plan has approximately 160 participants, including the NEOs. Each year we adopt a similar Long-Term Incentive Plan, which provides for overlapping three year performance periods. The Long-Term Incentive Plan consists of a performance-based long-term cash bonus and performance units which has the following characteristics:

ThePerformance-Based (50% of NEO long-term cash bonus potential is equal to the participant’s salary at the end of the fiscal year preceding the plan effective date (or for those participants entering the plan after the commencement date, the date of eligibility for the plan).

target compensation)

In addition,Long-term performance-based compensation is provided under a fixedLong-Term Incentive Plan adopted by the Compensation Committee. The Committee adopts a new plan every year, measuring improvement on the Company’s long-term goals over successive three-year periods. Accordingly, at any one time there are three plans outstanding, which are summarized below.

Under the Long-Term Incentive Plans, NEOs receive grants of equity called performance units. A target number of performance units based on level and individual performance is awarded to each participant at the beginning of the three-year performance period (or for those participants enteringperiod.

Payouts under the plan after the commencement date, the date of eligibility for the plan). The earned awards are paid out in Kroger common shares based on actual performance, along with a cash amount equal to the dividends paid during the performance periodcontingent on the numberachievement of issued common shares ultimately earned.

certain strategic performance and financial measures and incentivize recipients to promote long-term value creation and enhance shareholder wealth by supporting the Company’s long-term strategic goals.

The actual long-term cash bonus and number of performance units earned are each determined based on our performance against the same metrics established by the Compensation Committee (the independent directors, for the CEO) at the beginning of the performance period.

Performance at the end of the three-year period is measured against the baseline of each performance metric established at the beginning of the performance period.

The payout percentage, based on the extent to which the performance metrics are achieved, is applied to both the long-term cash bonus potential and the number of performance units awarded.

Then, a modifier based on Relative Total Shareholder Return compared to the S&P 500 is applied, which can increase or decrease the payout.

Actual payouts cannot exceed 100% ofPerformance units are paid out in Kroger common shares based on actual performance, along with dividend equivalents for the long-term cash bonus potential or 100% ofperformance period on the number of performance units awarded.

issued common shares.

Time-Based (50% of NEO long-term target compensation)

Long-term time-based compensation consists of 20% stock options and 30% restricted stock, which are linked to common share performance, creating alignment between the NEOs’ and our shareholders’ interests. Grants vest ratably over four years.

Stock options have no initial value and recipients only realize benefits if the value of our common shares increases following the date of grant, further aligning the NEOs’ and our shareholders’ interests.

Amounts of long-term compensation awards issued and outstanding for the NEOs are set forth in the Executive Compensation Tables section.

Summary of Three Long-Term Incentive Plans Outstanding During 2022

With respect to our long-term performance-based compensation, in November 2019, Kroger committed to investors an 8 – 11% Total Shareholder Return (TSR) target over time. The Compensation Committee redesigned plan metrics to align with Kroger’s long-term business plans and growth model that we communicated to shareholders. These metrics are the key elements in driving Kroger’s TSR.

The Compensation Committee anticipates adoptingadopts a new Long-Term Incentive Plan each year, measuring improvement over successivewhich provides for overlapping three-year performance periods. Each year when establishingAdditional detail regarding each of the performance metric baselinesthree plans is provided below, and percentage payouts per unita summary of improvement, the Compensation Committee considersdesign of the difficulty of achieving compounded improvement over time. During 2015, Kroger awarded 503,276 performance units to approximately 160 employees, including the NEOs.plans outstanding during 2022 is as follows:

24


 2020 – 2022 LTIP2021 – 2023 LTIP2022 – 2024 LTIP
Performance Units and Dividend EquivalentsPerformance units are equity grants which are paid out in Kroger common shares, based on actual performance at the end of the 3-year performance period, along with dividend equivalents for the performance period on the number of issued common shares ultimately earned.
Performance Metrics

●    Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons;

●    Growth in Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including Fuel

●    Cumulative Adjusted Free Cash Flow;

●    Fresh Equity metric; and

●    Relative Total Shareholder Return modifier

 

●    Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons;

●    Value Creation Metric (iTSR) Percentage

●    Fresh Equity metric; and

●    Relative Total Shareholder Return modifier

Determination of PayoutThe payout percentage, based on the extent to which the performance metrics are achieved, is applied to number of performance units awarded.
Maximum Payout125%187.5%187.5%
Payout DateMarch 2023March 2024March 2025


2020-2022 and 2021-2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics

Both the 2020 – 2022 and Connection tothe 2021-2023 Long-Term Incentive Plans have the following components which support our Business Strategylong-term business plans, each accounting for 25% of the payout calculation:

MetricRationale for UseWeighting
Customer 1stStrategyTotal Sales without Fuel + Fuel GallonsKroger’s Customer 1stStrategy isThis metric represents total revenue dollars without fuel + the focus, innumber of fuel gallons sold over the three-year term of the plan. It represents the important metric of top line growth of the business from all of Kroger’s decision-making, on the customer. The Four Keys of Kroger’s Customer 1stStrategy are People, Products, Shopping Experience and Price.channels.25%
 
This proprietaryfinancial metric measuresequals gross profit, excluding the improvement in how Kroger is perceived by customers in each of the Four Keys.LIFO charge, minus OG&A, minus rent, and minus depreciation and amortization.
 
Growth in Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including FuelLong-Term Incentive Plan payoutAdjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including fuel, is based on alla key measure of company success as it tracks our earnings from operations, and it measures our day-to-day operational effectiveness. It is a useful measure to investors because it reflects the elements of the Customer 1stStrategy,revenue and expense that a company can control. It is particularly important to maintain our top executives’ consistent focus on the entiretygrowth of the Customer 1stStrategy. This is in contrast to the annual cash bonus payout which is based on certain elements of the Customer 1stPlan, to highlight annual objectives that are intended to receive the most focused attention in that year.this financial measure over time.25%
Improvement in Associate
       Engagement
Cumulative Adjusted Free Cash Flow
Kroger measures associate engagement inAdjusted Free Cash Flow is an annual survey of associates.adjusted free cash flow measure calculated as net cash provided by operating activities minus payments for property and equipment, including payments for lease buyout, plus or minus adjustments for certain items.25%
 
This metric is included in the Long-Term Incentive Plan as an acknowledgement that our Company’s success is directly tied to our associates connecting with and serving our customers every day, whether in our stores, manufacturing plants, distribution centers or offices.
Reduction in Operating
       Costs
(1)as a Percentage of
       Sales, without Fuel
An essential part of Kroger’s model is to increase productivity and efficiency, and to take costs out of the business in a sustainable way.
We strive to be disciplined, so that as the Company grows, expenses are properly managed.
This metric is included in both the annual cash bonus plan and Long-Term Incentive Plans. Operating costs, without fuel, can be improved temporarily on an annual basis, but it is more difficult to maintain these reductions over time.
It is an important measure for the role ofbusiness because it reflects the approximately 160 employees incash left over after the Long-Term Incentive Plan to continue to reducecompany pays for operating costs as a percentage of sales,without fuel, over timeexpenses and to ensure such reductions are sustainable over the long-term. Including this metric in the Long-term Incentive Plan, incentivizes these key employees to implement policies for sustainable improvement over a long period of time.
ROIC(2)Part of our long-term growth strategy is to increase capital investments over time. We have a pipeline of high quality projects and new store openings, and we continue to increase the square footage in our fill-in markets.expenditures.
 
Fresh Equity metricWith increased capital spend,Fresh is a key element of how people decide where to shop. It drives trips and therefore delivers business results. Fresh is the core focus of how we differentiate and drive great engagement with customers and it is essential that we achieve the proper returns onwill be a key driver of our investments.growth.25%

After the calculation of the four metrics above, a modifier based on Relative Total Shareholder Return compared to the S&P 500 will be applied which can increase or decrease the payout, as follows, interpolated for actual results between thresholds:

TSR Relative to S&P 500Modifier 
This measure is intended to hold executives accountable for the returns on the increased capital investments.

(1)25th percentile Operating Costs is calculated as the sum of (i) operating, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, and rent expense, without fuel, and (ii) warehouse and transportation costs, shrink, and advertising expenses, for our supermarket operations, without fuel. Operating costs will exclude one-time expenses incurred in lieu of future anticipated obligations. Future expenses that are avoided by virtue of the incurrence of the one-time expense will be deemed to be total operating expenses in the year in which they otherwise would have been incurred.75%

25



(2)50th percentile Return on invested capital is calculated by dividing adjusted operating profit for the prior four quarters by the average invested capital. Adjusted operating profit is calculated by excluding certain items included in operating profit, and adding our LIFO charge, depreciation and amortization, and rent. Average invested capital will be calculated as the sum of (i) the average of our total assets, (ii) the average LIFO reserve, (iii) the average accumulated depreciation and amortization, and (iv) a rent factor equal to total rent for the last four quarters multiplied by a factor of eight; minus  (i)the average taxes receivable, (ii) the average trade accounts payable, (iii) the average accrued salaries and wages, and (iv) the average other current liabilities, excluding accrued income taxes.100%

The following table summarizes the Long-Term Incentive Plans adopted for the years shown:

75th percentile 2013 Plan1252014 Plan2015 Plan
Performance Period2013 to 20152014 to 20162015 to 2017
Payout DateMarch 2016March 2017March 2018
Long-term CashSalary at end ofSalary at end ofSalary at end of
     Bonus Potentialfiscal year 2012*fiscal year 2013*fiscal year 2014*
Performance Metrics
Customer 1stStrategy2% payout per unit2% payout per unit4% payout per unit
improvementimprovementimprovement
Improvement in Associate4% payout per unit4% payout per unit4% payout per unit
     Engagementimprovementimprovementimprovement
Reduction in Operating Cost as a0.50% payout per0.50% payout per0.50% payout per
     Percentage of Sales,0.01% reduction0.01% reduction0.01% reduction
     without Fuelin operating costsin operating costsin operating costs
Baseline: 26.69%Baseline: 26.68%Baseline: 26.41%
ROIC1% payout per1% payout per1% payout per
0.01% improvement0.01% improvement0.01% improvement
in ROICin ROICin ROIC
Baseline: 13.27%Baseline: 13.29%Baseline: 13.76%%
____________________

*Or date of plan entry, if later.

The Compensation Committee has made adjustmentspayout percentage, as modified by the Relative TSR modifier, will be applied to the percentage payouts for the componentsnumber of the Long-Term Incentive Plans over time to account for the increasing difficulty of achieving compounded improvement.

During 2015, Kroger awarded 503,276 performance units granted under the plan to approximately 160 employees, includingdetermine the NEOs.

26



Results of 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

payout amount. The 2013maximum payout under the 2020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan which measured improvements overis 125% and the three year period from 2013 to 2015, paid out in March 2016maximum payout under the 2021-2023 Long Term Incentive Plan is 187.5% as further described below.


2020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan – Results and was calculatedPayout

The results and payout of the 2020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan are as follows:follows.

Payout perPercentage
ImprovementImprovementEarned
Metric     Baseline     Result(1)     (A)     (B)     (A) x (B)
Customer 1st12 units of          
     Strategy(2)**improvement2.00%24.00%
Improvement
     in Associate2 units of
     Engagement(2)**improvement4.00%8.00%
Reduction in Operating
     Cost as a Percentage56 basis point
     of Sales, without Fuel26.69%26.13%improvement0.50%28.00%
Return on Invested66 basis point
     Capital13.27%13.93%improvement1.00%66.00%
Total126.00%
Total Earned: Payout is
     capped at 100%100.00%
____________________

(1)Results exclude Harris Teeter and Roundy’s because the mergers occurred after the performance goals

Metric Performance  Goal  Payout Percentage 
Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons  $134.3B   $123.6B   100%
Growth in Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including Fuel  $5.1B   $3.47B   100%
Cumulative Adjusted Free Cash Flow  $9.6B   $5.7B   100%
Fresh Equity metric  43.3   45.4   0%
Payout Before Modifier          75%
Relative TSR Modifier  75th Percentile   >50th Percentile   125%
Total Payout          93.75%

The NEOs were established.

(2)The Customer 1stStrategy and Improvement in Associate Engagement components were established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the performance period, but are not disclosed as they are competitively sensitive.

Accordingly, each NEO received a long-term cash bonus in an amount equal to 100% of that executive’s long-term cash bonus potential, and was issued the number of Kroger common shares equal to 100%93.75% of the number of performance units awarded to that executive, along with a cash amount equal todividend equivalents for the dividendsthree-year performance period on the number of issued common shares.

The dividend equivalents paid on that number of common shares duringearned under the three year performance period. Payout for the cash components of the 20132020 – 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and “All Other Compensation” columnscolumn of the Summary Compensation Table and footnotes 4 and 6footnote 5 to that table, and the common shares issued under the plan are reported in the 20152022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table and footnote 2 to that table.

The annual and long-term performance-based compensation awards described herein were made pursuant to our 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in June 2019, and the 2019 Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in June 2022.

Additional Features of the 2021-2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Going into 2021, there were an extraordinary number and degree of unknowns that could have impacted our financial results. The Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, the course of the pandemic, including new COVID variants, availability and outcomes of vaccine programs, continuing sales trends, food at home and food away from home trends, inflation/deflation, and other potential market influencing events. To account for these unknowns, the Compensation Committee designed the 2021 long-term plan with an incremental goal setting approach due to our inability to forecast reliable long-term performance targets against the background of the market uncertainty at the time. The Committee designed the plan to take into account the extraordinary uncertainties going into the three-year plan, while aligning to our identical sales and operating profit growth and productivity improvement goals, all in support of our long-term value creation model. Under the incremental goal setting approach, the plan was designed with clearly defined financial performance goals for 2021, and a mechanism for setting the 2022-2023 goals based on actual 2021 results.

This approach does not change the timing of the payout. The payout for the three-year plan will be calculated following the close of fiscal year 2023 and, if earned, will be paid out to participants in the form of common shares, and corresponding accrued dividend equivalents, in March of 2024.

For the 2021-2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee aligned the plan with market practices, increasing the maximum payout potential on the four metrics from 100% to 150%. The highest payout from the four metrics alone equals 100%. However, the payout may exceed 100%, if for years 2 and 3 of the plan: (1) the Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons metric, the Growth in Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit, including Fuel, metric, and the Cumulative Adjusted Free Cash Flow metric all achieve 100%, and (2) the 2-year compound annual growth rate of Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons exceeds 3.5%. The plan payout will increase incrementally from 100%, up to 150% maximum if the 2-year compound annual growth rate on the Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons metric is 5.0%. With the potential application of the relative TSR modifier, the total maximum payout would be 187.5%.


2022 – 2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics

The 2022-2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan metrics have been designed to reflect commitments made to our investors and other stakeholders regarding long-term sales growth, our Value Creation algorithm (through intrinsic Total Shareholder Return, or iTSR) and our commitment to Fresh as a strategic differentiator. The plan also includes a modifier based on our shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 shareholder return.

MetricRationale for UseWeighting
Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel GallonsThis metric represents total revenue dollars without fuel + the number of fuel gallons sold over the three-year term of the plan. It represents the important metric of top line growth of the business from all channels.25%
Value Creation Metric (iTSR) PercentageThis financial metric equals Adjusted Earnings per diluted share (EPS) growth plus Dividend Yield.50%
Fresh Equity metricFresh is a key element of how people decide where to shop. It drives trips and therefore delivers business results. Fresh is the core focus of how we differentiate and drive great engagement with customers and it will be a key driver of our growth.25%

The highest payout from the three metrics alone equals 100%. However, the payout may exceed 100% if: (1) both the Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons metric and the iTSR metric achieve 100%, and (2) the 3-year compound annual growth rate of Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons exceeds 3.5%. The plan payout will increase incrementally from 100%, up to 150% maximum if the 3-year compound annual growth rate on the Total Sales without Fuel + Fuel Gallons metric is 5.0%.

After the calculation described above, a modifier based on Relative Total Shareholder Return compared to the S&P 500 will be applied, as follows, interpolated for actual results between the 25th percentile and 75th percentile thresholds:

TSR Relative to S&P 500Modifier
25th percentile75%
50th percentile100%
75th percentile125%

The payout percentage, as modified by the Relative TSR modifier, will be applied to the number of performance units granted under the plan to determine the payout amount. If all three metrics are achieved at the maximum level and the Relative Total Shareholder Return modifier is maximized, the total plan payout would be 187.5%.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

Stock options and restricted stock continue to play an important role in rewarding NEOs for the achievement of long-term business objectives and providing incentives for the creation of shareholder value.Awardsvalue. Awards based on Kroger’s common shares are granted annually to the NEOs and a large number of other employees.NEOs. Kroger historically has distributed time-based equity awards widely, aligning the interests of employeesassociates with your interest asinterests of shareholders.

In 2015, Kroger granted 3,425,720 stock options to approximately 1,222 employees, including the NEOs.

The options permit the holder to purchase Kroger common shares at an option price equal to the closing price of Kroger common shares on the date of the grant.

During 2015, Kroger awarded 3,228,270 shares of restricted stock to approximately 8,280 employees, including the NEOs.

Options are granted only on one of the four dates of Board meetings conducted after Kroger’s public release of its quarterly earnings results.

The Compensation Committee determines the vesting schedule for stock options and restricted stock.

During 2015,2022, the Compensation Committee granted to the NEOs: (a)NEOs stock options and restricted stock, each with a five-year vesting schedule; and (b) restricted stock with a three- or five-yearfour-year ratable vesting schedule.

27



As discussed below under Stock Ownership Guidelines, covered individuals, including

Restricted stock awards are reported in the NEOs, must hold 100% of common shares issued pursuant to performance units earned, the shares received upon the exercise of stock options or upon the vesting of restricted stock, except those necessary to pay the exercise price“Stock Awards” column of the options and/or applicable taxes, until applicable stock ownership guidelinesSummary Compensation Table and footnote 1 to the table and the 2022 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table. Stock option awards are met, unlessreported in the disposition is approved in advance by“Option Awards” column of the CEO, or bySummary Compensation Table and the Board or Compensation Committee for“All other Option Awards” column of the CEO.2022 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table.


Retirement and Other Benefits

Kroger maintains aseveral defined benefit and several defined contribution retirement plans for its employees.associates. The NEOs participate in one or more of these plans, as well as one or more excess plans designed to make up the shortfall in retirement benefits created by limitations under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) on benefits to highly compensated individuals under qualified plans. Additional details regarding certain retirement benefits available to the NEOs can be found below in footnote 5 to the 2015Summary Compensation Table and the 2022 Pension Benefits Table and the accompanying narrative description that follows this discussion and analysis.narrative.

Kroger also maintains an executive deferred compensation plan in which some of the NEOsCEO has elected to participate. This plan is a nonqualified plan under which participants can elect to defer up to 100% of their cash compensation each year. Additional details regarding our nonqualified deferred compensation plans available to the NEOs can be found below in the 2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table and the accompanying narrative.

Kroger also maintains The Kroger Co. Employee Protection Plan (“KEPP”), which covers all of our management employeesassociates who are classified as exempt under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and certain administrative or technical support personnel who have provided services to Kroger for at least one year and whose employment isare not covered by a collective bargaining agreement.agreement, with at least one year of service. KEPP has a double trigger change in control provision, and it provides for severance benefits and extended Kroger-paid health care, as well as the continuation of other benefits as described in the plan, when an employeeassociate is actually or constructively terminated without cause within two years following a change in control of Kroger (as defined in KEPP). Participants are entitled to severance pay of up to 24 months’ salary and bonus.annual incentive target. The actual amount is dependent upon pay level and years of service. KEPP can be amended or terminated by the Board at any time prior to a change in control.

Performance-based long-term cash bonus, performance unit, stock

Stock option and restricted stock grant agreements with award recipients provide that those awards “vest,” with 50% of the long-term cash bonus potential being paid, common shares equal to 50% of the performance units being awarded, options becoming immediately exercisable, and restrictions on restricted stock lapsing upon a change in control as described in the grant agreements.agreements, but only if an associate is actually or constructively terminated without cause within two years following a change in control of Kroger (as defined in the grant agreement, and consistent with KEPP).

None of the NEOs isare party to an employment agreement.

Perquisites

Our NEOs receive limited perquisites becauseas the Compensation Committee does not believe that it is necessary for the attraction or retention of management talent to provide the NEOsexecutives a substantial amount of compensation in the form of perquisites. In 2015, the only perquisites available to our NEOs were:

premiums paid on life insurance policies;

premiums paid on accidental death and dismemberment insurance; and

premiums paid on long-term disability insurance policies.

Because he was an officer of Harris Teeter during 2015, Mr. Morganthall also was eligible for the following Harris Teeter perquisites:

premiums paid on executive bonus insurance policies; and

tax reimbursements for the taxes due on insurance premiums paid by Harris Teeter.

The total amount of perquisites furnished to the NEOs is shown in the Summary Compensation Table and described in more detail in footnote 6 to that table.

28



Process for Establishing Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee of the Board has the primary responsibility for establishing the compensation of our executive officers, including the NEOs, with the exception of the Chief Executive Officer.CEO. The Compensation Committee’s role regarding the CEO’s compensation is to make recommendations to the independent members of the Board; those members of the Board establish the CEO’s compensation.

The Compensation Committee directly engagesengaged Korn Ferry as a compensation consultant from Mercer Human Resource Consulting to advise the Compensation Committee in the design of compensation for executive officers.officers and to advise with respect to the unique circumstances of the 2022 compensation cycle.

The Mercer consultant conducts

Korn Ferry conducted an annual competitive assessment of executive positions at Kroger for the Compensation Committee. The assessment is one of several bases,factors, as described above, on which the Compensation Committee determines compensation. The consultant assesses:assessed:

Basebase salary;

Targettarget performance-based annual cash bonus;

incentive;

Targettarget annual cash compensation (the sum of salary and annual cash bonusincentive potential);

Annualized long-term incentive compensation, such as performance-based long-term cash bonus potential andcomprised of performance units, stock options and restricted stock; and

Totaltotal direct compensation (the sum of target annual cash compensation and annualized long-term compensation).

In addition to the factors identified above, the consultant also reviewed actual payout amounts against the targeted amounts.


The consultant comparescompared these elements against those of other companies in a group of publicly-traded food and drug retailers.publicly traded companies selected by the Compensation Committee. For 2015,2022, our peer group consisted of:

Albertsons

AmerisourceBergen
Best Buy
Cardinal Health
Costco Wholesale

SUPERVALU

CVS Health formerly CVS Caremark

Home Depot
Johnson & Johnson
Lowe’s
Procter & Gamble

Target
Rite AidWal-Mart
Safeway

Sysco

Target
TJX Companies
Walgreens Boots Alliance formerly Walgreen
Walmart


This peer group is the same group as was used in 2014. Median 2015 revenue for the peer group was $92.5 billion, compared to our revenue of $109.8 billion.

The make-up of the compensation peer group is reviewed annually and modified as circumstances warrant. Industry consolidation and other competitive forces will result in changes to the peer group over time.

The consultant also providesIn addition, the Compensation Committee considered supplemental data provided by its independent compensation consultant from “general industry” companies, a representation of major publicly-traded companies of similar size and scope from outside the retail industry.Fortune 40, excluding financial services companies. This data serves asprovided reference points, particularly for senior staffexecutive positions where competition for talent extends beyond the retail sector. The peer group includes a combination of food and drug retailers, other large retailers based on revenue size, and large consumer-facing companies. Median 2022 revenue for the peer group was $119.3 billion, compared to our 2022 revenue of $148.3 billion.

Considering the size of Kroger in relation to other peer group companies, the Compensation Committee believes that salaries paid to our NEOs should be at or above the mediancompetitively positioned relative to amounts paid by peer group companies for comparable positions. The Compensation Committee also aims to provide an annual cash bonusincentive potential to our NEOs that, ifaround the increasingly more challenging annual business plan objectives are achieved at superior levels, would cause total cash compensation to be meaningfully above themarket median. Actual payouts may be as low as zero if performance does not meet the baselines established by the Compensation Committee.Committee while superior financial performance is rewarded with compensation falling above the median.

The independent members of the Board have the exclusive authority to determine the amount of the CEO’s compensation. In setting total compensation, the independent directors consider the median compensation of the peer group’s CEOs. With respect to the annual bonus,incentive plan, the independent directors make two determinations: (1) they determine the annual cash bonusincentive potential that will be multiplied by the corporate annual cash bonusincentive payout percentage earned that is generally applicable to all corporate management, including the NEOs and (2) the independent directors determine the annual cash bonusincentive amount paid to the CEO by retaining discretion to reduce the annual cash bonusincentive percentage payout the CEO would otherwise receive under the formulaic plan. The independent directors also retain discretion to determine the form of payout, to include a portion in equity in place of cash.

29



The Compensation Committee performs the same function and exercises the same authority as to the other NEOs. In its annual review of compensation for the NEOs, the Compensation Committee:

Conducts an annual review of all components of compensation, quantifying total compensation for the NEOs on tally sheets. The review includesincluding a summary for each NEO of salary; performance-based annual cash bonus;incentive; and long-term performance-based cash andequity comprised of performance unit compensation;units, stock options; restricted stock; accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gainsoptions and restricted stock and performance unit values; the value of any perquisites; retirement benefits; company paid health and welfare benefits; banked vacation; severance benefits available under KEPP; and earnings and payouts available under Kroger’s nonqualified deferred compensation program.

stock.

Considers internal pay equity at Kroger to ensure that the CEO is not compensated disproportionately. The Compensation Committee has determined that the compensation of the CEO and that of the other NEOs bears a reasonable relationship to the compensation levels of other executive positions at Kroger taking into consideration performance and differences in responsibilities.

Reviews a report from the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultantsconsultant reflecting a comprehensive review of each element of pay, both annual and long-term and comparing NEO and other senior executive compensation with that of other companies, including both our peer group of competitors and a larger general industry group, to ensure that the Compensation Committee’s objectives of competitiveness are met.

Takes into account a recommendation from the CEO (except in the case of his own compensation) for salary, annual cash bonusincentive potential and long-term compensation awards for each of the senior officers including the other NEOs. The CEO’s recommendation takes into consideration the objectives established by and the reports received by the Compensation Committee as well as his assessment of individual job performance and contribution to our management team.

In considering each of the factors above, the

The Compensation Committee does not make use of a formula, but ratherboth qualitatively and quantitatively reviewsconsiders each factorof the factors identified above in setting compensation.

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

At the 2015 annual meeting, we held our fifth annual advisory vote on executive compensation. Over 95% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory proposal in 2015. The Compensation Committee believes it conveys our shareholders’ support of the Compensation Committee’s decisions and the existing executive compensation programs. As a result, the Compensation Committee made no material changes in the structure of our compensation programs or our pay for performance philosophy.


At the 2016 annual meeting, in keeping with our shareholders’ request for an annual advisory vote, we will again hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (see page 49). The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results from this year’s and future advisory votes on executive compensation in their evaluation and administration of our compensation program.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

To more closely align the interests of our officers and directors with your interests as shareholders, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines. These guidelines require non-employeeindependent directors, executive officers, and other key executives to acquire and hold a minimum dollar value of Kroger common shares as set forth below:

Position Multiple
Chief Executive Officer5 times base salary
Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer4 times base salary
Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents3 times base salary
Other Key ExecutivesIndependent Directors2 times base salary
Non-employee Directors35 times annual base cash retainer

30



Covered

All covered individuals are expected to achieve the target level within five years of appointment to their position. Ifpositions. Until the requirements are not met, covered individuals, including the NEOs, must hold 100% of common shares issued pursuant to performance units earned,shares received upon the exercise of stock options and upon the vesting of restricted stock, except those necessary to pay the exercise price of the options and/or applicable taxes, and must retain all Kroger common shares unless the disposition is approved in advance by the CEO, or by the Board or Compensation Committee for the CEO.

Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy (Clawback)

If

Under the 2019 Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”), unless an award agreement provides otherwise, if a participant’s employment or service is terminated for cause, or if after termination the Compensation Committee determines either that (i) prior to termination, the participant engaged in an act or omission that would have warranted termination for cause or (ii) after termination, the participant violates any continuing obligation or duty of the participant with respect to Kroger, any gain realized by the participant from the exercise, vesting or payment of any award may be cancelled, forfeited or recouped in the sole discretion of the Committee. Under the 2019 Plan, any gain realized by the participant from the exercise, vesting or payment of any award may also be recouped if, within one year after such exercise, vesting or payment, (i) a participant is terminated for cause, (ii) the Compensation Committee determines that the participant is subject to recoupment pursuant to any Kroger policy, or (iii) after a participant’s termination for any reason, the Compensation Committee determines either that (1) prior to termination the participant engaged in an act or omission that would have warranted termination for cause, or (2) after termination the participant violates any continuing obligation or duty of the participant with respect to Kroger. Unless otherwise defined under 2019 Plan award agreement, “cause” has the meaning as defined in The Kroger Co. Employee Protection Plan, as amended from time to time.

Additionally, if an award based on financial statements that are subsequently restated in a way that would decrease the value of such award, the participant will, to the extent not otherwise prohibited by law, upon the written request of Kroger, forfeit and repay to Kroger the difference between what was received and what should have been received based on the accounting restatement, which will be repaid in accordance with any applicable Kroger policy or applicable law, including Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and any rules or regulations adopted thereunder. We intend our policy to comply with the NYSE listing rules regarding recoupment of incentive compensation when those rules become effective. Kroger also has a recoupment policy, which provides that if a material error of facts results in the payment to an executive officer at the level of Group Vice President or higher of an annual cash bonusincentive or a long-term cash bonusincentive in an amount higher than otherwise would have been paid, as determined by the Compensation Committee, then the officer, upon demand from the Compensation Committee, will reimburse Kroger for the amounts that would not have been paid if the error had not occurred. This recoupment policy applies to those amounts paid by Kroger within 36 months prior to the detection and public disclosure of the error. In enforcing the policy, the Compensation Committee will take into consideration all factors that it deems appropriate, including:

Thethe materiality of the amount of payment involved;

Thethe extent to which other benefits were reduced in other years as a result of the achievement of performance levels based on the error;

Individualindividual officer culpability, if any; and

Otherother factors that should offset the amount of overpayment.

Compensation Policies as They Relate to Risk Management

As part of the Compensation Committee’s review of our compensation practices, the Compensation Committee considers and analyzes the extent to which risks arise from such practices and their impact on Kroger’s business. As discussed in this discussion and analysis, our policies and practices for compensating employees are designed to, among other things, attract and retain high quality and engaged employees. In this process, the Compensation Committee also focuses on minimizing risk through the implementation of certain practices and policies, such as the executive compensation recoupment policy, which is described above under “Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy (Clawback)”. Accordingly, we do not believe that our compensation practices and policies create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Kroger.


Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

After considering best practices related to ownership of company shares, the

The Board has adopted a policy regarding hedging, pledging and short sales of Kroger securities.prohibiting Kroger directors and executive officers are prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the pledging of, hedging transactions in, or short sales of, Kroger securities. In addition, the policy was further revised as of April 1, 2016, to preclude Kroger officers and directors from pledging Kroger securities.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

Tax laws place a deductibility limit of $1,000,000 on some types of compensation for the CEO and the next four most highly compensated officers (other than the chief financial officer) reported in this proxy because they are among the four highest compensated officers (“covered employees”). In Kroger’s case, this group of individuals is not identical

Prior to the group of NEOs. Compensation that is deemed to be “performance-based” is excluded for purposeseffective date of the calculationTax Cuts and isJobs Act of 2017, Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallowed a federal tax deductible. Awards under Kroger’s Long-Term Incentive Plans, when payable upon achievement of stated performance criteria, should be considered performance-based anddeduction to public companies for compensation greater than $1 million paid in any tax year to specified executive officers unless the compensation paidwas “qualified performance-based compensation” under those plans should be tax deductible. Generally, compensation expense related to stock options awardedthat section. Pursuant to the CEOTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the next four most highly compensated officers should be deductible. Onexception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code was eliminated with respect to all remuneration in excess of $1 million other hand, Kroger’s awards of restricted stock that vest solely uponthan qualified performance-based compensation pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 or earlier which was not modified in any material respect on or after such date (the legislation providing for such transition rule, the passage of time are not performance-based. As a result,“Transition Rule”).

31



compensation expense for those awards to the covered employees is not deductible, to the extent that the related compensation expense, plus any other expense for compensation that is not performance-based, exceeds $1,000,000.

Kroger’s bonus plans rely on performance criteria, which have been approved by shareholders. As a result, bonuses paid under the plans to the covered employees should be deductible by Kroger.

Kroger’s policy is, primarily, to design and administerperformance-based compensation plans that support the achievement of long-term strategic objectives and enhance shareholder value. Where it is material and supports Kroger’s compensation philosophy, the Compensation Committee alsostructured with the intent of qualifying as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) prior to the change in the law may or may not be fully deductible, depending on the application of the Transition Rule. In addition, compensation arrangements structured following the change in law will attemptbe subject to maximize the amountSection 162(m) limitation (without any exception for performance-based compensation). Consistent with its past practice, the Committee will continue to retain flexibility to design compensation programs that are in the best long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders, with deductibility of compensation expense that is deductible by Kroger.being one of a variety of considerations taken into account.

Compensation Committee Report

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with Kroger’s management of the Company the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Company’s Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’sKroger’s proxy statement and incorporated by reference into its Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee:

Clyde R. Moore, Chair
Jorge P. Montoya
Susan M. Phillips
James A. Runde
Amanda Sourry
Mark Sutton

32



Executive Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

The following table and footnotes provide information regarding the compensation of the NEOs for the fiscal years presented.

Name and Principal
Position
(1)
   Fiscal
Year
   

Salary
($)

   Stock
Awards
($)(2)
   

Option
Awards
($)(3)

   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
   

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)

   All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
   Total
($)
W. Rodney McMullen20151,216,6654,332,2522,300,0922,999,693618,033279,65611,746,391
     Chairman and Chief20141,118,7263,740,2511,951,3942,441,5463,498,396232,60212,982,915
     Executive Officer2013962,7315,062,435907,8621,722,94663,518166,3298,885,821
J. Michael Schlotman2015793,8252,489,1481,040,8471,394,75244,163148,1045,910,839
     Executive Vice President2014745,3131,490,700520,3721,103,7501,922,821113,9225,896,878
     and Chief Financial2013688,5991,564,689509,0881,004,22085,1763,851,772
     Officer 
Michael J. Donnelly2015700,6841,919,013585,5291,274,152321,545175,1124,976,035
     Executive Vice President2014651,315748,051390,2791,024,261341,775100,3053,255,986
     of Merchandising2013565,1361,099,201236,283803,0523,74481,5572,778,973
Christopher T. Hjelm2015653,3681,992,003780,6331,302,85216898,9924,828,016
     Executive Vice President
     and Chief Information
     Officer
Frederick J. Morganthall II2015619,9441,595,918390,4141,453,450297,3354,357,061
     Executive Vice President
     of Retail Operations

Name and Principal
Position
 Fiscal Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus ($)  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total
($)
 
W. Rodney McMullen  2022   1,388,495       10,367,639   2,299,636   4,130,769   175,750   847,554   19,209,843 
Chairman and Chief  2021   1,351,358       8,800,023   2,199,162   4,647,750   159,640   1,010,797   18,168,730 
Executive Officer  2020   1,341,060   769,231   10,900,041   2,101,581   4,888,929   1,795,455   577,277   22,373,574 
                                     
Gary Millerchip  2022   809,879       3,358,792   749,879   1,269,231       265,342   6,453,123 
Senior Vice President  2021   726,815       2,800,022   699,735   1,498,006       261,842   5,986,420 
and Chief Financial Officer  2020   601,050   312,426   2,498,469   540,409   1,092,959       122,377   5,167,690 
                                     
Stuart W. Aitken  2022   915,632       3,346,838   749,879   1,269,231       277,694   6,559,274 
Senior Vice President and  2021   878,387       2,800,022   699,735   1,527,013       300,214   6,205,371 
Chief Merchandising & Marketing Officer  2020   849,484   323,077   3,010,038   540,409   1,586,363       177,900   6,487,271 
                                     
Yael Cosset  2022   809,879       3,358,792   749,879   1,269,231       267,548   6,455,329 
Senior Vice President  2021   739,685       2,800,022   699,735   1,498,006       265,342   6,002,790 
and Chief Information Officer  2020   689,567   312,426   2,998,473   540,409   1,338,239       121,168   6,000,282 
                                     
Timothy A. Massa  2022   839,113       2,320,484   499,919   1,133,654       208,794   5,001,964 
Senior Vice President
and Chief People Officer
  2021   780,914       1,760,033   439,836   1,194,114       210,350   4,385,247 

(1)Messrs. Hjelm and Morganthall became NEOs in 2015.
(2)Amounts reflect the grant date fair value of restricted stock and performance units granted each fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The following table reflects the value of each type of award granted to the NEOs in 2015:2022:

Name     Restricted Stock     Performance Units
Mr. McMullen$3,300,021       $1,032,231       
Mr. Schlotman$1,979,946$509,202
Mr. Donnelly$1,632,562$286,451
Mr. Hjelm$1,610,062$381,941
Mr. Morganthall$1,404,958$190,960

Name Restricted Stock  Performance Units 
Mr. McMullen $4,617,648  $5,749,991 
Mr. Millerchip $1,483,785  $1,875,007 
Mr. Aitken $1,471,831  $1,875,007 
Mr. Cosset $1,483,785  $1,875,007 
Mr. Massa $1,070,498  $1,249,986 

The Restricted Stock values include the annual grant of restricted stock in 2022 as well as the grant in 2023, which was granted with respect to a portion of the 2022 Annual Incentive Plan as further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and in the Grants of Plan Based Awards Table.

The grant date fair value of the performance units reflected in the stock awards column and in the table above is computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. This amount is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized by the Company over the three-year performance period of the award determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The assumptions used in calculating the valuations are set forth in Note 1211 to the consolidated financial statements in Kroger’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015.2022.


33



Assuming that the highest level of performance conditions is achieved, the aggregate fair value of the 20152022 performance unit awards at the grant date is as follows:

Value of Performance Units
Name      Assuming Maximum Performance
Mr. McMullen                        $2,064,462                        

Mr. Schlotman

$1,018,403
Mr. Donnelly$572,901
Mr. Hjelm $763,881
Mr. Morganthall$381,921

Name Value of Performance Units
Assuming Maximum Performance
 
Mr. McMullen $10,781,233 
Mr. Millerchip $3,515,638 
Mr. Aitken $3,515,638 
Mr. Cosset $3,515,638 
Mr. Massa $2,343,724 

(3)(2)These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the valuations are set forth in Note 1211 to the consolidated financial statements in Kroger’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015.
2022.

(4)(3)Non-equity incentive plan compensation earned for 20152022 consists of amounts earned under the 2015 performance-based annual cash bonus program and the 2013 Long-Term2022 Annual Incentive Plan. The 2022 Annual Incentive Plan was calculated at 192.40.% and was applied to each NEO’s annual incentive plan target, except for Mr. Aitken. Mr. Aitken’s payout of 190.98% of his annual incentive target was calculated based on the Annual Incentive Plan metrics and the merchandising team metrics. For the 2022 Annual Incentive Plan, the payout consisted of 150% cash and the remainder in restricted shares which are included in footnote (1) above. See “2022 Annual Incentive Plan Results” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information on this plan.

(4)The amount reported for Mr. Morganthall also includes the 2015 amount earned under the Harris Teeter Merger Cash Bonus Plan (described below).

Long-Term CashHarris Teeter
NameAnnual Cash Bonus       Bonus      Merger Bonus
Mr. McMullen                $2,060,093                  $939,600              N/A     
Mr. Schlotman$723,652$671,100N/A
Mr. Donnelly$723,652$550,500N/A
Mr. Hjelm$723,652 $579,200 N/A
Mr. Morganthall$645,010$369,083$439,357

In accordance with the termsconsists of the 2015 performance-based annual cash bonus program, Kroger paid 126.7% of bonus potentials for the participants, including the NEOs. These amounts were earned with respect to performance in 2015 and paid in March 2016. Mr. Morganthall’s annual cash bonus payout was calculated by using the Harris Teeter formula for the 17 weeks he was a Harris Teeter officer and the Kroger formula for the remainder of the year when he was a Kroger officer.

The long-term cash bonus awarded under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan is a performance-based bonus plan designed to reward participants for improving the long-term performance of the Company. The plan covered performance during fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015 and amounts earned under the plan were paid in March 2016. In accordance with the terms of the plan, participants earned and Kroger paid 100% of long-term cash bonus potentials. The long-term cash bonus potential equaled the participant’s salary in effect on the last day of fiscal 2012, and for Mr. Morganthall, the day he became eligible for the plan.

Amounts for Mr. Morganthall also include $439,357 for 2015 performance under The Harris Teeter Merger Cash Bonus Plan. This plan is a performance-based bonus plan designed to reward participants for achieving synergies over the three year period following the merger between Harris Teeter and Kroger, fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016. Payouts are made following the end of each fiscal year of amounts earned based on that year’s performance, subject to a maximum payout over the three-year period of 200% of the participant’s bonus potential. The bonus potential is equal to the participant’s salary in effect on the date of the merger. In March 2016, Mr. Morganthall received $439,357 for 2015 performance.

34



(5)For 2015, the amounts reported consist of the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefit under a defined benefit pension plan (including supplemental plans), which applies to all eligible NEOs, and preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation, which only applies to Messrs. McMullen, Donnelly and Hjelm:Mr. McMullen. The remainder of the NEOs do not participate in a defined benefit pension plan or in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

Change inPreferential Earnings on Nonqualified
Name     Pension Value     Deferred Compensation
Mr. McMullen    $537,941     $80,092 
Mr. Schlotman$44,163N/A
Mr. Donnelly$316,969 $4,576
Mr. Hjelm$(1,142)$168 
Mr. Morganthall$(429,556)N/A

Change in Pension Value. The actuarial present value of Mr. McMullen’s accumulated pension benefits decreased by $4,395,890. This change in value of accumulated pension benefits is not included in the Summary Compensation Table because the value decreased. The value of accrued benefits decreased primarily due to the change in value of the accumulated pension benefit for each of Messrs. Hjelmdue to aging. The Company froze the compensation and Morganthall are not included in the table because the value decreased.

Amounts reported for 2015 and 2014 include the change in the actuarial present value of accumulated pension benefits and preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. Amounts reported for 2013 include only preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation because the changes in pension value were negative, which are not required to be reported in the table in accordance with SEC rules. Pension values may fluctuate significantly from year to year depending on a number of factors, including age, years of service average annual earnings and the assumptionsperiods used to determine the present value, such as the discount rate. The change in the actuarial present value of accumulatedcalculate pension benefits for 2014 was significantly greater than 2013 primarily due to a lower discount rate and revised mortality assumptions. The changeactive associates who participate in the actuarial present valueaffected pension plans, including Mr. McMullen’s, as of accumulated pensionDecember 31, 2019. Beginning January 1, 2020, the affected active associates will no longer accrue additional benefits for 2015 is primarily due to a lower discount rate.future service and eligible compensation received under these plans. Please see the 2022 Pension Benefits section for further information regarding the assumptions used in calculating pension benefits.

Messrs.

Preferential Earnings on Nonqualified Deferred Compensation. Mr. McMullen Donnellyparticipates in The Kroger Co. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) and Hjelm participate in Kroger’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan.received preferential earnings of $175,750. Under the plan, deferred compensation earns interest at a rate representing Kroger’s cost of ten-year debt, as determined by the CEOCFO, and approved by the Compensation Committee prior to the beginning of each deferral year. For each participant, a separate deferral account is created each year and the interest rate established for that year is applied to that deferral account until the deferred compensation is paid out. If the interest rate established by Kroger for a particular year exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term interest rate that corresponds most closely to the plan rate, the amount by which the plan rate exceeds 120% of the corresponding federal rate is deemed to be above-market or preferential. In thirteen of the twenty-two years in which at least one NEO deferred compensation, the rate set under the plan for that year exceeds 120% of the corresponding federal rate. For each of the deferral accounts in which the plan rate is deemed to be above-market, Kroger calculates the amount by which the actual annual earnings on the account exceed what the annual earnings would have been if the account earned interest at 120% of the corresponding federal rate, and discloses those amounts as preferential earnings. Amounts deferred in 2015 earn interest at a rate lower than 120% of the corresponding federal rate; accordingly there are no preferential earnings on these amounts. In 2015, Mr. Morganthall participated in the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc.Flexible Deferral Plan (the “HT Flexible Deferral Plan”), which does not provide above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation.


35



(6)(5)Amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2015 include: the dollar value of premiums paid by the Company for life insurance,2022 include Company contributions to defined contribution retirement plans, dividend equivalents paid on earned performance units, and dividends paid on unvested restricted stockstock. In 2022, the total amount of perquisites and other benefits.personal benefits for each of the NEOs was less than $10,000. The following table identifies the perquisites and other compensation for 2015 that are required to be quantified by SEC rules.value of each element of All Other Compensation:

Name  Life
Insurance
Premiums
  Retirement Plan
Contributions(a)
  Payment of
Dividend
Equivalents
on Earned
Performance Units
 
  Dividends
Paid on
Unvested
Restricted
Stock
  Other(b)
Mr. McMullen  $76,340                          $50,791            $152,525  
Mr. Schlotman$60,878$28,481$58,745
Mr. Donnelly$54,525$69,169$13,219$38,199
Mr. Hjelm$36,781$12,867$13,219$36,125
Mr. Morganthall$20,940$34,466$6,689$61,583$173,657

Name Retirement Plan
Contributions(a) 
  Payment of
Dividend
Equivalents
on Earned
Performance
Units
  Dividends
Paid on
Unvested
Restricted
Stock
 
Mr. McMullen $195,500  $405,648  $246,406 
Mr. Millerchip $89,457  $104,310  $71,575 
Mr. Aitken $99,188  $104,310  $74,196 
Mr. Cosset $90,407  $104,310  $72,831 
Mr. Massa $85,923  $77,267  $45,604 

(a)Retirement plan contributions.The Company makes automatic and matching contributions to NEOs’ accounts under the applicable defined contribution plan on the same terms and using the same formulas as other participating employees.associates. The amounts reported representCompany also makes contributions to NEOs’ accounts under the following contributionsapplicable defined contribution plan restoration plan, which is intended to make up the shortfall in 2015:
Mr. Donnelly – $13,603 to the Dillon Companies, Inc. Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan and $55,566 to the Dillon Companies, Inc. Excess Benefit Profit Sharing Plan;
Mr. Hjelm – $12,867 to The Kroger Co. 401(k) Retirement Savings Account Plan, which includes a $2,000 automatic Company contribution; and
Mr. Morganthall – $20,991 to the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Retirement and Savings Plan, which includes a $13,000 automatic Company contribution, and $13,475 to the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Flexible Deferral Plan.
(b)Other.For each of Messrs. McMullen, Schlotman, Donnelly and Hjelm the total amount of otherretirement benefits provided was less than $10,000.
For Mr. Morganthall, this amount includes the dollar value of insurance premiums paidcaused by the Companylimitations on accidental death and dismemberment insurance and long-term disability insurance. In addition, because he was an officer of Harris Teeter during 2015, Mr. Morganthall was eligible for certain Harris Teeter benefits. Accordingly, during 2015 Mr. Morganthall received the following benefits under Harris Teeter plans: executive bonus insurance (whole life insurance) premiums paid by the Company in the amount of $63,254, and tax reimbursements of $47,762 for taxes on the premiums paid by the Companyto highly compensated individuals under the Harris Teeter long-term disability plan anddefined contribution plans in accordance with the Harris Teeter executive bonus insurance plan. In addition, in connection with his relocation to Cincinnati, at the Company’s request, Mr. Morganthall received aggregate relocation benefits of $58,851, which includes an allowance equal to one month’s salary at the time of his relocation and reimbursement of certain temporary living expenses.Code.

36



20152022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information about equity and non-equity incentive awards granted to the NEOs in 2015.2022.

Name   Grant
Date
   Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
   
Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or

Units
(#)(4)
   All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying

Options
(#)(5)
   Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option

Awards
($/Sh)
   Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and

Option
Awards
Target
($)
   Maximum
($)

Target
(#)

   

Maximum
(#)

W. Rodney$1,625,962(1)$3,251,924(1)            
McMullen $600,000(2)$1,200,000(2)
7/15/201586,095$3,300,021
 7/15/2015235,415$38.33$2,300,092
7/15/201526,090(3)  52,179(3) $1,032,231
J. Michael$571,154(1)$1,142,308(1)
Schlotman$380,000(2)$760,000(2)
7/15/201538,610$1,479,921
9/17/201513,334$500,025
7/15/2015106,531$38.33$1,040,847
7/15/201512,870(3)25,740(3) $509,202
Michael J.$571,154(1)$1,142,308(1)
Donnelly$331,450(2)$662,900(2)
7/15/201529,547$1,132,537
9/17/201513,334$500,025
7/15/201559,929$38.33$585,529
7/15/20157,240(3)14,480(3) $286,451
Christopher T.$571,154(1)$1,142,308(1)
Hjelm$310,000(2)$620,000(2)
7/15/201528,960$1,110,037
9/17/201513,334$500,025
7/15/201579,898$38.33$780,633
7/15/20159,654(3)19,307(3) $381,941
Frederick J.$577,769(1)$1,155,538(1)
Morganthall II$285,117(2)$570,234(2)
7/15/201523,609$904,933
9/17/201513,334$500,025
7/15/201539,959$38.33$390,414
7/15/20154,827(3)9,653(3) $190,960

                All Other          
                Stock  All Other       
                Awards:  Option     Grant 
          Estimated Future  Number  Awards:  Exercise  Date Fair 
    Estimated Possible Payouts  Payouts Under  of  Number of  or Base  Value of 
    Under Non-Equity  Equity Incentive  Shares of  Securities  Price of  Stock 
    Incentive Plan Awards  Plan Awards  Stock or  Underlying  Option  and 
    Target  Maximum  Target  Maximum  Units  Options  Awards  Option 
Name Grant Date ($)(1)  ($)(1)  (#)(2)  (#)(2)  (#)(3)  (#)(4)  ($/Sh)  Awards 
W. Rodney
McMullen
    2,800,000   5,880,000                         
  3/10/2022                  60,431           3,450,006 
  3/10/2022                      142,858  $57.09   2,299,636 
  3/10/2022          100,718   188,846               5,749,991 
  3/9/2023                  24,712           1,167,642 
Gary Millerchip    850,000   1,785,000                         
  3/10/2022                  19,706           1,125,016 
  3/10/2022                      46,584  $57.09   749,879 
  3/10/2022          32,843   61,581               1,875,007 
  3/9/2023                  7,593           358,769 
Stuart W. Aitken    850,000   1,785,000                         
  3/10/2022                  19,706           1,125,016 
  3/10/2022                      46,584  $57.09   749,879 
  3/10/2022          32,843   61,581               1,875,007 
  3/9/2023                  7,340           346,815 
Yael Cosset    850,000   1,785,000                         
  3/10/2022                  19,706           1,125,016 
  3/10/2022                      46,584  $57.09   749,879 
  3/10/2022          32,843   61,581               1,875,007 
  3/9/2023                  7,593           358,769 
Timothy A. Massa    775,000   1,627,500                         
  3/10/2022                  13,138           750,048 
  3/10/2022                      31,056  $57.09   499,919 
  3/10/2022          21,895   41,053               1,249,986 
  3/9/2023                  6,782           320,450 


(1)These amounts relate to the 20152022 performance-based annual cash bonusincentive plan. The amount listed under “Target” represents the annual cash bonusincentive potential of the NEO. By the terms of the plan, payouts are limited to no more than 200%210% of a participant’s annual cash bonusincentive potential; accordingly, the amount listed under “Maximum” equals two timesis 210% of that officer’s annual cash bonusincentive potential amount. In the event that a participant’s annual cash bonus potential is increased during the year following the annual compensation review and/or a promotion, the target and maximum amounts are prorated to reflect the increase. Accordingly, the amounts reported for each NEO reflect the prorated targets and maximums. The amounts actually earned under this plan were paid out in March 20162023; are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis; and are included in the Summary Compensation Table for 20152022 in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column and arethe “Stock Awards” column, and described in footnote 4footnotes 1 and 3 to that table. See “2022 Annual Cash Incentive Plan” in CD&A for more information about the program for 2022.

37



(2)These amounts relate torepresent performance units awarded under the long-term cash bonus potential issued under 20152022 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which covers performance during fiscal years 2015, 20162022, 2023, and 2017. The long-term cash bonus potential amount equals the annual base salary of the NEOs as of the last day of fiscal 2014 (or date of plan entry, if later). By the terms of the plan, payouts are limited to no more than 100% of a participant’s long-term cash bonus potential; accordingly, the amount listed under “Maximum” equals the participant’s long-term cash bonus potential. Because the actual payout is based on the level of performance achieved, the target amount is not determinable and therefore the amount listed under “Target” is a representative amount based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions.
(3)These amounts represent performance units awarded under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which covers performance during fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017.2024. The amount listed under “Maximum” represents the maximum number of common shares that can be earned by the NEO under the award. Because the actual payout is based on the levelaward or 187.5% of performance achieved, the target amount is not determinable and therefore the amount listed under “Target” reflects a representative amount based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions. The grant date fair value reported in the last column is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date.amount. This amount is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized by the Company over the three-year performance period of the award determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The grant date fair value reported in the last column is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. The aggregate grant date fair value of these awards is included in the Summary Compensation Table for 20152022 in the “Stock Awards” column and described in footnote 21 to that table.

(4)(3)These amounts represent the number of shares of restricted stock granted in 2015.2022 as well as the number of shares of restricted stock granted in 2023 with respect to a portion of the 2022 Annual Incentive Plan. The aggregate grant date fair value reported in the last column is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date fair value of these awards is included in the Summary Compensation Table for 20152022 in the “Stock Awards” column and described in footnote 21 to that table.

(5)(4)These amounts represent the number of stock options granted in 2015.2022. Options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of Kroger common shares on the grant date. The aggregate grant date fair value reported in the last column is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date fair value of these awards is included in the Summary Compensation Table for 20152022 in the “Option Awards” column.column and described in footnote 2 to that table.

The Compensation Committee, and the independent members of the Board in the case of the CEO, established the bonus potentials shownincentive potential amounts for the performance-based annual incentive awards (shown in this table as “Target” amounts) and the number of performance units awarded for the performance-based annual cash bonuslong-term incentive awards and established the amounts shown(shown in this table as “Maximum” amounts for the long-term cash bonus awards and the performance unit awards.“Target”). Amounts are payable to the extent that Kroger’s actual performance meets specific performance goalsmetrics established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the performance period. There are no guaranteed or minimum payouts; if none of the performance metrics are achieved, then none of the award is earned and no payout is made. As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,CD&A, actual earnings under the performance-based annual performance-based cash bonusincentive plan may exceed the target amount if the Company’s performance exceeds the performance goals, but are limited to 200%210% of the target amount. The Compensation Committee, and the independent members of the Board in the case of the CEO, also determined the number ofpotential values for performance units to be awarded to each NEO, under which common shares are earned to the extent performance meets specific objectives established at the beginning of the performance period. The performance units and the long-term cash bonus awards2022-2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan are more particularly described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.CD&A.

Restrictions on

The annual restricted stock awarded to the NEOs normally lapse, so long as the officer is then in our employ, in equal amounts on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date, except that theand nonqualified stock options awards granted to Messrs. Schlotman, Donnelly, Hjelm and Morganthall on 9/17/2015 and 9,132 shares of the award granted to Mr. Morganthall on 7/15/15NEOs vest in equal amounts on each of the first threefour anniversaries of the grant date, so long as the officer remains a Kroger associate, except for the restricted stock granted in March 2023 with respect to a portion of the 2022 Annual Incentive Plan which vests on the first anniversary of the grant date. Any dividends declared on Kroger common shares are payable on unvested restricted stock. Nonqualified stock options granted to the NEOs normally vest, so long as the officer is then in our employ, in equal amounts on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date.

38



2015

2022 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information about outstanding equity-based incentive compensation awards for the NEOs as of the end of 2015.2022. The vesting schedule for each award is described in the footnotes to this table. The market value of unvested restricted stock and unearned performance units is based on the closing price of Kroger’s common shares of $38.81$45.05 on January 29, 2016,27, 2023, the last trading day of 2015.fiscal 2022.

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)

  

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
    Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  

Market Value
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
  

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)

W. Rodney   120,000          $9.97  5/4/2016  13,716(6)    532,318     73,875(16)    2,952,414(16)  
McMullen120,000$14.146/28/201729,232(7)1,134,494 26,090(17)1,044,754(17)
130,000 $14.316/26/201843,848(8)1,701,741
 130,000$11.176/25/201996,000(9)3,725,760
140,000$10.086/24/202090,000(10)3,492,900 
146,30436,576(1)$12.376/23/202186,095(11)3,341,347
116,92877,952(2)$10.987/12/2022
 77,952116,928(3)$18.887/15/2023
60,000240,000(4)$24.677/15/2024
235,415(5)$38.337/15/2025
J. Michael50,000$10.086/24/20206,846(6)265,69319,700(16)787,311(16)
Schlotman73,02418,256(1)$12.376/23/202116,392(7)636,17412,870(17)515,379(17)
65,56843,712(2)$10.987/12/202224,588(8)954,260
43,71265,568(3)$18.887/15/202313,000(12)504,530
16,00064,000(4)$24.677/15/202416,000(13)620,960
106,531(5)$38.337/15/202524,000(10)931,440
38,610(11)1,498,454
13,334(14)517,493
Michael J.40,000$14.146/28/20174,804(6)186,44314,775(16)590,483(16)
Donnelly40,000$14.316/26/20187,608(7)295,2667,240(17)289,926(17)
40,000$11.176/25/201914,412(8)559,330
40,000$10.086/24/202013,000(12)504,530
56,57614,144(1)$12.376/23/202118,000(10)698,580
30,43220,288(2)$10.987/12/202229,547(11)1,146,719
20,28830,432(3)$18.887/15/202313,334(14)517,493
12,00048,000(4)$24.677/15/2024
59,929(5)$38.337/15/2025
Christopher T.8,000$14.316/26/20183,804(6)147,63314,775(16)590,483(16)
Hjelm16,000$11.176/25/20197,608(7)295,2669,654(17)386,574(17)
24,000$10.086/24/202011,412(8)442,900
30,43210,144(1)$12.376/23/202113,000(12)504,530
30,43220,288(2)$10.987/12/202218,000(10)698,580
20,28830,432(3)$18.887/15/202328,960(11)1,123,938
12,00048,000(4)$24.677/15/202413,334(14)517,493
79,898(5)$38.337/15/2025
Frederick J.39,959(5)$38.337/15/202575,778(15)2,940,94413,445(16)537,339(16)
Morganthall II34,710(10)1,347,0954,827(17)193,277(17)
9,132(8)354,413
14,477(11)561,852
13,334(14)517,493

39


  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
   Market Value
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
   Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)
 
W. Rodney McMullen  194,880       $18.88  7/15/2023  31,819(6)  $1,433,446          
   300,000       $24.67  7/15/2024  54,087(7)  $2,436,619          
   235,415       $38.33  7/15/2025  70,836(8)  $3,191,162          
   358,091       $37.48  7/13/2026  60,431(9)  $2,722,417          
   573,127       $22.92  7/13/2027           118,060(12)  $5,644,448 
   349,293       $28.05  7/13/2028           100,718(13)  $4,841,514 
   261,194   87,065(1)  $24.75  3/14/2029                  
   164,577   164,577(2)  $29.12  3/12/2030                  
   65,243   195,730(3)  $34.94  3/11/2031                  
       142,858(4)  $57.09  3/10/2032                  
                                  
Gary Millerchip  9,600       $24.67  7/15/2024  6,061(6)  $273,048          
   13,992       $38.33  7/15/2025  5,945(10)  $267,822          
   27,972       $37.48  7/13/2026  13,908(7)  $626,555          
   34,905       $22.92  7/13/2027  22,539(8)  $1,015,382          
   30,251       $28.05  7/13/2028  19,706(9)  $887,755          
   66,335   16,584(1)  $24.75  3/14/2029           37,565(12)  $1,795,981 
   38,337   12,779(5)  $22.08  7/15/2029           32,843(13)  $1,578,763 
   42,320   42,320(2)  $29.12  3/12/2030                  
   20,759   62,278(3)  $34.94  3/11/2031                  
       46,584(4)  $57.09  3/10/2032                  
                                  
Stuart W. Aitken  11,149       $22.92  7/13/2027  7,576(6)  $341,299          
   33,124       $28.05  7/13/2028  13,908(7)  $626,555          
   78,773   20,730(1)  $24.75  3/14/2029  5,127(11)  $230,971          
   42,320   42,320(2)  $29.12  3/12/2030  22,539(8)  $1,015,382          
   20,759   62,278(3)  $34.94  3/11/2031  19,706(9)  $887,755          
       46,584(4)  $57.09  3/10/2032           37,565(12)  $1,795,981 
                           32,843(13)  $1,578,763 
                                  
Yael Cosset  10,611       $28.83  3/9/2027  6,061(6)  $273,048          
   8,704       $22.92  7/13/2027  13,908(7)  $626,555          
   29,499       $28.05  7/13/2028  5,127(11)  $230,971          
   66,335   16,584(1)  $24.75  3/14/2029  22,539(8)  $1,015,382          
   42,320   42,320(2)  $29.12  3/12/2030  19,706(9)  $887,755          
   20,759   62,278(3)  $34.94  3/11/2031           37,565(12)  $1,795,981 
       46,584(4)  $57.09  3/10/2032           32,843(13)  $1,578,763 
                                  
Timothy A. Massa  46,000       $24.67  7/15/2024  4,546(6)  $204,797          
   29,970       $38.33  7/15/2025  10,303(7)  $464,150          
   25,889       $37.48  7/13/2026  14,168(8)  $638,268          
   45,065       $22.92  7/13/2027  13,138(9)  $591,867          
   40,561       $28.05  7/13/2028           23,612(12)  $1,128,891 
   53,898   12,438(1)  $24.75  3/14/2029           21,895(13)  $1,052,493 
   31,348   31,348(2)  $29.12  3/12/2030                  
   13,048   39,147(3)  $34.94  3/11/2031                  
       31,056(4)  $57.09  3/10/2032                  


(1)Stock options vest on 6/23/2016.3/14/2023.

(2)Stock options vest in equal amounts on 7/3/12/20162023 and 7/3/12/2017.2024.

(3)Stock options vest in equal amounts on 7/15/2016, 7/15/20173/11/2023, 3/11/2024, and 7/15/2018.3/11/2025.

(4)Stock options vest in equal amounts on 7/15/2016, 7/15/2017, 7/15/20183/10/2023, 3/10/2024, 3/10/2025, and 7/15/2019.3/10/2026.

(5)Stock options vest in equal amounts on 7/15/2016, 7/15/2017, 7/15/2018, 7/15/2019 and 7/15/2020.2023.

(6)Restricted stock vests on 6/23/2016.3/14/2023.

(7)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 7/3/12/20162023 and 7/3/12/2017.2024.

(8)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 7/15/2016, 7/15/20173/11/2023, 3/11/2024, and 7/15/2018.3/11/2025.

(9)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 12/12/2016, 12/12/20173/10/2023, 3/10/2024, 3/10/2025, and 12/12/2018.3/10/2026.

(10)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 7/15/2016, 7/15/2017, 7/15/2018 and 7/15/2019.2023.

(11)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 7/15/2016, 7/15/2017, 7/15/2018, 7/15/2019 and 7/15/2020.
(12)Restricted stock vests on 12/12/2016.
(13)Restricted stock vests as follows: 4,000 shares on 7/15/2016 and 12,000 shares on 7/15/2017.
(14)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 9/17/2016, 9/17/2017 and 9/17/2018.2023.

(15)Restricted stock vests in equal amounts on 1/30/2017, 1/30/2018 and 1/30/2019.
(16)(12)Performance units granted under the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan2021 long-term incentive plan are earned as of the last day of fiscal 2016,2023, to the extent performance conditions are achieved. Because the awards earned are not currently determinable, in accordance with SEC rules, the number of units and the corresponding market value reflect a representative amount based on performance through 2022, including cash payments equal to projected dividend equivalent payments, reflect the probable outcome of performance conditions as of fiscal year-end.payments.

(17)(13)Performance units granted under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan2022 long-term incentive plan are earned as of the last day of fiscal 2017,2024, to the extent performance conditions are achieved. Because the awards earned are not currently determinable, in accordance with SEC rules, the number of units and the corresponding market value reflect a representative amount based on performance in 2022, including cash payments equal to projected dividend equivalent payments, reflect the probable outcome of performance conditions as of fiscal year-end.payments.

2015

2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information for 2015 regarding 2022 stock options exercised, restricted stock vested, and common shares issued to the NEOs pursuant to performance units earned under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.long-term incentive plans.

Option Awards(1)Stock Awards(2)
Name     Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
     Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
     Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
     Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
W. Rodney McMullen    150,000       $4,141,875        156,668       $6,019,970  
J. Michael Schlotman  70,808$2,696,280
Michael J. Donnelly 36,000$1,124,28043,426  $1,668,288 
Christopher T. Hjelm   41,426 $1,593,233
Frederick J. Morganthall II43,034$1,656,157

  Option Awards(1)  Stock Awards(2) 
Name Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
  Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
  Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)
 
W. Rodney McMullen  194,880   8,661,442   376,876   19,160,902 
Gary Millerchip        87,809   4,438,529 
Stuart W. Aitken  101,747   2,768,087   90,240   4,566,794 
Yael Cosset  73,566   2,079,679   90,012   4,550,119 
Timothy A. Massa  16,000   627,275   65,961   3,342,585 

(1)Stock options have a ten-year life and expire if not exercised within that ten-year period. The value realized on exercise is the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing price of Kroger’s common shares on the respective date(s) of exercise.exercise date.

40



(2)The Stock Awards columns include vested restricted stock and earned performance units, as follows:



Vested Restricted StockEarned Performance Units
Name     Number of
Shares
Value
Realized
Number of
Shares
Value
Realized
Mr. McMullen     107,948          $4,181,764           48,720           $1,838,206
Mr. Schlotman43,488$1,665,49627,320$1,030,784
Mr. Donnelly 30,746$1,189,87212,680$478,416
Mr. Hjelm28,746$1,114,81712,680$478,416
Mr. Morganthall33,934$1,312,8149,100$343,343

  Vested Restricted Stock  Earned Performance Units 
Name Number of
Shares
  Value
Realized
  Number of
Shares
  Value
Realized
 
W. Rodney McMullen  207,856  $11,174,707   169,020  $7,986,195 
Gary Millerchip  44,346  $2,384,902   43,463  $2,053,627 
Stuart W. Aitken  46,777  $2,513,167   43,463  $2,053,627 
Yael Cosset  46,549  $2,496,492   43,463  $2,053,627 
Timothy A. Massa  33,766  $1,821,371   32,195  $1,521,214 

Restricted stock. The table includes the number of shares acquired upon vesting of restricted stock and the value realized on the vesting of restricted stock.stock, based on the closing price of Kroger common shares on the vesting date.

Performance Units. In 2013, participantsParticipants in the 20132020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan were awarded performance units that were earned based on performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee atas described in “2020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan — Results and Payout” in the beginning of the three-year performance period.CD&A. Actual payouts were based on the level of performance achieved and were paid in common shares. The number of common shares issued, and the value realized based on the closing price of Kroger common shares of $37.73$47.25 on March 10, 2016,9, 2023, the date of deemed delivery of the shares, are reflected in the table above.

2015

2022 Pension Benefits

The following table provides information regarding pension benefits for the NEOs as of the last day of 2015.fiscal 2022. Only Mr. McMullen participates in a pension plan.

Name    Plan Name    Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)
    Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)
W. Rodney McMullenKroger Consolidated Retirement Benefit Plan      30        $1,070,880  
Kroger Excess Benefit Plan30$10,276,024
J. Michael SchlotmanKroger Consolidated Retirement Benefit Plan30$1,169,438
Kroger Excess Benefit Plan30$5,457,400
Michael J. DonnellyKroger Consolidated Retirement Benefit Plan36$244,532
 Kroger Excess Benefit Plan36$3,241,033
Christopher T. Hjelm Kroger Consolidated Retirement Benefit Plan(2)$10,086
Frederick J. Morganthall IIHarris Teeter Employees’ Pension Plan29$975,455
Harris Teeter Supplemental Executive
     Retirement Plan29$8,044,875

Name Plan Name Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)(1) 
  Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(2) 
  Payments during
Last fiscal year
($)
 
W. Rodney McMullen Pension Plan  34   1,610,951    
  Excess Plan  34   18,009,437    
Gary Millerchip Pension Plan         
  Excess Plan         
Stuart W. Aitken Pension Plan         
  Excess Plan         
Yael Cosset Pension Plan         
  Excess Plan         
Timothy A. Massa Pension Plan         
  Excess Plan         

(1)In 2018, the Company froze the service periods used to calculate pension benefits and thus, Mr. McMullen’s number of years of credited service is less than his actual 44 years of service.

(2)The discount rate used to determine the present values was 4.66%4.89% for theThe Kroger Consolidated Retirement Benefit Plan Spin Off (the “Pension Plan”) and Dillon plans, 4.65%4.92% for the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Employees’ PensionThe Kroger Co. Consolidated Retirement Excess Benefit Plan (the “HT Pension“Excess Plan”) and 4.40% for the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “HT SERP”), which are the same rates used at the measurement date for financial reporting purposes. Additional assumptions used in calculating the present values are set forth in Note 1514 to the consolidated financial statements in Kroger’s 10-K for 2015.
(2)The benefits for cash balance participants are not based on years of credited service. See the narrative discussion following this table for a description of how plan benefits are determined.fiscal year 2022.

41



Kroger Pension Plan and Excess Plan

Messrs.

In 2022, Mr. McMullen Schlotman, Donnelly and Hjelm participatewas a participant in The Kroger Consolidated Retirement Benefitthe Pension Plan, (the “Kroger Pension Plan”), which is a qualified defined benefit pension plan. Messrs.Mr. McMullen Schlotman and Donnelly also participateparticipates in The Kroger Co.the Excess Benefit Plan, (the “Excess Plan”), which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of the Excess Plan is to make up the shortfall in retirement benefits caused by the limitations on benefits to highly compensated individuals under the qualified defined benefit pension plans in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code.

Although participants generally receive credited service beginning at age 21, certain participants in the Kroger Pension Plan and the Excess Plan who commenced employment prior to 1986, including Messrs.Mr. McMullen, and Schlotman, began to accrue credited service after attaining age 25 and one year of service. The Kroger Pension Plan and the Excess Plan generally determine accrued benefits using a cash balance formula but retain benefit formulas applicable under prior plans for certain “grandfathered participants” who were employed by Kroger on December 31, 2000. Each of Messrs.Mr. McMullen Schlotman and Donnelly is eligible for these grandfathered benefits. Mr. Hjelm is not a grandfathered participant, and therefore, his benefits are determined using the cash balance formula.

Grandfathered Participants

Benefits for grandfathered participants are determined using formulas applicable under prior plans, including the Kroger formula covering service to The Kroger Co. and the Dillon formula covering service to Dillon Companies, Inc. As a “grandfathered participants”, Messrs.participant,” Mr. McMullen Schlotman and Donnelly will receive benefits under the Kroger Pension Plan and the Excess Plan, determined as follows:

112% times years of credited service multiplied by the average of the highest five years of total earnings (base salary and annual cash bonus)incentive) during the last ten calendar years of employment, reduced by 114% times years of credited service multiplied by the primary social security benefit;

normal retirement age is 65;

and

unreduced benefits are payable beginning at age 62; and

benefits payable between ages 55 and 62 will be reduced by⅓ of one percent for each of the first 24 months and by ½ of one percent for each of the next 60 months by which the commencement of benefits precedes age 62.

In 2018, we announced changes to these company-sponsored pension plans. The Company froze the event of a termination of employment other than death or disability, Messrs. McMullen, Schlotmancompensation and Donnelly currently are eligibleservice periods used to calculate pension benefits for a reduced early retirement benefit, as each has attained age 55. If a “grandfathered participant” becomes disabled while employed by Kroger and after attaining age 55, the participant will receive the full retirement benefit. If a married “grandfathered participant” dies while employed by Kroger, the surviving spouse will receive benefits as though a retirement occurred on such date, based on the greater of: actual benefits payable to the participant if he was over age 55, or the benefits that would have been payable to the participant assuming he was age 55 on the date of death.

Cash Balance Participants

Mr. Hjelm began participatingactive associates who participate in the Kroger Pension Plan in August 2005 as a cash balance participant. Untilaffected pension plans, including the plan was frozen on December 31, 2006, cash balanceNEO participants, received an annual pay credit equal to 5% of that year’s eligible earnings plus an annual interest credit equal to the account balance at the beginning of the plan year multiplied by the annual rate of interest on 30-year Treasury Securities in effect prior to the plan year. Beginning on January 1, 2007, cash balance participants receive an annual interest credit but no longer receive an annual pay credit. Upon retirement, cash balance participants generally are eligible to receive a life annuity which is the actuarial equivalent of his account balance, but may elect in some circumstances to receive a lump sum distribution equal to his account balance. If Mr. Hjelm becomes disabled while employed by Kroger, he will receive the full retirement benefit. If he dies while employed by Kroger, his beneficiary will receive a death benefit equal to the benefit he was eligible to receive if a retirement occurred on such date.

42



Offsetting Benefits

Mr. Donnelly also participates in the Dillon Companies, Inc. Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan, which is a qualified defined contribution plan (the “Dillon Profit Sharing Plan”) under which Dillon Companies, Inc. and its participating subsidiaries may choose to make discretionary contributions each year that are allocated to each participant’s account. Participation in Dillon Profit Sharing Plan was frozen in 2001 and participants are no longer able to make employee contributions, but certain participants, including Mr. Donnelly, are still eligible for employer contributions. Participants elect from among a number of investment options and the amounts in their accounts are invested and credited with investment earnings in accordance with their elections. Due to offset formulas contained in the Kroger Pension Plan, Mr. Donnelly’s accrued benefits under the Dillon Profit Sharing Plan offset a portion of the benefit that would otherwise accrue for him under the Kroger Pension for his service with Dillon Companies, Inc. This offset is reflected in the table above.

Harris Teeter Pension Plan

Mr. Morganthall participates in the HT Pension Plan, which is a defined benefit pension plan. Participation in the HT Pension Plan was frozen effective October 1, 2005. For participants with age and service points as of December 31, 2005 equal to or greater than 45, which includes Mr. Morganthall, benefit accruals2019. Beginning January 1, 2020, the affected active associates no longer accrue additional benefits for future service and eligible compensation received under the HT Pension Plan after September 30, 2005 will be offset by the actuarial equivalent of the portion of their account balance under the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Retirement and Savings Plan (the “HT Savings Plan”) that are attributable to automatic retirement contributions made by Harris Teeter after September 30, 2005, plus earnings and losses on such contributions. A participant’s normal annual retirement benefit under the HT Pension Plan at age 65 is an amount equal to 0.8% of his final average earnings multiplied by years of service at retirement, plus 0.6% of his final average earnings in excess of Social Security covered compensation multiplied by the number of years of service up to a maximum of 35 years. A participant’s final average earnings is the average annual cash compensation paid to the participant during the plan year, including salary, incentive compensation and any amount contributed to the HT Savings Plan, for the 5 consecutive years in the last 10 years that produce the highest average.these plans.

Harris Teeter SERP

Mr. Morganthall also participates in the HT SERP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of the HT SERP is to supplement the benefits payable under the retirement plans. Under the HT SERP, participants who retire at normal retirement age of 60 receive monthly retirement benefits equal to between 55% and 60% of his final average earnings times his accrual fraction and reduced by his (1) assumed HT Pension Plan retirement benefit, and (2) assumed Social Security benefit. The final average earnings are the average annual earnings during the highest 3 calendar years out of the last 10 calendar years preceding termination of employment. The accrual fraction is a fraction, the numerator of which is the years of credited service, the denominator of which is 20, and which may not exceed 1.0. The benefits payable under the HT SERP are payable for the participant’s lifetime with an automatic 75% survivor benefit payable to the participant’s surviving eligible spouse for his or her lifetime. Mr. Morganthall is eligible to receive the full benefit as he has reached age 60. Harris Teeter uses a non-qualified trust to purchase and hold the assets to satisfy Harris Teeter’s obligation under the HT SERP, and participants in the HT SERP are general creditors of Harris Teeter in the event Harris Teeter becomes insolvent.

43



2015

2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table provides information on nonqualified deferred compensation for the NEOs for 2015.2022. Only Mr. McMullen participates in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

Name     Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
     Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
(1)
     Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE(2)
W. Rodney McMullen$7,500(3)    $532,896    $8,379,170
J. Michael Schlotman
Michael J. Donnelly$24,430$372,649
Christopher T. Hjelm$148,808(4)$10,053$236,885
Frederick J. Morganthall II$100,000(4)$13,475(5)$663,852

Name 

Executive Contributions

in Last FY

  Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY(1)
  Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE(2)
 
W. Rodney McMullen    $895,310  $14,106,653 
Gary Millerchip         
Stuart W. Aitken         
Yael Cosset         
Timothy A. Massa         

 

(1)(1)These amounts include the aggregate earnings on all accounts for each NEO, including any above-market or preferential earnings. The following amounts earned in 20152022 are deemed to be preferential earnings and are included in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2015:2022: Mr. McMullen, $80,092; Mr. Donnelly, $4,576; and Mr. Hjelm, $168.$175,750.

(2)The following amounts in the Aggregate Balance column from the table were reported in the Summary Compensation Tables covering fiscal years 2006 – 2014:2021: Mr. McMullen, – $2,558,370; and Mr. Donnelly - $14,318. For Messrs. Hjelm and Morganthall, no portion of the Aggregate Balance from the table was reported in the Summary Compensation Table for prior years because they were not NEOs prior to 2015.
(3)This amount represents the deferral of a portion of his salary in 2015. This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2015.
(4)These amounts represent the deferral of a portion of the 2014 performance-based annual cash bonus earned in 2014 and paid in March 2015.
(5)This amount is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2015.$4,012,771.

Kroger Executive Deferred Compensation Plan

Messrs.

Mr. McMullen Donnelly and Hjelm participateparticipates in The Kroger Co. Executivethe Deferred Compensation Plan, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Participants may elect to defer up to 100% of the amount of their salary that exceeds the sum of the FICA wage base and pre-tax insurance and other Internal Revenue Code Section 125 plan deductions, as well as up to 100% of their annual and long-term cash bonusincentive compensation. Kroger does not match any deferral or provide other contributions. Deferral account amounts are credited with interest at the rate representing Kroger’s cost of ten-year debt as determined by Kroger’s CEOCFO and approved by the Compensation Committee prior to the beginning of each deferral year. The interest rate established for deferral amounts for each deferral year will be applied to those deferral amounts for all subsequent years until the deferred compensation is paid out. Amounts deferred in 2015 earn interest at a rate of 3.65%. Participants can elect to receive lump sum distributions or quarterly installments for periods up to ten years. Participants also can elect between lump sum distributions and quarterly installments to be received by designated beneficiaries if the participant dies before distribution of deferred compensation is completed.


Participants may not withdraw amounts from their accounts until they leave Kroger, except that Kroger has discretion to approve an early distribution to a participant upon the occurrence of an unforeseen emergency. Participants who are “specified employees”associates” under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which includes the NEOs, may not receive a post-termination distribution for at least six months following separation. If the employeeassociate dies prior to or during the distribution period, the remainder of the account will be distributed to his or her designated beneficiary in lump sum or quarterly installments, according to the participant’s prior election.

44



Harris Teeter Flexible Deferral Plan

Mr. Morganthall participates in the HT Flexible Deferral Plan, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides certain highly compensated employees of Harris Teeter, the opportunity to defer the receipt and taxation on a portion of their annual compensation and supplements the benefits under tax qualified retirement plans to the extent that such benefits are subject to limitation under the Internal Revenue Code. Participants may elect to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 90% of their non-equity incentive bonus compensation. Harris Teeter provides matching contributions of 50% of the participant’s contribution, up to a maximum of 4% of the participant’s pay, less assumed matching contributions under the HT Savings Plan. These deferred amounts and Company match are credited to the participant’s account. Plan participants may choose deemed investments in the HT Flexible Deferral Plan that represent choices that span a variety of diversified asset classes. Participants may elect to receive a lump sum distribution, annual installment payments for 2-15 years, or a partial lump sum and installment payments. Upon retirement, death, disability, or other separation of service, the participant will receive distributions in accordance with his election, subject to limitations under Section 409A. Mr. Morganthall has reached the retirement age and is eligible for the full benefit. The HT Flexible Deferral Plan also allows for an in-service withdrawal for an unforeseeable emergency based on facts and circumstances that meet Internal Revenue Service and plan guidelines. Harris Teeter uses a non-qualified trust to purchase and hold the assets to satisfy Harris Teeter’s obligation under the HT Flexible Deferral Plan, and participants in the HT Flexible Deferral Plan are general creditors of Harris Teeter in the event Harris Teeter becomes insolvent.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Kroger does not have employment agreements or other contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements that provide for payments to the NEOs in connection with a termination of employment or a change in control of Kroger. However, KEPP ourand award agreements for stock options, restricted stock and performance units and our long-term cash bonus plans provide for certain payments and benefits to participants, including the NEOs, in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control of Kroger, as described below.defined in the applicable plan or agreement. Our pension plans and nonqualified deferred compensation plan also provide for certain payments and benefits to participants in the event of a termination of employment, as described above in the 2022 Pension Benefits section and the 2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation section, respectively.

A “change in control” under KEPP, and our equity and non-equity incentive awards occurs if:

any person or entity (excluding Kroger’s employee benefit plans) acquires 20% or more of the voting power of Kroger;

a merger, consolidation, share exchange, division, or other reorganization or transaction with Kroger results in Kroger’s voting securities existing prior to that event representing less than 60% of the combined voting power immediately after the event;

Kroger’s shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or winding up of Kroger or an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of Kroger’s assets; or

during any period of 24 consecutive months, individuals at the beginning of the period who constituted Kroger’s Board of Directors cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors.

KEPPThe Kroger Co. Employee Protection Plan

KEPP applies to all management employeesassociates who are classified as exempt under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and to certain administrative or technical support personnel who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement, with at least one year of service, andincluding the NEOs. KEPP provides severance benefits when a participant’s employment is terminated actually or constructively within two years following a change in control of Kroger, including the NEOs.as defined in KEPP. The actual amount of the severance benefit is dependent on pay level and years of service. TheExempt associates, including the NEOs, are eligible for the following benefits:

a lump sum severance payment equal to up to two times the sum24 months of the participant’s annual base salary and 70% of the greater of the currenttarget annual cash bonus potential or the average of the actual annual cash bonus payments for the prior three years;

incentive potential;

45



a lump sum payment equal to the participant’s accrued and unpaid vacation, including banked vacation;

a lump sum payment equal to 1/12th of the sum of the participant’s annual vacation pay plus 70% of the greater of the current year’s annual cash bonus potential or the average of the actual annual cash bonus payments for the prior three years, multiplied by the number of months elapsed in the current calendar year;

continued medical and dental benefits for up to 24 months and continued group term life insurance coverage for up to 6six months; and

up to $5,000 as reimbursement for eligible tuition expenses and up to $10,000 as reimbursement for eligible outplacement expenses.

Payments

In the event that any payments or benefits received or to executive officersbe received by an eligible associate in connection with a change in control or termination of employment (whether pursuant to KEPP or any other plan, arrangement or agreement with Kroger or any person whose actions result in a change in control) would constitute parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and would be subject to the excise tax under KEPPSection 4999 of the Code, then such payments and benefits will either be (i) paid in full or (ii) reduced to the minimum extent necessary soto ensure that no portion of such payments or benefits will not exceed 2.99 timesbe subject to the officer’s average W-2 earnings overexcise tax, whichever results in the preceding five years.eligible associate receiving the greatest aggregate amount on an after-tax basis.


Long-Term CompensationIncentive Awards

The following table describes the treatment of long-term compensationincentive awards following a termination of employment or change in control of Kroger.Kroger, as defined in the applicable agreement. In each case, the continued vesting, exercisability or eligibility for the incentive awards will end if the participant provides services to a competitor of Kroger.

Triggering EventStock OptionsRestricted StockPerformance UnitsPerformance-Based
Long-Term Cash Bonus

Involuntary
Termination

Forfeit all unvested options. Previously vested options remain exercisable for the shorter of one year after termination or the remainder of the original 10-year term.

term

Forfeit all unvested shares

Forfeit all rights to units for which the three yearthree-year performance period has not ended

Forfeit all rights to long-term cash bonuses for which the three year performance period has not ended

Voluntary
Termination/
Retirement

-  Prior to minimum
age and five
years of
     service(2)
service(1)

Forfeit all unvested options. Previously vested options remain exercisable for the shorter of one year after termination or the remainder of the original 10-year term.

term

Forfeit all unvested shares

Forfeit all rights to units for which the three yearthree-year performance period has not ended

Forfeit all rights to long-term cash bonuses for which the three year performance period has not ended

Voluntary
Termination/
  Retirement

-  After minimum
age
and five years of
     service(2)
service(1)

Unvested options held greater than one year continue vesting on the original schedule. All options are exercisable for remainder of the original 10-year term.

term

Forfeit all unvestedUnvested shares granted prior to 2013. Vesting continuesheld greater than one year continue vesting on the original schedule for awards granted during or after 2013.

Pro rata portion(1)portion(2) of units earned based on performance results over the full three-year period

Pro rata portion(1) of long-term cash bonuses earned based on performance results over the full three-year period

Death

Unvested options are immediately vested. All options are exercisable for the remainder of the original 10-year term.

term

Unvested shares immediately vest

Pro rata portion(1)portion(2) of units earned based on performance results through the end of the fiscal year in which death occurs. Award will be paid following the end of such fiscal year.

Pro rata portion(1) of long-term cash bonuses earned based on performance results through the end of the fiscal year in which death occurs. Award will be paid following the end of such fiscal year.

Disability

Unvested options are immediately vested. All options are exercisable for remainder of the original 10-year term.

term

Unvested shares immediately vest

Pro rata portion(1)portion(2) of units earned based on performance results over the full three-year period

Pro rata portion(1) of long-term cash bonuses earned based on performance results over the full three-year period

Change in
     Control(3)
Control(3)

●  For awards prior to 2019

Unvested options are immediately vested and exercisable

Unvested shares immediately vest

50% of the maximum units granted at the beginning of the performance period earned immediately

Change in Control(3)

●  For awards in March 2019 and thereafter

Unvested options only vest and become exercisable upon an actual or constructive termination of employment within two years following a change in control

Unvested shares only vest upon an actual or constructive termination of employment within two years following a change in control

50% of the maximum bonusunits granted at the beginning of the performance period earned immediately

upon an actual or constructive termination of employment within two years following a change in control

46



(1)The minimum age requirement is age 62 for stock options and restricted stock and age 55 for performance units.

(2)The prorated amount is equal to the number of weeks of active employment during the performance period divided by the total number of weeks in the performance period.

(2)The minimum age requirement is age 62 for stock options and restricted stock and age 55 for performance units and the long-term cash bonus.
(3)These benefits are payable upon an actual or constructive termination of employment within two years after a change in control, of Kroger with or without a termination of employment.as defined in the applicable agreements.

Quantification of Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table provides information regarding certain potential payments that would have been made to the NEOs if the triggering event occurred on the last day of the fiscal year, January 30, 2016,28, 2023, given compensation, age and service levels as of that date and, where applicable, based on the closing market price per Kroger common share on the last trading day of the fiscal year ($38.8145.05 on January 29, 2016)27, 2023). Amounts actually received upon the occurrence of a triggering event will vary based on factors such as the timing during the year of such event, the market price of Kroger common shares, and the officer’s age, length of service and compensation levels.level.

Name     Involuntary
Termination
     Voluntary
Termination/
Retirement
     Death     Disability     Change
in Control
without
Termination
     

Change in
Control with
Termination

W. Rodney McMullen          
     Accrued and Banked Vacation$763,072$763,072$763,072$763,072$763,072$763,072
     Severance4,790,016
     Additional Vacation and Bonus108,173
     Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)58,326
     Stock Options(2)8,973,4488,973,4488,973,4488,973,448
     Restricted Stock(3)13,928,56013,928,56013,928,56013,928,560
     Performance Units(4)2,615,4632,615,4632,615,4632,467,9082,467,908
     Long-Term Cash Bonus(5)1,133,3401,133,3401,133,3401,150,0001,150,000
     Executive Group Life Insurance4,910,000
J. Michael Schlotman
     Accrued and Banked Vacation$516,928$516,928$516,928$516,928$516,928$516,928
     Severance2,581,080
     Additional Vacation and Bonus45,622
     Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)48,995
     Stock Options(2)3,962,0593,962,0593,962,0593,962,059
     Restricted Stock(3)5,929,0045,929,0045,929,0045,929,004
     Performance Units(4)850,471850,471850,471887,585887,585
     Long-Term Cash Bonus(5)743,335743,335743,335747,500747,500
     Executive Group Life Insurance3,064,200
Michael J. Donnelly
     Accrued and Banked Vacation$245,191$245,191$245,191$245,191$245,191$245,191
     Severance2,345,731
     Additional Vacation and Bonus42,451
     Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)38,794
     Stock Options(2)2,252,5782,252,5782,252,5782,252,578
     Restricted Stock(3)3,908,3613,908,3613,908,3613,908,361
     Performance Units(4)575,422575,422575,422572,059572,059
     Long-Term Cash Bonus(5)650,008650,008650,008653,230653,230
     Executive Group Life Insurance2,770,000
Christopher T. Hjelm
     Accrued and Banked Vacation$53,848$53,848$53,848$53,848$53,848$53,848
     Severance2,053,342
     Additional Vacation and Bonus39,487
     Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)48,101
     Stock Options(2)2,156,4032,156,4032,156,4032,156,403
     Restricted Stock(3)3,730,3403,730,3403,730,3403,730,340
     Performance Units(4)637,879637,879637,879665,727665,727
     Long-Term Cash Bonus(5)606,668606,668606,668610,000610,000
     Executive Group Life Insurance3,165,000

47



Name    Involuntary
Termination
    

Voluntary
Termination/
Retirement

    Death    Disability    Change
in Control
without
Termination
    Change in
Control with
Termination
Frederick J. Morganthall II                  
     Accrued and Banked Vacation$77,310$77,310$77,310$77,310$77,310$77,310
     Severance2,180,016
     Additional Vacation and Bonus41,443
     Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)27,484
     Stock Options(2)19,18019,18019,18019,180
     Restricted Stock(3)5,721,7975,721,7975,721,7975,721,797
     Performance Units(4)478,038478,038478,038452,195452,195
     Long-Term Cash Bonus(5)559,162559,162559,162561,930561,930
     Executive Group Life Insurance2,295,000

Name Involuntary
Termination
  Voluntary
Termination/
Retirement
  Death  Disability  Change
in Control
without
Termination
  Change in
Control with
Termination
 
W. Rodney McMullen                        
Accrued and Banked Vacation $638,750  $638,750  $638,750  $638,750  $638,750  $638,750 
Severance                $8,400,000 
Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)                 $49,101 
Stock Options(2)   $0  $0  $6,367,962  $6,367,962  $0  $6,367,962 
Restricted Stock(3)   $0  $0  $9,783,644  $9,783,644  $0  $9,783,644 
Performance Units(4)  $0  $5,058,176  $5,058,176  $5,058,176  $0  $5,814,401 
Executive Group Life Insurance       $2,000,000          
Gary Millerchip                        
Accrued and Banked Vacation $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Severance                $3,210,432 
Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)                 $57,269 
Stock Options(2)   $0  $0  $1,933,978  $1,933,978  $0  $1,933,978 
Restricted Stock(3)   $0  $0  $3,070,563  $3,070,563  $0  $3,070,563 
Performance Units(4)  $0  $0  $1,621,380  $1,621,380  $0  $1,867,976 
Executive Group Life Insurance       $1,237,500          
Stuart W. Aitken                        
Accrued and Banked Vacation $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Severance                $3,550,008 
Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)                 $59,895 
Stock Options(2)   $0  $0  $1,724,608  $1,724,608  $0  $1,724,608 
Restricted Stock(3)   $0  $0  $3,101,963  $3,101,963  $0  $3,101,963 
Performance Units(4)  $0  $0  $1,621,380  $1,621,380  $0  $1,867,976 
Executive Group Life Insurance       $1,387,500          
Yael Cosset                        
Accrued and Banked Vacation $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Severance                $3,350,016 
Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)                 $44,303 
Stock Options(2)   $0  $0  $1,640,444  $1,640,444  $0  $1,640,444 
Restricted Stock(3)   $0  $0  $3,033,712  $3,033,712  $0  $3,033,712 
Performance Units(4)  $0  $0  $1,621,380  $1,621,380  $0  $1,867,976 
Executive Group Life Insurance       $1,237,500          
Timothy A. Massa                        
Accrued and Banked Vacation $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Severance                $3,250,008 
Continued Health and Welfare Benefits(1)                 $48,839 
Stock Options(2)   $0  $0  $1,147,641  $1,147,641  $0  $1,147,641 
Restricted Stock(3)   $0  $0  $1,899,083  $1,899,083  $0  $1,899,083 
Performance Units(4)  $0  $1,037,944  $1,037,944  $1,037,944  $0  $1,202,339 
Executive Group Life Insurance       $1,275,000          

 

(1)(1)Represents the aggregate present value of continued participation in the Company’s medical, dental and executive term life insurance plans, based on the premiums paidpayable by the Company during the eligible period. The eligible period for continued medical and dental benefits is based on the level and length of service, which is 22 months for Mr. Hjelm, and 24 months for the otherall NEOs. The eligible period for continued executive term life insurance coverage is six months for allthe NEOs. The amounts reported may ultimately be lower if the executiveNEO is no longer eligible to receive benefits, which could occur upon obtaining other employment and becoming eligible for substantially equivalent benefits through the new employer.


(2)Amounts reported in the death, disability“Death,” “Disability,” and change“Change in controlControl” columns represent the intrinsic value of the accelerated vesting of unvested stock options, calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the stock option and the closing price per Kroger common share on January 29, 2016.27, 2023. A value of $0 is attributed to stock options with an exercise price greater than the market price on the last day of the fiscal year. In accordance with SEC rules, no amount is reported in the voluntary termination/retirement“Voluntary Termination/Retirement” column because vesting is not accelerated, but the awardsoptions may continue to vest on the original schedule if the conditions described above are met.

(3)Amounts reported in the death, disability“Death,” “Disability,” and change“Change in controlControl” columns represent the aggregate value of the accelerated vesting of unvested restricted stock. In accordance with SEC rules, no amount is reported in the voluntary termination/retirement“Voluntary Termination/Retirement” column because vesting is not accelerated, but the awardsrestricted stock may continue to vest on the original schedule if the conditions described above are met.

(4)Amounts reported in the voluntary termination/retirement, death“Voluntary Termination/Retirement,” “Death” and disability“Disability” columns represent the aggregate value of the performance units granted in 20142021 and 2015,2022, based on performance through the probable outcomelast day of the performance conditions as of January 30, 2016fiscal 2022 and prorated for the portion of the performance period completed. Amounts reported in the change in control column represent the aggregate value of 50% of the maximum number of performance units granted in 20142021 and 2015 at the beginning of the performance period.2022. Awards under the 20132020 Long-Term Incentive Plan were earned as of the last day of 20152022 so each NEO age 55 or over was entitled to receive (regardless of the triggering event) the amount actually earned, which is reported in the Stock Awards column of the 20152022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table.

Pay Versus Performance

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive “compensation actually paid,” or “CAP,” and certain financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to the CD&A beginning on page 46.

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE*

(a)  (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h) 
               Value of Initial Fixed
$100 Investment Based
on5
       
Year  Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
($)1
  Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
($)2
  Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)3
  Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
($)4
  Total
Share-
holder
Return
($)
  Peer
Group
Total
Share-
holder
Return ($)
  Net
Income
($)6
(in millions)  
  Adjusted
FIFO
Operating
Profit
($)7
(in millions)  
 
2022   19,209,843   23,325,794   6,117,423   6,281,085   178.23   140.77   2,244   5,079 
2021   18,168,730   36,111,316   5,644,957   9,323,327   168.66   145.25   1,655   4,310 
2020   22,373,574   29,840,084   6,932,437   9,191,933   131.19   123.01   2,585   4,056 

*Totals in the above table might not equal the summation of the columns due to rounding amounts to the nearest dollar.

(5)Amounts1.During fiscal 2020, 2021, and 2022, Mr. McMullen served as our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”). The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the voluntary termination/retirement, death and disability columns represent the aggregate valueamounts of the long-term cash bonuses granted in 2014 and 2015, based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of January 30, 2016 and proratedtotal compensation reported for the portion of the performance period completed. Amounts reportedeach corresponding year in the change in control column represent the aggregate value of 50% of the long-term cash bonus potentials under the 2014 and 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plans. Awards under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan were earned as of the last day of 2015, so each NEO was entitled to receive (regardless of the triggering event) the amount actually earned, which is reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan CompensationTotal column of the Summary Compensation Table.Table (“SCT”).

48


2.The dollar amounts reported in column (c) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. McMullen as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. McMullen during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. McMullen’s total compensation for each year to determine the CAP:


PEO SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation 
Year  Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table for PEO
($)
  Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Value of
Equity
Awards(a)
($)
  Equity Award
Adjustments(b)
($)
  Reported
Change in the
APV of
Pension
Benefits in

Summary
Compensation
Table (c)
($)
  Plus: Pension
Benefit
Adjustments(b)(c)

($)
  Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO
($)
 
2022   19,209,843   12,667,275   16,783,226   -   -   23,325,794 
2021   18,168,730   10,999,185   28,941,771   -   -   36,111,316 
2020   22,373,574   13,001,622   22,126,697   1,658,565   -   29,840,084 

a)The amounts included in this column are the amounts reported in “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” column of the SCT for each applicable year and are subtracted from the Reported Summary Compensation Table for PEO.

b)The equity award and pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year were calculated in accordance with the methodology required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K as follow: the equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount equal to the change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in the fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in the same applicable year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock or option awards in the applicable year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the applicable year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments for the PEO are provided in the table below:

PEO Equity Award Adjustments 
Year  Year End Fair Value
of Awards Granted in
the Year
($)
  YoY Change in Fair
Value of Outstanding
& Unvested Awards
($)
  Fair Value as of
Vesting Date of
Awards Granted
and Vested in the
Year
($)
  Year over Year
Change in Fair Value
of Awards Granted
in Prior Years that
Vested in the Year
($)
  Total Equity Award
Adjustments
($)
 
2022   9,214,146   (855,562)  -   8,424,642   16,783,226 
2021   17,014,361   2,769,331   -   9,158,079   28,941,771 
2020   12,561,917   6,145,551   -   3,419,229   22,126,697 

c)The amounts included in this column are the amounts reported in “Change in Pension and Nonqualifed Deferred Compensation” of the SCT for each applicable year. Total Pension Benefit Adjustments are equal to the Pension Service Costs incurred during the relevant period. No Prior Service Costs were incurred as no modifications were made to the pension plan during the relevant period.

3.The dollar amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the amounts reported for our non-PEO NEOs as a group in the Total column of the SCT in each applicable year. The names of each of these NEOs included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for Fiscal 2022 and 2021, Mr. Millerchip, Mr. Aitken, Mr. Cosset, and Mr. Massa; and (ii) for Fiscal 2020, Mr. Millerchip, Mr. Aitken, Mr. Cosset, and Mr. Donnelly.


4.The dollar amounts reported in column (e) represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the Non-PEO NEOs as a group as identified in footnote 3 above, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to these NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to the average total compensation for these NEOs as a group for each year to determine the CAP using the same methodology as described in footnote 2:

Average Non-PEO NEOs Summary Compensation Table Total to CAP Reconciliation 
Year  Average
Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table for Non-
PEO NEOs
($)
  Average
Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Value of
Equity Awards
for non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  Average Equity
Award
Adjustments(a)
($)
  Average
Reported
Change in the
APV of
Pension
Benefits in
SCT(b)
($)
  Plus: Average
Pension Benefit
Adjustments
($)
  Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
non-PEO NEOs
($)
 
2022   6,117,423   3,783,616   3,947,278   -   -   6,281,085 
2021   5,644,957   3,174,785   6,853,155   -   -   9,323,327 
2020   6,932,437   3,807,225   6,291,210   224,490   -   9,191,933 

(a)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are provided in the table below:

Equity Award Adjustments for Non-PEO NEOs 
Year  Average Year End
Fair Value of
Awards Granted
in the Year
($)
  Year over Year
Average Change in
Fair Value of
Outstanding &
Unvested Awards
($)
  Average Fair Value
as of Vesting Date
of Awards Granted
and Vested in the
Year
($)
  Year over Year
Average Change in
Fair Value of Awards
Granted in Prior
Years that Vested in
the Year
($)
  Total Average
Equity Award
Adjustment ($)
 
2022   2,606,281   (259,317)  -   1,600,314   3,947,278 
2021   4,424,764   667,315   -   1,761,076   6,853,155 
2020   4,033,879   1,507,771   -   749,561   6,291,210 

(b)Total Pension Benefit Adjustments are equal to the Pension Service Costs incurred during the relevant period. No Prior Service Costs were incurred as no modifications were made to the pension plan during the relevant period. Only Mr. Donnelly participated in the pension plan.

5.Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing (a) the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by (b) the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. The peer group selected by the Company for purposes of the TSR benchmarking for the pay versus performance disclosures is the same peer group the Company uses for its performance graph in the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. The Peer Group consists of Albertsons Companies, Inc. (included from June 26, 2020 when it began trading), Costco Wholesale Corporation, CVS Health Corporation, Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V., Target Corp., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Walmart Inc. The cumulative TSR depicts a hypothetical $100 investment in Kroger common shares on February 1, 2020, and shows the value of that investment over time (assuming the reinvestment of dividends) for each calendar year. A hypothetical $100 investment in the Peer Group using the same methodology is shown for comparison.

6.Net income is as reported in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

7.Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit equals gross profit, excluding the LIFO charge, minus OG&A, minus rent, and minus depreciation and amortization. For a reconciliation of non-GAAP information, see pages 27 – 33 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2023, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2023.


Most Important Performance Measures

The three measures listed below represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link CAP to Company performance for the 2022 fiscal year,

Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit

ID sales, without fuel

Adjusted net earnings per diluted share attributable to The Kroger Co.

For a reconciliation of non-GAAP information, see pages 27 – 33 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2023, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2023.


COMPANY SELECTED METRIC – Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit

NET INCOME GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION

 


KROGER TSR GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION

 

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 2.402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chairman and CEO, Mr. McMullen, to the annual total compensation of our median associate.

As reported in the Summary Compensation Table, our CEO had annual total compensation for 2022 of $19,209,843. Using this Summary Compensation Table methodology, the annual total compensation of our median associate for 2022 was $28,644. As a result, we estimate that the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to that of our median associate for fiscal 2022 was 671 to 1. Our median employee is a full-time associate in the Southeast region. Over half of Kroger’s associates are part-time workers.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated associate and calculating the pay ratio based on that associate’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Therefore, the estimated pay ratio reported above may not be comparable to the pay ratios reported by other companies and should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

We then determined the median associate’s annual total compensation using the Summary Compensation Table methodology as detailed in Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and compared it to the annual total compensation of Mr. McMullen as detailed in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2022, to arrive at the pay ratio disclosed above. Due to a material increase in salary of our median associate in fiscal 2022, we identified a substitute median associate as permitted under SEC rules on April 3, 2023 because we reasonably believed that continuing to use the prior median associate would have significantly affected our CEO pay ratio disclosure and the CEO pay ratio would not reflect the actual ratio that was used to calculate the pay ratio.

Compensation Policies as They Relate to Risk Management

As part of the Compensation Committee’s review of our compensation practices, the Compensation Committee considers and analyzes the extent to which risks arise from such practices and their impact on Kroger’s business. As discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our policies and practices for compensating associates are designed to, among other things, attract and retain high quality and engaged associates. In this process, the Compensation Committee also focuses on minimizing risk through the implementation of certain practices and policies, such as the executive compensation recoupment policy, which is described above. Accordingly, we do not believe that our compensation practices and policies create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Kroger.


Item No. 2 Advisory Vote onto Approve Executive Compensation

You are being asked to vote, on an advisory basis, to approve the compensation of our NEOs. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of compensation of our NEOs.

FORThe Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of compensation of our NEOs.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we give our shareholders the right to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed earlier in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.

As discussed earlier in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,CD&A, our compensation philosophy is to attract and retain the best management talent and to motivate these employeesassociates to achieve our business and financial goals. Our incentive plans are designed to reward the actions that lead to long-term value creation. To achieve our objectives, we seek to ensure that compensation is competitive and that there is a direct link between pay and performance. To do so, we are guided by the following principles:

Compensation must be designed to retract and retain the individuals to be an executive at Kroger;

A significant portion of pay should be performance-based, with the percentage of total pay tied to performance increasing proportionally with an executive’s level of responsibility;

Compensation should include incentive-based pay to drive performance, providing superior pay for superior performance, including both a short- and long-term focus;

Compensation policies should include an opportunity for, and a requirement of, significant equity ownership to align the interests of executives and shareholders; and

Components of compensation should be tied to an evaluation of business and individual performance measured against metrics that directly drive our business strategy.

strategy;

Compensation plans should provide a direct line of sight to company performance;

Compensation programs should be aligned with market practices; and

Compensation programs should serve to both motivate and retain talent.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation. Rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our NEOs as described in this proxy statement. The vote is advisory. This means that the vote is not binding on Kroger. The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for establishing executive compensation. In so doing, thatthe Compensation Committee will consider, along with all other relevant factors, the results of this vote.

We ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and the related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

The next advisory vote will occur at our 2024 Annual Meeting subject to shareholders approving one year as the frequency of the advisory vote in Item No. 3 below.

Item No. 3 Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

You are being asked to vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. The Board of Directors recommends a vote of ONE YEAR for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act also require that shareholders be given the right to vote, again on a nonbinding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

When the advisory vote was last held in 2017, annual meeting.shareholders indicated a preference to hold the advisory vote on executive compensation each year and the Board implemented this standard. The Board of Directors believes that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for Kroger and it therefore recommends that you vote for the one year alternative.


The vote is advisory. This means that the vote is not binding on Kroger. Our Board of Directors will determine the actual voting frequency for approval of executive compensation. In so doing the Board will consider, along with all other relevant factors, the results of this vote. The Board may decide to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by shareholders.

The proxy card provides shareholders the opportunity to choose among four options for the frequency of the advisory vote: every one, two, or three years, or abstain from casting a vote. Shareholders will not be voting to approve or to disapprove the recommendation of the Board of Directors. The option receiving the most affirmative votes will be the outcome of the advisory vote. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of this vote.

The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteFor This Proposal.

49



Director Compensation

2015 Director Compensation

The following table describes the 2015 compensation for non-employee directors. Mr. McMullen does not receive compensation for his Board service.

Name     Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
     Stock
Awards
(1)
     Option
Awards(1)
     Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(2)
     Total
Nora A. Aufreiter   $84,772     $165,586                $250,358
Robert D. Beyer$124,664$165,586$8,271$298,521
Anne Gates(3)$13,280$98,136$111,416
Susan J. Kropf$94,745$165,586$260,331
David B. Lewis$84,772$165,586$250,358
Jorge P. Montoya$99,731$165,586$265,317
Clyde R. Moore$104,718$165,586$11,753$282,057
Susan M. Phillips$94,745$165,586$2,701$263,032
James A. Runde$99,731$165,586$265,317
Ronald L. Sargent$114,691$165,586$2,777$283,054
Bobby S. Shackouls$94,745$165,586$260,331
(1)Amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the annual incentive share award, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Options are no longer granted to non-employee directors. The aggregate number of previously granted stock options that remained unexercised and outstanding at fiscal year-end was as follows:

NameOptions
Ms. Aufreiter
Mr. Beyer85,000
Ms. Gates
Ms. Kropf75,000
Mr. Lewis75,000
Mr. Montoya75,000
Mr. Moore65,000
Ms. Phillips85,000
Mr. Runde85,000
Mr. Sargent85,000
Mr. Shackouls7,800

(2)The amounts reported for Messrs. Beyer and Sargent and Dr. Phillips represent preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation. For a complete explanation of preferential earnings, please refer to footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table. The amount reported for Mr. Moore represents the change in actuarial present value of his accumulated benefit under the pension plan for non-employee directors.
(3)Ms. Gates joined the Board in December 2015. Her retainer and incentive shares were prorated accordingly.

50



Annual Compensation

Each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of $85,000. The chairs of each of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee receive an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000. The chair of each of the other committees receives an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000. Each member of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000. The director designated as the Lead Director receives an additional annual cash retainer of $25,000.

Approximately $165,000 worth of incentive shares (Kroger common shares) are issued to non-employee directors as a portion of the directors’ overall compensation. On July 15, 2015, each non-employee director, except for Ms. Gates, received 4,320 common shares. Ms. Gates received 2,386 common shares on December 10, 2015 upon joining the Board.

The Board has determined that compensation of non-employee directors must be competitive on an ongoing basis to attract and retain directors who meet the qualifications for service on the Board. Non-employee director compensation will be reviewed from time to time as the Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate.

Pension Plan

Non-employee directors first elected prior to July 17, 1997 receive an unfunded retirement benefit equal to the average cash compensation for the five calendar years preceding retirement. Only Mr. Moore is eligibleOne Year for this benefit. Participants who retire from the Board prior to age 70 will be credited with 50% vesting after five years of service, and 10% for each additional year up to a maximum of 100%. Benefits for participants who retire prior to age 70 begin at the later of actual retirement or age 65.

Nonqualified Deferred CompensationProposal.

We also maintain a deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors. Participants may defer up to 100% of their cash compensation and/or the receipt of all (and not less than all) of the annual award of incentive shares.

Cash Deferrals

Cash deferrals are credited to a participant’s deferred compensation account. Participants may elect from either or both of the following two alternative methods of determining benefits:

interest accrues until paid out at the rate of interest determined prior to the beginning of the deferral year to represent Kroger’s cost of ten-year debt; and/or

amounts are credited in “phantom” stock accounts and the amounts in those accounts fluctuate with the price of Kroger common shares.

In both cases, deferred amounts are paid out only in cash, based on deferral options selected by the participant at the time the deferral elections are made. Participants can elect to have distributions made in a lump sum or in quarterly installments, and may make comparable elections for designated beneficiaries who receive benefits in the event that deferred compensation is not completely paid out upon the death of the participant.

Incentive Share Deferrals

Participants may also defer the receipt of all (and not less than all) of the annual award of incentive shares. Distributions will be made by delivery of Kroger common shares within 30 days after the date which is 6 months after the participant’s separation of service.

51



Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

The following table sets forth the common shares beneficially owned as of April 1, 2016 by Kroger’s directors, the NEOs, and the directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership is based on 964,367,417 of Kroger common shares outstanding on April 1, 2016. Shares reported as beneficially owned include shares held indirectly through Kroger’s defined contribution plans and other shares held indirectly, as well as shares subject to stock options exercisable on or before May 31, 2016. Except as otherwise noted, each beneficial owner listed in the table has sole voting and investment power with regard to the common shares beneficially owned by such owner.

Name     Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
(a)
     

Options
Exercisable on
or before May 31,
2016 – included
in column (a)
(b)

Nora A. Aufreiter(2)          7,513                              
Robert D. Beyer(2)295,68277,200
Michael J. Donnelly467,879249,296
Anne Gates2,386
Christopher T. Hjelm379,250141,152
Susan J. Kropf137,46067,200
David B. Lewis(2)158,25567,200
W. Rodney McMullen3,292,5201,041,184
Jorge P. Montoya(3)101,36267,200
Clyde R. Moore145,86057,200
Frederick J. Morganthall II183,101
Susan M. Phillips176,92367,200
James A. Runde154,46077,200
Ronald L. Sargent(2)152,63077,200
J. Michael Schlotman606,675248,304
Bobby S. Shackouls(2)(4)73,180
Directors and executive officers as a group (29 persons,
     including those named above)8,187,3502,998,844
(1)No director or officer owned as much as 1% of Kroger common shares. The directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned less than 1% of Kroger common shares.
(2)This amount includes incentive share awards that were deferred under the deferred compensation plan for independent directors in the following amounts: Ms. Aufreiter, 4,357; Mr. Beyer, 6,833; Mr. Lewis, 11,190; Mr. Sargent, 11,190; Mr. Shackouls, 11,190.
(3)This amount includes 22,000 shares held in Mr. Montoya’s trust. Mr. Montoya disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(4)This amount includes 42,281 shares held by Mr. Shackouls’ wife. Mr. Shackouls disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

52



The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial owners of more than five percent of Kroger common shares as of April 1, 2016 based on reports on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC.

Name     Address of
Beneficial Owner
     Amount and
Nature of
Ownership
     Percentage
of Class
BlackRock, Inc.(1)55 East 52ndStreet66,134,3716.80%
New York, NY 10055 
Vanguard Group Inc.(2)100 Vanguard Blvd54,699,3705.61%
Malvern, PA 19355
(1)Reflects beneficial ownership by BlackRock Inc., as of December 31, 2015, as reported on Amendment No. 6 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016, and reports sole voting power with respect to 58,135,743 common shares, shared voting power with respect to 14,864 common shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 66,119,507 common shares, and shared dispositive power with regard to 14,864 common shares.
(2)Reflects beneficial ownership by Vanguard Group Inc. as of December 31, 2015, as reported on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016, and reports sole voting power with respect to 1,804,169 common shares, shared voting power with respect to 94,000 common shares, sole dispositive power of 52,789,803 common shares, and shared dispositive power of 1,909,567 common shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Those officers, directors and shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of Forms 3 and 4 received by Kroger, and any written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, we believe that during 2015 all filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners were timely satisfied, with the following exception. In August 2015, Michael L. Ellis, who retired as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company in July 2015, was 2 days late in the filing of a Form 4 to report a stock purchase in the amount of 500 shares.

Related Person Transactions

The Board has adopted a written policy requiring that any Related Person Transaction may be consummated or continue only if the Audit Committee approves or ratifies the transaction in accordance with the policy. A “Related Person Transaction” is one (a) involving Kroger, (b) in which one of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers, or greater than five percent shareholders, or their immediate family members, have a direct or indirect material interest; and (c) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in a fiscal year.

The Audit Committee will approve only those Related Person Transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of Kroger and its shareholders, as determined by the Audit Committee in good faith in accordance with its business judgment. No director may participate in any review, approval or ratification of any transaction if he or she, or an immediate family member, has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction.

Where a Related Person Transaction will be ongoing, the Audit Committee may establish guidelines for management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related person and the Audit Committee will review and assess the relationship on an annual basis to ensure it complies with such guidelines and that the Related Person Transaction remains appropriate.

53



Item No. 34 Ratification of the Appointment of Kroger’s Independent Auditor

You are being asked to ratify the appointment of Kroger’s independent auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

FORThe Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the Company’s financial reporting and accounting practices including the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the independent public accountants’ qualifications and independence; the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent public accountants; and the preparation of the Audit Committee Report. The Audit Committee performs this work pursuant to a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee charter most recently was revised during fiscal 2012 and is available on the Company’s website at ir.kroger.com under CorporateInvestors — Governance  Committee Composition. The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to assist it during the course of each fiscal year in devoting the attention that is necessary and appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under the Audit Committee’s charter. The Audit Committee held five5 meetings during fiscal year 2015.2022.

Selection of Independent Auditor

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of Kroger’s independent auditor, as required by law and by applicable NYSE rules. On March 9, 2016,8, 2023, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Kroger’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017.27, 2024. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or its predecessor firm has been the Company’s independent auditor since 1929.

In determining whether to reappoint the independent auditor, our Audit Committee:

Reviews PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence and performance;

Considers the tenure of the independent registered public accounting firm and safeguards around auditor independence;

Reviews, in advance, all non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, specificallywith regard to the effect on the firm’s independence;

Conducts an annual assessment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s performance, including aninternal survey of their service quality by members of management and the Audit Committee;

Conducts regular executive sessions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP;

Conducts regular executive sessions with the Vice President of Internal Audit;

Considers PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s familiarity with our operations, businesses, accountingpolicies and practices and internal control over financial reporting;

Reviews candidates for the lead engagement partner in conjunction with the mandated rotation ofthe public accountants’ lead engagement partner;


Reviews recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board reports on PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP and its peer firms; and

Obtains and reviews a report from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP describing all relationshipsbetween the independent auditor and Kroger at least annually to assess the independence of theinternalthe internal auditor.

As a result, the members of the Audit Committee believe that the continued retention ofPricewaterhouseCoopersof PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our companyCompany and its shareholders.

While shareholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditor is not required by Kroger’s Regulations or otherwise, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to shareholders for ratification, as it has in past years, as a good corporate governance practice. If the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee

54



may, but is not required to, reconsider whether to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different auditor at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our companyCompany and our shareholders.

A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present atparticipate in the meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table presents the aggregate fees billed for professional services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the annual audit and quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 20152022 and 2014,2021, and for audit-related, tax and all other services performed in 20152022 and 2014.2021.

Fiscal Year Ended
     January 30, 2016     January 31, 2015
Audit Fees(1)     $5,659,193          $5,250,203     
Audit-Related Fees(2)441,704
Tax Fees(3)360,498
All Other Fees(4)85,000
Total$5,659,193$6,137,405
____________________

  Fiscal Year Ended 
  January 28,
2023
($)
  January 29,
2022
($)
 
Audit Fees(1)   5,886,900   5,427,500 
Audit-Related Fees  982,000   0 
Tax Fees(2)   153,000   25,000 
All Other Fees(3)   5,850   3,150 
Total  7,027,750   5,455,650 

(1)(1)Includes annual audit and quarterly reviews of Kroger’s consolidated financial statements, the issuance of comfort letters to underwriters, consents, and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2)Includes assurancepre-approved assistance with tax compliance and related services pertaining to accounting consultationassistance in connection with attest services that are not required by statute or regulations, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. These fees also included services related to acquisition related due diligence.tax audits.

(3)Includes state tax compliance, tax audit support and debt restructuring.
(4)Includes fees for fiscal 2014 for advisory services pertaining to retiree healthcare benefits.use of accounting research tool.

The Audit Committee requires that it approve in advance all audit and non-audit work performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. On March 9, 2016,Pursuant to the Audit Committee approved services to be performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the remainder of fiscal year 2015 that are related to the audit of Kroger or involve the audit itself. In 2007, the Audit Committee adopted an audit and non-audit service pre-approval policy. Pursuant to the terms of that policy, the Committee will annually pre-approve certain defined services that are expected to be provided by the independent auditors. If it becomes appropriate during the year to engage the independent accountant for additional services, the Audit Committee must first approve the specific services before the independent accountant may perform the additional work.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has advised the Audit Committee that neither the firm, nor any member of the firm, has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in any capacity in Kroger or its subsidiaries.

The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteFor This Proposal.

55



Audit Committee Report

Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s accounting and financial reporting principles and internal controls, and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent public accountants are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and expressing opinions as to the financial statements’ conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In performing its functions, the Audit Committee:

Met separately with the Company’s internal auditor and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with andwithout management present to discuss the results of the audits, their evaluation and management’sassessmentmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of Kroger’s internal controls over financial reporting and the overallqualityoverall quality of the Company’s financial reporting;

Met separately with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer or the Company’s General Counselwhen needed;

Met regularly in executive sessions;

Reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements included in ourAnnual Report;

Discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed under theapplicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
Board and the SEC; and

Received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by theapplicable requirements of the Public Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent publicaccountant’spublic accountant’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussedwith themdiscussed the matters related to their independence; andindependence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in this report, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2016,28, 2022, as filed with the SEC.

This report is submitted by the Audit Committee.


Anne Gates, Chair
Kevin M. Brown
Karen M. Hoguet
Ronald L. Sargent Chair
Anne Gates
Susan J. Kropf
Susan M. Phillips
Bobby S. Shackouls
Ashok Vemuri

56



Items 5 – 9

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Included in this proxy statement are five separate shareholder proposals that have been submitted under SEC rules by shareholders who notified the company of their intention to present the proposals for voting at the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. Some shareholder proposals and supporting statements may contain assertions about Kroger that we believe are incorrect, and we have not tried to refute all such inaccuracies in the company’s responses. All statements and citations contained in a shareholder proposal and its supporting statements are the sole responsibility of the proponent of that shareholder proposal. Our company will provide the names, addresses, and shareholdings (to our company’s knowledge) of the proponents of any shareholder proposal upon oral or written request made to Corporate Secretary, The Kroger Co., 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1100. The information on, or accessible through, Kroger’s websites or report links included in this proxy statement, including the statements that follow, is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.

AGAINSTThe Board recommends a vote AGAINST each of the following shareholder proposals, in each case if properly presented at the meeting, for the reasons stated in Kroger’s statements in opposition following each shareholder proposal.

Item No. 45          Shareholder Proposal – Report on Public Health Costs from Sale of Tobacco Products

We have been notifiedadvised that The Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia or an appointed representative, along with nine co-filers, will present the following proposal for consideration during the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

“RESOLVED, shareholders ask that the board commission and disclose a report on the external public health costs created by ninethe sale of tobacco products by our company (the “Company”) and the manner in which such costs affect the vast majority of its shareholders who rely on overall market returns.

The negative health and productivity impacts from the consumption of tobacco products impose $1.2 trillion in social damage; tobacco’s unpriced social burden amounts to almost 3 percent of global GDP annually.1

Yet, in spite of the Company dedicating an entire division, Kroger Health, to addressing its customers’ healthcare needs2, as well as the overwhelming evidence that tobacco – a known carcinogen that impairs respiratory function – significantly prejudices the health outcomes of smokers, and particularly smokers infected with COVID-19, the Company continues to sell tobacco products in its stores.

These public health costs, year after year, are devastating to economic growth and further compound the financial devastation wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet Kroger does not disclose any methodology to address the public health costs of its tobacco sales. Thus, shareholders have no guidance as to costs the Company is externalizing and consequent economic harm. This information is essential to shareholders, the namesmajority of whom are beneficial owners with broadly diversified interests.

But Kroger undermines its commitments to promoting good health and shareholdingsultimately the interests of its diversified shareholders by not disclosing the social and environmental costs and risks imposed on stakeholders, even when these costs and risks threaten society, the economy and the performance of other companies. All stakeholders are unalterably harmed when companies impose costs on the economy that lower GDP, which reduces equity value.3 While the Company may profit by ignoring costs it externalizes, diversified shareholders will ultimately pay these costs, and they have a right to ask what they are.

The Company’s disclosures do not address the issue, because they do not address the public health costs that Kroger’s tobacco sales impose on shareholders as diversified investors who must fund retirement, education, public goods and other critical social needs. This is a separate social issue of great importance. A report would help shareholders determine whether these externalized costs and the economic harm they may create ultimately serve their interests.”

1https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/economics/econ_facts/index.htm

2Kroger Health – Business & Community Health Solutions

3https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/universal_ownership_full.pdf


The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote Against This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Kroger takes the responsibility of selling tobacco products very seriously and has established policies and processes to limit the sale of these items only to customers who are legally permitted to purchase them. We offer customers a wide range of choices across all product categories to meet wide-ranging tastes and preferences, including food and discretionary items.

The Company has the management systems and governance to limit the sale of tobacco products and to support choices for better health.

The Kroger family of companies is committed to ethical and responsible behavior in all parts of our business. Our behavior is rooted in Our Purpose – to Feed the Human Spirit™ – and our promise to our customers. This includes upholding Our Values, which have been the foundation of Kroger’s culture for decades.

The Audit Committee and Public Responsibilities Committee of the board of directors oversee progress in regulatory compliance and pharmacy safety measures.

We recognize our responsibility as a business to support our communities and help families by making it easier for them to live healthier lives. We also believe in our customers’ freedom of choice, and adult customers can choose to purchase tobacco products understanding fully the potential health impacts. The Company continually reviews its product assortment, including tobacco and tobacco cessation products.

Notably, recent studies that show the percentage of U.S. adults who smoke cigarettes has reached a new low, driven by sharply lower smoking rates among young adults.1 Sales for both tobacco products and tobacco cessation products at Kroger have similarly decreased in recent years.

How We Limit Tobacco Sales

Tobacco sales, like the sales of many products, are governed by regulations, which we strictly follow. The Company’s Tobacco Sales Policy is designed to comply with these regulations and affirm our commitment to the health and welfare of our nation’s youth by reducing adolescent access to tobacco. The Policy outlines internal business procedures and best practices to maintain compliance at retail stores.

How We Promote Health and Healthier Choices

We aim to serve and improve health for millions of people across the country through our business operations, Environmental, Social and Governance Strategy – Thriving Together – and Kroger Health’s strategy and services.

Kroger Health leads the company’s health and nutrition strategy, services and programs. It includes retail, mail order, central fill and specialty pharmacy operations; retail health clinics; nutrition and dietitian services; and health advocacy. A team of 22,000 healthcare practitioners, including pharmacists, nurse practitioners, dietitians and technicians, serves more than 14 million customers annually.

We aim to support our customers and communities with tools, resources and services that advance population health for all. We inform our Customers and Associates about the importance of healthy lifestyles, and we equip our pharmacy and health clinic teams to support people trying to quit tobacco. Specifically related to the use of tobacco products, we:

Offer smoking cessation coaching programs that are available to all, including coaching through telehealth services;

1 https://news.gallup.com/poll/405884/cigarette-smoking-rates-down-sharply-among-young-adults.aspx#:~:text=U.S.%20Cigarette%20Smoking%20Rates%2C%20by%20Age%20Group&text=That%20dropped%20to%20an%20average,those%20ages%2065%20and%20older


Offer affordable prescription and over-the-counter smoking cessation products that are available to all; and

Encourage Associates not to use tobacco through Company health plan incentives, coverage for smoking cessation products, and employee assistance programs for smoking cessation.

Kroger continues to make a wide range of health and wellness services more affordable and convenient for millions of customers and for local communities across the U.S. As a trusted local partner, we also provided essential support and services during the COVID-19 pandemic, rapidly scaling testing and vaccine distributions when needed most.

Assessing the external public health costs related to the Company’s sale of a single category of products is not reasonable or practicable given the resources and expertise required to consider all externalities and related topics outside of our control. In light of the above, we do not believe an additional report would add meaningfully to the extensive body of research currently available on this subject and therefore do not believe such an additional report is necessary.

For the foregoing reasons, we urge you to vote AGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 6 – Listing of Charitable Contributions of $10,000 or more

We have been advised that The Louis B & Diana R Eichold Trust or an appointed representative will present the following proposal for consideration during the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

Whereas the Company's charitable contributions, properly managed, are likely to enhance the reputation of the Company:

Whereas increased disclosure regarding appropriate charitable contributions can create goodwill for our Company .

Whereas making the benefits of our Company's philanthropic programs better known is likely to promote the Company's interests:

Whereas feedback from employees, shareholders, and customers could help guide the Company's future charitable giving process.

Resolved: The Proponent requests that the Board of Directors consider listing on the Company website any recipient of $10,000 or more of direct contributions, excluding employee matching gifts.

Supporting Statement

Absent a system of accountability and transparency; some charitable contributions may be made unwisely, potentially harming the Company's reputation and shareholder value. Corporate philanthropic gifts should be given as much exposure as possible, lest their intended impact on goodwill is diminished. For example, if we gave to the American Cancer Society, thousands of our stakeholders might potentially approve of our interest in challenging this disease. Likewise, our support of Planned Parenthood could win the praise of millions of Americans who have had an abortion at one of their facilities. Educational organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center have seen an increase in funding since they included several conservative Christian organizations on their list of hate groups. Our stakeholders and customers might be similarly enthused if we supported them. Be it the Girl Scouts, American Heart Association, Boys and Girls Club of America, Red Cross, or countless other possible recipients, our support should be publicly noted. Those who might disagree with our decisions can play a valuable role also.

Some charities may be controversial. Charitable contributions come from the fruit of our employee's labor and belong to our shareholders. Both groups represent a wide diversity of opinions. More importantly, we market ourselves to the general public and should avoid offending segments of this most critical group. It would be unfortunate if a charitable contribution resulted in lower employee morale and shareholder interest, much less a loss of potential revenue.

Fuller disclosure would provide enhanced feedback opportunities from which our Company could make more beneficial choices.”


The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote Against This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Kroger has a long history of giving back meaningfully in the communities we serve. Charitable giving is central to Our Purpose – to Feed the Human Spirit – and strategically aligned to our mission – Kroger’s Zero Hunger | Zero Waste social and environmental impact plan. This plan empowers Kroger to pursue our goal to help create communities free of hunger and waste across the country. Additionally, we provide annual public disclosures related to charitable giving areas of focus and annual grant-making.

Every year, we direct charitable contributions at the national, regional and local levels to advance positive impacts for people and our planet. This giving includes funds, in-kind product donations, and retail store donations of surplus fresh food that our associates recover for local food bank partners through our leading Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Food Rescue program. For example, in 2022, 100% of our retail stores participated in the Food Rescue program, donating more than 100 million pounds of fresh food to our communities.

Through corporate giving and the work of our two nonprofit foundations – The Kroger Co. Foundation and The Kroger Co. Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation – we direct more than $300 million annually to partners and causes that align with our mission. Of this, more than 75% supports hunger relief programs to feed individuals and families where we live and work. These totals include generous support from our associates and customers through in-store fundraising programs at checkout. The largest share of corporate funds, in-kind product donations, and customer donations is directed to the Feeding America-affiliated network of local food banks, pantries and agencies in our communities.

Other national organizations receiving significant charitable funds from Kroger include No Kid Hungry, American Red Cross, United Service Organizations (USO), American Heart Association and World Wildlife Fund. Notably, Kroger is the largest cumulative corporate donor to the USO in the organization’s history, showing our long-standing support for the nation’s active-duty military service men and women and their families. At the regional and local levels, we support other nonprofit organizations and causes that matter most to our associates and customers.

Foundation Grants

Kroger provides detailed annual disclosures on the work of our two foundations. The Kroger Co. Foundation, the company’s private foundation established in 1987, which focuses grant-making on causes that support hunger relief; sustainability; disaster relief; diversity and inclusion; and education and youth development. The Foundation’s 2022 Report, including grantee highlights and specific grant funding levels across the country, is available here: https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Kroger-Co-Foundation-2022-Report.pdf.

In 2021, the Foundation directed $12.7 million in grants, of which 58% aligned with hunger relief and sustainability causes, and 24% supported emergency assistance and disaster relief efforts. Specific grants and grant recipients are highlighted in the annual The Kroger Co. Foundation report.

The Kroger Co. Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation, a nonprofit public charity established in 2018, is designed to advance collective action and innovation to build a better food system for the future. More about the Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation is available on its website: https://thekrogercozerohungerzerowastefoundation.com/. More details about the Foundation’s general grant-making and signature program, the Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Innovation Fund, are disclosed in its annual report: https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Kroger-Co-Zero-Hunger-Zero-Waste-Foundation-2022-Report.pdf.

In 2021, the Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation directed $18 million in grants; of these, 97% aligned to hunger relief and sustainability causes. Grants included $11.7 million in funds to improve food access and food security and $4.5 million to advance more sustainable food systems. Grant highlights are included in the Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation report.


Guidelines & Policies:

We follow best practices and specific guidelines when reviewing grant requests. Our Donation Guidelines provide direction on the types of organizations that Kroger supports and, importantly, make clear the types of organizations to which donations will not be furnishedgranted. We accept and consider donation requests from 501(c)(3) registered nonprofit organizations through an online grant management platform. We use the Guidestar Charity Check to confirm they meet all Internal Revenue Service requirements to receive grants and donations. The Donation Guidelines are publicly available on our corporate website: https://thekrogerco.versaic.com/login?Select-A-Store=Enabled&ReturnTo=/default.aspx

We do not make charitable donations to individuals, political campaigns, sectarian or religious organizations for projects that serve only its own members or supporters, or organizations that discriminate based on race, color, sex, pregnancy, disability, age, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information or any other characteristic protected by applicable law.

The Company has adequate public disclosures related to its charitable giving areas of focus and annual grant-making.

Kroger recognizes that disclosure of its corporate philanthropic efforts is important and provides stakeholders with an opportunity to review Kroger charitable programs. We believe the extensive information and other disclosures provided in Kroger’s annual ESG Report, The Kroger Co. Foundation annual report, The Kroger Co. Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation annual report and our website provide ample disclosures related to our approach to charitable giving, which supports Our Purpose, ESG Strategy, and Zero Hunger | Zero Waste impact plan.

For the foregoing reasons, we urge you to vote AGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 7 Shareholder Proposal — Recyclability of Packaging

We have been advised that As You Sow on behalf of the Michael Monteiro 2016 Trust or an appointed representative, along with one co-filer, will present the following proposal for consideration during the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

“WHEREAS: The growing plastic pollution crisis poses increasing risks to Kroger. Corporations could face an annual financial risk of approximately $100 billion should governments require them to cover the waste management costs of the packaging they produce.1 New laws to this effect were recently passed in Maine, Oregon, Colorado, and California,2 while the European Union has enacted a $1 per kilogram tax on all non-recycled plastic packaging waste.3

Pew Charitable Trusts released a groundbreaking study, Breaking the Plastic Wave ("Pew Report"), concluding that improved recycling is insufficient and at least one-third of overall plastic use must be eliminated to stem the global plastic pollution crisis. It finds that plastic use reduction is the most viable solution from environmental, economic, and social perspectives . Without immediate and sustained new commitments, annual flows of plastics into oceans could nearly triple by 2040.4

Kroger has fallen behind its peers in plastic packaging reductions. Kroger is notably absent from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's Global Commitment to reduce plastic pollution, in which brand signatories have committed to reduce virgin plastic use by an average of 20% by 2025.5 The majority of signatories have already reduced their use of plastic packaging over a 2018 baseline.6

1 https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2020/07/breakingtheplasticwave_report.pdf

2 https://www.packworld.com/news/sustainability/article/22419036/four-states-enact-packaging-epr-laws

3 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/2021-2027/revenue/own-resources/plastics-own-resource_en

4 https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2020/07/breakingtheplasticwave_report.pdf

5 https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/f6oxost9xeso-nsjoqe/@/#id=2

6 https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/f6oxost9xeso-nsjoqe/@/#id=2, p. 11


Unilever has taken the most significant action to date, agreeing to cut virgin plastic use by 50% by 2025, including an absolute elimination of 100,000 tons of plastic packaging. At least sixty other consumer goods and retail companies currently have goals to reduce use of virgin plastic packaging, including competitors Walmart and Target.7 Kroger has no plastic reduction goal.

Starbucks, Coca-Cola, and Pepsi are leading the industry in reducing disposable packaging, each having set new goals to expand use of zero-waste reusable packaging. As a retail partner of the global reuse platform Loop, Kroger is poised to increase use of reusable packaging, yet has made no commitment to make reusable packaging permanent.

Our company could avoid regulatory, environmental, and competitive risks, and keep up with its peers by, for example, setting new commitments to reduce use of disposable virgin plastic and invest in reusable packaging.

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Kroger Board issue a report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, describing how the Company could reduce its plastics use in alignment with the one-third reduction findings of the Pew Report, or other authoritative sources, to reduce its contribution to ocean plastics pollution.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:The report should, at Board discretion:

Assess the reputational, financial, and operational risks associated with continuing to use substantial amounts of single-use plastic packaging while plastic pollution grows;

Evaluate dramatically reducing the amount of plastic used in our packaging through transitioning to reusables; and

Describe how the Company can further reduce single-use packaging, including any planned reduction strategies or goals, materials redesign, substitution, or reductions in use of virgin plastic.”

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote Against This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

The Kroger family of companies is committed to protecting people and our planet by advancing positive change in our company and our communities. Through our Zero Hunger | Zero Waste social and environmental impact plan, we are on a journey to help create communities free of hunger and waste.

Our sustainable packaging commitments

Kroger has focused on improving the environmental attributes of product packaging for many years through a series of ambitious sustainable packaging goals. Our goals demonstrate Kroger’s continued commitment to help create a more circular economy and reduce plastics found in nature by using more sustainable packaging options where feasible; supporting reusable packaging models; using recyclable packaging and incorporating recycled content; and increasing consumer awareness about reuse and recycling.

We are also committed to upholding the highest standards of food safety and quality for our customers. Decisions about Our Brands food packaging consider critical attributes needed to protect and preserve food safety, quality, freshness, and affordability as well as to reduce greenhouse gas emissions related to the manufacture and transportation of items.

Kroger’s 2030 sustainable packaging commitments include the following elements:

Complete an Our Brands baseline product packaging footprint to fully understand current packaging impacts.

Seek to achieve 100% recyclable, compostable and/or reusable packaging for Our Brands products.

Increase recycled content in packaging so that the Our Brands product portfolio collectively contains at least 10% recycled content in packaging.

Reduce unnecessary packaging.

Increase awareness among Kroger customers about how to properly manage Our Brands product packaging at end of life.

7 https://gc-22.emf.org/ppu/?_gl=1*1p3bi1c*_ga*nzEwMDEwNTU0LjE2Njl1NjQ4MTY.*_ga_V32N675KJX*MTY3MTlyMTM1OS4xMS4xLjE2NzEyMjE0OTMuNjAuMC4w


Taking Action to Achieve our 2030 Goals

In 2022, we developed our baseline packaging footprint with guidance from a consultant and input from our suppliers and internal subject matter experts. We found that 40% of Our Brands product packaging meets our definition of recyclable, when measured by weight of packaging material. In addition, the packaging portfolio captured in our baseline includes 14% post-consumer recycled content (PCR) material. We plan to update and refine our packaging baseline over time to track goal progress and inform goal achievement.

In 2023, we are continuing our work to build a roadmap to achieving our goals by 2030 and prioritize opportunities to adjust our packaging and/or support infrastructure changes. Our roadmap will also accommodate changes required by packaging legislation in the states and municipalities in which Kroger operates. In addition, the packaging baseline will inform any adjustments or refinements to our current goals.

More detailed information about our packaging baseline and key action steps to increase packaging sustainability is available in our 2022 Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) report (https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Kroger-Co-2022-ESG-Report.pdf).

We continue to evaluate and implement opportunities to reduce plastic use and improve end-of-life management opportunities for product packaging. Examples include:

Plastic Reduction & Circularity:

In 2022, Kroger added 50% post-consumer recycled content (PCR) PET plastic to a new line of Our Brands spice products. We continue to pilot different levels of PCR material in our product packaging, particularly in those products that are subject to packaging legislation, evaluating factors such as function, shelf-life, and aesthetic.

Kroger-operated manufacturing plants continue to reduce plastic use and packaging weights for Our Brands items, where feasible. Last year, we reduced the amount of plastic used in our carbonated soft drinks and cultured dairy tub product packages, saving approximately 450,000 pounds of plastic annually.

Kroger was the first U.S. grocery retail partner for the innovative Loop reusable packaging platform. In 2022, Kroger conducted a pilot at 25 Fred Meyer stores in the Portland, OR, area, selling more than 20 items representing popular brands, to gauge consumer response to this alternative to single-use packaging. Our pilot collected valuable insights on what may be needed to scale reusable packaging solutions in our industry.

End-of-Life Solutions:

We continue to offer the Kroger Our Brands packaging recycling program so our customers can collect flexible plastic packaging and mail it free of charge to TerraCycle for recycling. Kroger is the first retailer to offer this type of recycling program across an entire private-label portfolio. Program engagement and recycling volume continues to grow, with Kroger customers returning more than 1 million packages—the equivalent of more than 22,000 pounds of plastic—to date.

Kroger continued adding the How2Recycle logo to Our Brands items to increase our customers’ awareness of how to recycle product packaging, including those items eligible for front-of-store plastic film recycling programs—which we offer across the enterprise.

The Kroger Co. Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation supports the multi-stakeholder Polypropylene Recycling Coalition, facilitated by The Recycling Partnership, which aims to improve community-level infrastructure to enable curbside polypropylene collection and recycling. In 2022, the Foundation expanded this support to help fund the PET Recycling Coalition, which aims to increase the recyclability of PET (polyethylene terephthalate) plastic packaging.

Kroger is the Grocery Sector Lead partner for Closed Loop Partners’ Beyond the Bag Initiative, launched by the Consortium to Reinvent the Retail Bag. This multi-year collaboration across retail sectors aims to identify, test and implement innovative new design solutions to replace the single-use plastic retail shopping bag.


Given the above progress on our sustainable packaging roadmap, including detailed reporting available in Kroger’s 2022 ESG Report, we don’t believe additional reporting on packaging and plastics use is additive at this time.

For the foregoing reasons, we urge you to vote AGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 8 Report on Racial and Gender Pay Gaps

We have been advised that Arujna Capital on behalf of Susan Silver or an appointed representative along with one co-filer will present the following proposal for consideration during the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

Whereas: Pay inequities persist across race and gender and pose substantial risks to companies and society. Black workers' hourly median earnings represent 64 percent of white wages. The median income for women working full time is 83 percent that of men. Intersecting race, Black women earn 63 percent, Native women 60 percent, and Latina women 55 percent. At the current rate, women will not reach pay equity until 2059, Black women in 2130, and Latina women in 2224 .1

Citigroup estimates closing minority and gender wage gaps 20 years ago could have generated 12 trillion dollars in additional national income. PwC estimates closing the gender pay gap could boost Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries' economies by 2 trillion dollars annually.2

Actively managing pay equity is associated with improved representation. Diversity in leadership is linked to superior stock performance and return on equity.3 Minorities represent 38.5 percent of Kroger's workforce and 26 percent of Store Leaders. Women represent 50.5 percent of the workforce and 33 percent of Store Leaders.4

Best practice pay equity reporting consists of two parts:

1.unadjusted median pay gaps, assessing equal opportunity to high paying roles,
2.statistically adjusted gaps, assessing whether minorities and non-minorities, men and women, are paid the same for similar roles.

Kroger does not report quantitative unadjusted or adjusted pay gaps. Over 20 percent of the 100 largest U.S. employers currently report adjusted gaps, and an increasing number of companies disclose unadjusted gaps to address the structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay.5

Racial and gender unadjusted median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way of measuring pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, OECD, and International Labor Organization. The United Kingdom and Ireland mandate disclosure of median pay gaps, and the United Kingdom is considering racial pay reporting.6

Resolved: Shareholders request The Kroger Co. report on both quantitative median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender, including associated policy, reputational, competitive, and operational risks, and risks related to recruiting and retaining diverse talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, litigation strategy and legal compliance information.

1https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/Racial+Gender+Pay+Scorecard+2022+-+Arjuna+Capital.pdf

2 Ibid.

3 Ibid.

4https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Kroger-Co-2022-ESG-Report.pdf

5https://diversiq.com/which-sp-500-companies-disclose-gender-pay-equity-data/

6 https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/Racial+Gender+Pay+Scorecard+2022+-+Arjuna+Capital.pdf


Racial/gender pay gaps are defined as the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings (Wikipedia/OECD, respectively).

Supporting Statement:An annual report adequate for investors to assess performance could, with board discretion, integrate base, bonus and equity compensation to calculate:

percentage median and adjusted gender pay gap, globally and/or by country, where appropriate
percentage median and adjusted racial/minority/ethnicity pay gap, US and/or by country, where appropriate”

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote Against This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Kroger welcomes associates from every race, culture, gender and ability, and is actively creating and maintaining an equitable workplace where every associate is empowered, supported, and feels valued and a sense of belonging. Our aspiration is for the demographic representation of women and people of color to reflect our communities, at both the organization-wide and local levels.

Kroger already has an established approach to pay equity.Kroger has been performing an annual pay equity analysis since 2016, which takes into consideration gender and race for all salaried roles. We review our pay equity analysis annually with the Compensation and Talent Development Committee of the Board of Directors. The organization also equips and enables our leaders to promote pay equity and transparency. We have robust and comprehensive pay administration guidelines for non-bargaining-unit employees, enabling our managers to effectively manage compensation throughout the year to reward performance and address progression within pay ranges. In addition to these guidelines, we provide additional training to managers in preparation for annual compensation planning.

Kroger provides robust disclosure of representation annually. Kroger consistently discloses and discusses its diverse associate representation in the organization’s annual ESG Report. We publish our annual EEO-1 reports as filed with the EEOC (https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/EEO-1-2021.pdf). In addition, Kroger provides a detailed discussion of our workforce strategy and total rewards and benefits approach in our Annual Report and Form 10-K. The organization also discusses its approach to Human Capital Management in its annual ESG report. The report, available on www.thekrogerco.com/esgreport, includes disclosures related to associate health and safety; Kroger’s Framework for Action: Diversity, Equity & Inclusion plan; talent attraction and retention; and labor relations.

The majority of Kroger’s workforce is covered under collective bargaining agreements, which facilitate pay equity for frontline associates. Kroger’s compensation structure supports fair pay. Wages, health care and pensions are included in more than 354 collective bargaining agreements that cover approximately 64% of our associates. The negotiated pay structures within those agreements facilitate standard and consistent pay progression based on tenure and experience. Pay is determined using structured wage progressions where an associate moves through the progression based on time in role or hours worked. Associates move through the wage progression based on the same definitions and criteria as other associates working in the same roles. Pay parity is promoted within the model because of the structured wage grids and inherent progression framework.

Non-union hourly roles follow similar wage progressions. Where we use a pay-for-performance model for non-union, hourly roles, those workplaces follow compensation guidelines that provide for a framework of tying pay to performance and using pay levels.

Kroger provides comprehensive benefits for associates. The organization has invested an incremental $1.9 billion in associate wages and training since 2018. This has increased our national average hourly rate of pay from $13.66 to $18, or $23.50 per hour with comprehensive benefits.

Kroger has announced plans to continue investing in wages, with plans for a more than $770 million incremental investment in associates during 2023.


In addition to market-competitive wages, our associates have access to a wide variety of benefits that provide value in their lives today and in the future. We invest in the whole person with a benefits package that generally includes: quality, affordable healthcare; retirement savings plans and pension plans; on-demand access to mental health assistance and free counseling to support emotional wellness; career advancement opportunities; financial education programs to help associates manage their day-to-day finances; and an industry-leading continuing education benefit that provides up to $21,000 for associates, part-time and full-time alike, which, along with scholarships for children of associates — most of whom are first-generation college attendees — provide pathways to social mobility to associates who choose to participate. We also offer associates a variety of grocery discounts, volunteer opportunities, and other perks and rewards.

Diversity and inclusion are part of Kroger’s core organizational values, and the organization has strong programs in place to create and maintain an equitable workplace and inclusive culture.

Diversity and inclusion have been longstanding Kroger values. In 2020, we introduced Kroger’s Framework for Action to further advance diversity, equity and inclusion in our culture and communities. The plan’s action steps include creating a DE&I advisory council reporting to senior leadership, providing diversity training to our associate population, improving diverse talent recruiting through expanded partnerships with HBCUs and Hispanic-serving institutions, establishing two-way mentorship and advocacy programs, increasing spend with diverse suppliers, and more. We report progress against these goals in Kroger’s annual ESG report.

Kroger strives to attract, retain and develop leaders and associates who best reflect our communities. Because of our unique business model, we help unlock economic opportunity for nearly half a million people of various ages and aspirations, from those wanting an entry-level part-time job to graduate-degree specialists across corporate functions. We also aim to develop and promote diverse leaders to roles with increasing levels of responsibility. For open leadership positions, we assemble a diverse slate of candidates for consideration.

In 2022, every manager across the organization was expected to actively mentor and develop an associate who has a different background than them. This, along with other objectives, is used to assess the manager’s performance and ultimately affects their compensation. Currently, over 80% of retail division executive leadership teams have at least one diverse leader.

We believe that Kroger’s current compensation practices promote diversity, inclusion and fair pay across our workforce. While Kroger welcomes continued engagement with shareholders on these issues, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is not necessary in light of our existing practices.

For the foregoing reasons, we urge you to vote AGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 9 – Report on EEO Policy Risks

We have been advised that the National Center for Public Policy Research or an appointed representative will present the following proposal for consideration during the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. We will promptly to any shareholderprovide the shareholdings upon written or oral request to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices, that they intend to proposeoffices.

“RESOLVED

Shareholders request the following resolution atKroger Company ("Kroger") issue a public report detailing the annual meeting:

The Kroger Company
Human Rights Risk Assessment - 2016

“RESOLVED, that shareholders of The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”) urge the Board of Directors to report to shareholders, at reasonable costpotential risks associated with omitting "viewpoint" and omitting proprietary information, on Kroger’s process for identifying and analyzing potential and actual human rights risks of Kroger’s operations and supply chain (referred to herein as a “human rights risk assessment”) addressing the following:

Human rights principles used to frame the assessment
Frequency of assessment
Methodology used to track and measure performance
Nature and extent of consultation with relevant stakeholders in connection with the assessment
How the results of the assessment are incorporated into company policies and decision making.

"ideology" from its written equal employment opportunity (EEO) policy. The report should be made available within a reasonable timeframe, prepared at a reasonable expense and omit proprietary information.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Kroger does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on viewpoint or ideology in its written EEO policy.

Kroger's lack of a company-wide best practice EEO policy sends mixed signals to shareholders on Kroger’s website no later than October 31, 2016.

Supporting Statement

As long-term shareholders, we favorcompany employees and prospective employees and calls into question the extent to which individuals are protected due to inconsistent state policies and practices that protectthe absence of a relevant federal protection. Approximately half of Americans live and enhancework in a jurisdiction with no legal protections if their employer takes action against them for their political activities or discriminates on the valuebasis of our investments. There is increasing recognition that company risks relatedviewpoint in the workplace.


Companies with inclusive policies are better able to human rights violations, such asrecruit the most talented employees from a broad labor pool, resolve complaints internally to avoid costly litigation or reputational damage, and project delaysminimize employee turnover. Moreover, inclusive policies contribute to more efficient human capital management by eliminating the need to maintain different policies in different locations.

There is ample evidence that individuals with conservative viewpoints may face discrimination at Kroger.

Kroger recently kowtowed to leftwing social media criticism by removing patriotic and disruptions,Second Amendment related paraphernalia from store shelves. For instance, after someone complained on Twitter about a drink sleeve that stated, "Arms Change, Rights Don't", the Company reportedly recalled the items.1 Kroger's subsidiary grocery store, Harris Teeter, likewise complied with liberal demands to pull "Freedom Series" items from its shelves, removing items that read, "Give me liberty or give me death" and "America, love it or leave it."2

While removing patriotic items from its stores, Kroger has simultaneously pushed a leftwing social agenda. Published in2021, the Company released an "allyship guide" that told employees to use "inclusive language" and celebrate transgender holidays.3 Defining terms such as "non-binary," "transgender," and "pansexual," the guide asserts that, "Some people's morality can adversely affect shareholder value.be a barrier to accepting LGBTQ+ people."4

Removing pro-America items from store shelves while publishing "allyship" training guides for staff certainly raise concerns over how Kroger like many other companies, has adopted a supplier codetreats employees with diverse points of conduct (See The Kroger Company Standard Vendor Agreement) but has yet to publish a company-wide Human Rights Policy, addressing human rights issues and a separate human rights code that applies to its suppliers. Adoption of these principles would be an important first step in effectively managing human rights risks. Companies must then assess risks to shareholder value of human rights practices in their operations and supply chains to translate principles into protective practices.

The importance of human rights risk assessment is reflected in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (the “Ruggie Principles”) approved by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011. The Ruggie Principles urge that “business enterprises should carry out human rights due diligence... assessing actual and potential human rights impacts, integrating and acting upon the findings, tracking responses, and communicating how impacts are addressed.” (http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf)

Kroger’s business exposes it to significant human rights risks. As of year-end 2014, Kroger operations, including supermarkets, convenience and jewelry stores, are located in over 40 states. While over 90% of Kroger’s business is food its vendor Code of Conduct is based heavily on complianceview, particularly those who disagree with the law,Company's blatant leftwing actions. This places the Company in reputational, legal, and U.S. agricultural workersfinancial risk, as evidenced by a recent settlement with fired employees who refused to wear a Company issued apron adorning a rainbow on account of it violating their religious beliefs.5

Presently, shareholders are excluded from many labor lawsunable to evaluate how Kroger prevents discrimination towards employees based on their ideology or viewpoint, mitigates employee concerns of potential discrimination, and ensures a respectful and supportive work atmosphere that apply to other U.S. workers. The company’s supply chain is complex and global and violations of human rights in Kroger’s supply chain can leadbolsters employee performance.

We recommend that the report evaluate risks including, but not limited to, negative publicity, public protests,effects on employee hiring and a loss of consumer confidence that can have a negative impact on shareholder value.retention, as well as litigation risks from conflicting state and company anti-discrimination policies.”

We urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.”

57



The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteAgainst This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Like

Kroger strives to reflect the proponents, the Board also recognizes the importance of ensuringcommunities we serve and foster a culture that those seeking to do business with us respect basic human rights. However, the Board opposes this proposal because we are already working to ensure an ethical supply chain for the products sold in our stores and we have a zero tolerance policy for human rights violations. Furthermore, we regularly consider our policies and practices and we have recently taken several important steps to drive into our supply chain greater responsibility and accountability:

In 2015, after consultation with a number of stakeholders, we updated our Vendor Code of Conduct(the “Code of Conduct”), which is available at www.thekrogerco.com. The new Code of Conductmakes it clear that our suppliers and their suppliers are expected to live up to our standards as setforth in the Code of Conduct. To the extent they do not live up to such standards, we will not dobusiness with them.
In 2015, we created a social responsibility center of excellence (the “Center of Excellence”) toschedule, review and monitor social responsibility audits, assess risks such as those describedabove and develop a reporting structure that informs our business decisions. The Center ofExcellence is also tasked with recommending ways to continually improve social accountability inour supply chain.
In 2015, our annual sustainability report included a more in-depth report on our social responsibilityactivities, which is available at sustainability.kroger.com.
Since 2012, we have more than doubled the number of social responsibility audits we haveconducted and we expect this program to continue to grow.
This past year, our work revealed several facility failures. Many of these facilities have significantly improved through corrective action plans, but we are no longer doing business with a few.
In 2016, we made the Kroger Social Responsibility Audit Checklist (the “Audit Checklist”) availableonline. The Audit Checklist is required for Kroger suppliers that our social responsibility teamidentifies as higher risk due to variables such as country, product and/or industry.
In commodities and/or regions that are higher risk, like farmed shrimp in Thailand, we not only request supplier audits but also work with third party environmental and social certification programs to further eliminate risk in the supply chain.
In 2016, Kroger will also conduct a third party review of commodities in our supply chain to furtherassess both environmental and social risks.

We expect our program to continue to evolve and develop based on input from suppliers, customers, government, non-governmental organizations and developments within the industry. We believe that these efforts represent significant and positive steps forward for our Company’s social responsibility program.

Kroger is already actively implementing, monitoring, and continually improving our policies and practices, addressing a number of the areas discussed by the proponent. We believe that preparation of an additional report would not be an efficient use of our shareholders’ resources. We urge you to voteAGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 5 Shareholder Proposal

We have been notified by one shareholder, the name and shareholdings of which will be furnished promptly to any shareholder upon written or oral request to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices, that it intends to propose the following resolution at the annual meeting:

58



Shareholder Proposal
Recyclability of Packaging

“WHEREAS: A portion of Kroger house brand product packaging is unrecyclable, including plastics, which are a growing component of marine litter. Authorities say that marine litter kills and injures marine life, spreads toxics, and poses a potential threat to human health.

Plastic is the fastest growing form of packaging; U.S. flexible plastic sales are estimated at $26 billion. Dried fruit, frozen meat, cheese, and dog food are some of the Kroger house brand items packaged in unrecyclable plastic pouches. Private label items account for a quarter of all sales - nearly $20 billion annually. Using unrecyclable packaging when recyclable alternatives are available wastes valuable resources. William McDonough, a leading green design advisor, calls pouch packaging a “monstrous hybrid” designed to end up either in a landfill or incinerator.

Recyclability of household packaging is a growing area of focus as consumers become more environmentally conscious, yet recycling rates stagnate. Only 14% of plastic packaging is recycled, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Billions of pouches and similar plastic laminates, representing significant embedded value, lie buried in landfills. Unrecyclable packaging is more likelyempowers everyone to be litteredtheir true self, inspires collaboration, and swept into waterways. A recent assessment of marine debris by a panel offeeds the Global Environment Facility concluded that one cause of debris entering oceans is “design and marketing of products internationally without appropriate regard to their environmental fate or ability to be recycled...”

In the marine environment, plastics break down into indigestible particles that marine life mistake for food. Studies by the EPA suggest a synergistic effect between plastic debris and persistent, bio-accumulative, toxic chemicals. Plastics absorb toxics such as polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins from water or sediment and transfer them to the marine food web and potentially to human diets. One study of fish from the North Pacific found one or more plastic chemicals in all fish tested, independent of location and species.spirit.

California spends nearly $500 million annually preventing trash, much of it packaging, from polluting beaches, rivers and oceanfront. Making all packaging recyclable, if possible, is the first step needed to reduce the threat posed by ocean debris.

Companies who aspire to corporate sustainability yet use these risky materials need to explain why they use unrecyclable packaging. Other companies who manufacture and sell food and household goods are moving towards recyclability. Procter & Gamble and Colgate-Palmolive agreed to make most of their packaging recyclable by 2020. Keurig Green Mountain will make K-cup coffee pods recyclable; and McDonald’s and Dunkin Donuts shifted away from foam plastic cups, which cannot be readily recycled.

RESOLVED: Shareowners of Kroger request that the board of directors issue a report, at reasonable cost, omitting confidential information, assessing the environmental impacts of continuing to use unrecyclable brand packaging.

Supporting Statement: Proponents believe that the report should include an assessment of the reputational, financial and operational risks associated with continuing to use unrecyclable brand packaging and, if possible, goals and a timeline to phase out unrecyclable packaging.”

The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteAgainst This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Kroger shares the proponent’s concerns regarding plastic recyclability and recognizes the important role we play as a good steward of the environment.

We continue to improve the recyclability of our Corporate Brand products, while still preserving their safety and quality. More specifically, we follow a balanced, multi-pronged approach to optimizing packaging design that considers factors such as food safety, shelf life, availability, quality, material type, function, recyclability and cost, among others.

We are increasingly labeling recyclable Corporate Brand products per the Federal Trade Commission’s Green Guides, prompting our customers to “PLEASE RECYCLE.” One example is through our redesign of Kroger brand milks, creams and orange juices that come in quart, pint and

59



half-pint packages. The packaging for these products is comprised of a bottle made from #1 polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), one of the most widely recycled plastics available, and a shrink sleeve. While the shrink sleeve is also made from #1 PETE, these shrink sleeves may interfere with the ability of the bottles to be segregated and recycled when a recycling facility uses optical scanning technology. As a result, in order to increase the number of Corporate Brand #1 PETE bottles that can be properly recycled, we have added a tear perforation and the consumer message, “REMOVE LABEL TO RECYCLE BOTTLE,” to the shrink labels.

We recognize that creating lasting sustainable consumption patterns requires a comprehensive approach and so we also work with various industry experts and forums to advocate for expanded recycling infrastructure to support both multiple forms of plastic packaging and diversion from landfills.

Additionally, our banner brand bread bags are made from low-density polyethylene (LDPE). This type of plastic can be a contaminant in many single stream recycling programs. To help our customers recycle their LDPE bread bags we have added customer communication on the bag that reads, “Please recycle at your local, Kroger Family of Stores drop-off location.” These drop-off recycling bins are part of our plastic bag recycling program and are typically located in the front vestibule of our stores. Along with bread bags, customers can also recycle clean and dry plastic bags, bottled water case wraps, bathroom tissue and diaper plastic overwraps, dry cleaning bags, and newspaper bags. This program is currently undergoing rebranding and expansion to encourage customers to recycle even more in 2016 and beyond.

For each of the past several years we have published online our annual Sustainability Report that highlights our sustainability initiatives and waste reduction efforts in greater detail, available at sustainability.kroger.com. In that report, we set forth a rigorous and tangible goal to strive to have zero waste in our retail locations. Through this initiative, and others, we will continue to support efforts to reduce waste, find optimized solutions and advocate for expanded recycling infrastructure as we believe these efforts are significant and meaningful. We urge you to support these efforts and voteAGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 6 Shareholder Proposal

We have been notified by two shareholders, the names and shareholdings of which will be furnished promptly to any shareholder upon written or oral request to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices, that they intend to propose the following resolution at the annual meeting:

Shareholder Proposal
Renewable Energy

“Whereas:

To mitigate the worst impacts of climate change, the United Nations has stated that global warming must not increase more than 2 degrees Celsius beyond pre-industrial levels, which implies U.S. carbon dioxide emission reductions of 80% from 1990 levels by 2050. (IPCC 2013). At the 2015 United Nations Conference of Parties in Paris, 195 parties agreed on a pathway to achieve a 2 degree limit.

At $108 billion in sales, Kroger is the 6th largest global retailer, and is 20th on Fortune’s 2015 Fortune 500 list (Kroger 10k; Deloitte, 2015; Fortune). Kroger’s globally significant carbon emissions - which exceed 29 nations’ respective carbon emissions from energy - are not being adequately addressed. (Kroger, “Energy/Carbon” website; IEA, Energy Atlas). Kroger lacks climate targets, and where many companies are reducing carbon, Kroger’s 2014 Scope 1 emissions increased from the previous year. Despite its significant carbon footprint, Kroger has installed renewable energy at only 8 of its 3,806 stores, plants, and distribution centers, approximately 0.2% of its locations. (Kroger “Energy/Carbon” website, Factbook).

In contrast, Whole Foods Market offsets its entire power use with renewable energy credits, and Walmart is at 24% renewable power. (Whole Foods, “Green Mission”; Walmart, “Walmart’s Approach to Renewable Energy”). Indeed, Whole Foods Market, Walmart, Whole Foods Market, and other food companies including Coca-Cola Enterprises, Mars, Nestle, and Starbucks have committed to working towards 100% renewable energy. (RE100).

60



Investing in carbon reduction can benefit Kroger’s shareholder value. Carbon reduction activities can be lucrative, yielding returns over 30%. (“Lower emissions, higher ROI”, Carbon Disclosure Project, 2014). Research indicates that corporate management of climate impacts can lead to improved financial performance, including enhanced return on equity, stronger dividends, lower earnings volatility, and minimized regulatory risk. (“S&P 500 Leaders Report”, Carbon Disclosure Project, 2014)

According to Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google (another RE100 signatory): “Much of corporate America is buying renewable energy [...] not just to be sustainable, because it makes business sense, helping companies diversify their power supply, hedge against fuel risks, and support innovation in an increasingly cost-competitive way.” (“Google’s commitment to sustainability”, Google Green Blog, 2014).

Resolved:

Shareholders request that Kroger produce a report, by year end 2016, assessing the climate benefits and feasibility of adopting enterprise-wide, quantitative, time bound targets for increasing Kroger’s renewable energy sourcing. The report should be produced at reasonable cost and exclude proprietary information.

Supporting:Shareholders request that the report include an analysis of options and scenarios for achieving renewable energy targets, for example by using on-site distributed energy, off-site generation, power purchases, and renewable energy credits, or other opportunities management would like to consider, at its discretion.”

The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteAgainst This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Kroger shares the proponents’ concerns regarding renewable energy sourcing. We are committed to environmental sustainabilitya policy of equal opportunity for all associates without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity. In implementing our policy, we seek and embrace differences in the backgrounds, cultures, and perspectives of all associates, and we strive to reduce our impact on the environment by using natural resources responsiblyencourage and minimizing waste inexpect all of our operations.

Our aggressiveassociates to collaborate and actively work in energy management resulted in a reductiontogether regardless of overall energy consumptionthese differences. Moreover, as we identify in our stores saving more than 2.5 billion kWh since 2000. ThisESG Report, our diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) programs demonstrate our commitment to building a diverse and inclusive workforce, fostering an environment where diversity is the carbon equivalent of taking 362,922 cars off the roada competitive advantage and providing equal opportunities for one year.associates.

We are actively workingfocused on creating a culture of fairness and respect.

Our formal DE&I Framework for Action, launched in 2020, is focused on creating a more inclusive culture and advancing equitable communities, among other goals, underscoring Kroger’s commitment to do more in both the short-standing together and long-term. For example,mobilizing our Turkey Hill Dairy has two wind energy turbines with 3.2 megawatt capacity. Since 2011, these turbines have supplied up to 25% of the dairy’s annual electricity needs, which is enough power to produce six million gallons of ice creampeople, passion, scale and 15 million gallons of iced tea. In addition, ten Kroger stores have approximately 3,092kW of solar energy capacity that in 2015 produced approximately 3.94 million kWh.

The Kroger Recovery System, located in Compton, CA at the Ralphs/Food 4 Less distribution center has been in operation since late 2012. It utilizes anaerobic digestion, a naturally occurring process,resources to transform food waste into renewable biogas. This system annually processes approximately 45,000 tonsour culture and our communities. The framework is built around pillars focused on creating a more inclusive culture, developing diverse talent, advancing diverse partnerships, advancing equitable communities and deeply listening and reporting progress.

1 https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/06/21/harris-teeter-kroger-remove-pro-america-items-from-shelves-after-woke-complaints-backlash-is-swift-1252599/; https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/harris-teeter-kroger-backlash-pro-america-items-complaints

2 https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/06/21/harris-teeter-kroger-remove-pro-america-items-from-shelves-after-woke-complaints-backlash-is-swift-1252599/; https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/harris-teeter-kroger-backlash-pro-america-items-complaints

3 https://www.breitbart.com/social-justice/2022/08/31/kroger-allyship-guide-tells-employees-to-celebrate-trans-holidays-support-bail-fund/

4 https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content-uploads/2021/03/AAPI-Allyship-Guide_v3.2-External-merged.pdf

5 https://news.yahoo.com/kroger-pay-180K-lawsuit-over-162047710.html


In particular, we understand that our associates have a wide range of food waste. This biogas is then turned into power for onsite operations. The system provided approximately 3.5 million kWh of renewable energy for the 650,000 square foot Ralphs/Food 4 Less distribution center. The system reduces area truck trips by more than 500,000 miles each year and reduces waste costs. These effortsviewpoints. We are estimated to reduce carbon emissions by 90,000 tons per year.

For each of the past several years, we have published online our annual Sustainability Report that highlights our sustainability initiatives and waste reduction efforts in greater detail. We will continue to support efforts to increase our renewable energy sourcing as we believe these efforts are significant and meaningful. You can view our Sustainability Report atsustainability.kroger.com where we address a number of the requests made by the proponent including quantitative enterprise-wide renewable energy production metrics, and supply-chain management through our logistics initiative.

We remain committed to environmental sustainabilitya culture of fairness, respect and renewable energy sourcinginclusion that drives us to value and embrace differences. As part of our Framework for Action, we willare engaging with external and internal stakeholders to seek perspectives and provide associates with platforms to continue sharing their stories and feedback. To that end, Kroger launched an internal DEI Advisory Council made up of cross-functional leaders who are committed to publish reportsadvancing this progress, working closely with senior officers and business leaders to identify opportunities and specific actions for improvement, as well as the Board’s Compensation & Talent Development Committee overseeing progress on our human capital efforts, including DEI.

Diverse viewpoints are respected and encouraged.

Our policies and practices demonstrate that diverse viewpoints are respected and encouraged and are an essential part of advancing our business. In light of our demonstrated commitment to our shareholders tracking our initiatives. We urge you to support the furtheringcore values of our current programsdiversity and vote AGAINST this proposal.

61



Item No. 7 Shareholder Proposal

We have been notified by one shareholder, the name and shareholdings of which will be furnished promptly to any shareholder upon written or oral request to Kroger’s Secretary at our executive offices, that it intends to propose the following resolution at the annual meeting:

Shareholder Proposal
Share Repurchase vs. Dividend

“Resolved: Shareholders of The Kroger Co. ask the board of directors to adopt and issue a general payout policy that gives preference to share repurchases (relative to cash dividends) as a method to return capital to shareholders. If a general payout policy currently exists,inclusion for all stakeholders, we ask that it be amended appropriately.

Supporting statement: Share repurchases as a method to return capital to shareholders have distinct advantages relative to dividends. Share repurchases should be preferred for the following reasons:

1)Financial flexibility. Four professors from Duke University and Cornell University studied executives’ decisions to pay dividends or make repurchases by surveying hundreds of executives of public companies. They found that “maintaining the dividend level is on par with investment decisions, while repurchases are made out of the residual cash flow after investment spending.”1Further, in follow up interviews as part of the study, executives “state[d] that they would pass up some positive net present value (NPV) investment projects before cutting dividends.” The creation of long-term value is of paramount importance; I believe that repurchases have the distinct advantage that they do not create an incentive to forgo long-term value enhancing projects in order to preserve a historic dividend level.
2)Tax efficiency. Share repurchases have been described in the Wall Street Journal2as “akin to dividends, but without the tax bite for shareholders.” The distribution of a dividend may automatically trigger a tax liability for some shareholders. The repurchase of shares does not necessarily trigger that automatic tax liability and therefore gives a shareholder the flexibility to choose when the tax liability is incurred. Shareholders who desire cash flow can choose to sell shares and pay taxes as appropriate. (This proposal does not constitute tax advice.)
3)Market acceptance: Some may believe that slowing the growth rate or reducing the level of dividends would result in a negative stock market reaction. However, a study published in the Journal of Finance finds that the market response to cutting dividends by companies that were also share repurchasers was not statistically distinguishable from zero.3I believe this study provides evidence that there is market acceptance that repurchases are valid substitutes for dividends.

Some may worry that share repurchases could be used to prop up metrics that factor into the compensation of executives. I believe that any such concern should not interfereissuing a public report detailing the potential risks associated with the choice of optimal payout mechanism because compensation packages can be designed such that metrics are adjusted to account for share repurchases.

In summary, I strongly believe that adopting a general payoutomitting ‘viewpoint’ and ‘ideology’ from our equal employment opportunity policy, that gives preference to share repurchases would enhance long-term value creation. I urge shareholders to vote FORas contemplated by this proposal.”
____________________

1http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405XO5000528
2http://www.wsj.com/articles/companies-stock-buybacks-help-buoy-the-market-1410823441
3http://www.afajof.org/details/journalArticle/2893861/Dividends-Share-Repurchases-and-the- Substitution-Hypothesis.html

62



The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteAgainst This Proposal for the Following Reasons:

Kroger believes that the policy advocated by the shareholder proposal, is notnecessary or in the best interests of our shareholders as it reduces long-term flexibility in the allocation of capital. In a rapidly evolving capital market, this flexibility is an essential element in the careful management of shareholder capital, which the Board thoughtfully oversees and reviews on a regular basis.

Our long-term financial strategy continues to be to use cash flow from operations, in a balanced manner, to repurchase shares, fund dividends, and increase capital investments, all while maintaining our current investment grade debt rating. Our balanced approach gives us the flexibility to pursue long-term growth strategies while returning capital toKroger or our shareholders.

Kroger is proud of our strong history of capital return to shareholders. We have made significant commitments over time to return capital to shareholders both through repurchases of our common shares and payment of cash dividends. We repurchased $703 million of Kroger common shares in 2015, as well as $1.1 billion in 2014, $338 million in 2013 and $1.2 billion in 2012. Additionally, we paid dividends totaling $385 million in 2015, $338 million in 2014, $319 million in 2013 and $267 million in 2012. We are also committed to growing long-term shareholder value through significant capital investments. Excluding acquisitions, we invested $3.38 billion, $2.89 billion, $2.46 billion and $2.06 billion in capital projects in 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Many of our shareholders view both dividends and share repurchases as an important component of Kroger’s investment profile, especially in light of our balanced capital return strategy that contributes to a healthy TSR (total shareholder return), which outperforms both our peers and

For the S&P 500 over time.

When contemplating capital returns, the Board engages in a thorough analysis and oversight process. Before the Board approves any share repurchase program or declares a cash dividend, it takes into account a wide range of factors, including Kroger’s short and long-term growth strategies, liquidity needs and capital requirements, cash flows, net earnings, debt obligations, and leverage ratios. The Board also considers how the then-current capital market conditions affect Kroger’s policies and strategies. There is no one-size-fits-all policy or strategy in returning capital to shareholders that would satisfy each market condition over the course of time. Balanced capital allocation decisions, overseen by an effective Board, remain the most effective and flexible strategy to continuously deliver healthy value to shareholders over the long-term.

This proposal requests that Kroger adopt a general policy that gives preference to share repurchases relative to cash dividends. Weforegoing reasons, we urge you to voteAGAINST this proposal.

63



Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations – 2017— 2024 Annual Meeting

Shareholder

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the proxy material relating to Kroger’s annual meeting of shareholders in June 20172024 should be addressed to Kroger’s Secretary and must be received at our executive offices not later than January 12, 2017.13, 2024. These proposals must comply with Rule 14a-8 and the SEC’s proxy rules. If a shareholder submits a proposal outside of Rule 14a-8 for the 2023 annual meeting and such proposal is not delivered within the time frame specified in the Regulations, Kroger’s proxy may confer discretionary authority on persons being appointed as proxies on behalf of Kroger to vote on such proposal.

In addition, Kroger’s Regulations contain an advance notice of shareholder business and director nominations requirement, which generally prescribes the procedures that a shareholder of Kroger must follow if the shareholder intends, at an annual meeting, to nominate a person for election to Kroger’s Board of Directors or to propose other business to be considered by shareholders. These procedures include, among other things, that the shareholder give timely notice to Kroger’s Secretary of the nomination or other proposed business, that the notice contain specified information, and that the shareholder comply with certain other requirements. In order to be timely, this notice must be delivered in writing to Kroger’s Secretary, at our principal executive offices, not later than 45 calendar days prior to the date on which our proxy statement for the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders was mailed to shareholders. If a shareholder’s nomination or proposal is not in compliance with the procedures set forth in the Regulations, we may disregard such nomination or proposal. Accordingly, if a shareholder intends, at the 2017 annual meeting,2024 Annual Meeting, to nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors or to propose other business, the shareholder must deliver a notice of such nomination or proposal to Kroger’s Secretary not later than March 28, 2017,2024 and comply with the requirements of the Regulations. If a shareholder submits a proposal outside

Furthermore, in addition to the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 or our Regulations, as applicable, as described above, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must provide notice to Kroger’s Secretary that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act no later than April 23, 2024, and must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-814a-19(b).

Eligible shareholders may also submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 20172024 annual meeting of shareholders. To be eligible, shareholders must have owned at least three percent of our common shares for at least three years. Up to 20 shareholders will be able to aggregate for this purpose. Nominations must be submitted to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than December 14, 2023 and such proposal is not delivered within the time frame specified in the Regulations, Kroger’s proxy may confer discretionary authority on persons being appointed as proxies on behalf of Kroger to vote on such proposal. no later than January 13, 2024.

Shareholder proposals, director nominations, including, if applicable pursuant to proxy access, and advance notices shouldmust be addressed in writing, and addressed and delivered timely to: Corporate Secretary, The Kroger Co., 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1100.


2015 Annual Report

Attached to this Proxy Statement is our 2015 Annual Report which includes a brief description of our business, including the general scope and nature thereof during fiscal year 2015, together with the audited financial information contained in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.A copy of that report is available to shareholders on request without charge by writing to: Todd A. Foley, Treasurer, The Kroger Co., 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1100 or by calling 513-762-1220. Our SEC filings are available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Householding of Proxy Materials

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, shareholders of record who have the same address and last name will receive only one copy of the Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials (or proxy materials in the case of shareholders who receive paper copies of such materials) unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees. Householding will not in any way affect dividend check mailings.

If you are eligible for householding, but you and other shareholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of our Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials (or proxy materials in the case of shareholders who receive paper copies of such materials), or if you hold in more than one account, and in either case you wish to receive only a single copy for your household or if you prefer to receive separate copies of our documents in the future, please contact your bank or broker, or contact Kroger’s Secretary at 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-110045202 or via telephone at 513-762-4000.

Beneficial shareholders can request information about householding from their banks, brokers or other holders of record.

____________________

The management knows of no other matters that are to be presented at the meeting, but, if any should be presented, the Proxy Committee expects to vote thereon according to its best judgment.

By order of the Board of Directors,
Christine S. Wheatley, Secretary

64



Available Information

_____________


2015 ANNUAL REPORT

_____________



FINANCIAL REPORT 2015

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The managementCompany files Annual Reports on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of The Kroger Co. has the responsibilityAnnual Report on Form 10-K for preparing the accompanyingfiscal year ended January 28, 2023 (except for certain exhibits thereto), including our audited financial statements and for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis and are not misstated due to material error or fraud. The financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Management also prepared the other information in the report and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the financial statements.

Kroger’s financial statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, whose selection has been ratified by the shareholders. Management has made available to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP all of Kroger’s financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of the shareholders’ and directors’ meetings. Furthermore, management believes that all representations made to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during its audit were valid and appropriate.

Management also recognizes its responsibility for fostering a strong ethical climate so that Kroger’s affairs are conducted according to the highest standards of personal and corporate conduct. This responsibility is characterized and reflected inThe Kroger Co. Policy on Business Ethics, which is publicized throughout Kroger and available on Kroger’s website at ir.kroger.com.The Kroger Co. Policy on Business Ethics addresses, among other things, the necessity of ensuring open communication within Kroger; potential conflicts of interests; compliance with all domestic and foreign laws, including those related to financial disclosure; and the confidentiality of proprietary information. Kroger maintains a systematic program to assess compliance with these policies.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our management excluded Roundy’s, Inc. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting because it was acquired in a purchase business combination on December 18, 2015. Roundy’s, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 2% and less than 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts asschedules, may be obtained, free of and for the year ended January 30, 2016. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 30, 2016.

W. Rodney McMullenJ. Michael Schlotman
Chairman of the Board andExecutive Vice President and
Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer

A-1



SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Fiscal Years Ended

January 30,
2016
(52 weeks)(1)

January 31,
2015
(52 weeks)(1)

February 1,
2014
(52 weeks)(1)
February 2,
2013
(53 weeks)
January 28,
2012
(52 weeks)
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Sales       $109,830           $108,465           $98,375           $96,619           $90,269    
Net earnings including
     noncontrolling interests2,0491,7471,5311,508596
Net earnings attributable to
     The Kroger Co.2,0391,7281,5191,497602
Net earnings attributable to
     The Kroger Co. per diluted
     common share2.061.721.451.390.51
Total assets33,89730,49729,28124,63423,454
Long-term liabilities, including
     obligations under capital leases
     and financing obligations14,12313,66313,1819,35910,405
Total shareholders’ equity –
     The Kroger Co.6,8115,4125,3844,2073,981
Cash dividends per common share0.3950.3400.3080.2480.215
____________________

(1)Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) is included in our ending Consolidated Balance Sheets for 2015, 2014 and 2013 and in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2015 and 2014. Due to the timing of the merger closing late in fiscal year 2013, its results of operations were not material to our consolidated results of operations for 2013.

COMMON SHARE PRICE RANGE

20152014
Quarter     High     Low     High     Low
1st$38.87$34.05$23.95$17.57
2nd$38.65$37.09$25.75$23.25
3rd$38.73$27.32$29.08$24.99
4th$42.75$36.00$35.03$28.64

Main trading market: New York Stock Exchange (Symbol KR)

Number of shareholders of record at fiscal year-end 2015: 29,102

Number of shareholders of record at March 23, 2016: 28,959

During 2015, we paid two quarterly cash dividends of $0.0925 per share and two quarterly cash dividends of $0.105 per share. During 2014, we paid three quarterly cash dividends of $0.0825 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $0.0925 per share. On March 1, 2016, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.105 per share. On March 10, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors have declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.105 per share, payable on June 1, 2016,charge, upon written request by any shareholder to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 13, 2016. We currently expect to continue to pay comparable cash dividends on a quarterly basis depending on our earnings and other factors.

A-2



PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the five-year cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares, based on the market price of the common shares and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the cumulative total return of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and a peer group composed of food and drug companies.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE FIVE-YEAR TOTAL RETURN*
Among The Kroger Co., the S&P 500, and Peer Group**

BaseINDEXED RETURNS
PeriodYears Ending
Company Name/Index     2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     2015
The Kroger Co.100116.26136.28179.49348.32395.78
S&P 500 Index100105.33123.87149.02170.22169.08
Peer Group100105.11126.94143.63173.96161.13

Kroger’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31.
____________________

*Total assumes $100 invested on January 30, 2011, in The Kroger Co., S&P 500 Index, and the Peer Group, with reinvestment of dividends.
**The Peer Group consists of Costco Wholesale Corp., CVS Caremark Corp, Etablissements Delhaize Freres Et Cie Le Lion (Groupe Delhaize), Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (included through March 13, 2012 when it became private after emerging from bankruptcy), Koninklijke Ahold NV, Safeway, Inc. (included through January 29, 2015 when it was acquired by AB Acquisition LLC), Supervalu Inc., Target Corp., Tesco plc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. (formerly, Walgreen Co.), Whole Foods Market Inc. and Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (included through March 9, 2012 when it became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bi-Lo Holdings).
Data supplied by Standard & Poor’s.

The foregoing Performance Graph will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing, absent an express reference thereto.

A-3



ISSUER PURCHASESOF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period(1)Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased(2)
     Average
Price
Paid
Per
Share
     Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs(3)
     Maximum
Dollar
Value of
Shares
that May Yet
Be
Purchased
Under
the Plans or
Programs(4)
(in millions)
First period - four weeks                         
     November 8, 2015 to December 5, 201594,717$37.8974,819$500
Second period - four weeks
     December 6, 2015 to January 2, 2016906,648$41.47831,783$500
Third period – four weeks
     January 3, 2016 to January 30, 2016213,721$39.73169,598$500
Total1,215,086$40.881,076,200$500
____________________

(1)The reported periods conform to our fiscal calendar composed of thirteen 28-day periods. The fourth quarter of 2015 contained three 28-day periods.
(2)Includes (i) shares repurchased under a program announced on December 6, 1999 to repurchase common shares to reduce dilution resulting from our employee stock option and long-term incentive plans, under which repurchases are limited to proceeds received from exercises of stock options and the tax benefits associated therewith (the “1999 Repurchase Program”), and (ii) 138,886 shares that were surrendered to the Company by participants under our long-term incentive plans to pay for taxes on restricted stock awards.
(3)Represents shares repurchased under the 1999 Repurchase Program.
(4)The amounts shown in this column reflect the amount remaining under the $500 million share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors and announced on June 25, 2015 (the “2015 Repurchase Program”). Amounts available under the 1999 Repurchase Program are dependent upon option exercise activity. The 2015 Repurchase Program and the 1999 Repurchase Program do not have an expiration date but may be terminated by the Board of Directors at any time. On March 10, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a new $500 million share repurchase program to supplement the 2015 Repurchase Program, which is expected to be exhausted by the end of the second quarter of 2016.

BUSINESS

The Kroger Co. (the “Company” or “Kroger”) was founded in 1883 and incorporated in 1902. As of January 30, 2016, we are one of the largest retailers in the world based on annual sales. We also manufacture and process some of the food for sale in our supermarkets. Our principal executive offices are locatedSecretary at 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 and ouror via telephone number is (513) 762-4000. We maintain a web site (www.thekrogerco.com) that includes additional information about the Company. We make available through our web site, freeat 513-762-4000. Copies of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and our interactive data files, including amendments. These forms are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed them with, or furnished them electronicallyall exhibits to the SEC.

A-4



Our revenues are predominately earned and cash is generated as consumer products are sold to customers in our stores and fuel centers. We earn income predominantly by selling products at price levels that produce revenues in excess of the costs to make these products available to our customers. Such costs include procurement and distribution costs, facility occupancy and operational costs, and overhead expenses. Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. All references to 2015, 2014 and 2013 are to the fiscal years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, respectively, unless specifically indicated otherwise.

EMPLOYEES

As of January 30, 2016, Kroger employed approximately 431,000 full- and part-time employees. A majority of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements negotiated with local unions affiliated with one of several different international unions. There are approximately 350 such agreements, usually with terms of three to five years.

STORES

As of January 30, 2016, Kroger operated, either directly or through its subsidiaries, 2,778 retail food stores under a variety of local banner names, 1,387 of which had fuel centers. Approximately 42% of these supermarkets were operated in Company-owned facilities, including some Company-owned buildings on leased land. Our current strategy emphasizes self-development and ownership of store real estate. Our stores operate under a variety of banners that have strong local ties and brand recognition. Supermarkets are generally operated under one of the following formats: combination food and drug stores (“combo stores”); multi-department stores; marketplace stores; or price impact warehouses.

The combo store is the primary food store format. They typically draw customers from a 2 – 2½ mile radius. We believe this format is successful because the stores are large enough to offer the specialty departments that customers’ desire for one-stop shopping, including natural food and organic sections, pharmacies, general merchandise, pet centers and high-quality perishables such as fresh seafood and organic produce.

Multi-department stores are significantly larger in size than combo stores. In addition to the departments offered at a typical combo store, multi-department stores sell a wide selection of general merchandise items such as apparel, home fashion and furnishings, outdoor living, electronics, automotive products, toys and fine jewelry.

Marketplace stores are smaller in size than multi-department stores. They offer full-service grocery, pharmacy and health and beauty care departments as well as an expanded perishable offering and general merchandise area that includes apparel, home goods and toys.

Price impact warehouse stores offer a “no-frills, low cost” warehouse format and feature everyday low prices plus promotions for a wide selection of grocery and health and beauty care items. Quality meat, dairy, baked goods and fresh produce items provide a competitive advantage. The average size of a price impact warehouse store is similar to that of a combo store.

In addition to the supermarkets, as of January 30, 2016, we operated, through subsidiaries, 784 convenience stores, 323 fine jewelry stores and an online retailer. All 121 of our fine jewelry stores located in malls are operated in leased locations. In addition, 78 convenience stores were operated by franchisees through franchise agreements. Approximately 54% of the convenience stores operated by subsidiaries were operated in Company-owned facilities. The convenience stores offer a limited assortment of staple food items and general merchandise and, in most cases, sell gasoline.

SEGMENTS

We operate retail food and drug stores, multi-department stores, jewelry stores, and convenience stores throughout the United States. Our retail operations, which represent over 99% of our consolidated sales and earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), is our only reportable segment. Our retail operating divisions have been aggregated into one reportable segment due to the operating divisions having similar economic characteristics with similar long-term financial performance. In addition, our operating divisions offer customers similar products, have

A-5



similar distribution methods, operate in similar regulatory environments, purchase the majority of the merchandise for retail sale from similar (and in many cases identical) vendors on a coordinated basis from a centralized location, serve similar types of customers, and are allocated capital from a centralized location. Our operating divisions reflect the manner in which the business is managed and how our Chief Executive Officer, who acts as our chief operating decision maker, assesses performance internally. All of our operations are domestic. Revenues, profits and losses and total assets are shown in our Consolidated Financial Statements set forth beginning on page A-29 below.

MERCHANDISING AND MANUFACTURING

Corporate brand products play an important role in our merchandising strategy. Our supermarkets, on average, stock over 14,000 private label items. Our corporate brand products are primarily produced and sold in three “tiers.” Private Selection® is the premium quality brand designed to be a unique item in a category or to meet or beat the “gourmet” or “upscale” brands. The “banner brand” (Kroger®, Ralphs®, Fred Meyer®, King Soopers®, etc.), which represents the majority of our private label items, is designed to satisfy customers with quality products. Before we will carry a “banner brand” product we must be satisfied that the product quality meets our customers’ expectations in taste and efficacy, and we guarantee it. P$$T…®, Check This Out… and Heritage Farm™ are the three value brands, designed to deliver good quality at a very affordable price. In addition, we continue to grow our other brands, including Simple Truth® and Simple Truth Organic®. Both Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic are Free From 101 artificial preservatives and ingredients that customers have told us they do not want in their food, and the Simple Truth Organic products are USDA certified organic.

Approximately 40% of the corporate brand units sold in our supermarkets are produced in our food production plants; the remaining corporate brand items are produced to our strict specifications by outside manufacturers. We perform a “make or buy” analysis on corporate brand products and decisions are based upon a comparison of market-based transfer prices versus open market purchases. As of January 30, 2016, we operated 38 food production plants. These plants consisted of 17 dairies, ten deli or bakery plants, five grocery product plants, two beverage plants, two meat plants and two cheese plants.

SEASONALITY

The majority of our revenues are generally not seasonal in nature. However, revenues tend to be higher during the major holidays throughout the year.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The disclosure regarding executive officers is set forth in Item 10 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 under the heading “Executive Officers of the Company,” and is incorporated herein by reference.

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT

For the disclosure related to our competitive environment, see Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 under the heading “Competitive Environment.”

A-6



Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OUR BUSINESS

The Kroger Co. was founded in 1883 and incorporated in 1902. Kroger is one of the nation’s largest retailers, as measured by revenue, operating 2,778 supermarket and multi-department stores underare available upon a variety of local banner names in 35 states and the District of Columbia. Of these stores, 1,387 have fuel centers. We also operate 784 convenience stores, either directly or through franchisees, 323 fine jewelry stores and an online retailer.

We operate 38 food production plants, primarily bakeries and dairies, which supply approximately 40% of the corporate brand units sold in our supermarkets.

Our revenues are earned and cash is generated as consumer products are sold to customers in our stores. We earn income predominately by selling products at price levels that produce revenues in excess of the costs we incur to make these products available to our customers. Such costs include procurement and distribution costs, facility occupancy and operational costs, and overhead expenses. Our retail operations, which represent over 99% of our consolidated sales and EBITDA, is our only reportable segment.

On December 18, 2015, we closed our merger with Roundy’s by purchasing 100% of the Roundy’s outstanding common stock for $3.60 per share and assuming Roundy’s outstanding debt, for a purchase price of $866 million. Roundy’s is included in our ending Consolidated Balance Sheets for 2015 and in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the last six weeks of 2015. Certain year-over-year comparisons will be affected as a result. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our merger with Roundy’s.

On August 18, 2014, we closed our merger with Vitacost.com by purchasing 100% of the Vitacost. com outstanding common stock for $8.00 per share or $287 million. Vitacost.com is included in our ending Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2014 and 2015. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our merger with Vitacost.com.

On January 28, 2014, we closed our merger with Harris Teeter by purchasing 100% of the Harris Teeter outstanding common stock for approximately $2.4 billion. Harris Teeter is included in our ending Consolidated Balance Sheets for 2014 and 2015 and in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2014 and 2015. Due to the timing of the merger closing late in fiscal year 2013, its results of operations were not material to our consolidated results of operations for 2013. Certain year-over-year comparisons will be affected as a result. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our merger with Harris Teeter.

OUR 2015 PERFORMANCE

We achieved outstanding results in 2015. Our business strategy continues to resonate with a full range of customers and our results reflect the balance we seek to achieve across our business including positive identical supermarket sales growth, increases in loyal household count, and good cost control, as well as growth in net earnings and net earnings per diluted share. Our 2015 net earnings were $2.0 billion or $2.06 per diluted share, compared to $1.7 billion, or $1.72 per diluted share for 2014. All share and per share amounts presented are reflective of the two-for-one stock split that began trading at the split adjusted price on July 14, 2015.

Our net earnings for 2015 include a $110 million expense to operating, general, and administrative (“OG&A”) for certain contributions to the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (“UFCW”) Consolidated Pension Plan (“2015 UFCW Contributions”) made during the third and fourth quarters of 2015. In addition, our net earnings for 2015 include a lower last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) charge compared to 2014. Net earnings for 2014 include a net $39 million after-tax charge for an $87 million ($56 million after-tax) charge to OG&A due to the commitments and withdrawal liabilities arising from restructuring of certain multi-employer obligations (“2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation”) to help stabilize associates’ future pension benefits, offset partially by the benefits from certain tax items of $17 million (“2014 Adjusted

A-7



Items”). In addition, our net earnings for 2014 include unusually high fuel margins, partially offset by a LIFO charge that was significantly higher than 2013 and $140 million in contributions charged to OG&A expenses for the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan ($55 million) and The Kroger Co. Foundation ($85 million) (“2014 Contributions”). The 2015 and 2014 contributions to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan was to further fund the plan. The $85 million contribution, in 2014, to The Kroger Co. Foundation will enable it to continue to support causes such as hunger relief, breast cancer awareness, the military and their families and local community organizations. Fuel margin per gallon was $0.19 in 2014, compared to $0.14 in 2013. Our net earnings for 2013 include a net benefit of $23 million, which includes benefits from certain tax items of $40 million, offset partially by costs of $11 million in interest and $16 million in OG&A expenses ($17 million after-tax) related to our merger with Harris Teeter (“2013 Adjusted Items”).

Our 2015 net earnings were $2.0 billion or $2.06 per diluted share, compared to $1.7 billion, or $1.72 per diluted share for 2014. Net earnings for 2015 totaled $2.0 billion, or $2.06 per diluted share, compared to net earnings in 2014 of $1.8 billion, or $1.76 per diluted share, excluding the 2014 Adjusted Items. We believe adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per diluted share present a more accurate year-over-year comparison of our financial results because the 2014 Adjusted Items were not the result of our normal operations. Our net earnings per diluted share for 2015 represent a 17% increase, compared to 2014 adjusted net earnings per diluted share. Please refer to the “Net Earnings” section of MD&A for more information.

Our identical supermarket sales increased 5.0%, excluding fuel, in 2015, compared to 2014. We have achieved 49 consecutive quarters of positive identical supermarket sales growth, excluding fuel. As we continue to outpace many of our competitors on identical supermarket sales growth, we continue to gain market share. We focus on identical supermarket sales growth, excluding fuel, as it is a key performance target for our long-term growth strategy.

Increasing market share is an important part of our long-term strategy as it best reflects how our products and services resonate with customers. Market share growth allows us to spread the fixed costs in our business over a wider revenue base. Our fundamental operating philosophy is to maintain and increase market share by offering customers good prices and superior products and service. Based on Nielsen POS+ data, our overall market share of the products we sell in markets in which we operate increased by approximately 40 basis points in 2015. This data also indicates that our market share increased in 17 markets and declined in one. These market share results reflect our long-term strategy of market share growth.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion summarizes our operating results for 2015 compared to 2014 and for 2014 compared to 2013. Comparability is affected by income and expense items that fluctuated significantly between and among the periods, our merger with Roundy’s in late 2015 and our merger with Harris Teeter in late 2013. All share and per share amounts presented below are reflective of the two-for-one stock split that began trading at the split adjusted price on July 14, 2015.

Management believes adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) are useful metrics to investors and analysts because they more accurately reflect our day-to-day business operations than do the generally accepted accounting principle (“GAAP”) measures of net earnings and net earnings per diluted share. Adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) are non-generally accepted accounting principle (“non-GAAP”) financial measures and should not be considered alternatives to net earnings (and net earnings per diluted share) or any other GAAP measure of performance. Adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) should not be viewed in isolation or considered substitutes for our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. Management uses adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) in evaluating our results of operations as it believes these measures are more meaningful indicators of operating performance since, as adjusted, those earnings relate more directly to our day-to-day operations. Management also uses adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) as a performance metric for management incentive programs, and to measure our progress against internal budgets and targets.

A-8



Net Earnings

Net earnings totaled $2.0 billion in 2015, $1.7 billion in 2014 and $1.5 billion in 2013. Net earnings improved in 2015, compared to net earnings in 2014, due to an increase in operating profit, partially offset by an increase in income tax expense. Operating profit increased in 2015, compared to 2014, primarily due to an increase in first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) non-fuel operating profit, lower charges for total contributions to The Kroger Co. Foundation, UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan, the charge related to the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation and a lower LIFO charge which was $28 million (pre-tax), compared to a LIFO charge of $147 million (pre-tax) in 2014, partially offset by a decrease in fuel operating profit and continued investments in lower prices for our customers. The decrease in fuel operating profit was primarily due to a decrease in fuel margin per gallon to $0.17 in 2015, compared to $0.19 in 2014, partially offset by an increase in fuel gallons sold. Continued investments in lower prices for our customers includes our pharmacy department, which experienced high levels of inflation that were not fully passed on to the customer in 2015. Net earnings improved in 2014, compared to net earnings in 2013, due to an increase in operating profit, partially offset by increases in interest and income tax expense. Operating profit increased in 2014, compared to 2013, primarily due to an increase in FIFO non-fuel operating profit, excluding Harris Teeter, the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and an increase in fuel operating profit, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers, the 2014 Contributions, the charge related to the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation and a higher LIFO charge which was $147 million (pre-tax), compared to a LIFO charge of $52 million (pre-tax) in 2013.

The net earnings for 2015 do not include any non-GAAP adjustments. The net earnings for 2014 include a net charge of $39 million, after tax, related to the 2014 Adjusted Items. The net earnings for 2013 include a net benefit of $23 million, after tax, related to the 2013 Adjusted Items. Excluding these benefits and charges for Adjusted Items for 2014 and 2013, adjusted net earnings were $2.0 billion in 2015, $1.8 billion in 2014 and $1.5 billion in 2013. 2015 net earnings improved, compared to adjusted net earnings in 2014, due to an increase in FIFO non-fuel operating profit, lower charges for total contributions to The Kroger Co. Foundation and UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan and a lower LIFO charge which was $28 million (pre-tax), compared to a LIFO charge of $147 million (pre-tax) in 2014, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers, a decrease in fuel operating profit and an increase in income tax expense. Continued investments in lower prices for our customers includes our pharmacy department, which experienced high levels of inflation that were not fully passed on to the customer in 2015. 2014 adjusted net earnings improved, compared to adjusted net earnings in 2013, due to an increase in FIFO non-fuel operating profit, excluding Harris Teeter, the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and an increase in fuel operating profit, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers, the 2014 Contributions, increases in interest and income tax expense and a higher LIFO charge which was $147 million (pre-tax), compared to a LIFO charge of $52 million (pre-tax) in 2013.

Net earnings per diluted share totaled $2.06 in 2015, $1.72 in 2014 and $1.45 in 2013. Net earnings per diluted share in 2015, compared to 2014, increased primarily due to fewer shares outstanding as a result of the repurchase of Kroger common shares and an increase in net earnings. Net earnings per diluted share in 2014, compared to 2013, increased primarily due to fewer shares outstanding as a result of the repurchase of Kroger common shares and an increase in net earnings.

There were no adjustment items in 2015, but excluding the 2014 and 2013 Adjusted Items, adjusted net earnings per diluted share totaled $1.76 in 2014 and $1.43 in 2013. Net earnings per diluted share in 2015, compared to adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2014, increased primarily due to fewer shares outstanding as a result of the repurchase of Kroger common shares and an increase in adjusted net earnings. Adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2014, compared to adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2013, increased primarily due to fewer shares outstanding as a result of the repurchase of Kroger common shares and an increase in adjusted net earnings.

A-9



The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. to net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. excluding Adjusted Items for 2014 and 2013 and a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share to the net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share excluding Adjusted Items for 2014 and 2013. In 2015, we did not have any adjustment items that affect net earnings or net earnings per diluted share.

Net Earnings per Diluted Share excluding the Adjusted Items
(in millions, except per share amounts)

     2015     2014     2013
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.$2,039$1,728$1,519
2014 Adjusted Items39
2013 Adjusted Items(23)
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. excluding the
     adjustment items above$2,039$1,767$1,496
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share$2.06$1.72$1.45
2014 Adjusted Items(1)0.04
2013 Adjusted Items(1)(0.02)
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share
     excluding the adjustment items above$2.06$1.76$1.43
Average numbers of common shares used in diluted calculation9809931,040
____________________

(1)The amounts presented represent the net earnings per diluted common share effect of each adjusted item.

Sales

Total Sales
(in millions)
 
PercentagePercentage
     2015     Increase(2)     2014     Increase(3)     2013
Total supermarket sales                    
     without fuel$91,3105.8%$86,28112.5%$76,666
Fuel sales14,804(21.5%)18,850(0.6%)18,962
Other sales(1)3,71611.5%3,33421.4%2,747
Total sales$109,8301.3%$108,46510.3%$98,375
____________________

(1)Other sales primarily relate to sales at convenience stores, excluding fuel; jewelry stores; food production plants to outside customers; variable interest entities; a specialty pharmacy; in-store health clinics; sales on digital coupon services; and online sales by Vitacost.com.
(2)This column represents the sales percentage increases in 2015, compared to 2014.
(3)This column represents the sales percentage increases in 2014, compared to 2013.

Total sales increased in 2015, compared to 2014, by 1.3%. This increase in 2015 total sales, compared to 2014, was primarily due to an increase in identical supermarket sales, excluding fuel, of 5.0%. Total sales also increased due to the inclusion of Roundy’s sales, due to our merger, for the period of December 18, 2015 to January 30, 2016. Identical supermarket sales, excluding fuel, for 2015, compared to 2014, increased primarily due to an increase in the number of households shopping with us, an increase in visits per household, changes in product mix and product cost inflation. Total fuel sales decreased in 2015, compared to 2014, primarily due to a 26.7% decrease in the average retail fuel price, partially offset by an increase in fuel gallons sold of 7.1%.

Total sales increased in 2014, compared to 2013, by 10.3%. This increase in 2014 total sales, compared to 2013, was primarily due to our merger with Harris Teeter, which closed on January 28, 2014, and an increase in identical supermarket sales, excluding fuel, of 5.2%. Identical supermarket

A-10



sales, excluding fuel for 2014, compared to 2013, increased primarily due to an increase in the number of households shopping with us, an increase in visits per household and product cost inflation. Total fuel sales decreased in 2014, compared to 2013, primarily due to a 6.8% decrease in the average retail fuel price, partially offset by an increase in fuel gallons sold of 6.6%.

We define a supermarket as identical when it has been in operation without expansion or relocation for five full quarters. Although identical supermarket sales is a relatively standard term, numerous methods exist for calculating identical supermarket sales growth. As a result, the method used by our management to calculate identical supermarket sales may differ from methods other companies use to calculate identical supermarket sales. We urge you to understand the methods used by other companies to calculate identical supermarket sales before comparing our identical supermarket sales to those of other such companies. Fuel discounts received at our fuel centers and earned based on in-store purchases are included in all of the supermarket identical sales results calculations illustrated below and reduce our identical supermarket sales results. Differences between total supermarket sales and identical supermarket sales primarily relate to changes in supermarket square footage. Identical supermarket sales include sales from all departments at identical Fred Meyer multi-department stores and include Roundy’s sales for the last six weeks of fiscal 2015 for stores that are identical as if they were part of the Company in the prior year. We calculate annualized identical supermarket sales by adding together four quarters of identical supermarket sales. Our identical supermarket sales results are summarized in the table below.

Identical Supermarket Sales
(dollars in millions)

     2015     2014
Including supermarket fuel centers$98,916$97,813
Excluding supermarket fuel centers$87,553$83,349
Including supermarket fuel centers1.1%4.2%
Excluding supermarket fuel centers5.0%5.2%

Gross Margin and FIFO Gross Margin

We calculate gross margin as sales less merchandise costs, including advertising, warehousing, and transportation expenses. Merchandise costs exclude depreciation and rent expenses. Our gross margin rates, as a percentage of sales, were 22.16% in 2015, 21.16% in 2014 and 20.57% in 2013. The increase in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from a decrease in retail fuel sales and reductions in transportation costs and a decrease in our LIFO charge, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink costs, as a percentage of sales. The increase in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter, an increase in fuel gross margin rate and a reduction in warehouse and transportation costs, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and an increase in our LIFO charge, as a percentage of sales. The merger with Harris Teeter, which closed late in fiscal year 2013, had a positive effect on our gross margin rate in 2014 since Harris Teeter has a higher gross margin rate as compared to total Company without Harris Teeter. The increase in fuel gross margin rate for 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from an increase in fuel margin per gallon sold of $0.19 in 2014, compared to $0.14 in 2013. Our retail fuel operations lower our gross margin rate, as a percentage of sales, due to the very low gross margin on retail fuel sales as compared to non-fuel sales. A lower growth rate in retail fuel sales, as compared to the growth rate for the total Company, increases the gross margin rates, as a percentage of sales, when compared to the prior year.

We calculate FIFO gross margin as sales less merchandise costs, including advertising, warehousing, and transportation expenses, but excluding the LIFO charge. Merchandise costs exclude depreciation and rent expenses. Our LIFO charge was $28 million in 2015, $147 million in 2014 and $52 million in 2013. FIFO gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to gross margin or any other GAAP measure of performance. FIFO gross margin should not be reviewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for our financial results as reported in accordance

A-11



with GAAP. FIFO gross margin is an important measure used by management to evaluate merchandising and operational effectiveness. Management believes FIFO gross margin is a useful metric to investors and analysts because it measures our day-to-day merchandising and operational effectiveness.

Our FIFO gross margin rates, as a percentage of sales, were 22.18% in 2015, 21.30% in 2014 and 20.62% in 2013. Our retail fuel operations lower our FIFO gross margin rate, as a percentage of sales, due to the very low FIFO gross margin rate on retail fuel as compared to non-fuel sales. Excluding the effect of retail fuel operations, our FIFO gross margin rate decreased four basis points in 2015, as a percentage of sales, compared to 2014. The decrease in FIFO gross margin rates, excluding retail fuel, in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink costs, partially offset by a reduction in transportation costs, as a percentage of sales. Excluding the effect of retail fuel, our FIFO gross margin rate decreased three basis points in 2014, as a percentage of sales, compared to 2013. The decrease in FIFO gross margin rates, excluding retail fuel, in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from continued investments in lower prices for our customers, offset partially by the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and a reduction of warehouse and transportation costs, as a percentage of sales.

LIFO Charge

The LIFO charge was $28 million in 2015, $147 million in 2014 and $52 million in 2013. In 2015, we experienced lower product cost inflation, compared to 2014, which resulted in a lower LIFO charge. In 2015, our LIFO charge primarily resulted from annualized product cost inflation related to pharmacy, and was partially offset by annualized product cost deflation related to meat and dairy. In 2014, we experienced higher product cost inflation, compared to 2013, which resulted in a higher LIFO charge. In 2014, our LIFO charge primarily resulted from annualized product cost inflation related to pharmacy, grocery, deli, meat and seafood. In 2013, our LIFO charge resulted primarily from an annualized product cost inflation related to meat, seafood and pharmacy.

Operating, General and Administrative Expenses

OG&A expenses consist primarily of employee-related costs such as wages, health care benefits and retirement plan costs, utilities and credit card fees. Rent expense, depreciation and amortization expense and interest expense are not included in OG&A.

OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 16.34% in 2015, 15.82% in 2014 and 15.45% in 2013. The increase in OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from a decrease in retail fuel sales, increases in EMV chargebacks, company sponsored pension, healthcare and incentive plan costs, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by increased supermarket sales, the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation, lower charges for total contributions to The Kroger Foundation and UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan, productivity improvements and effective cost controls at the store level. The increase in OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from the 2014 Contributions, the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation, the effect of fuel, the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and increases in credit card fees and incentive plan costs, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by increased supermarket sales growth, productivity improvements and effective cost controls at the store level. Retail fuel sales lower our OG&A rate due to the very low OG&A rate, as a percentage of sales, of retail fuel sales compared to non-fuel sales. The merger with Harris Teeter, which closed late in fiscal year 2013, increased our OG&A rate, as a percentage of sales, since Harris Teeter has a higher OG&A rate as compared to the total Company without Harris Teeter.

Our retail fuel operations reduce our overall OG&A rate, as a percentage of sales, due to the very low OG&A rate on retail fuel sales as compared to non-fuel sales. OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel, the 2015 UFCW Contributions, the 2014 Contributions and the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation, decreased 9 basis points, compared to 2014. The decrease in our adjusted OG&A rate in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from increased supermarket sales, productivity improvements and effective cost controls at the store level, partially offset by increases in

A-12



EMV chargebacks, company sponsored pension, healthcare and incentive plan costs, as a percentage of sales. OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel, the 2014 Contributions and the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation, decreased 19 basis points in 2014, compared to 2013, adjusted for the 2013 Adjusted Items. The decrease in our adjusted OG&A rate in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from increased supermarket sales growth, productivity improvements and effective cost controls at the store level, offset partially by the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and increases in credit card fees and incentive plan costs, as a percentage of sales.

Rent Expense

Rent expense was $723 million in 2015, compared to $707 million in 2014 and $613 million in 2013. Rent expense, as a percentage of sales, was 0.66% in 2015, compared to 0.65% in 2014 and 0.62% in 2013. Rent expense increased in 2015, compared to 2014, due to the effect of our merger with Roundy’s, partially offset by our continued emphasis on owning rather than leasing, whenever possible. Rent expense, as a percentage of sales, in 2015 was consistent with 2014 due to the effect of our merger with Roundy’s, partially offset by our continued emphasis to own rather than lease, whenever possible, and the benefit of increased sales. The increase in rent expense, as a percentage of sales, in 2014, compared to 2013, is due to the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter, partially offset by our continued emphasis to own rather than lease, whenever possible, and the benefit of increased sales. The merger with Harris Teeter, which closed late in fiscal year 2013, increased rent expense, as a percentage of sales, since Harris Teeter has a higher rent expense rate compared to the total Company without Harris Teeter.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.1 billion, compared to $1.9 billion in 2014 and $1.7 billion in 2013. Depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, was 1.90% in 2015, 1.80% in 2014 and 1.73% in 2013. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense for 2015, compared to 2014, was the result of additional depreciation due to our merger with Roundy’s and on capital investments, including mergers and lease buyouts, of $3.4 billion, excluding Roundy’s. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, from 2015, compared to 2014, is primarily due to the additional depreciation resulting from our increased capital investments, including mergers and lease buyouts in 2015, compared to 2014. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense for 2014, compared to 2013, in total dollars, was due to the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and our increased spending in capital investments, including mergers and lease buyouts, of $3.1 billion in 2014. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, from 2014, compared to 2013, is primarily due to the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and our increased spending in capital investments, partially offset by increased supermarket sales. The merger with Harris Teeter, which closed late in fiscal year 2013, increased our depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, since Harris Teeter has a higher depreciation expense rate as compared to the total Company without Harris Teeter.

Operating Profit and Adjusted FIFO Operating Profit

Operating profit was $3.6 billion in 2015, $3.1 billion in 2014 and $2.7 billion in 2013. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales, was 3.26% in 2015, 2.89% in 2014 and 2.77% in 2013. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales, increased 37 basis points in 2015, compared to 2014, primarily from increased supermarket sales, a LIFO charge that was significantly lower in 2015, lower charges for total contributions to The Kroger Co. Foundation and UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan, the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Obligation, productivity improvements, effective cost controls at the store level, and reductions in transportation costs, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by the effect of our merger with Roundy’s, continued investments in lower prices for our customers, a decrease in operating profit from our fuel operations, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense and increases in EMV chargebacks, company sponsored pension, healthcare, incentive plan and shrink costs, as a percentage of sales. The decrease in operating profit from our fuel operations for 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from a decrease in the average margin per gallon of fuel sold, partially offset by an increase in

A-13



fuel gallons sold. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales, increased 12 basis points in 2014, compared to 2013, primarily from the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter, an increase in fuel gross margin rate and a reduction in warehouse and transportation costs, rent and depreciation and amortization expenses, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and an increase in the LIFO charge, as a percentage of sales.

We calculate FIFO operating profit as operating profit excluding the LIFO charge. FIFO operating profit is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to operating profit or any other GAAP measure of performance. FIFO operating profit should not be reviewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. FIFO operating profit is an important measure used by management to evaluate operational effectiveness. Management believes FIFO operating profit is a useful metric to investors and analysts because it measures our day-to-day merchandising and operational effectiveness. Since fuel discounts are earned based on in-store purchases, fuel operating profit does not include fuel discounts, which are allocated to our in-store supermarket location departments. We also derive OG&A, rent and depreciation and amortization expenses through the use of estimated allocations in the calculation of fuel operating profit.

FIFO operating profit was $3.6 billion in 2015, $3.3 billion in 2014 and $2.8 billion in 2013. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales, was 3.28% in 2015, 3.03% in 2014 and 2.82% in 2013. FIFO operating profit, excluding the 2015 UFCW Contributions, the 2014 Contributions, the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation and 2013 Adjusted Items, was $3.7 billion in 2015, $3.5 billion in 2014 and $2.8 billion in 2013. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2015 UFCW Contributions, the 2014 Contributions, the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation and 2013 Adjusted Items, was 3.38% in 2015, 3.24% in 2014 and 2.84% in 2013.

Retail fuel sales lower our overall FIFO operating profit rate due to the very low FIFO operating profit rate, as a percentage of sales, of retail fuel sales compared to non-fuel sales. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel, the 2015 UFCW Contributions, the 2014 Contributions and the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation, increased 5 basis points in 2015, compared to 2014. The increase in our adjusted FIFO operating profit rate in 2015, compared to 2014, was primarily due to increased supermarket sales, productivity improvements, effective cost controls at the store level and reductions in transportation costs, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers, the effect of our merger with Roundy’s, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense and increases in EMV chargebacks, company sponsored pension, healthcare, incentive plan and shrink costs, as a percentage of sales. Excluding the effects of our merger with Roundy’s, FIFO operating profit increased 8 basis points in 2015, compared to 2014. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales, excluding fuel, the 2014 Contributions and the 2014 Multi-Employer Pension Plan Obligation, increased 10 basis points in 2014, compared to 2013, adjusted for the 2013 Adjusted Items. The increase in our adjusted FIFO operating profit rate in 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter and a reduction in warehouse and transportation costs, improvements in OG&A, rent and depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, partially offset by continued investments in lower prices for our customers.

Interest Expense

Interest expense totaled $482 million in 2015, $488 million in 2014 and $443 million in 2013. The decrease in interest expense in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily due to the timing of debt principal payments and debt issuances, partially offset by an increase in interest expense associated with our commercial paper program. The increase in interest expense in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from an increase in net total debt, primarily due to financing the merger with Harris Teeter and repurchases of our outstanding common shares.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 33.8% in 2015, 34.1% in 2014 and 32.9% in 2013. The 2015, 2014 and 2013 tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the utilization of tax credits, the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and other changes, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes.

A-14



COMMON SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAMS

We maintain share repurchase programs that comply with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and allow for the orderly repurchase of our common shares, from time to time. We made open market purchases of our common shares totaling $500 million in 2015, $1.1 billion in 2014 and $338 million in 2013 under these repurchase programs. In addition to these repurchase programs, we also repurchase common shares to reduce dilution resulting from our employee stock option plans. This program is solely funded by proceeds from stock option exercises, and the tax benefit from these exercises. We repurchased approximately $203 million in 2015, $155 million in 2014 and $271 million in 2013 of our common shares under the stock option program.

The shares repurchased in 2015 were acquired under two separate share repurchase programs. The first is a $500 million repurchase program that was authorized by our Board of Directors on June 26, 2014. The second is a program that uses the cash proceeds from the exercises of stock options by participants in our stock option and long-term incentive plans as well as the associated tax benefits. On June 25, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a new $500 million share repurchase program to replace our prior authorization, which had been exhausted. As of January 30, 2016, we have not repurchased any shares utilizing the June 25, 2015 repurchase program. On March 10, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a new $500 million share repurchase program to supplement the 2015 Repurchase Program, which is expected to be exhausted by the end of the second quarter of 2016.

CAPITAL INVESTMENTS

Capital investments, including changes in construction-in-progress payables and excluding mergers and the purchase of leased facilities, totaled $3.3 billion in 2015, $2.8 billion in 2014 and $2.3 billion in 2013. Capital investments for mergers totaled $168 million in 2015, $252 million in 2014 and $2.3 billion in 2013. Payments for mergers of $168 million in 2015, $252 million in 2014 and $2.3 billion in 2013 relate to our mergers with Roundy’s, Vitacost.com and Harris Teeter, respectively. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the mergers with Roundy’s, Vitacost.com and Harris Teeter. Capital investments for the purchase of leased facilities totaled $35 million in 2015, $135 million in 2014 and $108 million in 2013. The table below shows our supermarket storing activity and our total food store square footage:

Supermarket Storing Activity

     2015     2014     2013
Beginning of year2,6252,6402,424
Opened313317
Opened (relocation)12137
Acquired159227
Closed (operational)(37)(48)(28)
Closed (relocation)(12)(13)(7)
End of year2,7782,6252,640
Total food store square footage (in millions)173162161

RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL

We calculate return on invested capital (“ROIC”) by dividing adjusted operating profit for the prior four quarters by the average invested capital. Adjusted operating profit is calculated by excluding certain items included in operating profit, and adding back our LIFO charge, depreciation and amortization and rent to our U.S. GAAP operating profit of the prior four quarters. Average invested capital is calculated as the sum of (i) the average of our total assets, (ii) the average LIFO reserve, (iii) the average accumulated depreciation and amortization and (iv) a rent factor equal to total rent for the last four quarters multiplied by a factor of eight; minus (i) the average taxes receivable, (ii) the average trade accounts payable, (iii) the average accrued salaries and wages and (iv) the average other current liabilities, excluding accrued income taxes. Averages are calculated for ROIC by adding the beginning balance of the first

A-15



quarter and the ending balance of the fourth quarter, of the last four quarters, and dividing by two. We use a factor of eight for our total rent as we believe this is a common factor used by our investors, analysts and rating agencies. ROIC is a non-GAAP financial measure of performance. ROIC should not be reviewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. ROIC is an important measure used by management to evaluate our investment returns on capital. Management believes ROIC is a useful metric to investors and analysts because it measures how effectively we are deploying our assets.

Although ROIC is a relatively standard financial term, numerous methods exist for calculating a company’s ROIC. As a result, the method used by our management to calculate ROIC may differ from methods other companies use to calculate their ROIC. We urge you to understand the methods used by other companies to calculate their ROIC before comparing our ROIC to that of such other companies.

The following table provides a calculation of ROIC for 2015 and 2014. The 2015 calculation of ROIC excludes the financial position, results and merger costs for the Roundy’s transaction:

January 30,January 31,
     2016     2015
Return on Invested Capital          
Numerator
     Operating profit$3,576$3,137
     LIFO charge28147
     Depreciation and amortization2,0891,948
     Rent723707
     Adjustments for pension plan agreements87
     Other(13)
     Adjusted operating profit$6,403$6,026
 
Denominator
     Average total assets$32,197$29,860
     Average taxes receivable(1)(206)(19)
     Average LIFO reserve1,2591,197
     Average accumulated depreciation and amortization17,44116,057
     Average trade accounts payable(5,390)(4,967)
     Average accrued salaries and wages(1,359)(1,221)
     Average other current liabilities(2)(3,054)(2,780)
     Adjustment for Roundy’s merger(714)
     Rent x 85,7845,656
     Average invested capital$45,958$43,783
Return on Invested Capital13.93%13.76%
____________________

(1)Taxes receivable were $392 as of January 30, 2016, $20 as of January 31, 2015 and $18 as of February 1, 2014. The increase in taxes receivable as of January 30, 2016, compared to as of January 31, 2015, is due to recently issued tangible property regulations. Refer to Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
(2)Other current liabilities included accrued income taxes of $5 as of January 31, 2015 and $92 as of February 1, 2014. We did not have any accrued income taxes as of January 30, 2016. Accrued income taxes are removed from other current liabilities in the calculation of average invested capital.

A-16



CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We have chosen accounting policies that we believe are appropriate to report accurately and fairly our operating results and financial position, and we apply those accounting policies in a consistent manner. Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical in the preparation of our financial statements because they involve the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Self-Insurance Costs

We primarily are self-insured for costs related to workers’ compensation and general liability claims. The liabilities represent our best estimate, using generally accepted actuarial reserving methods, of the ultimate obligations for reported claims plus those incurred but not reported for all claims incurred through January 30, 2016. We establish case reserves for reported claims using case-basis evaluation of the underlying claim data and we update as information becomes known.

For both workers’ compensation and general liability claims, we have purchased stop-loss coverage to limit our exposure to any significant exposure on a per claim basis. We are insured for covered costs in excess of these per claim limits. We account for the liabilities for workers’ compensation claims on a present value basis utilizing a risk-adjusted discount rate. A 25 basis point decrease in our discount rate would increase our liability by approximately $2 million. General liability claims are not discounted.

The assumptions underlying the ultimate costs of existing claim losses aresimilar request, subject to a high degree of unpredictability, which can affect the liability recorded for such claims. For example, variability in inflation rates of health care costs inherent in these claims can affect the amounts realized. Similarly, changes in legal trends and interpretations, as well as a change in the nature and method of how claims are settled can affect ultimate costs. Our estimates of liabilities incurred do not anticipate significant changes in historical trends for these variables, and any changes could have a considerable effect on future claim costs and currently recorded liabilities.

Impairments of Long-Lived Assets

We monitor the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment each quarter based on whether certain triggering events have occurred. These events include current period losses combined with a history of losses or a projection of continuing losses or a significant decrease in the market value of an asset. When a triggering event occurs, we perform an impairment calculation, comparing projected undiscounted cash flows, utilizing current cash flow information and expected growth rates related to specific stores, to the carrying value for those stores. If we identify impairment for long-lived assets to be held and used, we compare the assets’ current carrying value to the assets’ fair value. Fair value is determined based on market values or discounted future cash flows. We record impairment when the carrying value exceeds fair market value. With respect to owned property and equipment held for disposal, we adjust the value of the property and equipment to reflect recoverable values based on our previous efforts to dispose of similar assets and current economic conditions. We recognize impairment for the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair market value, reduced by estimated direct costs of disposal. We recorded asset impairments in the normal course of business totaling $46 million in 2015, $37 million in 2014 and $39 million in 2013. We record costs to reduce the carrying value of long-lived assets in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Operating, general and administrative” expense.

A-17



The factors that most significantly affect the impairment calculation are our estimates of future cash flows. Our cash flow projections look several years into the future and include assumptions on variables such as inflation, the economy and market competition. Application of alternative assumptions and definitions, such as reviewing long-lived assets for impairment at a different level, could produce significantly different results.

Goodwill

Our goodwill totaled $2.7 billion as of January 30, 2016. We review goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, and also upon the occurrence of triggering events. We perform reviews of each of our operating divisions and variable interest entities (collectively, “reporting units”) that have goodwill balances. Fair value is determined using a multiple of earnings, or discounted projected future cash flows, and we compare fair value to the carrying value of a reporting unit for purposes of identifying potential impairment. We base projected future cash flows on management’s knowledge of the current operating environment and expectations for the future. If we identify potential for impairment, we measure the fair value of a reporting unit against the fair value of its underlying assets and liabilities, excluding goodwill, to estimate an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. We recognize goodwill impairment for any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value.

In 2015, goodwill increased $420 million primarily due to our merger with Roundy’s. In 2014, goodwill increased $169 million primarily due to our merger with Vitacost.com. For additional information related to the allocation of the purchase price for Roundy’s and Vitacost.com, refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed for our other reporting units during the fourth quarter of 2015, 2014 and 2013 did not result in impairment. Based on current and future expected cash flows, we believe goodwill impairments are not reasonably likely. A 10% reduction in fair value of our reporting units would not indicate a potential for impairment of our goodwill balance.

For additional information relating to our results of the goodwill impairment reviews performed during 2015, 2014 and 2013 see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The impairment review requires the extensive use of management judgment and financial estimates. Application of alternative estimates and assumptions, such as reviewing goodwill for impairment at a different level, could produce significantly different results. The cash flow projections embedded in our goodwill impairment reviews can be affected by several factors such as inflation, business valuations in the market, the economy and market competition.

Store Closing Costs

We provide for closed store liabilities on the basis of the present value of the estimated remaining non-cancellable lease payments after the closing date, net of estimated subtenant income. We estimate the net lease liabilities using a discount rate to calculate the present value of the remaining net rent payments on closed stores. We usually pay closed store lease liabilities over the lease terms associated with the closed stores, which generally have remaining terms ranging from one to 20 years. Adjustments to closed store liabilities primarily relate to changes in subtenant income and actual exit costs differing from original estimates. We make adjustments for changes in estimates in the period in which the change becomes known. We review store closing liabilities quarterly to ensure that any accrued amount that is not a sufficient estimate of future costs is adjusted to earnings in the proper period.

We estimate subtenant income, future cash flows and asset recovery values based on our experience and knowledge of the market in which the closed store is located, our previous efforts to dispose of similar assets and current economic conditions. The ultimate cost of the disposition of the leases and the related assets is affected by current real estate markets, inflation rates and general economic conditions.

A-18



We reduce owned stores held for disposal to their estimated net realizable value. We account for costs to reduce the carrying values of property, equipment and leasehold improvements in accordance with our policy on impairment of long-lived assets. We classify inventory write-downs in connection with store closings, if any, in “Merchandise costs.” We expense costs to transfer inventory and equipment from closed stores as they are incurred.

Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

We account for our defined benefit pension plans using the recognition and disclosure provisions of GAAP, which require the recognition of the funded status of retirement plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We record, as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs or credits and transition obligations that have not yet been recognized.

The determination of our obligation and expense for Company-sponsored pension plans and other post-retirement benefits is dependent upon our selection of assumptions used by actuaries in calculating those amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and include, among others, the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, mortality and the rate of increases in compensation and health care costs. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense and recorded obligation in future periods. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions, including the discount rate used and the expected return on plan assets, may materially affect our pension and other post-retirement obligations and our future expense. Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the effect of a 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rate on other post-retirement benefit costs and the related liability.

The objective of our discount rate assumptions was intended to reflect the rates at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. In making this determination, we take into account the timing and amount of benefits that would be available under the plans. Our methodology for selecting the discount rates was to match the plan’s cash flows to that of a hypothetical bond portfolio whose cash flow from coupons and maturities match the plan’s projected benefit cash flows. The discount rates are the single rates that produce the same present value of cash flows. The selection of the 4.62% and 4.44% discount rates as of year-end 2015 for pension and other benefits, respectively, represents the hypothetical bond portfolio using bonds with an AA or better rating constructed with the assistance of an outside consultant. We utilized a discount rate of 3.87% and 3.74% as of year-end 2014 for pension and other benefits, respectively. A 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would decrease the projected pension benefit obligation as of January 30, 2016, by approximately $438 million.

To determine the expected rate of return on pension plan assets held by Kroger for 2015, we considered current and forecasted plan asset allocations as well as historical and forecasted rates of return on various asset categories. In 2015, our assumed pension plan investment return rate was 7.44%, compared to 7.44% in 2014 and 8.50 in 2013. Our pension plans’ average rate of return was 6.47% for the 10 calendar years ended December 31, 2015, net of all investment management fees and expenses. The value of all investments in our Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans during the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, net of investment management fees and expenses, decreased 0.80%. For the past 20 years, our average annual rate of return has been 7.99%. Based on the above information and forward looking assumptions for investments made in a manner consistent with our target allocations, we believe a 7.44% rate of return assumption is reasonable for 2015. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the asset allocations of pension plan assets.

On January 31, 2015, we adopted new mortality tables, including industry-based tables for annuitants, reflecting more current mortality experience and assumptions for future generational mortality improvement in calculating our projected benefit obligations as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 and our 2015 pension expense. The tables assume an improvement in life expectancy and increased our benefit obligation and future expenses. We used the RP-2000 projected to 2021 mortality table in calculating our 2013 year end pension obligation and 2014 and 2013 pension expense.

A-19



Sensitivity to changes in the major assumptions used in the calculation of Kroger’s pension plan liabilities is illustrated below (in millions).

Projected
Benefit
PercentageObligationExpense
PointDecrease/Decrease/
Change(Increase)(Increase)
Discount Rate+/- 1.0%$438/(530)$36/($42)
Expected Return on Assets+/- 1.0%$38/($38)

In 2015, we contributed $5 million to our Company-sponsored defined benefit plans and do not expect to make any contributions to these plans in 2016. In 2014, we did not contribute to our Company-sponsored defined benefit plans and do not expect to make any contributions to this plan in 2015. We did not make a contribution in 2014 and contributed $100 million in 2013 to our Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans. Among other things, investment performance of plan assets, the interest rates required to be used to calculate the pension obligations, and future changes in legislation, will determine the amounts of contributions.

We contributed and expensed $196 million in 2015, $177 million in 2014 and $148 million in 2013 to employee 401(k) retirement savings accounts. The increase in 2015, compared to 2014, is due to a higher employee savings rate. The increase in 2014, compared to 2013, is due to the effect of our merger with Harris Teeter. The 401(k) retirement savings account plans provide to eligible employees both matching contributions and automatic contributions from the Company based on participant contributions, plan compensation, and length of service.

Multi-Employer Pension Plans

We contribute to various multi-employer pension plans, including the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan, based on obligations arising from collective bargaining agreements. We are designated as the named fiduciary of the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan and have sole investment authority over these assets. These multi-employer pension plans provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Trustees are appointed in equal number by employers and unions. The trustees typically are responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants as well as for such matters as the investment of the assets and the administration of the plans.

In 2015, we contributed $190 million to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan. We had previously accrued $60 million of the total contributions at January 31, 2015 and recorded expense for the remaining $130 million at the time of payment in 2015. In 2014, we incurred a charge of $56 million (after-tax) related to commitments and withdrawal liabilities associated with the restructuring of pension plan agreements, of which $15 million was contributed to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan in 2014. As of January 30, 2016, we are not required to contribute to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan in 2016.

We recognize expense in connection with these plans as contributions are funded or when commitments are made, in accordance with GAAP. We made cash contributions to these plans of $426 million in 2015, $297 million in 2014 and $228 million in 2013.

Based on the most recent information available to us, we believe that the present value of actuarially accrued liabilities in most of the multi-employer plans to which we contribute substantially exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. We have attempted to estimate the amount by which these liabilities exceed the assets, (i.e., the amount of underfunding), as of December 31, 2015. Because we are only one of a number of employers contributing to these plans, we also have attempted to estimate the ratio of our contributions to the total of all contributions to these plans in a year as a way of assessing our “share” of the underfunding. Nonetheless, the underfunding is not a direct obligation or liability of ours or of any employer. As of December 31, 2015, we estimate that our share of the underfunding of multi-employer plans to which we contribute was approximately $2.9 billion, pre-tax, or

A-20



$1.8 billion, after-tax, which includes Roundy’s share of underfunding of its multi-employer plans. This represents an increase in the estimated amount of underfunding of approximately $1.1 billion, pre-tax, or approximately $680 million, after-tax, as of December 31, 2015, compared to December 31, 2014. The increase in the amount of underfunding is attributable to lower than expected returns on the assets held in the multi-employer plans during 2015, changes in mortality rate assumptions and the merger of Roundy’s. Our estimate is based on the most current information available to us including actuarial evaluations and other data (that include the estimates of others), and such information may be outdated or otherwise unreliable.

We have made and disclosed this estimate not because, except as noted above, this underfunding is a direct liability of ours. Rather, we believe the underfunding is likely to have important consequences. In 2016, we expect to contribute approximately $260 million to multi-employer pension plans, subject to collective bargaining and capital market conditions. We expect increases in expense as a result of increases in multi-employer pension plan contributions over the next few years. Finally, underfunding means that, in the event we were to exit certain markets or otherwise cease making contributions to these funds, we could trigger a substantial withdrawal liability. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP.

The amount of underfunding described above is an estimate and could change based on contract negotiations, returns on the assets held in the multi-employer plans and benefit payments. The amount could decline, and our future expense would be favorably affected, if the values of the assets held in the trust significantly increase or if further changes occur through collective bargaining, trustee action or favorable legislation. On the other hand, our share of the underfunding could increase and our future expense could be adversely affected if the asset values decline, if employers currently contributing to these funds cease participation or if changes occur through collective bargaining, trustee action or adverse legislation. We continue to evaluate our potential exposure to under-funded multi-employer pension plans. Although these liabilities are not a direct obligation or liability of ours, any commitments to fund certain multi-employer plans will be expensed when our commitment is probable and an estimate can be made.

See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information relating to our participation in these multi-employer pension plans.

Uncertain Tax Positions

We review the tax positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns to determine whether and to what extent a benefit can be recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the amount of unrecognized tax benefits and other disclosures related to uncertain tax positions.

Various taxing authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, we record allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. As of January 30, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service had concluded its examination of our 2010 and 2011 federal tax returns. Tax years 2012 and 2013 remain under examination.

The assessment of our tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

We account for stock options under the fair value recognition provisions of GAAP. Under this method, we recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments granted. We recognize share-based compensation expense, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, over the requisite service period of the award. In addition, we record expense for restricted stock awards in an amount equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date of the award, over the period the award restrictions lapse.

A-21



Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally on a LIFO basis) or market. In total, approximately 95% of inventories in 2015 and 2014 were valued using the LIFO method. Cost for the balance of the inventories, including substantially all fuel inventories, was determined using the FIFO method. Replacement cost was higher than the carrying amount by $1.3 billion at January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015. We follow the Link-Chain, Dollar-Value LIFO method for purposes of calculating our LIFO charge or credit.

We follow the item-cost method of accounting to determine inventory cost before the LIFO adjustment for substantially all store inventories at our supermarket divisions. This method involves counting each item in inventory, assigning costs to each of these items based on the actual purchase costs (net of vendor allowances and cash discounts) of each item and recording the cost of items sold. The item-cost method of accounting allows for more accurate reporting of periodic inventory balances and enables management to more precisely manage inventory. In addition, substantially all of our inventory consists of finished goods and is recorded at actual purchase costs (net of vendor allowances and cash discounts).

We evaluate inventory shortages throughout the year based on actual physical counts in our facilities. We record allowances for inventory shortages based on the results of recent physical counts to provide for estimated shortages from the last physical count to the financial statement date.

Vendor Allowances

We recognize all vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs when the related product is sold. In most cases, vendor allowances are applied to the related product cost by item, and therefore reduce the carrying value of inventory by item. When it is not practicable to allocate vendor allowances to the product by item, we recognize vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs based on inventory turns and as the product is sold. We recognized approximately $7.3 billion in 2015, $6.9 billion in 2014 and $6.2 billion in 2013 of vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs. We recognized approximately 91% of all vendor allowances in the item cost with the remainder being based on inventory turns.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended Accounting Standards Codification 835, “Interest-Imputation of Interest.” The amendment simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability by requiring it be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This amendment became effective beginning February 1, 2015, and was adopted retrospectively in accordance with the standard. The adoption of this amendment resulted in amounts previously reported in other assets to now be reported within long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts were not material to the prior year. The adoption of this amendment did not have an effect on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Per ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of Effective Date,” this guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending February 2, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the first quarter of our fiscal year ending February 3, 2018. We are currently in the process of evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

A-22



In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, “Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets.” This amendment permits an entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year end for all plans. This guidance will be effective for us in the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. The implementation of this amendment will not have an effect on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and will not have a significant effect on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).” This amendment removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share. This guidance will be effective for us in the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. The implementation of this amendment will have an effect on our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and will not have an effect on our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” This amendment eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination. This guidance will be effective for us in the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. The implementation of this amendment is not expected to have a significant effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” This amendment requires deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This guidance will be effective for our fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The implementation of this amendment will not have an effect on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and will not have a significant effect on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, which provides guidance for the recognition of lease agreements. The standard’s core principle is that a company will now recognize most leases on its balance sheet as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets. This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year ending February 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU will result in a significant increase to our Consolidated Balance Sheets for lease liabilities and right-of-use assets, and we are currently evaluating the other effects of adoption of this ASU on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe our current off-balance sheet leasing commitments are reflected in our investment grade debt rating.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flow Information

Net cash provided by operating activities

We generated $4.8 billion of cash from operations in 2015, compared to $4.2 billion in 2014 and $3.6 billion in 2013. The cash provided by operating activities came from net earnings including non-controlling interests adjusted primarily for non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, expense for Company-sponsored pension plans, the LIFO charge and changes in working capital.

The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily due to an increase in net earnings including non-controlling interests, an increase in non-cash items and changes in working capital. The increase in non-cash items in 2015, as compared to 2014, was primarily due to increases in depreciation and amortization expense and expense for Company-sponsored pension plans, partially offset by a lower LIFO charge.

A-23



The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily due to an increase in net earnings including non-controlling interests, which include the results of Harris Teeter, an increase in non-cash items, a reduction in contributions to Company-sponsored pension plans and changes in working capital. The increase in non-cash items in 2014, as compared to 2013, was primarily due to increases in depreciation and amortization expense and the LIFO charge. The amount of cash paid for income taxes increased in 2014, compared to 2013, primarily due to an increase in net earnings including non-controlling interests.

Cash provided (used) by operating activities for changes in working capital was $96 million in 2015, compared to ($49) million in 2014 and $63 million in 2013. The increase in cash provided by operating activities for changes in working capital in 2015, compared to 2014, was primarily due to an increase in cash provided by trade accounts payables and store deposits in transit, partially offset by a decrease in cash provided by income taxes receivable and payable. The increase in cash used by operating activities for changes in working capital in 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to an increase in cash used for receivables and a decrease in cash provided by trade accounts payables, partially offset by an increase in cash provided by accrued expenses.

Net cash used by investing activities

Cash used by investing activities was $3.6 billion in 2015, compared to $3.1 billion in 2014 and $4.8 billion in 2013. The amount of cash used by investing activities increased in 2015, compared to 2014, due to increased payments for capital investments, partially offset by lower payments for mergers. The amount of cash used by investing activities decreased in 2014, compared to 2013, due to decreased payments for mergers, offset primarily by increased payments for capital investments. Capital investments, including payments for lease buyouts, but excluding mergers, were $3.3 billion in 2015, $2.8 billion in 2014 and $2.3 billion in 2013. Merger payments were $168 million in 2015, $252 million in 2014 and $2.3 billion in 2013. Merger payments decreased in 2014, compared to 2013, primarily due to our merger with Harris Teeter in 2013. Refer to the “Capital Investments” section for an overview of our supermarket storing activity during the last three years.

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

Financing activities (used) provided cash of ($1.3) billion in 2015, ($1.2) billion in 2014 and $1.4 billion in 2013. The increase in the amount of cash used for financing activities in 2015, compared to 2014, was primarily related to increased payments on long-term debt and commercial paper, partially offset by higher proceeds from issuances of long-term debt and decreased treasury stock purchases. The increase in the amount of cash used for financing activities in 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily related to decreased proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and increased treasury stock purchases, offset partially by decreased payments on long-term debt. Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt were $1.2 billion in 2015, $576 million in 2014 and $3.5 billion in 2013. Net (payments) borrowings provided from our commercial paper program were ($285) million in 2015, $25 million in 2014 and ($395) million in 2013. Please refer to the “Debt Management” section of MD&A for additional information. We repurchased $703 million of Kroger common shares in 2015, compared to $1.3 billion in 2014 and $609 million in 2013. We paid dividends totaling $385 million in 2015, $338 million in 2014 and $319 million in 2013.

Debt Management

Total debt, including both the current and long-term portions of capital lease and lease-financing obligations, increased $481 million to $12.1 billion as of year-end 2015, compared to 2014. The increase in 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from the issuance of (i) $300 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 2.00%, (ii) $300 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 2.60%, (iii) $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3.50% and (iv) an increase in capital lease obligations due to our merger with Roundy’s and various leased locations, partially offset by payments of $678 million on long-term debt obligations assumed as part of our merger with Roundy’s and $500 million of payments at maturity of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3.90%. The increase in financing obligations was due to partially funding our merger with Roundy’s.

A-24



Total debt, including both the current and long-term portions of capital lease and lease-financing obligations increased $346 million to $11.7 billion as of year-end 2014, compared to 2013. The increase in 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from (i) the issuance of $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 2.95% and (ii) an increase in commercial paper of $25 million, partially offset by payments at maturity of $300 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 4.95%. The increase in financing obligations was due to partially funding our outstanding common share repurchases.

Liquidity Needs

We estimate our liquidity needs over the next twelve-month period to range from $6.6 to $6.9 billion, which includes anticipated requirements for working capital, capital investments, interest payments and scheduled principal payments of debt and commercial paper, offset by cash and temporary cash investments on hand at the end of 2015. We generally operate with a working capital deficit due to our efficient use of cash in funding operations and because we have consistent access to the capital markets. Based on current operating trends, we believe that cash flows from operating activities and other sources of liquidity, including borrowings under our commercial paper program and bank credit facility, will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months and for the foreseeable future beyond the next twelve months. We have approximately $990 million of commercial paper and $1.3 billion of senior notes maturing in the next twelve months, which is included in the range of $6.6 to $6.9 billion in estimated liquidity needs. We expect to refinance this debt, in 2016, by issuing additional senior notes or commercial paper on favorable terms based on our past experience. We also currently plan to continue repurchases of common shares under the Company’s share repurchase programs. We believe we have adequate coverage of our debt covenants to continue to maintain our current debt ratings and to respond effectively to competitive conditions.

Factors Affecting Liquidity

We can currently borrow on a daily basis approximately $2.75 billion under our commercial paper (“CP”) program. At January 30, 2016, we had $990 million of CP borrowings outstanding. CP borrowings are backed by our credit facility, and reduce the amount we can borrow under the credit facility. If our short-term credit ratings fall, the ability to borrow under our current CP program could be adversely affected for a period of time and increase our interest cost on daily borrowings under our CP program. This could require us to borrow additional funds under the credit facility, under which we believe we have sufficient capacity. However, in the event of a ratings decline, we do not anticipate that our borrowing capacity under our CP program would be any lower than $500 million on a daily basis. Although our ability to borrow under the credit facility is not affected by our credit rating, the interest cost on borrowings under the credit facility could be affected by an increase in our Leverage Ratio. As of March 23, 2016, we had $1.1 billion of CP borrowings outstanding. The increase as of March 23, 2016, compared to year-end 2015, was due to partially funding our outstanding common share repurchases.

Our credit facility requires the maintenance of a Leverage Ratio and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (our “financial covenants”). A failure to maintain our financial covenants would impair our ability to borrow under the credit facility. These financial covenants and ratios are described below:

Our Leverage Ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the credit facility) was 1.97 to 1 as of January 30, 2016. If this ratio were to exceed 3.50 to 1, we would be in default of our credit facility and our ability to borrow under the facility would be impaired. In addition, our Applicable Margin on borrowings is determined by our Leverage Ratio.

Our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA plus Consolidated Rental Expense to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense plus Consolidated Rental Expense, as defined in the credit facility) was 5.30 to 1 as of January 30, 2016. If this ratio fell below 1.70 to 1, we would be in default of our credit facility and our ability to borrow under the facility would be impaired.

Our credit agreement is more fully described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We were in compliance with our financial covenants at year-end 2015.

A-25



The tables below illustrate our significant contractual obligations and other commercial commitments, based on year of maturity or settlement, as of January 30, 2016 (in millions of dollars):

2016     2017     2018     2019     2020     Thereafter     Total
Contractual Obligations(1) (2)
Long-term debt(3)$2,318$735$1,307$774$724   $5,538   $11,396
Interest on long-term debt(4)4764103753152792,5504,405
Capital lease obligations10372625752527873
Operating lease obligations9679228537746744,1998,389
Financed lease obligations131313131374139
Self-insurance liability(5)22313898633879639
Construction commitments(6)418418
Purchase obligations(7)532161775842106976
Total$5,050$2,451$2,786$2,054$1,822$13,072$27,235
Other Commercial Commitments
Standby letters of credit$244$$$$$$244
Surety bonds332332
Total$576$$$$$$576
____________________

(1)The contractual obligations table excludes funding of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, which totaled approximately $30 million in 2015. This table also excludes contributions under various multi-employer pension plans, which totaled $426 million in 2015.
(2)The liability related to unrecognized tax benefits has been excluded from the contractual obligations table because a reasonable estimate of the timing of future tax settlements cannot be determined.
(3)As of January 30, 2016, we had $990 million of borrowings of commercial paper and no borrowings under our credit agreement.
(4)Amounts include contractual interest payments using the interest rate as of January 30, 2016, and stated fixed and swapped interest rates, if applicable, for all other debt instruments.
(5)The amounts included in the contractual obligations table for self-insurance liability related to workers’ compensation claims have been stated on a present value basis.
(6)Amounts include funds owed to third parties for projects currently under construction. These amounts are reflected in other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(7)Amounts include commitments, many of which are short-term in nature, to be utilized in the normal course of business, such as several contracts to purchase raw materials utilized in our food production plants and several contracts to purchase energy to be used in our stores and food production plants. Our obligations also include management fees for facilities operated by third parties and outside service contracts. Any upfront vendor allowances or incentives associated with outstanding purchase commitments are recorded as either current or long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of January 30, 2016, we maintained a $2.75 billion (with the ability to increase by $750 million), unsecured revolving credit facility that, unless extended, terminates on June 30, 2019. Outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement and commercial paper borrowings, and some outstanding letters of credit, reduce funds available under the credit agreement. As of January 30, 2016, we had $990 million of borrowings of commercial paper and no borrowings under our credit agreement. The outstanding letters of credit that reduce funds available under our credit agreement totaled $13 million as of January 30, 2016.

A-26



In addition to the available credit mentioned above, as of January 30, 2016, we had authorized for issuance $900 million of securities under a shelf registration statement filed with the SEC and effective on December 13, 2013.

We also maintain surety bonds related primarily to our self-insured workers’ compensation claims. These bonds are required by most states in which we are self-insured for workers’ compensation and are placed with predominately third-party insurance providers to insure payment of our obligations in the event we are unable to meet our claim payment obligations up to our self-insured retention levels. These bonds do not represent liabilities of ours, as we already have reserves on our books for the claims costs. Market changes may make the surety bonds more costly and, in some instances, availability of these bonds may become more limited, which could affect our costs of, or access to, such bonds. Although we do not believe increased costs or decreased availability would significantly affect our ability to access these surety bonds, if this does become an issue, we would issue letters of credit, in states where allowed, against our credit facility to meet the state bonding requirements. This could increase our cost and decrease the funds available under our credit facility.

We also are contingently liable for leases that have been assigned to various third parties in connection with facility closings and dispositions. We could be required to satisfy obligations under the leases if any of the assignees are unable to fulfill their lease obligations. Due to the wide distribution of our assignments among third parties, and various other remedies available to us, we believe the likelihood that we will be required to assume a material amount of these obligations is remote. We have agreed to indemnify certain third-party logistics operators for certain expenses, including pension trust fund contribution obligations and withdrawal liabilities.

In addition to the above, we enter into various indemnification agreements and take on indemnification obligations in the ordinary course of business. Such arrangements include indemnities against third party claims arising out of agreements to provide services to us; indemnities related to the sale of our securities; indemnities of directors, officers and employees in connection with the performance of their work; and indemnities of individuals serving as fiduciaries on benefit plans. While our aggregate indemnification obligation could result in a material liability, we are not aware of any current matter that could result in a material liability.

OUTLOOK

This discussion and analysis contains certain forward-looking statements about our future performance. These statements are based on management’s assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to it. Such statements are indicated by words such as “comfortable,” “committed,” “will,” “expect,” “goal,” “should,” “intend,” “target,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” and similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.

Statements elsewhere in this report and below regarding our expectations, projections, beliefs, intentions or strategies are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. While we believe that the statements are accurate, uncertainties about the general economy, our labor relations, our ability to execute our plans on a timely basis and other uncertainties described below could cause actual results to differ materially. The guidance below includes our expectations for Roundy’s.

We expect net earnings to be $2.19 to $2.28 per diluted share, which is essentially in line with our long-term net earnings per diluted share growth rate of 8% - 11%. Where we fall within the range will be primarily driven by actual fuel margins, which we expect to be at or slightly below the five-year average, with continued volatility. We expect our core business in 2016 to grow in line with our long-term net earnings per diluted share growth rate of 8% – 11%.

We expect identical supermarket sales growth, excluding fuel sales, of 2.5%-3.5% in 2016, reflecting the lower inflationary environment.

We expect full-year FIFO operating margin in 2016, excluding fuel, to expand slightly compared to 2015 results.

A-27



We expect capital investments, excluding mergers, acquisitions and purchases of leased facilities, to be $4.1 to $4.4 billion. These capital investments include approximately 100 major projects covering new stores, expansions and relocations, including 10 Ruler locations; 200 to 220 major remodels; and other investments including minor remodels and technology and infrastructure to support our Customer 1st business strategy.

We expect total supermarket square footage for 2016 to grow approximately 3.0% - 3.5% before mergers, acquisitions and operational closings.

We expect 2016 year-end ROIC to increase slightly compared to the 2015 result.

We expect the 2016 effective tax rate to be approximately 35%, excluding the resolution of certain tax items.

In 2016, we anticipate annualized product cost inflation of 1.0% to 2.0%, excluding fuel, and an annualized LIFO charge of approximately $50 million. We expect inflation to be lower during the earlier portion of 2016 and to gradually rise during the later portion of 2016.

We expect 2016 Company-sponsored pension plans expense to be approximately $80 million. We do not expect to make a cash contribution in 2016.

In 2016, we expect to contribute approximately $260 million to multi-employer pension funds. We continue to evaluate and address our potential exposure to under-funded multi-employer pension plans. Although these liabilities are not a direct obligation or liability of Kroger, any new agreements that would commit us to fund certain multi-employer plans will be expensed when our commitment is probable and an estimate can be made.

In 2016, we will negotiate agreements with UFCW for store associates in Houston, Indianapolis, Little Rock, Nashville, Portland, Southern California and Fry’s in Arizona. Negotiations this year will be challenging as we must have competitive cost structures in each market while meeting our associates’ needs for solid wages and good quality, affordable health care and retirement benefits.

Various uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These include:

The extent to which our sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet our requirements may be affected by the state of the financial markets and the effect that such condition has on our ability to issue commercial paper at acceptable rates. Our ability to borrow under our committed lines of credit, including our bank credit facilities, could be impaired if one or more of our lenders under those lines is unwilling or unable to honor its contractual obligation to lend to us, or in the event that natural disasters or weather conditions interfere with the ability of our lenders to lend to us. Our ability to refinance maturing debt may be affected by the state of the financial markets.

Our ability to achieve sales, earnings and cash flow goals may be affected by: labor negotiations or disputes; changes in the types and numbers of businesses that compete with us; pricing and promotional activities of existing and new competitors, including non-traditional competitors, and the aggressiveness of that competition; our response to these actions; the state of the economy, including interest rates, the inflationary and deflationary trends in certain commodities, and the unemployment rate; the effect that fuel costs have on consumer spending; volatility of fuel margins; changes in government-funded benefit programs; manufacturing commodity costs; diesel fuel costs related to our logistics operations; trends in consumer spending; the extent to which our customers exercise caution in their purchasing in response to economic conditions; the inconsistent pace of the economic recovery; changes in inflation or deflation in product and operating costs; stock repurchases; our ability to retain pharmacy sales from third party payors; consolidation in the healthcare industry, including pharmacy benefit managers; our ability to negotiate modifications to multi-employer pension plans; natural disasters or adverse weather conditions; the potential costs and risks associated with potential cyber-attacks or data security breaches; the success of our future growth plans; and the successful integration of Harris Teeter and Roundy’s. Our ability to achieve sales and earnings goals may also be affected by our ability to manage the factors identified above. Our ability to execute our financial strategy may be affected by our ability to generate cash flow.

A-28



During the first three quarters of each fiscal year, our LIFO charge and the recognition of LIFO expense is affected primarily by estimated year-end changes in product costs. Our fiscal year LIFO charge is affected primarily by changes in product costs at year-end.

If actual results differ significantly from anticipated future results for certain reporting units including variable interest entities, an impairment loss for any excess of the carrying value of the reporting units’ goodwill over the implied fair value would have to be recognized.

Our effective tax rate may differ from the expected rate due to changes in laws, the status of pending items with various taxing authorities, and the deductibility of certain expenses.

Changes in our product mix may negatively affect certain financial indicators. For example, we continue to add supermarket fuel centers to our store base. Since fuel generates lower profit margins than our supermarket sales, we expect to see our FIFO gross margins decline as fuel sales increase.

We cannot fully foresee the effects of changes in economic conditions on Kroger’s business. We have assumed economic and competitive situations will not change significantly in 2016.

Other factors and assumptions not identified above could also cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking information. Accordingly, actual events and results may vary significantly from those included in, contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements made by us or our representatives. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking information contained in this filing.

A-29



REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Kroger Co.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equitypresent fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Kroger Co. and its subsidiariesat January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2016in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing on page A-1. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Roundy’s, Inc. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination on December 18, 2015. We have also excluded Roundy’s, Inc. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Roundy’s, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 2% and less than 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended January 30, 2016.


Cincinnati, Ohio
March 29, 2016

A-30



THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except par values)     January 30,
2016
     January 31,
2015
ASSETS        
Current assets
     Cash and temporary cash investments$277$268
     Store deposits in-transit923988
     Receivables1,7341,266
     FIFO inventory7,4406,933
     LIFO reserve(1,272)(1,245)
     Prepaid and other current assets790701
          Total current assets9,8928,911
Property, plant and equipment, net19,61917,912
Intangibles, net1,053757
Goodwill2,7242,304
Other assets609613
          Total Assets$33,897$30,497
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
     Current portion of long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and
          financing obligations$2,370$1,874
     Trade accounts payable5,7285,052
     Accrued salaries and wages1,4261,291
     Deferred income taxes221287
     Other current liabilities3,2262,888
          Total current liabilities12,97111,392
Long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations
     Face-value of long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and
          financing obligations9,7089,723
     Adjustment to reflect fair-value interest rate hedges1
          Long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and
               financing obligations9,7099,723
Deferred income taxes1,7521,209
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations1,3801,463
Other long-term liabilities1,2871,268
          Total Liabilities27,09925,055
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 13)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred shares, $100 par per share, 5 shares authorized and unissued
Common shares, $1 par per share, 2,000 shares authorized;
          1,918 shares issued in 2015 and 20141,9181,918
Additional paid-in capital2,9802,748
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(680)(812)
Accumulated earnings14,01112,367
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 951 shares in 2015 and 944 shares in 2014(11,409)(10,809)
          Total Shareholders’ Equity - The Kroger Co.6,8205,412
Noncontrolling interests(22)30
          Total Equity6,7985,442
          Total Liabilities and Equity$33,897$30,497
              

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

A-31



THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSOF OPERATIONS

Years Ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014

(In millions, except per share amounts)     2015
(52 weeks)
   2014
(52 weeks)
   2013
(52 weeks)
Sales   $109,830      $108,465       $98,375   
Merchandise costs, including advertising, warehousing, and 
     transportation, excluding items shown separately below85,49685,51278,138 
Operating, general and administrative17,94617,16115,196
Rent723707613
Depreciation and amortization2,0891,9481,703
     Operating Profit3,5763,1372,725
Interest expense482488443
     Earnings before income tax expense3,0942,6492,282
Income tax expense1,045902751
     Net earnings including noncontrolling interests2,0491,7471,531
     Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests101912
     Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.$2,039$1,728$1,519
     Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per basic common share$2.09$1.74$1.47
     Average number of common shares used in basic calculation9669811,028
     Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share$2.06$1.72$1.45
     Average number of common shares used in diluted calculation9809931,040
Dividends declared per common share$0.408$0.350$0.315
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

A-32



THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSOF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Years Ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014

(In millions)     2015
(52 weeks)
     2014
(52 weeks)
     2013
(52 weeks)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests  $2,049    $1,747    $1,531  
Other comprehensive income (loss)
     Unrealized gain on available for sale securities, net of
          income tax(1)355
     Change in pension and other postretirement defined benefit plans,
          net of income tax(2)131(329)295
     Unrealized losses on cash flow hedging activities,
          net of income tax(3)(3)(25)(12)
     Amortization of unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging
          activities, net of income tax(4)111
          Total other comprehensive income (loss)132(348)289
Comprehensive income2,1811,3991,820
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests101912
     Comprehensive income attributable to The Kroger Co.$2,171$1,380$1,808
____________________

(1)Amount is net of tax of $2 in 2015 and $3 in 2014 and 2013.
(2)Amount is net of tax of $77 in 2015, $(193) in 2014 and $173 in 2013.
(3)Amount is net of tax of $(2) in 2015, $(14) in 2014 and $(8) in 2013.
(4)Amount is net of tax of $1 in 2013.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

A-33



THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS oF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014

(In millions)    2015
(52 weeks)
    2014
(52 weeks)
    2013
(52 weeks)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:                        
       Net earnings including noncontrolling interests$2,049$1,747$1,531
              Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
                     Depreciation and amortization2,0891,9481,703
                     Asset impairment charge463739
                     LIFO charge2814752
                     Stock-based employee compensation165155107
                     Expense for Company-sponsored pension plans1035574
                     Deferred income taxes3177372
                     Other547247
                     Changes in operating assets and liabilities net of effects from mergers
                            of businesses:
                            Store deposits in-transit95(27)25
                            Receivables(59)(141)(8)
                            Inventories(184)(147)(131)
                            Prepaid and other current assets(28)2(49)
                            Trade accounts payable440135196
                            Accrued expenses19119777
                            Income taxes receivable and payable(359)(68)(47)
                            Contribution to Company-sponsored pension plans(5)(100)
                            Other(109)(22)(15)
                     Net cash provided by operating activities4,8334,1633,573
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
              Payments for property and equipment, including payments for lease buyouts(3,349)(2,831)(2,330)
              Proceeds from sale of assets453724
              Payments for mergers(168)(252)(2,344)
              Other(98)(14)(121)
                     Net cash used by investing activities(3,570)(3,060)(4,771)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
              Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt1,1815763,548
              Payments on long-term debt(1,245)(375)(1,060)
              Net (payments) borrowings on commercial paper(285)25(395)
              Dividends paid(385)(338)(319)
              Excess tax benefits on stock based awards975232
              Proceeds from issuance of capital stock120110196
              Treasury stock purchases(703)(1,283)(609)
              Investment in the remaining equity of a noncontrolling interest(26)
              Other(8)(3)(32)
                     Net cash provided (used) by financing activities(1,254)(1,236)1,361
Net increase (decrease) in cash and temporary cash investments9(133)163
Cash and temporary cash investments:
              Beginning of year268401238
              End of year$277$268$401
Reconciliation of capital investments:
       Payments for property and equipment, including payments for lease buyouts$(3,349)$(2,831)$(2,330)
       Payments for lease buyouts35135108
       Changes in construction-in-progress payables(35)(56)(83)
              Total capital investments, excluding lease buyouts$(3,349)$(2,752)$(2,305)
Disclosure of cash flow information:
              Cash paid during the year for interest$474$477$401
              Cash paid during the year for income taxes$1,001$941$679
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

A-34



THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTOF CHANGESIN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014

(In millions, except per share amounts)

Common Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Treasury StockAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Gain (Loss)
 Accumulated
Earnings
Noncontrolling
Interest
Total
 Shares Amount  Shares Amount    
Balances at February 2, 2013 1,918  $1,918   $2,492   890 $(9,237)      $(753)          $9,787           $7      $4,214
Issuance of common stock:   
      Stock options exercised (18)196 196
      Restricted stock issued(60)(5)26(34)
Treasury stock activity:  
      Treasury stock purchases, at cost18(338) (338)
      Stock options exchanged17(271)(271)
Share-based employee compensation107107
Other comprehensive gain net of
            income tax of $168 289289
Other51(17)(8)26
Cash dividends declared
            ($0.315 per common share)(325)(325)
Net earnings including 
                non-controlling interests1,519121,531
Balances at February 1, 2014 1,918$1,918$2,590902$(9,641)$(464)$10,981$11$5,395
Issuance of common stock:
      Stock options exercised(10)110110
      Restricted stock issued(91)(5)40(51)
Treasury stock activity:
     Treasury stock purchases, at cost51(1,129)(1,129)
     Stock options exchanged6(154)(154)
Share-based employee compensation155155
Other comprehensive loss net of income
            tax of ($204)(348)(348)
Other94(35)59
Cash dividends declared
            ($0.350 per common share)(342)(342)
Net earnings including
            non-controlling interests1,728191,747
Balances at January 31, 20151,918$1,918$2,748944$(10,809)$(812)$12,367$30$5,442
Issuance of common stock:
      Stock options exercised(9)120120
      Restricted stock issued(122)(5)37(85)
Treasury stock activity:
      Treasury stock purchases, at cost14(500)(500)
      Stock options exchanged7(203)(203)
Share-based employee compensation165165
Other comprehensive gain net of income
            tax of $77132132
Investment in the remaining equity of a
            non-controlling interest26(57)(31)
Other163(54)(5)104
Cash dividends declared
            ($0.408 per common share)(395)(395)
Net earnings including
            non-controlling interests2,039102,049
Balances at January 30, 20161,918$1,918$2,980951$(11,409)$(680)$14,011$(22)$6,798
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

A-35



NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

All amounts in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are in millions except per share amounts.

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed in preparing these financial statements.

Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The Kroger Co. (the “Company”) was founded in 1883 and incorporated in 1902. As of January 30, 2016, the Company was one of the largest retailers in the nation based on annual sales. The Company also manufactures and processes food for sale by its supermarkets. The accompanying financial statements include the consolidated accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and the variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

On June 25, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of The Kroger Co.’s common shares in the form of a 100% stock dividend, which was effective July 13, 2015. All share and per share amounts in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.

Refer to Note 17 for an additional change to the Consolidated Balance Sheets for a recently adopted accounting standard regarding the presentation of debt issuance costs.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. The last three fiscal years consist of the 52-week periods ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014.

Pervasiveness of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of consolidated revenues and expenses during the reporting period is also required. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash, Temporary Cash Investments and Book Overdrafts

Cash and temporary cash investments represent store cash and short-term investments with original maturities of less than three months. Book overdrafts are included in “Trade accounts payable” and “Accrued salaries and wages” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Deposits In-Transit

Deposits in-transit generally represent funds deposited to the Company’s bank accounts at the end of the year related to sales, a majority of which were paid for with debit cards, credit cards and checks, to which the Company does not have immediate access but settle within a few days of the sales transaction.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally on a last-in, first-out “LIFO” basis) or market. In total, approximately 95% of inventories in 2015 and 2014 were valued using the LIFO method. Cost for the balance of the inventories, including substantially all fuel inventories, was determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Replacement cost was higher than the carrying amount by $1,272 at January 30, 2016 and $1,245 at January 31, 2015. The Company follows the Link-Chain, Dollar-Value LIFO method for purposes of calculating its LIFO charge or credit.

A-36



The item-cost method of accounting to determine inventory cost before the LIFO adjustment is followed for substantially all store inventories at the Company’s supermarket divisions. This method involves counting each item in inventory, assigning costs to each of these items based on the actual purchase costs (net of vendor allowances and cash discounts) of each item and recording the cost of items sold. The item-cost method of accounting allows for more accurate reporting of periodic inventory balances and enables management to more precisely manage inventory. In addition, substantially all of the Company’s inventory consists of finished goods and is recorded at actual purchase costs (net of vendor allowances and cash discounts).

The Company evaluates inventory shortages throughout the year based on actual physical counts in its facilities. Allowances for inventory shortages are recorded based on the results of these counts to provide for estimated shortages as of the financial statement date.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost or, in the case of assets acquired in a business combination, at fair value. Depreciation and amortization expense, which includes the depreciation of assets recorded under capital leases, is computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of individual assets. Buildings and land improvements are depreciated based on lives varying from 10 to 40 years. All new purchases of store equipment are assigned lives varying from three to nine years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term to which they relate, which generally varies from four to 25 years, or the useful life of the asset. Food production plant and distribution center equipment is depreciated over lives varying from three to 15 years. Information technology assets are generally depreciated over five years. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2,089 in 2015, $1,948 in 2014 and $1,703 in 2013.

Interest costs on significant projects constructed for the Company’s own use are capitalized as part of the costs of the newly constructed facilities. Upon retirement or disposal of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the balance sheet and any gain or loss is reflected in net earnings. Refer to Note 4 for further information regarding the Company’s property, plant and equipment.

Deferred Rent

The Company recognizes rent holidays, including the time period during which the Company has access to the property for construction of buildings or improvements and escalating rent provisions on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The deferred amount is included in “Other current liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Goodwill

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year, and also upon the occurrence of a triggering event. The Company performs reviews of each of its operating divisions and variable interest entities (collectively, “reporting units”) that have goodwill balances. Generally, fair value is determined using a multiple of earnings, or discounted projected future cash flows, and is compared to the carrying value of a reporting unit for purposes of identifying potential impairment. Projected future cash flows are based on management’s knowledge of the current operating environment and expectations for the future. If potential for impairment is identified, the fair value of a reporting unit is measured against the fair value of its underlying assets and liabilities, excluding goodwill, to estimate an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Goodwill impairment is recognized for any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value. Results of the goodwill impairment reviews performed during 2015, 2014 and 2013 are summarized in Note 3.

A-37



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company monitors the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment each quarter based on whether certain triggering events have occurred. These events include current period losses combined with a history of losses or a projection of continuing losses or a significant decrease in the market value of an asset. When a triggering event occurs, an impairment calculation is performed, comparing projected undiscounted future cash flows, utilizing current cash flow information and expected growth rates related to specific stores, to the carrying value for those stores. If the Company identifies impairment for long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company compares the assets’ current carrying value to the assets’ fair value. Fair value is based on current market values or discounted future cash flows. The Company records impairment when the carrying value exceeds fair market value. With respect to owned property and equipment held for disposal, the value of the property and equipment is adjusted to reflect recoverable values based on previous efforts to dispose of similar assets and current economic conditions. Impairment is recognized for the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair market value, reduced by estimated direct costs of disposal. The Company recorded asset impairments in the normal course of business totaling $46, $37 and $39 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Costs to reduce the carrying value of long-lived assets for each of the years presented have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Operating, general and administrative” expense.

Store Closing Costs

The Company provides for closed store liabilities relating to the present value of the estimated remaining non-cancellable lease payments after the closing date, net of estimated subtenant income. The Company estimates the net lease liabilities using a discount rate to calculate the present value of the remaining net rent payments on closed stores. The closed store lease liabilities usually are paid over the lease terms associated with the closed stores, which generally have remaining terms ranging from one to 20 years. Adjustments to closed store liabilities primarily relate to changes in subtenant income and actual exit costs differing from original estimates. Adjustments are made for changes in estimates in the period in which the change becomes known. Store closing liabilities are reviewed quarterly to ensure that any accrued amount that is not a sufficient estimate of future costs is adjusted to income in the proper period.

Owned stores held for disposal are reduced to their estimated net realizable value. Costs to reduce the carrying values of property, equipment and leasehold improvements are accounted for in accordance with the Company’s policy on impairment of long-lived assets. Inventory write-downs, if any, in connection with store closings, are classified in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Merchandise costs.” Costs to transfer inventory and equipment from closed stores are expensed as incurred.

The current portion of the future lease obligations of stores is included in “Other current liabilities,” and the long-term portion is included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Interest Rate Risk Management

The Company uses derivative instruments primarily to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates. The Company’s current program relative to interest rate protection and the methods by which the Company accounts for its derivative instruments are described in Note 7.

Commodity Price Protection

The Company enters into purchase commitments for various resources, including raw materials utilized in its food production plants and energy to be used in its stores, food production plants and administrative offices. The Company enters into commitments expecting to take delivery of and to utilize those resources in the conduct of the normal course of business. The Company’s current program relative to commodity price protection and the methods by which the Company accounts for its purchase commitments are described in Note 7.

A-38



Benefit Plans and Multi-Employer Pension Plans

The Company recognizes the funded status of its retirement plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs or credits and transition obligations that have not yet been recognized as part of net periodic benefit cost are required to be recorded as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). All plans are measured as of the Company’s fiscal year end.

The determination of the obligation and expense for Company-sponsored pension plans and other post-retirement benefits is dependent on the selection of assumptions used by actuaries and the Company in calculating those amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note 15 and include, among others, the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, mortality and the rates of increase in compensation and health care costs. Actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect the recognized expense and recorded obligation in future periods. While the Company believes that the assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions may materially affect the pension and other post-retirement obligations and future expense.

The Company also participates in various multi-employer plans for substantially all union employees. Pension expense for these plans is recognized as contributions are funded. Refer to Note 16 for additional information regarding the Company’s participation in these various multi-employer plans.

The Company administers and makes contributions to the employee 401(k) retirement savings accounts. Contributions to the employee 401(k) retirement savings accounts are expensed when contributed. Refer to Note 15 for additional information regarding the Company’s benefit plans.

Share Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock options under fair value recognition provisions. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, over the requisite service period of the award. In addition, the Company records expense for restricted stock awards in an amount equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date of the award, over the period the awards lapse. Refer to Note 12 for additional information regarding the Company’s stock based compensation.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting basis. Refer to Note 5 for the types of differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are classified as a net current or noncurrent asset or liability based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes. A deferred tax asset or liability that is not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting is classified according to the expected reversal date.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company reviews the tax positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns to determine whether and to what extent a benefit can be recognized in its consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 5 for the amount of unrecognized tax benefits and other related disclosures related to uncertain tax positions.

A-39



Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, the Company records allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. As of January 30, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service had concluded its examination of the Company’s 2010 and 2011 federal tax returns. Tax years 2012 and 2013 remain under examination.

The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.

Self-Insurance Costs

The Company is primarily self-insured for costs related to workers’ compensation and general liability claims. Liabilities are actuarially determined and are recognized based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. The liabilities for workers’ compensation claims are accounted for on a present value basis. The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage to limit its exposure to any significant exposure on a per claim basis. The Company is insured for covered costs in excess of these per claim limits.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s self-insurance liability through January 30, 2016.

     2015     2014     2013
Beginning balance$599$569$537
Expense234246220
Claim payments(225)(216)(215)
Assumed from Roundy’s or Harris Teeter3127
Ending balance639599569
Less: Current portion(223)(213)(224)
Long-term portion$416$386$345

The current portion of the self-insured liability is included in “Other current liabilities,” and the long-term portion is included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company maintains surety bonds related to self-insured workers’ compensation claims. These bonds are required by most states in which the Company is self-insured for workers’ compensation and are placed with third-party insurance providers to insure payment of the Company’s obligations in the event the Company is unable to meet its claim payment obligations up to its self-insured retention levels. These bonds do not represent liabilities of the Company, as the Company has recorded reserves for the claim costs.

The Company is similarly self-insured for property-related losses. The Company maintains stop loss coverage to limit its property loss exposures including coverage for earthquake, wind, flood and other catastrophic events.

A-40



Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the sale of products are recognized at the point of sale. Discounts provided to customers by the Company at the time of sale, including those provided in connection with loyalty cards, are recognized as a reduction in sales as the products are sold. Discounts provided by vendors, usually in the form of paper coupons, are not recognized as a reduction in sales provided the coupons are redeemable at any retailer that accepts coupons. The Company records a receivable from the vendor for the difference in sales price and cash received. Pharmacy sales are recorded when product is provided to the customer. Sales taxes are recorded as other accrued liabilities and not as a component of sales. The Company does not recognize a sale when it sells its own gift cards and gift certificates. Rather, it records a deferred liability equal to the amount received. A sale is then recognized when the gift card or gift certificate is redeemed to purchase the Company’s products. Gift card and certificate breakage is recognized when redemption is deemed remote and there is no legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift card. The amount of breakage has not been material for 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Merchandise Costs

The “Merchandise costs” line item of the Consolidated Statements of Operations includes product costs, net of discounts and allowances; advertising costs (see separate discussion below); inbound freight charges; warehousing costs, including receiving and inspection costs; transportation costs; and food production and operational costs. Warehousing, transportation and manufacturing management salaries are also included in the “Merchandise costs” line item; however, purchasing management salaries and administration costs are included in the “Operating, general and administrative” line item along with most of the Company’s other managerial and administrative costs. Rent expense and depreciation and amortization expense are shown separately in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Warehousing and transportation costs include distribution center direct wages, transportation direct wages, repairs and maintenance, utilities, inbound freight and, where applicable, third party warehouse management fees. These costs are recognized in the periods the related expenses are incurred.

The Company believes the classification of costs included in merchandise costs could vary widely throughout the industry. The Company’s approach is to include in the “Merchandise costs” line item the direct, net costs of acquiring products and making them available to customers in its stores. The Company believes this approach most accurately presents the actual costs of products sold.

The Company recognizes all vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs when the related product is sold. When possible, vendor allowances are applied to the related product cost by item and, therefore, reduce the carrying value of inventory by item. When the items are sold, the vendor allowance is recognized. When it is not possible, due to systems constraints, to allocate vendor allowances to the product by item, vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction in merchandise costs based on inventory turns and, therefore, recognized as the product is sold.

Advertising Costs

The Company’s advertising costs are recognized in the periods the related expenses are incurred and are included in the “Merchandise costs” line item of the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s pre-tax advertising costs totaled $679 in 2015, $648 in 2014 and $587 in 2013. The Company does not record vendor allowances for co-operative advertising as a reduction of advertising expense.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be temporary cash investments.

A-41



Segments

The Company operates retail food and drug stores, multi-department stores, jewelry stores, and convenience stores throughout the United States. The Company’s retail operations, which represent over 99% of the Company’s consolidated sales and EBITDA, are its only reportable segment. The Company’s retail operating divisions have been aggregated into one reportable segment due to the operating divisions having similar economic characteristics with similar long-term financial performance. In addition, the Company’s operating divisions offer to its customers similar products, have similar distribution methods, operate in similar regulatory environments, purchase the majority of the Company’s merchandise for retail sale from similar (and in many cases identical) vendors on a coordinated basis from a centralized location, serve similar types of customers, and are allocated capital from a centralized location. The Company’s operating divisions reflect the manner in which the business is managed and how the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who acts as the Company’s chief operating decision maker, assess performance internally. All of the Company’s operations are domestic.

The following table presents sales revenue by type of product for 2015, 2014 and 2013.

201520142013
    Amount    % of total    Amount    % of total    Amount    % of total
Non Perishable(1)$57,18752.1%$54,39250.1% $49,229 50.0%
Perishable(2)25,72623.4%24,17822.3%20,62521.0%
Fuel14,80213.5%18,85017.4%18,96219.3%
Pharmacy9,7788.9%9,0328.3%8,0738.2%
Other(3)2,3372.1%2,0131.9%1,4861.5%
Total Sales and other revenue$109,830  100.0%  $108,465100.0%$98,375  100.0%  
____________________

(1)Consists primarily of grocery, general merchandise, health and beauty care and natural foods.
(2)Consists primarily of produce, floral, meat, seafood, deli, bakery and fresh prepared.
(3)Consists primarily of sales related to jewelry stores, food production plants to outside customers, variable interest entities, a specialty pharmacy, in-store health clinics and online sales by Vitacost.com.

2. Mergers

On December 18, 2015, the Company closed its merger with Roundy’s by purchasing 100% of Roundy’s outstanding common stock for $3.60 per share and assuming Roundy’s outstanding debt, for a purchase price of $866. The merger brings a complementary store base in communities throughout Wisconsin and a stronger presence in the greater Chicagoland area. The merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and was financed through a combination of commercial paper and long-term debt (see Note 6). In a business combination, the purchase price is allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, with any excess of purchase price over fair value recognized as goodwill. In addition to recognizing the assets and liabilities on the acquired company’s balance sheet, the Company reviews supply contracts, leases, financial instruments, employment agreements and other significant agreements to identify potential assets or liabilities that require recognition in connection with the application of acquisition accounting under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805. Intangible assets are recognized apart from goodwill when the asset arises from contractual or other legal rights, or are separable from the acquired entity such that they may be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged either on a standalone basis or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability.

A-42



Pending finalization of the Company’s valuation and other items, the following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the merger with Roundy’s:

     December 18,
2015
ASSETS          
Cash and temporary cash investments$20
Store deposits in-transit30
Receivables43
FIFO inventory323
Prepaid and other current assets19
     Total current assets435
Property, plant and equipment342
Intangibles324
Other assets4
     Total Assets, excluding Goodwill1,105
LIABILITIES
Current portion of obligations under capital leases and financing obligations(9)
Trade accounts payable(236)
Accrued salaries and wages(40)
Other current liabilities(89)
     Total current liabilities(374)
Fair-value of long-term debt(678)
Fair-value of long-term obligations under capital leases and financing obligations(20)
Deferred income taxes(112)
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations(36)
Other long-term liabilities(111)
     Total Liabilities(1,331)
     Total Identifiable Net Liabilities(226)
Goodwill414
     Total Purchase Price$188

Of the $324 allocated to intangible assets, $211 relates to the Mariano’s, Pick ’n Save, Metro Market and Copps trade names, to which we assigned an indefinite life and, therefore, will not be amortized. The Company also recorded $69, $38, and $6 related to favorable leasehold interests, pharmacy prescription files and customer lists, respectively. The Company will amortize the favorable leasehold interests over a weighted average of twelve years. The Company will amortize the pharmacy prescription files and customer lists over seven and two years, respectively. The goodwill recorded as part of the merger was attributable to the assembled workforce of Roundy’s and operational synergies expected from the merger, as well as any intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. The transaction was treated as a stock purchase for income tax purposes. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the merger did not result in a step up of the tax basis and goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The above amounts represent the preliminary allocation of the purchase price, and are subject to revision when the resulting valuations of property and intangible assets are finalized, which will occur prior to December 18, 2016. Due to the timing of the merger closing late in the year, the revenue and earnings of Roundy’s in 2015 were not material.

A-43



On August 18, 2014, the Company closed its merger with Vitacost.com, Inc. (“Vitacost.com”) by purchasing 100% of the Vitacost.com outstanding common stock for $8.00 per share or $287. This merger affords the Company access to Vitacost.com’s extensive e-commerce platform, which can be combined with the Company’s customer insights and loyal customer base, to create new levels of personalization and convenience for customers. The merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and was financed through the issuance of commercial paper (see Note 6).

The Company’s purchase price allocation was finalized in the second quarter of 2015. The changes in the fair values assumed from the preliminary amounts were not material. The table below summarizes the final fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

     August 18,
2014
ASSETS          
Total current assets$80
Property, plant and equipment28
Intangibles81
     Total Assets, excluding Goodwill189
LIABILITIES
Total current liabilities(56)
Deferred income taxes(6)
     Total Liabilities(62)
     Total Identifiable Net Assets127
Goodwill160
     Total Purchase Price$287

Of the $81 allocated to intangible assets, the Company recorded $49, $26 and $6 related to customer relationships, technology and the trade name, respectively. The Company will amortize the technology and the trade name, using the straight line method, over 10 and three years, respectively, while the customer relationships will be amortized over five years using the declining balance method. The goodwill recorded as part of the merger was attributable to the assembled workforce of Vitacost.com and operational synergies expected from the merger, as well as any intangible assets that did not qualify for separate recognition. The transaction was treated as a stock purchase for income tax purposes. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the merger did not result in a step up of the tax basis and goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Pro forma results of operations, assuming the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) merger had taken place at the beginning of 2012, the Vitacost.com merger had taken place at the beginning of 2013 and the Roundy’s transaction had taken place at the beginning of 2014, are included in the following table. The pro forma information includes historical results of operations of Harris Teeter, Vitacost.com and Roundy’s, as well as adjustments for interest expense that would have been incurred due to financing the mergers, depreciation and amortization of the assets acquired and excludes the pre-merger transaction related expenses incurred by Harris Teeter, Vitacost.com, Roundy’s and the Company. The pro forma information does not include efficiencies, cost reductions, synergies or investments in lower prices for our customers expected to result from the mergers. The unaudited pro

A-44



forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the Harris Teeter merger been completed at the beginning of 2012, the Vitacost.com merger completed at the beginning of 2013 or the Roundy’s merger completed at the beginning of 2014.

     Fiscal year ended
January 30, 2016
     Fiscal year ended
January 31, 2015
     Fiscal year ended
February 1, 2014
Sales        $113,308                $112,458                $103,584        
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests2,0611,7511,624
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests101912
     Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.$2,051$1,732$1,612

3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance through January 30, 2016.

          2015     2014
Balance beginning of year
     Goodwill$4,836$4,667
     Accumulated impairment losses(2,532)(2,532)
2,3042,135
Activity during the year
     Mergers420169
Balance end of year
     Goodwill5,2564,836
     Accumulated impairment losses(2,532)(2,532)
$2,724$2,304

In 2015, the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Roundy’s, a supermarket retailer in the Wisconsin and Chicagoland markets, resulting in additional goodwill totaling $414. Roundy’s is accounted for as a single reporting unit.

In 2014, the Company acquired all the outstanding shares of Vitacost.com, an online retailer, resulting in additional goodwill of $160.

See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Roundy’s and Vitacost.com mergers.

Testing for impairment must be performed annually, or on an interim basis upon the occurrence of a triggering event or a change in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The annual evaluations of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were performed during the fourth quarter of 2015, 2014 and 2013 did not result in impairment.

Based on current and future expected cash flows, the Company believes goodwill impairments are not reasonably likely. A 10% reduction in fair value of the Company’s reporting units would not indicate a potential for impairment of the Company’s remaining goodwill balance.

In 2015, the Company acquired definite and indefinite lived intangible assets totaling approximately $324 as a result of the merger with Roundy’s.

In 2014, the Company acquired definite and indefinite lived intangible assets totaling approximately $81 as a result of the merger with Vitacost.com.

A-45



The following table summarizes the Company’s intangible assets balance through January 30, 2016.

20152014
     Gross
carrying
amount
     

Accumulated
amortization(1)

     Gross
carrying
amount
     Accumulated
amortization
(1)
Definite-lived favorable leasehold interests     $169             $(31)             $101     $(26)
Definite-lived pharmacy prescription files127(40)98(41)
Definite-lived customer relationships93(39)87(17)
Definite-lived other78(23)74(13)
Indefinite-lived trade name641430
Indefinite-lived liquor licenses7864
Total$1,186$(133)$854$(97)
____________________

(1)Favorable leasehold interests are amortized to rent expense, pharmacy prescription files are amortized to merchandise costs, customer relationships are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense and other intangibles are amortized to operating, general and administrative (“OG&A”) expense and depreciation and amortization expense.

Amortization expense associated with intangible assets totaled approximately $51, $41 and $18, during fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Future amortization expense associated with the net carrying amount of definite-lived intangible assets for the years subsequent to 2015 is estimated to be approximately:

2016     $57
201748
201842
201940
202035
Thereafter112
Total future estimated amortization associated
     with definite-lived intangible assets$334

4. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of:

          2015     2014
Land$2,997$2,819
Buildings and land improvements10,5249,639
Equipment12,52011,587
Leasehold improvements8,7108,068
Construction-in-progress2,1151,690
Leased property under capital leases and financing obligations801737
     Total property, plant and equipment37,66734,540
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(18,048)(16,628)
     Property, plant and equipment, net$19,619$17,912

Accumulated depreciation and amortization for leased property under capital leases was $293 at January 30, 2016 and $332 at January 31, 2015.

A-46



Approximately $264 and $260, net book value, of property, plant and equipment collateralized certain mortgages at January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively.

5.  TAXES BASEDON INCOME

The provision for taxes based on income consists of:

     2015      2014      2013
Federal
      Current   $723$847$638
       Deferred266(15)81
Subtotal federal989832719
State and local
      Current375942
      Deferred 1911(10)
Subtotal state and local567032
Total$1,045$902$751

A reconciliation of the statutory federal rate and the effective rate follows:

     2015      2014      2013
Statutory rate35.0%35.0%35.0%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit1.2%1.7%0.9%
 Credits(1.2)%(1.2)%(1.3)%
Favorable resolution of issues(0.2)%(0.4)%%
Domestic manufacturing deduction(0.7)%(0.7)%(1.1)%
Other changes, net(0.3)%(0.3)%(0.6)%
33.8%34.1%32.9%

The 2015 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the utilization of tax credits, the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and other changes, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes. The 2015 rate for state income taxes is lower than 2014 due to the filing of amended returns to claim additional benefits in years still under review, the favorable resolution of state issues and an increase in state credits. The 2013 rate for state income taxes is lower than 2015 and 2014 due to an increase in state credits, including the benefit from filing amended returns to claim additional credits. The 2013 benefit from the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction is greater than 2015 and 2014 due to the amendment of prior years’ tax returns to claim the additional benefit available in years still under review by the Internal Revenue Service.

A-47



The tax effects of significant temporary differences that comprise tax balances were as follows:

     2015      2014
Current deferred tax assets:
      Net operating loss and credit carryforwards$10$5
      Compensation related costs8388
      Other6114
      Subtotal154107
      Valuation allowance(9)(7)
            Total current deferred tax assets145100
Current deferred tax liabilities:
      Insurance related costs(56)(99)
      Inventory related costs(310)(288)
            Total current deferred tax liabilities(366)(387)
Current deferred taxes$(221)$(287)
Long-term deferred tax assets:
      Compensation related costs$709$721
      Lease accounting106129
       Closed store reserves5750
      Insurance related costs2977
      Net operating loss and credit carryforwards128115
      Other172
      Subtotal1,0461,094
      Valuation allowance(43)(42)
            Total long-term deferred tax assets1,0031,052
Long-term deferred tax liabilities:
      Depreciation and amortization(2,755)(2,261)
            Total long-term deferred tax liabilities(2,755)(2,261)
Long-term deferred taxes$(1,752)$(1,209)

On November 19, 2015, the Internal Revenue Service issued implementation guidance for retailers with respect to recently issued tangible property regulations. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the immediate deduction of qualifying costs related to current and prior year store remodels, resulting in an increase in long-term deferred tax liability and current income tax receivable. The adoption of this guidance, along with the impact of the Roundy’s merger, resulted in the increase in the deferred tax liability related to depreciation and amortization from January 31, 2015 to January 30, 2016.

At January 30, 2016, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of $1,460. These net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2016 through 2036. The utilization of certain of the Company’s state net operating loss carryforwards may be limited in a given year. Further, based on the analysis described below, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance against some of the deferred tax assets resulting from its state net operating losses.

A-48



At January 30, 2016, the Company had state credit carryforwards of $65, most of which expire from 2016 through 2027. The utilization of certain of the Company’s credits may be limited in a given year. Further, based on the analysis described below, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance against some of the deferred tax assets resulting from its state credits.

At January 30, 2016, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $62. These net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2030 through 2034. The utilization of certain of the Company’s federal net operating loss carryforwards may be limited in a given year. Further, based on the analysis described below, the Company has not recorded a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets resulting from its federal net operating losses.

The Company regularly reviews all deferred tax assets on a tax filer and jurisdictional basis to estimate whether these assets are more likely than not to be realized based on all available evidence. This evidence includes historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversal of existing temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning strategies. Projected future taxable income is based on expected results and assumptions as to the jurisdiction in which the income will be earned. The expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences is based on current tax law and the Company’s tax methods of accounting. Unless deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized, a valuation allowance is established to reduce the carrying value of the deferred tax asset until such time that realization becomes more likely than not. Increases and decreases in these valuation allowances are included in “Income tax expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits, is as follows:

     2015     2014     2013
Beginning balance$246$325$299
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year111723
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(11)(6)(10)
Additions for tax positions of prior years4917
 Reductions for tax positions of prior years(27)(36)(4)
Settlements(17)(63)
Lapse of statute(2)
Ending balance$204$246$325

The Company does not anticipate that changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months will have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial position.

As of January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate was $83, $90 and $98, respectively.

To the extent interest and penalties would be assessed by taxing authorities on any underpayment of income tax, such amounts have been accrued and classified as a component of income tax expense. During the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, the Company recognized approximately $(5), $3 and $10, respectively, in interest and penalties (recoveries). The Company had accrued approximately $25, $30 and $41 for the payment of interest and penalties as of January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, respectively.

As of January 31, 2015, the Internal Revenue Service had concluded its examination of our 2010 and 2011 federal tax returns and is currently auditing tax years 2012 and 2013. The 2012 and 2013 audits are expected to be completed in 2016.

A-49



6.  DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Long-term debt consists of:

     2015     2014
0.76% to 8.00% Senior notes due through 2043$9,826$9,224
 5.00% to 12.75% Mortgages due in varying amounts through 20275873
0.27% to 0.66% Commercial paper due through February 20169901,275
Other522454
Total debt11,39611,026
Less current portion(2,318)(1,844)
Total long-term debt$9,078$9,182

In 2015, the Company issued $500 of senior notes due in fiscal year 2026 bearing an interest rate of 3.50%, $300 of senior notes due in fiscal year 2021 bearing an interest rate of 2.60% and $300 of senior notes due in fiscal year 2019 bearing an interest rate of 2.00%, and repaid $500 of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3.90% upon maturity. Due to the merger with Roundy’s, the Company assumed $678 of term loans, which were entirely paid off following the merger.

In 2014, the Company issued $500 of senior notes due in fiscal year 2021 bearing an interest rate of 2.95% and repaid $300 of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 4.95% upon maturity.

On June 30, 2014, the Company amended, extended and restated its $2,000 unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company entered into the amended credit facility to amend, extend and restate the Company’s existing credit facility that would have terminated on January 25, 2017. The amended credit facility provides for a $2,750 unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”), with a termination date of June 30, 2019, unless extended as permitted under the Credit Agreement. The Company has the ability to increase the size of the Credit Agreement by up to an additional $750, subject to certain conditions.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at the Company’s option, at either (i) LIBOR plus a market rate spread, based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio or (ii) the base rate, defined as the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Bank of America prime rate, and (c) one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%, plus a market rate spread based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio. The Company will also pay a Commitment Fee based on the Leverage Ratio and Letter of Credit fees equal to a market rate spread based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio. The Credit Agreement contains covenants, which, among other things, require the maintenance of a Leverage Ratio of not greater than 3.50:1.00 and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.70:1.00. The Company may repay the Credit Agreement in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. The Credit Agreement is not guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries.

As of January 30, 2016, the Company had $990 of borrowings of commercial paper, with a weighted average interest rate of 0.66%, and no borrowings under its Credit Agreement. As of January 31, 2015, the Company had $1,275 of borrowings of commercial paper, with a weighted average interest rate of 0.37%, and no borrowings under its Credit Agreement.

As of January 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $244, of which $13 reduces funds available under the Company’s Credit Agreement. The letters of credit are maintained primarily to support performance, payment, deposit or surety obligations of the Company.

A-50



Most of the Company’s outstanding public debt is subject to early redemption at varying times and premiums, at the option of the Company. In addition, subject to certain conditions, some of the Company’s publicly issued debt will be subject to redemption, in whole or in part, at the option of the holder upon the occurrence of a redemption event, upon not less than five days’ notice prior to the date of redemption, at a redemption price equal to the default amount, plus a specified premium. “Redemption Event” is defined in the indentures as the occurrence of (i) any person or group, together with any affiliate thereof, beneficially owning 50% or more of the voting power of the Company, (ii) any one person or group, or affiliate thereof, succeeding in having a majority of its nominees elected to the Company’s Board of Directors, in each case, without the consent of a majority of the continuing directors of the Company or (iii) both a change of control and a below investment grade rating.

The aggregate annual maturities and scheduled payments of long-term debt, as of year-end 2015, and for the years subsequent to 2015 are:

     2016$2,318
2017735
2018 1,307
2019774
 2020724
Thereafter5,538
Total debt$11,396

7.  DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

GAAP defines derivatives, requires that derivatives be carried at fair value on the balance sheet, and provides for hedge accounting when certain conditions are met. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as “cash flow” hedges, to the extent the hedges are highly effective, are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax effects. Ineffective portions of cash flow hedges, if any, are recognized in current period earnings. Other comprehensive income or loss is reclassified into current period earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as “fair value” hedges, along with corresponding changes in the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities, are recorded in current period earnings. Ineffective portions of fair value hedges, if any, are recognized in current period earnings.

The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether derivatives used as hedging instruments are highly effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value or cash flow of the hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or ceases to be highly effective, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

Interest Rate Risk Management

The Company is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. The Company manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations through the use of a commercial paper program, interest rate swaps (fair value hedges) and forward-starting interest rate swaps (cash flow hedges). The Company’s current program relative to interest rate protection contemplates hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt attributable to changes in interest rates. To do this, the Company uses the following guidelines: (i) use average daily outstanding borrowings to determine annual debt amounts subject to interest rate exposure, (ii) limit the average annual amount subject to interest rate reset and the amount of floating rate debt to a combined total of $2,500 or less, (iii) include no leveraged products, and (iv) hedge without regard to profit motive or sensitivity to current mark-to-market status.

A-51



The Company reviews compliance with these guidelines annually with the Financial Policy Committee of the Board of Directors. These guidelines may change as the Company’s needs dictate.

Fair Value Interest Rate Swaps

The table below summarizes the outstanding interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015.

 20152014
Pay
Floating
     Pay
Fixed
     Pay
Floating
     Pay
Fixed
Notional amount$100$—$100 $—
Number of contracts2  —2  —
Duration in years2.92  —3.94  —
Average variable rate6.00%  —5.83%  —
Average fixed rate6.80%  —6.80%  —
MaturityDecember 2018December 2018

The gain or loss on these derivative instruments as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk is recognized in current earnings as “Interest expense.” These gains and losses for 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Year-To-Date
January 30, 2016January 31, 2015
Consolidated Statements of
Operations Classification
     Gain/
(Loss) on
Swaps
     Gain/
(Loss) on
Borrowings
     Gain/
(Loss) on
Swaps
     Gain/
(Loss) on
Borrowings
Interest Expense$1$(1)$2$(2)

The following table summarizes the location and fair value of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:

Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedging
Instruments
January
30, 2016
January
31, 2015
Balance Sheet
Location
Interest Rate Hedges$1$—(Other long-term
liabilities)/Other
assets

Cash Flow Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps

As of January 30, 2016, the Company had seven forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with maturity dates of August 2017 with an aggregate notional amount totaling $400. A forward-starting interest rate swap is an agreement that effectively hedges the variability in future benchmark interest payments attributable to changes in interest rates on the forecasted issuance of fixed-rate debt. The Company entered into these forward-starting interest rate swaps in order to lock in fixed interest rates on its forecasted issuance of debt in August 2017. Accordingly, the forward-starting interest rate swaps were designated as cash-flow hedges as defined by GAAP. As of January 30, 2016, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was recorded in other long-term liabilities for $27 and accumulated other comprehensive loss for $17 net of tax.

A-52



As of January 31, 2015, the Company had four forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with maturity dates of October 2015 with an aggregate notional amount totaling $300 and seven forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with maturity dates of August 2017 with an aggregate notional amount totaling $400. The Company entered into these forward-starting interest rate swaps in order to lock in fixed interest rates on its forecasted issuances of debt in October 2015 and August 2017. Accordingly, the forward-starting interest rate swaps were designated as cash-flow hedges as defined by GAAP. As of January 31, 2015, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was recorded in other long-term liabilities for $39 and accumulated other comprehensive loss for $25 net of tax.

During 2015, the Company terminated eight forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with maturity dates of October 2015 and January 2016 with an aggregate notional amount totaling $600. Four of these forward-starting interest rate swap agreements, with an aggregate notional amount totaling $300, were entered into and terminated in 2015. These forward-starting interest rate swap agreements were hedging the variability in future benchmark interest payments attributable to changing interest rates on the forecasted issuance of fixed-rate debt issued in 2015. As discussed in Note 6, the Company issued $1,100 of senior notes in 2015. Since these forward-starting interest rate swap agreements were classified as cash flow hedges, the unamortized loss of $17, $11 net of tax, has been deferred in AOCI and will be amortized to earnings as the interest payments are made.

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for 2015 and 2014:

Year-To-Date
Derivatives in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationships
      Amount of Gain/
(Loss) in AOCI
on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
      Amount of Gain/
(Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI
into Income
(Effective Portion)
      Location of Gain/
(Loss) Reclassified
into Income

(Effective Portion)
2015      20142015      2014
Forward-Starting Interest Rate
      Swaps, net of tax*$(51)$(49)$(1)$(1)Interest expense
____________________

*

The amounts of Gain/(Loss) in AOCI on derivatives include unamortized proceeds and payments from forward-starting interest rate swaps once classified as cash flow hedges that were terminated prior to end of 2015.

For the above fair value and cash flow interest rate swaps, the Company has entered into International Swaps and Derivatives Association master netting agreements that permit the net settlement of amounts owed under their respective derivative contracts. Under these master netting agreements, net settlement generally permits the Company or the counterparty to determine the net amount payable for contracts due on the same date and in the same currency for similar types of derivative transactions. These master netting agreements generally also provide for net settlement of all outstanding contracts with a counterparty in the case of an event of default or a termination event.

Collateral is generally not required of the counterparties or of the Company under these master netting agreements. As of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, no cash collateral was received or pledged under the master netting agreements.

A-53



The effect of the net settlement provisions of these master netting agreements on the Company’s derivative balances upon an event of default or termination event is as follows as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015:

January 30, 2016     Gross
Amount
Recognized
     Gross
Amounts
Offset
in the
Balance
Sheet
     Net
Amount
Presented
in the
Balance
Sheet
     Gross Amounts Not Offset
in the Balance Sheet
     Net
Amount
Financial
Instruments
     Cash
Collateral
Assets
Fair Value Interest
      Rate Swaps$1$—$1$—$—$1
             
Liabilities
Cash Flow Forward-Starting
      Interest Rate Swaps272727

January 31, 2015
 
     Gross
Amount
Recognized
     Gross
Amounts
Offset
in the
Balance
Sheet
     Net
Amount
Presented
inthe
Balance
Sheet
     
Gross Amounts Not Offset

in the Balance Sheet
     Net
Amount

Financial

Instruments
     Cash
Collateral
Liabilities
Cash Flow Forward-Starting
      Interest Rate Swaps$39$—$39$—$—$39

Commodity Price Protection

The Company enters into purchase commitments for various resources, including raw materials utilized in its food production plants and energy to be used in its stores, warehouses, food production plants and administrative offices. The Company enters into commitments expecting to take delivery of and to utilize those resources in the conduct of normal business. Those commitments for which the Company expects to utilize or take delivery in a reasonable amount of time in the normal course of business qualify as normal purchases and normal sales.

8.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined in the standards are as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable;

Level 3 – Unobservable pricing inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

A-54



For items carried at (or adjusted to) fair value in the consolidated financial statements, the following tables summarize the fair value of these instruments at January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015:

January 30, 2016 Fair Value Measurements Using

 Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total
Trading Securities$48  $ —  $—  $ 48
Available-for-Sale Securities4141
Long-Lived Assets77
Interest Rate Hedges(26)(26)
Total$89$(26)$ 7$ 70

January 31, 2015 Fair Value Measurements Using

 Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total
Trading Securities$47  $ —  $—  $ 47
Available-for-Sale Securities3636
Warrants2626
Long-Lived Assets2222
Interest Rate Hedges(39)(39)
Total$83$(13)$22$ 92

In 2015 and 2014, unrealized gains on the Level 1 available-for-sale securities totaled $5 and $8, respectively.

The Company values warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is classified as a Level 2 input.

The Company values interest rate hedges using observable forward yield curves. These forward yield curves are classified as Level 2 inputs.

Fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are primarily used in the impairment analysis of goodwill, other intangible assets, long-lived assets and in the valuation of store lease exit costs. The Company reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and as circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment. See Note 3 for further discussion related to the Company’s carrying value of goodwill. Long-lived assets and store lease exit costs were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 1 for further discussion of the Company’s policies and recorded amounts for impairments of long-lived assets and valuation of store lease exit costs. In 2015, long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $53 were written down to their fair value of $7, resulting in an impairment charge of $46. In 2014, long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $59 were written down to their fair value of $22, resulting in an impairment charge of $37.

A-55



Mergers are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires that the purchase price paid for an acquisition be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated fair values as of the effective date of the acquisition, with the excess of the purchase price over the net assets being recorded as goodwill. See Note 2 for further discussion related to accounting for mergers.

FAIR VALUEOF OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Current and Long-term Debt

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, was estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues adjusted for illiquidity based on available market evidence. If quoted market prices were not available, the fair value was based upon the net present value of the future cash flow using the forward interest rate yield curve in effect at respective year-ends. At January 30, 2016, the fair value of total debt was $12,344 compared to a carrying value of $11,396. At January 31, 2015, the fair value of total debt was $12,378 compared to a carrying value of $11,026.

Cash and Temporary Cash Investments, Store Deposits In-Transit, Receivables, Prepaid and Other Current Assets, Trade Accounts Payable, Accrued Salaries and Wages and Other Current Liabilities

The carrying amounts of these items approximated fair value.

Other Assets

The fair values of these investments were estimated based on quoted market prices for those or similar investments, or estimated cash flows, if appropriate. At January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, the carrying and fair value of long-term investments for which fair value is determinable was $128 and $133, respectively. At January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, the carrying value of notes receivable for which fair value is determinable was $145 and $98, respectively.

9.  ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following table represents the changes in AOCI by component for the years ended January 31, 2015 and January 30, 2016:

Cash Flow
Hedging
Activities(1)
     Available
for sale
Securities(1)
     Pension and
Postretirement
Defined Benefit
Plans(1)
     Total(1)
Balance at February 1, 2014 $ (25) $12  $(451)$(464)
OCI before reclassifications(2)(25)5(351)(371)
Amounts reclassified out of AOCI(3)12223
Net current-period OCI(24)5(329)(348)
Balance at January 31, 2015(49)17(780)(812)
OCI before reclassifications(2)(3)37878
Amounts reclassified out of AOCI(3)15354
Net current-period OCI(2)3131132
Balance at January 30, 2016$ (51)$20$(649)$(680)
____________________

(1)All amounts are net of tax.
(2)Net of tax of $(14), $3 and $(206) for cash flow hedging activities, available for sale securities and pension and postretirement defined benefit plans, respectively, as of January 31, 2015. Net of tax of $(2), $2 and $45 for cash flow hedging activities, available for sale securities and pension and postretirement defined benefit plans, respectively, as of January 30, 2016.

A-56



(3)     Net of tax of $13 for pension and postretirement defined benefit plans, as of January 31, 2015. Net of tax of $32 for pension and postretirement defined benefit plans as of January 30, 2016.

The following table represents the items reclassified out of AOCI and the related tax effects for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014:

     For the year
ended
January 30,
2016
     For the year
ended
January 31,
2015
     For the year
ended
February 1,
2014
Gains on cash flow hedging activities                                    
     Amortization of unrealized gains and losses
          on cash flow hedging activities(1)$1$1$2
     Tax expense(1)
     Net of tax111
Pension and postretirement defined benefit
     plan items
     Amortization of amounts included in net
          periodic pension expense(2)853598
     Tax expense(32)(13)(36)
     Net of tax532262
Total reclassifications, net of tax$54$23$63
____________________

(1)     Reclassified from AOCI into interest expense.
(2)Reclassified from AOCI into merchandise costs and OG&A expense. These components are included in the computation of net periodic pension costs (see Note 15 for additional details).

10. LEASESAND LEASE-FINANCED TRANSACTIONS

While the Company’s current strategy emphasizes ownership of store real estate, the Company operates primarily in leased facilities. Lease terms generally range from 10 to 20 years with options to renew for varying terms. Terms of certain leases include escalation clauses, percentage rent based on sales or payment of executory costs such as property taxes, utilities or insurance and maintenance. Rent expense for leases with escalation clauses or other lease concessions are accounted for on a straight-line basis beginning with the earlier of the lease commencement date or the date the Company takes possession. Portions of certain properties are subleased to others for periods generally ranging from one to 20 years.

Rent expense (under operating leases) consists of:

          2015     2014     2013     
Minimum rentals$807$795$706
Contingent payments181613
Tenant income(102)(104)(106)
     Total rent expense$723$707$613

A-57



Minimum annual rentals and payments under capital leases and lease-financed transactions for the five years subsequent to 2015 and in the aggregate are:

      Capital
Leases
     Operating
Leases
     Lease-
Financed
Transactions
2016   $103       $967           $7       
2017729227
2018628538
2019577748
2020526749
Thereafter5274,19963
     Total$873$8,389$102
Less estimated executory costs included in capital leases
Net minimum lease payments under capital leases873
Less amount representing interest293
Present value of net minimum lease payments under
     capital leases$580

Total future minimum rentals under noncancellable subleases at January 30, 2016 were $261.

11. EARNINGSPERCOMMONSHARE

Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per basic common share equals net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. less income allocated to participating securities divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share equals net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. less income allocated to participating securities divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to dilutive stock options. The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. and shares used in calculating net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per basic common share to those used in calculating net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share:

For the year endedFor the year endedFor the year ended
 January 30, 2016January 31, 2015February 1, 2014
EarningsSharesPerEarningsSharesPerEarningsSharesPer
(in millions, except(Numer-(Denomi-Share(Numer-(Denomi-Share(Numer-(Denomi-Share
per share amounts)  ator)  nator)  Amount  ator)  nator)  Amount  ator)  nator)  Amount
Net earnings attributable to The
     Kroger Co. per basic common share
$2,021     966     $2.09$1,711     981     $1.74$1,507    1,028    $1.47
Dilutive effect of stock options141212
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.
     per diluted common share
$2,021980$2.06$1,711993$1.72$1,5071,040$1.45

The Company had combined undistributed and distributed earnings to participating securities totaling $18, $17 and $12 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

A-58



The Company had options outstanding for approximately 1.9 million, 4.6 million and 4.7 million, respectively, for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, which were excluded from the computations of net earnings per diluted common share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect on net earnings per diluted share.

12. STOCK OPTION PLANS

The Company grants options for common shares (“stock options”) to employees under various plans at an option price equal to the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock options under the fair value recognition provisions.Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, over the requisite service period of the award. Equity awards may be made at one of four meetings of its Board of Directors occurring shortly after the Company’s release of quarterly earnings. The 2015 primary grant was made in conjunction with the June meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors. Certain changes to the stock option compensation strategy were put into effect in 2015, which resulted in a reduction to the number of stock options granted in 2015, compared to 2014 and 2013.

Stock options typically expire 10 years from the date of grant. Stock options vest between one and five years from the date of grant. At January 30, 2016, approximately 37 million common shares were available for future option grants under these plans.

In addition to the stock options described above, the Company awards restricted stock to employees and non-employee directors under various plans. The restrictions on these awards generally lapse between one and five years from the date of the awards. The Company records expense for restricted stock awards in an amount equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares on the grant date of the award, over the period the awards lapse. As of January 30, 2016, approximately 21 million common shares were available under the 2008, 2011 and 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plans (the “Plans”) for future restricted stock awards or shares issued to the extent performance criteria are achieved. The Company has the ability to convert shares available for stock options under the Plans to shares available for restricted stock awards. Under the Plans, four shares available for option awards can be converted into one share available for restricted stock awards.

All awards become immediately exercisable upon certain changes of control of the Company.

Stock Options

Changes in options outstanding under the stock option plans are summarized below:

     Shares
subject
to option
(in millions)
     Weighted-
average
exercise
price
Outstanding, year-end 2012      53.0          $11.30    
      Granted8.4$18.84
      Exercised(17.7)$11.11
      Canceled or Expired(0.4)$12.74
Outstanding, year-end 201343.3$12.83
      Granted8.4$24.71
      Exercised(10.3)$11.56
      Canceled or Expired(0.6)$15.56
Outstanding, year-end 201440.8$15.56
      Granted3.4$38.40
      Exercised(8.9)$13.54
      Canceled or Expired(0.4)$19.98
Outstanding, year-end 201534.9$18.26

A-59



A summary of options outstanding, exercisable and expected to vest at January 30, 2016 follows:

Number of
shares
Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
life
Weighted-
average
exercise
price

Aggregate
intrinsic
value

     (in millions)     (in years)          (in millions)
Options Outstanding34.96.20$18.26719
Options Exercisable21.45.05$14.24526
Options Expected to Vest13.28.02$24.53189

Restricted stock

Changes in restricted stock outstanding under the restricted stock plans are summarized below:

     Restricted
shares
outstanding
(in millions)
     Weighted-
average
grant-date
fair value
Outstanding, year-end 2012      8.6          $11.34    
     Granted6.3$18.84
     Lapsed(5.1)$11.49
     Canceled or Expired(0.2)$13.66
Outstanding, year-end 20139.6$16.16
     Granted6.1$24.76
     Lapsed(5.2)$16.52
     Canceled or Expired(0.3)$18.67
Outstanding, year-end 201410.2$21.04
     Granted3.2$38.34
     Lapsed(5.4)$21.49
     Canceled or Expired(0.4)$22.80
Outstanding, year-end 20157.6$28.01

The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $9.78, $5.98 and $4.49, respectively. The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the assumptions shown in the table below. The Black-Scholes model utilizes accounting judgment and financial estimates, including the term option holders are expected to retain their stock options before exercising them, the volatility of the Company’s share price over that expected term, the dividend yield over the term and the number of awards expected to be forfeited before they vest. Using alternative assumptions in the calculation of fair value would produce fair values for stock option grants that could be different than those used to record stock-based compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The increase in the fair value of the stock options granted during 2015, compared to 2014, resulted primarily from an increase in the Company’s share price, which decreased the expected dividend yield. The increase in the fair value of the stock options granted during 2014, compared to 2013, resulted primarily from an increase in the Company’s share price, which decreased the expected dividend yield, and an increase in the weighted average risk-free interest rate.

A-60



The following table reflects the weighted-average assumptions used for grants awarded to option holders:

2015     2014     2013
Weighted average expected volatility24.07%25.29%26.34%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate2.12%2.06%1.87%
Expected dividend yield1.20%1.51%1.82%
Expected term (based on historical results)7.2 years6.6 years6.8 years

The weighted-average risk-free interest rate was based on the yield of a treasury note as of the grant date, continuously compounded, which matures at a date that approximates the expected term of the options. The dividend yield was based on our history and expectation of dividend payouts. Expected volatility was determined based upon historical stock volatilities; however, implied volatility was also considered. Expected term was determined based upon historical exercise and cancellation experience.

Total stock compensation recognized in 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $165, $155 and $107, respectively. Stock option compensation recognized in 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $31, $32 and $24, respectively. Restricted shares compensation recognized in 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $134, $123 and $83, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $217, $142 and $115 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The total amount of cash received in 2015 by the Company from the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements was $120. As of January 30, 2016, there was $206 of total unrecognized compensation expense remaining related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s equity award plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. The total fair value of options that vested was $33, $26 and $20 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises may be newly issued shares or reissued treasury shares. Proceeds received from the exercise of options, and the related tax benefit, may be utilized to repurchase the Company’s common shares under a stock repurchase program adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors. During 2015, the Company repurchased approximately five million common shares in such a manner.

13. COMMITMENTSAND CONTINGENCIES

The Company continuously evaluates contingencies based upon the best available evidence.

The Company believes that allowances for loss have been provided to the extent necessary and that its assessment of contingencies is reasonable. To the extent that resolution of contingencies results in amounts that vary from the Company’s estimates, future earnings will be charged or credited.

The principal contingencies are described below:

Insurance — The Company’s workers’ compensation risks are self-insured in most states. In addition, other workers’ compensation risks and certain levels of insured general liability risks are based on retrospective premium plans, deductible plans, and self-insured retention plans. The liability for workers’ compensation risks is accounted for on a present value basis. Actual claim settlements and expenses incident thereto may differ from the provisions for loss. Property risks have been underwritten by a subsidiary and are all reinsured with unrelated insurance companies. Operating divisions and subsidiaries have paid premiums, and the insurance subsidiary has provided loss allowances, based upon actuarially determined estimates.

A-61



Litigation –Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including suits charging violations of certain antitrust, wage and hour, or civil rights laws, as well as product liability cases, are pending against the Company. Some of these suits purport or have been determined to be class actions and/or seek substantial damages. Any damages that may be awarded in antitrust cases will be automatically trebled. Although it is not possible at this time to evaluate the merits of all of these claims and lawsuits, nor their likelihood of success, the Company is of the belief that any resulting liability will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company continually evaluates its exposure to loss contingencies arising from pending or threatened litigation and believes it has made provisions where it is reasonably possible to estimate and when an adverse outcome is probable. Nonetheless, assessing and predicting the outcomes of these matters involves substantial uncertainties. Management currently believes that the aggregate range of loss for the Company’s exposure is not material to the Company. It remains possible that despite management’s current belief, material differences in actual outcomes or changes in management’s evaluation or predictions could arise that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Assignments – The Company is contingently liable for leases that have been assigned to various third parties in connection with facility closings and dispositions. The Company could be required to satisfy the obligations under the leases if any of the assignees is unable to fulfill its lease obligations. Due to the wide distribution of the Company’s assignments among third parties, and various other remedies available, the Company believes the likelihood that it will be required to assume a material amount of these obligations is remote.

14. STOCK

Preferred Shares

The Company has authorized five million shares of voting cumulative preferred shares; two million shares were available for issuance at January 30, 2016. The shares have a par value of $100 per share and are issuable in series.

Common Shares

The Company has authorized two billion common shares, $1 par value per share.

On June 25, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of The Kroger Co.’s common shares in the form of a 100% stock dividend, which was effective July 13, 2015. All share and per share amounts in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.

Common Stock Repurchase Program

The Company maintains stock repurchase programs that comply with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to allow for the orderly repurchase of The Kroger Co. common shares, from time to time. The Company made open market purchases totaling $500, $1,129 and $338 under these repurchase programs in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition to these repurchase programs, in December 1999, the Company began a program to repurchase common shares to reduce dilution resulting from its employee stock option plans. This program is solely funded by proceeds from stock option exercises and the related tax benefit. The Company repurchased approximately $203, $154 and $271 under the stock option program during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

A-62



15. COMPANY-SPONSORED BENEFIT PLANS

The Company administers non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans for some non-union employees and union-represented employees as determined by the terms and conditions of collective bargaining agreements. These include several qualified pension plans (the “Qualified Plans”) and non-qualified pension plans (the “Non-Qualified Plans”). The Non-Qualified Plans pay benefits to any employee that earns in excess of the maximum allowed for the Qualified Plans by Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company only funds obligations under the Qualified Plans. Funding for the Company-sponsored pension plans is based on a review of the specific requirements and on evaluation of the assets and liabilities of each plan.

In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides certain health care benefits for retired employees. The majority of the Company’s employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach normal retirement age while employed by the Company. Funding of retiree health care benefits occurs as claims or premiums are paid.

The Company recognizes the funded status of its retirement plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs or credits and transition obligations that have not yet been recognized as part of net periodic benefit cost are required to be recorded as a component of AOCI. All plans are measured as of the Company’s fiscal year end.

Amounts recognized in AOCI as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 consists of the following (pre-tax):

Pension BenefitsOther BenefitsTotal
     2015     2014     2015     2014     2015     2014
Net actuarial loss (gain) $1,213  $1,398 $(121)$(89)$1,092$1,309
Prior service cost (credit)11(66)(75)(65)(74)
Total$1,214$1,399$(187)$(164)$1,027$1,235

Amounts in AOCI expected to be recognized as components of net periodic pension or postretirement benefit costs in the next fiscal year are as follows (pre-tax):

 Pension BenefitsOther BenefitsTotal
     2016     2016     2016
Net actuarial loss (gain)           $62                   $(9)         $53 
Prior service credit(8)(8)
Total$62$(17)$45

Other changes recognized in other comprehensive income in 2015, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (pre-tax):

Pension BenefitsOther BenefitsTotal
    2015    2014   2013   2015   2014   2013   2015   2014   2013
Incurred net actuarial loss (gain)$(83)$590$(243)$(39)$14$(97)$(122)$604$(340)
Amortization of prior service credit11741174
Amortization of net actuarial gain (loss)(102)(50)(102)78(95)(42)(102)
Other(2)(47)(30)(2)(47)(30)
Total recognized in other
     comprehensive income (loss)(185)540(345)(23)(18)(123)(208)522(468)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
     and other comprehensive income$(82)$595$(271)$(22)$(9)$(95)$(104)$586$(366)

A-63



Information with respect to change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, the funded status of the plans recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, net amounts recognized at the end of fiscal years, weighted average assumptions and components of net periodic benefit cost follow:

Pension Benefits
Other
Qualified PlansNon-Qualified PlansBenefits
201520142015     201420152014
Change in benefit obligation:                                         
Benefit obligation at beginning of fiscal year$4,102$3,509$304 $263$275$294
     Service cost6248331011
     Interest cost1541691213913
     Plan participants’ contributions1011
     Actuarial (gain) loss(411)539(17)40(39)14
     Benefits paid(162)(163)(17)(15)(19)(21)
     Other(17)3(2)(47)
     Assumption of Roundy’s benefit obligation1942
Benefit obligation at end of fiscal year$3,922$4,102$290$304$244$275
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of
     fiscal year$3,189$3,135$$$$
     Actual return on plan assets(124)217
     Employer contributions51715910
     Plan participants’ contributions1011
     Benefits paid(162)(163)(17)(15)(19)(21)
     Other(18)
     Assumption of Roundy’s plan assets155
Fair value of plan assets at end of fiscal year$3,045$3,189$$$$
Funded status at end of fiscal year$(877)$(913)$(290)$(304)$(244)$(275)
Net liability recognized at end of fiscal year$(877)$(913)$(290)$(304)$(244)$(275)

As of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, other current liabilities include $31 and $29, respectively, of net liability recognized for the above benefit plans.

As of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, pension plan assets do not include common shares of The Kroger Co.

 Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
Weighted average assumptions     201520142013201520142013
Discount rate – Benefit obligation4.62%     3.87%     4.99%     4.44%     3.74%     4.68%
Discount rate – Net periodic benefit cost3.87%4.99%4.29%3.74%4.68%4.11%
Expected long-term rate of return on
     plan assets7.44%7.44%8.50%
Rate of compensation increase –
     Net periodic benefit cost2.85%2.86%2.77%
Rate of compensation increase –
     Benefit obligation2.71%2.85%2.86%

A-64



The Company’s discount rate assumptions were intended to reflect the rates at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. They take into account the timing and amount of benefits that would be available under the plans. The Company’s policy is to match the plan’s cash flows to that of a hypothetical bond portfolio whose cash flow from coupons and maturities match the plan’s projected benefit cash flows. The discount rates are the single rates that produce the same present value of cash flows. The selection of the 4.62% and 4.44% discount rates as of year-end 2015 for pension and other benefits, respectively, represents the hypothetical bond portfolio using bonds with an AA or better rating constructed with the assistance of an outside consultant. A 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would decrease the projected pension benefit obligation as of January 31, 2016, by approximately $438.

To determine the expected rate of return on pension plan assets held byreimbursing the Company for 2015, the Company considered current and forecasted plan asset allocations as well as historical and forecasted rates of return on various asset categories. In 2015 and 2014, the Company decreased the assumed pension plan investment return rate to 7.44% compared to 8.50%its expenses in 2013. The Company pension plan’s average rate of return was 6.47% for the 10 calendar years ended December 31, 2015, net of all investment management fees and expenses. The value of all investments in the Qualified Plans during the calendar year ending December 31, 2015 decreased 0.80%, net of investment management fees and expenses. For the past 20 years, the Company’s average annual rate of return has been 7.99%. Based on the above information and forward looking assumptions for investments made in a manner consistent with the Company’s target allocations, the Company believes a 7.44% rate of return assumption is reasonable.supplying any exhibit.

The Company calculates its expected return on plan assets by using the market-related value of plan assets. The market-related value of plan assets is determined by adjusting the actual fair value of plan assets for gains or losses on plan assets. Gains or losses represent the difference between actual and expected returns on plan investments for each plan year. Gains or losses on plan assets are recognized evenly over a five year period. Using a different method to calculate the market-related value of plan assets would provide a different expected return on plan assets.

On January 31, 2015, the Company adopted new mortality tables based on mortality experience and assumptions for generational mortality improvement in calculating the Company’s 2015 and 2014 Company sponsored benefit plans obligations. The tables assume an improvement in life expectancy and increase our current year benefit obligation and future net periodic benefit cost. The Company used the RP-2000 projected 2021 mortality table in calculating the Company’s 2013 Company sponsored benefit plans obligations and the 2014 and 2013 Company-sponsored net periodic benefit cost.

The funded status increased in 2015, compared to 2014, due primarily to an increase in the discount rate and a decrease in plan assets.

The following table provides the components of the Company’s net periodic benefit costs for 2015, 2014 and 2013:

Pension Benefits
Non-Qualified
Qualified PlansPlansOther Benefits
   2015    2014    2013    2015    2014    2013    2015    2014    2013
Components of net periodic benefit cost:            
     Service cost$62$48$40$3$3$3$10$11$17
     Interest cost1541691441213991315
     Expected return on plan assets(230)(228)(224)
     Amortization of:
          Prior service credit(11)(7)(4)
          Actuarial (gain) loss934693949(7)(8)
Net periodic benefit cost$79$35$53$24$20$21$1$9$28

A-65



The following table provides the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”), accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) and the fair value of plan assets for all Company-sponsored pension plans.

Non-Qualified
Qualified Plans     Plans               
      2015     20142015     2014
     PBO at end of fiscal year$3,922$4,102 $290 $304
     ABO at end of fiscal year$3,786$3,947$280$297
     Fair value of plan assets at end of year$3,045$3,189$$

The following table provides information about the Company’s estimated future benefit payments.

PensionOther
Benefits     Benefits     
     2016  $234     $15   
     2017$221$16
     2018$230$17
     2019$238$18
     2020$248$19
     2021 – 2025$1,346$105

The following table provides information about the weighted average target and actual pension plan asset allocations.

Target
allocations
Actual
Allocations
2015     2015     2014
Pension plan asset allocation
     Global equity securities16.0%14.9%13.4%
     Emerging market equity securities5.45.25.8
     Investment grade debt securities13.111.311.2
     High yield debt securities12.111.912.5
     Private equity5.27.46.6
     Hedge funds34.636.037.5
     Real estate3.43.93.5
     Other10.29.49.5
Total     100.0%     100.0%100.0%

Investment objectives, policies and strategies are set by the Pension Investment Committees (the “Committees”) appointed by the CEO. The primary objectives include holding and investing the assets and distributing benefits to participants and beneficiaries of the pension plans. Investment objectives have been established based on a comprehensive review of the capital markets and each underlying plan’s current and projected financial requirements. The time horizon of the investment objectives is long-term in nature and plan assets are managed on a going-concern basis.

Investment objectives and guidelines specifically applicable to each manager of assets are established and reviewed annually. Derivative instruments may be used for specified purposes, including rebalancing exposures to certain asset classes. Any use of derivative instruments for a purpose or in a manner not specifically authorized is prohibited, unless approved in advance by the Committees.

A-66



The current target allocations shown represent the 2015 targets that were established in 2014. The Company will rebalance by liquidating assets whose allocation materially exceeds target, if possible, and investing in assets whose allocation is materially below target. If markets are illiquid, the Company may not be able to rebalance to target quickly. To maintain actual asset allocations consistent with target allocations, assets are reallocated or rebalanced periodically. In addition, cash flow from employer contributions and participant benefit payments can be used to fund underweight asset classes and divest overweight asset classes, as appropriate. The Company expects that cash flow will be sufficient to meet most rebalancing needs.

The Company is not required and does not expect to make any contributions to the Qualified Plans in 2016. If the Company does make any contributions in 2016, the Company expects these contributions will decrease its required contributions in future years. Among other things, investment performance of plan assets, the interest rates required to be used to calculate the pension obligations, and future changes in legislation, will determine the amounts of any contributions. The Company expects 2016 expense for Company-sponsored pension plans to be approximately $80. In addition, the Company expects 401(k) retirement savings account plans cash contributions and expense from automatic and matching contributions to participants to be approximately $200 in 2016.

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. The Company used a 6.90% initial health care cost trend rate, which is assumed to decrease on a linear basis to a 4.50% ultimate health care cost trend rate in 2028, to determine its expense. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

     1% Point
Increase
     1% Point
Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components$3$(2)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation$23$(20)

The following tables set forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the Qualified Plans’ assets at fair value as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015:

Assets at Fair Value as of January 30, 2016

     

Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total
Cash and cash equivalents      $27            $            $      $27
Corporate Stocks231231
Corporate Bonds7676
U.S. Government Securities7575
Mutual Funds/Collective Trusts8986140990
Partnerships/Joint Ventures118118
Hedge Funds1,1041,104
Private Equity225225
Real Estate103103
Other9696
Total$347$1,226$1,472$3,045

A-67



Assets at Fair Value as of January 31, 2015

     Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total
Cash and cash equivalents     $73           $            $      $73
Corporate Stocks294294
Corporate Bonds8080
U.S. Government Securities7878
Mutual Funds/Collective Trusts12350340666
Partnerships/Joint Ventures468468
Hedge Funds1,1581,158
Private Equity210210
Real Estate105105
Other5757
Total$490$1,186$1,513$3,189

For measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during 2015 and 2014, a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances is as follows:

     Hedge
Funds
     Private
Equity
     Real
Estate
     Collective
Trusts
Ending balance, February 1, 2014   $1,073      $243      $96         $39      
Contributions into Fund2204717
Realized gains4735141
Unrealized gains (losses)18(1)4
Distributions(257)(54)(25)
Reclass(1)58(58)
Other(1)(2)(1)
Ending balance, January 31, 20151,15821010540
Contributions into Fund2394713
Realized gains49239
Unrealized (losses) gains(49)(3)3
Distributions(294)(50)(26)
Other1(2)(1)
Ending balance, January 30, 2016$1,104$225$103$40
____________________

(1)In 2014,By order of the Company reclassified $58Board of Level 3 assets from Private Equity to Hedge Funds.

See Note 8 for a discussion of the levels of the fair value hierarchy. The assets’ fair value measurement level above is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A-68



The following is a description of the valuation methods used for the Qualified Plans’ assets measured at fair value in the above tables:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying value approximates fair value.

Directors,

Corporate Stocks: The fair values of these securities are based on observable market quotations for identical assets and are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

Corporate Bonds: The fair values of these securities are primarily based on observable market quotations for similar bonds, valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. When such quoted prices are not available, the bonds are valued using a discounted cash flow approach using current yields on similar instruments of issuers with similar credit ratings, including adjustments for certain risks that may not be observable, such as credit and liquidity risks.

U.S. Government Securities: Certain U.S. Government securities are valued at the closing price reported in the active market in which the security is traded. Other U.S. government securities are valued based on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings. When quoted prices are not available for similar securities, the security is valued under a discounted cash flow approach that maximizes observable inputs, such as current yields of similar instruments, but includes adjustments for certain risks that may not be observable, such as credit and liquidity risks.

Mutual Funds/Collective Trusts: The mutual funds/collective trust funds are public investment vehicles valued using a Net Asset Value (NAV) provided by the manager of each fund. The NAV is based on the underlying net assets owned by the fund, divided by the number of shares outstanding. The NAV’s unit price is quoted on a private market that is not active. However, the NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying securities within the fund, which are traded on an active market, and valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which those individual securities are traded.

Partnerships/Joint Ventures: These funds consist primarily of U.S. government securities, Corporate Bonds, Corporate Stocks, and derivatives, which are valued in a manner consistent with these types of investments, noted above.

Hedge Funds: Hedge funds are private investment vehicles valued using a Net Asset Value (NAV) provided by the manager of each fund. The NAV is based on the underlying net assets owned by the fund, divided by the number of shares outstanding. The NAV’s unit price is quoted on a private market that is not active. The NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying securities within the funds, which may be traded on an active market, and valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which those individual securities are traded. For investments not traded on an active market, or for which a quoted price is not publicly available, a variety of unobservable valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow, market multiple and cost valuation approaches, are employed by the fund manager to value investments. Fair values of all investments are adjusted annually, if necessary, based on audits of the Hedge Fund financial statements; such adjustments are reflected in the fair value of the plan’s assets.

Christine S. Wheatley, Secretary

A-69



Private Equity: Private Equity investments are valued based on the fair value of the underlying securities within the fund, which include investments both traded on an active market and not traded on an active market. For those investments that are traded on an active market, the values are based on the closing price reported on the active market on which those individual securities are traded. For investments not traded on an active market, or for which a quoted price is not publicly available, a variety of unobservable valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow, market multiple and cost valuation approaches, are employed by the fund manager to value investments. Fair values of all investments are adjusted annually, if necessary, based on audits of the private equity fund financial statements; such adjustments are reflected in the fair value of the plan’s assets. Real Estate: Real estate investments include investments in real estate funds managed by a fund manager. These investments are valued using a variety of unobservable valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow, market multiple and cost valuation approaches.

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

The Company contributed and expensed $196, $177 and $148 to employee 401(k) retirement savings accounts in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The 401(k) retirement savings account plans provide to eligible employees both matching contributions and automatic contributions from the Company based on participant contributions, compensation as defined by the plan, and length of service.

The Company also administers other defined contribution plans for eligible employees. The cost of these plans was $5 for 2015, 2014 and 2013.

16. Multi-Employer Pension Plans

The Company contributes to various multi-employer pension plans, including the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan, based on obligations arising from collective bargaining agreements. The Company is designated as the named fiduciary of the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan and has sole investment authority over these assets. These plans provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Trustees are appointed in equal number by employers and unions. The trustees typically are responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants as well as for such matters as the investment of the assets and the administration of the plans.

In 2015, the Company contributed $190 to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan. The Company had previously accrued $60 of the total contributions at January 31, 2015 and recorded expense for the remaining $130 at the time of payment in 2015.

In 2014, the Company incurred a charge of $56 (after-tax) related to commitments and withdrawal liabilities associated with the restructuring of pension plan agreements, of which $15 was contributed to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan in 2014.

Refer to Note 19 for additional details on the effect of certain contributions on quarterly results for 2015 and 2014.

The Company recognizes expense in connection with its multi-employer pension plans as contributions are funded, or when commitments are made. The Company made contributions to multi-employer funds of $426 in 2015, $297 in 2014 and $228 in 2013.

A-70



The risks of participating in multi-employer pension plans are different from the risks of participating in single-employer pension plans in the following respects:

a.Assets contributed to the multi-employer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
b.If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan allocable to such withdrawing employer may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
c.If the Company stops participating in some of its multi-employer pension plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on its allocable share of the unfunded vested benefits of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

The Company’s participation in multi-employer plans is outlined in the following tables. The EIN / Pension Plan Number column provides the Employer Identification Number (“EIN”) and the three-digit pension plan number. The most recent Pension Protection Act Zone Status available in 2015 and 2014 is for the plan’s year-end at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Among other factors, generally, plans in the red zone are less than 65 percent funded, plans in the yellow zone are less than 80 percent funded and plans in the green zone are at least 80 percent funded. The FIP/ RP Status Pending / Implemented Column indicates plans for which a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented. Unless otherwise noted, the information for these tables was obtained from the Forms 5500 filed for each plan’s year-end at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The multi-employer contributions listed in the table below are the Company’s multi-employer contributions made in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013.

A-71



The following table contains information about the Company’s multi-employer pension plans:

Pension
ProtectionFIP/RP
Act ZoneStatusMulti-Employer
EIN / PensionStatusPending/ContributionsSurcharge
Pension Fund   Plan Number   2015   2014   Implemented   2015   2014   2013   Imposed(6)
SO CA UFCW Unions & Food
     Employers Joint Pension
     Trust Fund(1) (2)95-1939092 - 001RedRedImplemented$55$48$45No
Desert States Employers
     & UFCW Unions
     Pension Plan(1)84-6277982 - 001GreenGreenNo182123No
Sound Retirement Trust
     (formerly Retail Clerks
     Pension Plan)(1) (3)91-6069306 - 001RedRedImplemented171513No
Rocky Mountain UFCW
     Unions and Employers
     Pension Plan(1)84-6045986 - 001GreenGreenNo171717No
Oregon Retail Employees
     Pension Plan(1)93-6074377 - 001GreenRedNo977No
Bakery and Confectionary Union
     & Industry International
     Pension Fund(1)52-6118572 - 001RedRedImplemented111112No
Washington Meat Industry
     Pension Trust(1) (4) (5)91-6134141 - 001RedRedImplemented13No
Retail Food Employers & UFCW
     Local 711 Pension(1)51-6031512 - 001RedRedImplemented998No
Denver Area Meat Cutters
     and Employers
     Pension Plan(1)84-6097461 - 001GreenGreenNo788No
United Food & Commercial
     Workers Intl Union – Industry
     Pension Fund(1) (4)51-6055922 - 001GreenGreenNo353333No
Western Conference of
     Teamsters Pension Plan91-6145047 - 001GreenGreenNo313031No
Central States, Southeast
     & Southwest Areas
     Pension Plan36-6044243 - 001RedRedImplemented161515No
UFCW Consolidated
     Pension Plan(1)58-6101602 - 001GreenGreenNo19070No
Other111213
Total Contributions$426$297$228
____________________

(1)The Company’s multi-employer contributions to these respective funds represent more than 5% of the total contributions received by the pension funds.
(2)The information for this fund was obtained from the Form 5500 filed for the plan’s year-end at March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014.
(3)The information for this fund was obtained from the Form 5500 filed for the plan’s year-end at September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
(4)The information for this fund was obtained from the Form 5500 filed for the plan’s year-end at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013.

A-72



(5)As of June 30, 2014, this pension fund was merged into the Sound Retirement Trust. After the completion of the merger, on July 1, 2014, certain assets and liabilities related to the Washington Meat Industry Pension Trust were transferred from the Sound Retirement Trust to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan. See the above information regarding the restructuring of certain pension plan agreements.
(6)Under the Pension Protection Act, a surcharge may be imposed when employers make contributions under a collective bargaining agreement that is not in compliance with a rehabilitation plan. As of January 30, 2016, the collective bargaining agreements under which the Company was making contributions were in compliance with rehabilitation plans adopted by the applicable pension fund.

The following table describes (a) the expiration date of the Company’s collective bargaining agreements and (b) the expiration date of the Company’s most significant collective bargaining agreements for each of the material multi-employer funds in which the Company participates.

Expiration DateMost Significant Collective
of CollectiveBargaining Agreements(1)
Bargaining(not in millions)
Pension Fund     Agreements     Count     Expiration
SO CA UFCW Unions & Food Employers JointMarch 2016 toMarch 2016 to
     Pension Trust FundJune 20172June 2017
March 2016 toApril 2016 to
UFCW Consolidated Pension PlanAugust 20208August 2020
Desert States Employers & UFCW UnionsOctober 2016 to
     Pension PlanJune 20181October 2016
Sound Retirement Trust (formerly RetailApril 2016 toMay 2016 to
     Clerks Pension Plan)January 20182August 2016
Rocky Mountain UFCW Unions andJanuary 2019 to
     Employers Pension PlanFebruary 20191January 2019
August 2015(2)toAugust 2015(2)to
Oregon Retail Employees Pension PlanApril 20173June 2016
Bakery and Confectionary Union & IndustryJune 2016 to JulyAugust 2016 to
     International Pension Fund20184July 2018
Retail Food Employers &April 2017 to
     UFCW Local 711 PensionNovember 20191March 2019
Denver Area Meat Cutters andJanuary 2019 to
     Employers Pension PlanFebruary 20191January 2019
United Food & Commercial Workers Intl Union –March 2014(2)toMarch 2017 to
     Industry Pension FundApril 20192April 2019
April 2017 toJuly 2017 to
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension PlanSeptember 20205September 2020
Central States, Southeast & SouthwestSeptember 2017 toSeptember 2017 to
     Areas Pension PlanNovember 20183November 2018
____________________

(1)This column represents the number of significant collective bargaining agreements and their expiration date for each of the Company’s pension funds listed above. For purposes of this table, the “significant collective bargaining agreements” are the largest based on covered employees that, when aggregated, cover the majority of the employees for which we make multi-employer contributions for the referenced pension fund.
(2)Certain collective bargaining agreements for each of these pension funds are operating under an extension.

A-73



Based on the most recent information available to it, the Company believes the present value of actuarial accrued liabilities in most of these multi-employer plans substantially exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. Moreover, if the Company were to exit certain markets or otherwise cease making contributions to these funds, the Company could trigger a substantial withdrawal liability. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated.

The Company also contributes to various other multi-employer benefit plans that provide health and welfare benefits to active and retired participants. Total contributions made by the Company to these other multi-employer health and welfare plans were approximately $1,192 in 2015, $1,200 in 2014 and $1,100 in 2013.

17. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended Accounting Standards Codification 835, “Interest-Imputation of Interest.” The amendment simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability by requiring it be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This amendment became effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2015, and was adopted retrospectively in accordance with the standard. The adoption of this amendment resulted in amounts previously reported in other assets to now be reported within long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts were not material to the prior year. The adoption of this amendment did not have an effect on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

18. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Per ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of Effective Date,” this guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending February 2, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year ending February 3, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, “Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets.” This amendment permits an entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year end for all plans. This guidance will be effective for the Company in the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. The implementation of this amendment will not have an effect on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, and will not have a significant effect on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).” This amendment removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share. This guidance will be effective for the Company in the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. The implementation of this amendment will have an effect on the Company’s Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and will not have an effect on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Balance Sheets.

A-74



In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” This amendment eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination. This guidance will be effective for the Company in its fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. The implementation of this amendment is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” This amendment requires deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This guidance will be effective for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The implementation of this amendment will not have an effect on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and will not have a significant effect on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, which provides guidance for the recognition of lease agreements. The standard’s core principle is that a company will now recognize most leases on its balance sheet as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets. This guidance will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal year ending February 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted currently. The adoption of this ASU will result in a significant increase to the Company’s balance sheet for lease liabilities and right-of-use assets, and the Company is currently evaluating the other effects of adoption of this ASU on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

19. Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

The two tables that follow reflect the unaudited results of operations for 2015 and 2014.

Quarter
FirstSecondThirdFourthTotal Year
2015(16 Weeks)   (12 Weeks)   (12 Weeks)   (12 Weeks)   (52 Weeks)
Sales      $33,051      $25,539      $25,075      $26,165      $109,830   
Merchandise costs, including advertising,
     warehousing, and transportation, excluding
     items shown separately below25,76020,06519,47820,19385,496
Operating, general and administrative5,3544,0684,1694,35517,946
Rent215155172181723
Depreciation and amortization6204774845082,089
Operating profit1,1027747729283,576
Interest expense148114107113482
Earnings before income tax expense9546606658153,094
Income tax expense3302272382501,045
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests6244334275652,049
Net earnings (loss) attributable to
     noncontrolling interests5(1)610
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.$619$433$428$559$2,039
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per
     basic common share$0.63$0.44$0.44$0.57$2.09
Average number of shares used
     in basic calculation969963965966966
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.
     per diluted common share$0.62$0.44$0.43$0.57$2.06
Average number of shares used in
     diluted calculation983977979980980
Dividends declared per common share$0.093$0.105$0.105$0.105$0.408

Annual amounts may not sum due to rounding.

In the third quarter of 2015, the Company incurred a $80 charge to OG&A expenses for contributions to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan.

A-75



In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company incurred a $30 charge to OG&A expenses for contributions to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan.

Quarter
FirstSecondThirdFourthTotal Year
2014(16 Weeks)   (12 Weeks)   (12 Weeks)   (12 Weeks)   (52 Weeks)
Sales      $32,961         $25,310         $24,987         $25,207         $108,465   
Merchandise costs, including advertising,
     warehousing, and transportation, excluding
     items shown separately below26,06520,13619,76419,54785,512
Operating, general and administrative5,1683,9203,9544,11917,161
Rent217166162162707
Depreciation and amortization5814444564671,948
Operating profit9306446519123,137
Interest expense147112114115488
Earnings before income tax expense7835325377972,649
Income tax expense274182172274902
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests5093503655231,747
Net earnings attributable to
     noncontrolling interests833519
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.$501$347$362$518$1,728
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.
     per basic common share$0.50$0.35$0.37$0.53$1.74
Average number of shares used in
     basic calculation1,002970972972981
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.
     per diluted common share$0.49$0.35$0.36$0.52$1.72
Average number of shares used in diluted
     calculation1,014982984987993
Dividends declared per common share$0.083$0.083$0.093$0.093$0.350

Annual amounts may not sum due to rounding.

In the first quarter of 2014, the Company incurred a $87 charge to OG&A expenses due to commitments and withdrawal liabilities arising from restructuring of certain pension plan agreements to help stabilize associates’ future benefits.

In the third quarter of 2014, the Company incurred a $25 charge to OG&A expenses due to contributions to the Company’s charitable foundation and a $17 benefit to income tax expense due to certain tax items.

In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company incurred a $60 charge to OG&A expenses due to contributions to the Company’s charitable foundation and a $55 charge to OG&A expenses for contributions to the UFCW Consolidated Pension Plan.

20. Subsequent Event

In anticipation of future debt refinancing in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, the Company, in the first quarter of 2016, entered into additional forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount totaling $1,300. After entering into these additional forward-starting interest rate swaps, the Company has a total of $1,700 notional amount of forward-starting interest rate swaps outstanding. The forward-starting interest rate swaps entered into in the first quarter of 2016 were designated as cash-flow hedges as defined by GAAP.

A-76




THE KROGER CO.
1014CO.1014 VINE STREET
CINCINNATI, OH 45202

VOTE45202SCAN TO MATERIALS & VOTEVOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com
Use or scan the QR Barcode aboveUse the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up untilinformation. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date.on June 21, 2023 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 20, 2023 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web sitewebsite and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would likeform.During The Meeting - Go to reducewww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023You may attend the costs incurred byour companyin mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronicallymeeting via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and when prompted, indicatevote during the meeting. Have the information that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronicallyis printed in future years.

VOTEthe box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up untilinstructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date.on June 21, 2023 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 20, 2023 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTEinstructions.VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If11717.TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: V16737-P90683 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYTHE KROGER CO.The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the following:1. Election of DirectorsNominees:1a. Nora A. Aufreiter1b. Kevin M. Brown1c. Elaine L. Chao1d. Anne Gates1e. Karen M. Hoguet1f. W. Rodney McMullen1g. Clyde R. Moore1h. Ronald L. Sargent1i. J. Amanda Sourry Knox1j. Mark S. Sutton1k. Ashok VemuriFor Against Abstain The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR proposals For Against Abstain 2 and 4 and 1 YEAR for proposal 3. ! ! ! 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of Kroger's executive compensation. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain ! ! ! 3. Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Votes on Executive ! ! ! ! Compensation. ! ! ! For Against Abstain! ! ! 4. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as auditors. ! ! ! ! ! ! The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST For Against Abstain proposals 5-9. ! ! ! 5. Report on Public Health Costs from Sale of Tobacco Products. ! ! ! ! ! ! 6. Listing of Charitable Contributions of $10,000 or More. ! ! ! ! ! ! 7. Report on Recyclability of Packaging. ! ! ! ! ! ! 8. Report on Racial and Gender Pay Gaps. ! ! ! ! ! ! 9. Report on EEO Policy Risks. ! ! !NOTE: Holders of common shares of record at the close of business onApril 24, 2023 will be entitled to vote at the meeting.Please sign exactly as your proxyname(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.authorized officer.Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date










TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E11115-P78329KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
THE KROGER CO.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
1.    Election of Directors
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.    Nora A. Aufreiter
1b.Robert D. Beyer
1c.Anne Gates
1d.Susan J. Kropf
1e.W. Rodney McMullen
1f.Jorge P. Montoya
1g.Clyde R. Moore
1h.Susan M. Phillips
1i.James A. Runde
1j.Ronald L. Sargent
1k.Bobby S. Shackouls
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.ForAgainstAbstain
2.    Advisory vote to approve executive compensation.
3.Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as auditors.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST proposals 4, 5, 6 and 7.ForAgainstAbstain
4.A shareholder proposal, if properly presented, to publish a report on human rights risks of operations and supply chain.
5.A shareholder proposal, if properly presented, to issue a report assessing the environmental impacts of using unrecyclable packaging for private label brands.
6.A shareholder proposal, if properly presented, to issue a report assessing the climate benefits and feasibility of adopting enterprise-wide, quantitative, time bound targets for increasing renewable energy sourcing.
7.A shareholder proposal, if properly presented, to adopt a general payout policy that gives preference to share repurchases (relative to cash dividends) as a method to return capital to shareholders.
NOTE:Holders of common shares of record at the close of business on April 27, 2016, will be entitled to vote at the meeting.



Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.


Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]     DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Combined Notice, Proxy Statement, and Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

E11116-P78329

THE www.proxyvote.com.V16738-P90683THE KROGER CO.
2016CO.2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
June 23, 201622, 2023 11:00 AM, Eastern Time
ThisTimeThis proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

TheDirectorsThe undersigned hereby appoints each of ROBERT D. BEYER,ANNE GATES, W. RODNEY McMULLEN, and RONALD L. SARGENT, or if more than one is present and acting then a majority thereof, proxies, with full power of substitution and revocation, to vote the common shares of The Kroger Co. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting of shareholders,Shareholders, and at any adjournment thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, including authority to vote on the matters shown on the reverse in the manner directed, and upon any other matter that properly may come before the meeting. The undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously given to vote those shares at the meeting or at any adjournment.

Theadjournment.The proxies are directed to vote as specified on the reverse hereof and in their discretion on all other matters coming before the meeting. Except as specified to the contrary on the reverse, the shares represented by this proxy will be voted FOR each nominee listed in Proposal 1, FOR ProposalsProposal 2, and1 YEAR for Proposal 3, FOR Proposal 4, and AGAINST Proposals 4, 5, 6 and 7.

If5-9.If you wish to vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors, all you need to do is sign and return this card. The above named proxies cannot vote the shares unless you vote your proxy by Internet or telephone, or sign and return this card.

Only shareholders and persons holding proxies from shareholders may attend the meeting.If you are attending the meeting, you must bring either: (1) the notice of the meeting that was separately mailed to you or (2) the top portion of your proxy card, either of which will be your admission ticket.

YOURcard.YOUR MANAGEMENT DESIRES TO HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS REPRESENTED AT THE VIRTUAL MEETING, IN PERSON OR BY PROXY. PLEASE VOTE YOUR PROXY ELECTRONICALLY VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE.TELEPHONE, OR SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD. IF YOU HAVE ELECTED TO RECEIVE PRINTED MATERIALS, YOU MAY SIGN AND DATE THETHIS PROXY CARD AND MAIL IT IN THE SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE PROVIDED. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. If you are unable to attend the annual meeting, you may listen toThe Annual Meeting is being held on a live webcast of the meeting, which willvirtual - only basis and can be accessible through our website, ir.kroger.com,accessed online at 11:00 AM Eastern Time on June 23, 2016.

Continuedwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/KR2023.Continued and to be signed on reverse side



0000056873 3 2022-01-30 2023-01-28